Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a party other than the Registrant

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant toSection 240.14a-12

under §240.14a-12

MSCI Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in itsIn Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY):
 No fee required.
required
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
(1)    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
materials
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:

0-11



Table of Contents

        LOGO

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

Our directors work together to continually assess whether the Board2022

Annual Meeting of Directors (the “Board”) of MSCI Inc. (“MSCI” or the “Company”) is performing effectivelyShareholders and efficiently, and evolving its culture and practices to have the greatest impact on long-term value creation. As we approach the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2019 Annual Meeting”), we would like to share with you, on behalf of our fellow directors, some of the Board’s priorities and actions during this past year.Proxy Statement

Driving Sound Business Strategy

During a year of volatility in international markets and a heightened level of uncertainty in the U.S. markets over the last several months, the Company continued to deliver strong financial results reflecting the resiliency of MSCI’s franchise. Through such times, it is more important than ever for the Board to be informed, active and constructively engaged with management. In 2018, the Board provided critical insights on executing and developing a sound strategy by, among other things:

engaging in robust discussion of long-term strategic objectives at our annualmulti-day strategy session, which focused on growth opportunities and risks that could challenge the successful execution of our strategic objectives;

 


Table of Contents

receiving regular updates on, and discussing, key strategic initiatives at quarterly Board meetings, including those related to innovation, product development and our technology transformation;

inviting clients and shareholders to present at quarterly Board meetings to give directors access to the perspectives that are vital to MSCI’s success and engaging in discussions focused on trends in the investment industry, the competitive landscape, our shareholders’ investment theses and client needs; and

reviewing our capital allocation strategy to ensure that it generates sufficient shareholder value through internal investments accompanied by the return of excess capital through share repurchases and dividends. In 2018, the Company divested twonon-core product lines and returned $1.1 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Building a Board with Diverse Perspectives

The Board, through its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”), is continuously evaluating potential director candidates to ensure that we have strong leaders who bring diverse perspectives, skills and experiences and balance new perspectives and ideas with institutional knowledge. In addition to rotating the chairs of all of its NYSE-mandated committees and its Lead Director in 2018, in the past few years, the Company has seen a number of changes to our Board’s composition.

In 2017, Jacques P. Perold and Marcus L. Smith were appointed to the Board. Each of them bring valuable experience from long careers in the investment industry, and their insights into our competitive landscape and clients made them strong candidates for our Strategy and Finance Committee (the “Strategy Committee”) where they currently provide valuable advice on the Company’s long-term strategy.

In 2018, we said farewell to two of our fellow directors— Rodolphe M. Vallee (“Skip”) and Patrick Tierney. Skip served on the Board for over 10 years and as the Lead Director for over eight of those years. Having joined the Board shortly after MSCI’s IPO and in his role as Lead Director, Skip was integral to building a Board with a diverse and broad set of skills and experiences, strengthening our risk management program and developing the Board’s operating framework, including forging an effective collaboration between the Board and senior management. During Pat’s nearly eight-year tenure, the Board benefitted from his valuable expertise and counsel on various aspects of managing a complex and global business, including with respect to M&A transactions, and from his service on the Compensation & Talent Management Committee (“Compensation Committee”), where he has advised management on fostering the performance culture that has been central to the successful execution of our strategy and helped position MSCI for the next phase of its transformation. In addition, Wendy E. Lane, who has served as a director since 2015, has chosen not to stand for re-election in 2019. We thank Wendy for her service, and for her valuable contributions to the development of our business strategy and performance-aligned compensation plans.


Creating Value Through Our Executive Compensation Program

Ensuring that the Company has an executive compensation program that appropriately attracts, retains and incentivizes our management is one of the Board’s most critical responsibilities. In 2016, the Compensation Committee designed and adopted a pay-for-performance program that has helped deliver $7.9 billion1 in value creation to shareholders. In anticipation of the conclusion of the performance period for the 2016 executive compensation program, during 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Compensation Committee undertook a comprehensive process, including engaging with shareholders, to refine the Company’s executive compensation program. In response to shareholder feedback, the structure of the equity award program adopted in 2019:

continued to focus on the alignment of long-term executive pay outcomes with shareholder returns through the use of absolute total shareholder return compound annual growth rate (“TSR CAGR”) as a performance metric for performance stock units;

continued to structure the equity component of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) pay to be 100% performance-based;

eliminated the relative TSR CAGR performance metric for performance stock units; and

eliminated the “re-test” or extended performance period for performance stock units.

Additionally, we strengthened our Clawback Policy to cover a broader range of detrimental conduct that results in a negative financial impact to the Company and/or reputational harm and financial restatements (even in the absence of detrimental conduct). We also increased our minimum stock ownership requirements for the members of our Executive Committee.

We believe these changes effectively cultivate an “owner-operator” mindset among our senior executives, reward performance and drive long-term value creation for our shareholders, and are aligned with our strategic objectives. You can read more about these changes starting on page 47 of this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”).

Strengthening Our Commitment to Corporate Responsibility

The Board supports MSCI in the pursuit of its mission to power better investment decisions for a better world. The belief that sound environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices are linked to better business results not only underpins a key element of our business strategy, but also reflects how MSCI operates. To ensure guidance and support of MSCI’s corporate responsibility initiatives at the highest levels, the Governance Committee is now responsible for overseeing the Company’s ESG practices and policies and receives a periodic update from the Company’s Chief Responsibility Officer (“CRO”), a position that was created in 2018. The CRO leads a Corporate Responsibility Committee comprised of a cross-functional team of senior leaders at the Company who will work together to formalize the Company’s ESG disclosure processes and reevaluate and make recommendations for evolving the Company’s ESG practices. Additionally, the Compensation Committee helps to develop and oversee many of MSCI’s social programs and practices, including talent management, employee engagement and diversity and inclusion. The Board is dedicated to ensuring transparency and integrity when it comes to the policies and practices that are meaningful to MSCI’s customers, shareholders and employees. You can learn more about our commitment to ESG by visiting our corporate responsibility page (www.msci.com/corporate-responsibility) and corporate governance page (http://ir.msci.com/corporate-governance).

Your Support is Important to Us

Your vote is very important to us. We strongly encourage you to read both our Proxy Statement and annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “2018 Annual Report onForm 10-K”) in their entirety, and ask that you vote with our recommendations. You can communicate with the Board at any time (see page A-7 of this Proxy Statement for instructions).

Thank you for your continued support of MSCI and your participation in the 2019 Annual Meeting.

 

LOGOLOGO

Henry A. FernandezOur
Purpose

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerWe strive to bring greater
transparency to financial markets,
enabling the investment
community to make better
decisions for a better world.

March 11, 2019

Robert G. AsheBringing clarity to
complexity. We aim to:

Developnew research and models to help our clients better assess an increasingly complex and expanding global investment landscape

Lead DirectorMeasureand model environmental, social and governance (ESG) and climate risk and opportunities

March 11, 2019Enhanceour clients’ experience by leveraging technology to easily integrate into client workflows and deliver our solutions across multiple platforms

Achieveclient-centricity by understanding our clients’ unique needs in the markets in which they operate and by providing excellent client support

Helping the
investment industry
build better portfolios
for a better world


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT3

(1) Based on the growth of the Company’s market capitalizationLetter from $6.5 billion as of February 9, 2016 to $14.4 billion as of February 8, 2019 (the performance period of the performance stock units granted to certain senior executives in 2016). This number does not include dividend payments.our Chairman and CEO


        LOGO

Looking ahead, we remain focused on being nimble and investing aggressively to meet client demand across the growth opportunities in front of us, including with respect to ESG and climate.

1   Recurring net new sales represent the amount of new recurring subscription sales net of subscription cancellations during the period.

Dear fellow shareholders,

  

First and foremost, thank you for your continued support of MSCI Inc. (“MSCI” or the “Company”). Thanks to MSCI’s more than 4,000 employees around the world, we delivered exceptional results in 2021, demonstrating the strength of our ambitious strategy, key long-term investments and relentless execution.

Delivering Results

Our 2021 performance further speaks to the trust our clients place in us to help them navigate an increasingly complex investment landscape and our ability to continue to meet their needs. Among other milestones, at the end of 2021, we achieved record full-year and quarterly recurring sales and recurring net new sales1, along with the 32nd consecutive quarter of double-digit subscription growth in our Index product line.

We also affirmed our status as a leading provider of ESG and climate solutions for investors. We saw significant momentum in our ESG and Climate segment, resulting in nearly 50% top-line growth compared to the prior year. Throughout 2021, we rolled out several new climate tools, including an analytical tool that provides carbon emissions data for more than 15,000 private companies and nearly 4,000 active private equity and debt funds. This is in addition to our launch of Climate Lab Enterprise, a first-in-kind visualization dashboard that combines our climate data with our analytical risk and portfolio management capabilities, and the carbon emission data we already provide on nearly 10,000 public companies.

In 2021, we also saw a significant expansion of our capabilities with respect to private assets, with the completion of our acquisition of Real Capital Analytics, Inc. (“Real Capital Analytics” or “RCA”), a provider of data and analytics for the properties and transactions that drive the global commercial real estate capital markets. After this and other investments in our business, we returned approximately $440 million of cash to shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases.

    DATE:Positioning MSCI for the Future

Looking ahead, we remain focused on being nimble and investing aggressively to meet client demand across the growth opportunities in front of us, including with respect to ESG and climate. The global race

to net-zero keeps accelerating, and we aim to further position MSCI to become the top provider of ESG and climate solutions to the investment industry.

We will also continue to invest in our data-transformation strategy. This strategy was a direct result of the feedback we received from many of you. We plan to continue to rapidly incorporate new proprietary and third-party data sets to expand and enrich our existing content in order to generate more meaningful and richer insights for our clients. We are also continuing to create new pathways for clients to access and interact with our products, including by developing and launching our new open-architecture Investment Solutions as a Service (“ISaaS”) offerings, many of which can integrate with our clients’ existing ecosystems via APIs.

Doing our Part

For the last several years, including by publishing the MSCI Principles of Sustainable Investing, we have been urging all investors to integrate ESG and climate considerations into their investment processes in order to achieve long-term, sustainable investment performance. Since then, we have published reports, data and research to continue to provide clarity for investors so that they can make more informed decisions regarding material environmental, social and governance risks. We have also released tools that can help our clients navigate these efforts – tools that support our mission of enabling investors to build better portfolios for a better world. In 2022, we not only remain deeply committed to this objective, but we also aim to lead by example through our corporate responsibility policies and practices.

We Ask for Your Support

Your vote is very important to us. We strongly encourage you to read both our Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K in their entirety and ask that you support our recommendations. We sincerely appreciate your continued support of MSCI, and we look forward to the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,

HENRY A. FERNANDEZ

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Shareholder
March 16, 2022


Table of Contents

4MSCI

Letter from our Independent
Lead Director

    Thursday,

    April 25, 2019

The Board’s role is critical in overseeing MSCI’s strategy, and we continue to work closely with management on matters regarding the business, its performance and its long-term outlook.

TIME:Dear fellow shareholders,

2:30 P.M.

Eastern Time

PLACE:

via the internet

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019

The independent directors of MSCI and I join Henry in inviting you to attend our Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting. It is a privilege to continue serving as your independent Lead Director during this important time for MSCI. As we approach the 2022 Annual Meeting, I am grateful for this opportunity to share with you some of the ways that the Board has worked together over the past year to provide independent oversight of areas that are important to you.

Shareholder Engagement

As a Board, we actively engage with our shareholders and gain firsthand information on the areas that matter most to them, including not just strategy and financial performance, but other key issues such as corporate responsibility, our efforts around diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”), executive compensation and corporate governance. In the winter of 2021, during our Corporate Responsibility Roadshow, members of MSCI’s senior management engaged with top shareholders representing more than 40% of our shares outstanding. Members of the Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee of the Board, Jacques Perold and Paula Volent, participated in discussions with several shareholders during these meetings. As detailed in this Proxy Statement, under “Shareholder Engagement,” we covered a range of topics, and the Board continues to use your input to inform our practices to ensure they align with shareholder interests. We welcome your continued engagement and feedback.

Board Composition and Process

An essential component of the Board leadership structure at MSCI is oversight by independent directors. As MSCI’s Lead Director, I am responsible for helping ensure that the Board exercises its role independent from the management

of the Company, as described in this Proxy Statement, under “Structure of our Board,” to ensure independent and effective oversight.

One of my priorities as Lead Director is to ensure the Board is comprised of directors who are equipped to oversee the risks and opportunities of this business. This year’s Board nominees represent a wide range of backgrounds and expertise. We believe our diversity of experiences, perspectives and skills contribute to the Board’s effectiveness in managing risk and providing guidance to position MSCI for long-term success across rapidly changing business environments for us and for our clients. Of the 10 Board nominees, 9 are independent, which includes all committee chairs and members.

We are pleased to announce the nomination of Rajat Taneja for election to the Board at our 2022 Annual Meeting. Rajat is President of Technology for Visa Inc., and has 30 years of global technology, innovation, and research and development experience. He has been a tremendous addition to the Board as we seek to increasingly leverage cutting-edge technologies to deliver enhanced user experiences and evolve MSCI’s cybersecurity program. Rajat’s appointment in 2021 was informed by the Board’s continued focus on its composition, as well as insights provided through the Board’s annual evaluation process, which includes both evaluation of the Board and its Committees as well as individual director evaluation through interviews that I conduct with each director.

We also consistently prioritize a focus on the Board’s processes and structures to ensure they remain effective. In 2021, we instituted a review of the roles and responsibilities of our committees. We enhanced our committee charters to reflect leading practices and renamed


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT5

the Audit and Risk Committee; Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee; and Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee to provide more clarity and transparency to stakeholders on areas of Board committee-level oversight. These changes in committee names and scope reflect the strategic significance that risk oversight, talent and culture management and corporate responsibility have to our long-term success, and they reflect the growing focus of these areas by our shareholders and the broader stakeholder community.

Commitment to Corporate Responsibility

The Board and its Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee are actively engaged in overseeing MSCI’s corporate responsibility efforts, including to ensure that our practices complement our leadership in ESG and climate. Based on feedback from you, in 2021, we announced our net-zero commitment and increased the amount of reporting we prepare relating to our corporate responsibility efforts, including our first United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) report and our first Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR) report. In addition, we published our two most recent EEO-1 reports (containing demographic data for our U.S. employees by race/ethnicity, gender and job categories) as well as SASB-aligned diversity disclosure, and we have committed to doing so in the future. As you will see in this Proxy Statement, we have added a more detailed “Corporate Responsibility” section to provide transparency on the governance of our corporate responsibility efforts by the Board and management.

Our People and the Future of Work

We are committed to ensuring that MSCI’s programs related to our employees continue to support our people and our strategy during a period of rapid change. The Board fully appreciates that MSCI’s employees are an essential element of our long-term success, and we spent significant time in 2021 reviewing the Company’s approach to organizational development, talent development, DE&I initiatives and succession planning. In particular, we focused on flexibility in how and where our employees work, and in January 2022, we implemented our “Future of Work,” a hybrid work environment that utilizes pandemic lessons to allow our employees to work at times at the office and other times remotely, depending on the requirements of specific roles. Following an extensive organizational design assessment, we also announced several changes to senior management, as well as the expansion of

MSCI’s Executive Committee to include greater representation from key operating functions, in particular, Research, Technology and Data, and Private Assets.

In 2021, we also spent significant time reviewing the Company’s executive compensation program to ensure that MSCI is appropriately incentivizing long-term performance and shareholder value creation. Over the past several years, MSCI has chosen to incorporate a number of performance-based metrics and qualitative goals to reward exceptional performance, including by assessing performance against individualized DE&I goals, which are directly linked to a portion of each Managing Director’s annual incentive compensation. As we continue to promote an “owner-operator” mindset within the Company, we also significantly enhanced the stock ownership requirements applicable to our senior leaders. You can learn more about our executive compensation program in this Proxy Statement, under “Compensation Matters.”

Oversight of Strategy and Risk

The Board’s role is critical in overseeing MSCI’s strategy, and we continue to work closely with management on matters regarding the business, its performance and its long-term outlook. The Board sees an incredible opportunity for MSCI to continue to be a leader in the evolving global investment landscape, and, in 2021, our Board meetings regularly included consideration of significant business and organizational initiatives, capital allocation strategies and corporate development opportunities, including our acquisition of Real Capital Analytics in September. Throughout the year, the Board was also kept informed of enterprise risk and information technology risk developments, including our technology infrastructure, regulatory and compliance matters, public policy developments, risks and opportunities related to climate and go-to-market strategy.

On behalf of my fellow independent directors and the entire Board, thank you for your continued support. We appreciate the opportunity to serve MSCI on your behalf in 2022 and beyond. We look forward to hearing your views at the 2022 Annual Meeting and through our on-going engagement.

Sincerely,

ROBERT G. ASHE

Independent Lead Director and Shareholder
March 16, 2022


Table of Contents

6MSCI

Notice of Annual Meeting
of Shareholders

Annual Meeting Proposals and Voting Recommendations

1Election of Directors“FOR” each
nominee
 SEE PAGE 20
2Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)“FOR
 SEE PAGE 55
3Ratification of the Appointment of MSCI’s Independent Auditor“FOR
 SEE PAGE 99
  

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

I cordially invite you to attend the MSCI 2019 Annual Meeting to be held via the internet through aThe virtual web conference atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019 on April 25, 2019annual meeting will commence at 2:30 P.M., Eastern Time, and any adjournments or postponements thereof. YouTime. Online check-in will be able to attendavailable beginning at 1:30 P.M., Eastern Time. Please allow ample time for the 2019 Annual Meeting online vote your shares electronically and submit questions online duringcheck-in process.

To participate in the virtual annual meeting, by logging in toyou will need the website listed above using the16-digit control number included inon your Notice of Internet Availability of the proxy materials,Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on any additional voting instructions form accompanying thesethat accompanied your proxy materials.

A webcast replay of the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2022 Annual Meeting”) will also be made available on our Investor Relations website We have adopted this technology(https://ir.msci.com).

If you are a beneficial shareholder, your broker will not be able to expand accessvote your shares with respect to any of the matters presented at the meeting, improve communications and lower the cost to our shareholders, the Company and the environment. In the past,in-person shareholders’ meetings were only attended by a few shareholders. We believe virtual meetings enable increased shareholder participation from locations around the world. Additionally, the online format allows us to communicate more effectively via apre-meeting forum that you can enter by visitingwww.proxyvote.com with your control number. We recommend that you log in a few minutes before the meeting to ensure you are logged in when the meeting starts.

The meeting is being convened for the following purposes:

1.

To elect 10 members to our Board;

2.

To approve, bynon-binding vote, our executive compensation, as described in these proxy materials;

3.

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditor”); and

4.

To transact such other business as may properly come before our 2019 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of the directors, the approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation andother than the ratification of the appointmentselection of our independent auditor.registered public accounting firm, unless you give your broker specific voting instructions.

We are once again pleased to furnish our proxy materials over the internet pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. As a result, we are mailing to many of our shareholders the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our 2018 Annual Report on Form10-K. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement (including the proxy card) and our 2018 Annual Report on Form10-K over the internet, how to request a paper or email copy of these materials and how to vote by mail or via the internet. We believe that posting the proxy materials on the internet expedites shareholders’ receipt of the information that they need, while lowering our costs of printing and delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting of shareholders.

Our Board has fixed the close of business on February 27, 2019 as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, our 2019 Annual Meeting. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be mailed to our shareholders of record beginning on or about March 11, 2019. These proxy materials are being made available beginning on or about March 11, 2019.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2022 Annual Meeting to be held on April 26, 2022. Our Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 are available without charge at www.proxyvote.com. Information contained on such website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.


DATE AND TIME

APRIL 26, 2022 (Tuesday)

2:30 P.M., EASTERN TIME

LOCATION

Attend the virtual meeting, including to vote and/or submit questions via the internet through a virtual web conference at:

www.virtualshareholder
meeting.com/MSCI2022

RECORD DATE

MARCH 1, 2022

 

As a shareholder of MSCI, your vote is important. How to Vote

Whether or not you plan to attend our 20192022 Annual Meeting, it is important that you vote as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented. For information on how to vote by mail, telephone, or via the internet, please refer to the question “How do I vote my shares?” inAnnex A, or instructions in the Proxy Statement Summary, the proxy card, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials distributed to you on or about March 11, 2019.

Thank you for your support of MSCI.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Henry A. Fernandez

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

March 11, 2019

 

INTERNET

www.proxyvote.com

Use the internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 25, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

TELEPHONE

1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 25, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage- paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 


 


Note on Forward-Looking Statements

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaningTable of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements relate to future events or to future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond our control and that could materially affect our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT7

Other factors that could materially affect actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements can be found in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019 and in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed or furnished with the SEC. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from what MSCI projected. Any forward-looking statement in this Proxy Statement reflects MSCI’s current views with respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to MSCI’s operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. MSCI assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.


Table of Contents


NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Important Notice RegardingThis Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the Availabilitymeaning of Proxy Materials for the 2019 Annual MeetingPrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements relate to future events or to future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be heldmaterially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You should not place undue reliance on
April 25, 2019. Our Proxy Statement forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond our 2018control and that could materially affect our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

Other factors that could materially affect actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements can be found in the 2021 Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022 and in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed or furnished with the SEC. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from what MSCI projected. Any forward-looking statement in this Proxy Statement reflects MSCI’s current views with respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to MSCI’s operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. MSCI assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2018 are available without charge at www.proxyvote.com. any reason, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Information
contained and reports on theour website isor other websites that we refer to in this Proxy Statement will not be deemed a part of, or otherwise incorporated by reference intoin, this Proxy Statement or
any other report we file with the SEC.


Table of Contents

8MSCI

Proxy Summary

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            i


LOGO

Proxy Statement Summary This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Annual Meeting Information Date: April 25, 2019 Time: 2:30 P.M., Eastern Time Online check-in will be available beginning at 1:30 p.m., Eastern Time. Please allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. Admission: Virtual meeting held via the internet through a virtual web conference at: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019 To participate in the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of the Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on any additional voting instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. " Voting: " Shareholders as of the record date, February 27, 2019, are entitled to vote. " Your broker will not be able to vote your shares with respect to any of the matters presented at the meeting, other than the ratification of the selection of our independent auditor, unless you give your broker specific voting instructions. Even if you plan on attending our virtual meeting on April 25, 2019, please vote as soon as possible before the meeting by: INTERNET: Go to www.proxyvote.com. Use the internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 24, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. PHONE: 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 24, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. MAIL: Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. During the virtual meeting, you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019. A webcast replay of the 2019 Annual Meeting, including the Q&A session, will also be archived on our Investor Relations website, http://ir.msci.com/events.cfm, until April 25, 2020. For additional information regarding the virtual meeting, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions in Annex A.


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY        

Annual Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations

   

PROPOSAL

 

DESCRIPTION

 

BOARD
RECOMMENDATION  

PAGE REFERENCE

 

   
   

1

Election of DirectorsFOR EACH NOMINEE13
   
   

 

2

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation(Say-on-Pay)

FOR

 

85

 

   
   

 

3

Ratification of the Appointment of MSCI’s Independent Auditor

FOR

 

89

 

About MSCI Inc.

MSCI Inc. (referred to herein as the “Company,” “MSCI,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) is a leading provider of critical decision support tools and services for the global investment community — we power better investment decisions by enabling clients to understand and analyze key drivers of risk and return and confidently build more effective portfolios. We create industry-leading research-enhanced solutions(1) that clients use to gain insight into and improve transparency across the investment process. We are able to do this by leveraging our knowledge of the global investment process and our expertise in research, data and technology in order to deliver actionable solutions to our clients. We are dynamic and flexible in the delivery of our content and capabilities, such as our indexes; portfolio construction tools and risk-management services; ESG research and ratings; and real estate benchmarks, analytics services and market insights; much of which can be accessed by our clients through multiple channels and platforms.

As a client-centric company, we offer innovative solutions to help our clients adapt to a fast-changing marketplace. As the needs of our clients change, so do our offerings. Our clients use our offerings in a variety of ways for their most important investment activities across multiple asset classes, including to better understand the drivers of risk and return, to gain a complete and detailed picture of their entire portfolio, to develop index-based products to more efficiently implement their investment strategies and to integrate ESG considerations into their investment processes.

Our composition of revenue in 2018 and Run Rate(2) as of December 31, 2018 is as follows:

LOGO

(1) The term “solutions” as used throughout this Proxy Statement refers to the usage of our products and/or services by our clients to help them achieve their specific investment objectives.

(2) See Annex B for definitions of operating metrics, including Run Rate.

2            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

OUR STRATEGY        

We aim to expand our position as a leading source for mission critical content, applications and services that support the investment processes of the largest and most sophisticated participants in the global investment industry. Our growth strategy is focused on a number of key initiatives that optimize the value of our integrated company and capitalize on our competitive advantages to address the changing needs of our clients and the investment industry. These strategic initiatives include:

(1)

MSCI at a Glance

MSCI Inc. trades under the symbol “MSCI” on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and as of March 1, 2022 had a market capitalization of $40.7 billion.

As of December 31, 2021,
we employed

4,303people and served over

6,300clients in more than

95 countries.

We are a leading provider of critical decision support tools and solutions for the global investment community. Our mission-critical offerings help investors address the challenges of a transforming investment landscape and power better investment decisions. Leveraging our knowledge of the global investment process and our expertise in research, data and technology, we enable our clients to understand and analyze key drivers of risk and return and confidently and efficiently build more effective portfolios.

expandingMission

To enable investors to build better portfolios for a better world.

Strategic Pillars of Growth

Extend leadership in research-enhanced content across asset
classes

(2)

strengthening existingLead the enablement of ESG and newclimate investment integration

Enhance distribution and content-enabling technology

Expand solutions that empower client customization

Strengthen client relationships by providing solutions,

(3)

improving access to our solutions through cutting-edge technology and platforms,grow into strategic partnerships with clients

(4)

expanding value-added service offerings and

(5)

executingExecute strategic relationships and acquisitions with complementary content and technology companies.companies


Addressing All Participants in the Investment Process


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT9

Strong Financial Performance

In executing our strategy, we are committed to maintaining overall cost discipline and continuing to deliver positive operating leverage. Through disciplined expense management we can self-fund initiatives that deliver the highest return on investment. During 2018, our capital deployment strategy remained unchanged as2021, we continued to prioritize returning capitalexecute a focused strategy to shareholders.accelerate growth, improve efficiency and attract the best talent. Our strong results reflect our commitment to building long-term shareholder value. Financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2021 include the following:

2021 Financial Highlights

OPERATING REVENUES
(in millions except percentages)
OPERATING EXPENSES
(in millions except percentages)
DILUTED EPS / ADJUSTED EPS*
(unaudited)
CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
(in millions except percentages)
*MSCI has presented supplemental non-GAAP financial measures as part of this Proxy Statement. Definitions of each non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure with the most comparable GAAP measure are set forth in Annex B. The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement should not be considered as alternative measures for the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement are used by management to monitor the financial performance of the business, inform business decision making and forecast future results.

Table of Contents

10MSCI   |   PROXY SUMMARY

Our Capital Allocation Program

~$3.1 billion
Capital returned in the last
five years (as of December 31, 2021)
(includes dividends)
~11.3 million
Shares repurchased in the
last five years
(as of December 31, 2021)
~33.3 percent
2021 increase in quarterly per-share
dividend from $0.78 quarterly to
$1.04 quarterly

ANNUALIZED DIVIDEND RATES

 

LOGO

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            3


(1)MSCI began paying quarterly dividends in September 2014 at an annualized rate of $0.72 per share.

Capital Optimization Activities in 2021

Increased regular quarterly cash dividend by approximately 33.3% to $1.04 per share, representing $4.16 per share on an annualized basis.
Repurchased over 300,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $412.25 per share for a total value of $140 million.
Issued $500 million of 3.625% senior unsecured notes due 2030; leveraged lower coupon rate for pre-maturity redemption of $500 million of 4.750% senior unsecured notes due 2026.
Issued $600 million of 3.625% senior unsecured notes due 2031.
Issued $700 million of 3.250% senior unsecured notes due 2033; leveraged lower coupon rate for pre-maturity redemption of $500 million of 5.375% senior unsecured notes due 2027.

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY        

11

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNTotal Shareholder Return

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholders’ return (“TSR”) of our common stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the NYSE Composite Index since December 31, 2008 (a little over one year after our IPO)2011 assuming an investment of $100 at the closing price of each respective investment on December 31, 2008.2011. In calculating annual TSR, we have assumed the reinvestment of dividends, if any. The indexes are included for comparative purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect management’s opinion that such indexes are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of our common stock.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TEN YEAR TOTAL RETURN

 

LOGO

 
  YEARS ENDED 
 
           
  12/31/2008  12/31/2009  12/31/2010  12/30/2011  12/31/2012  12/31/2013  12/31/2014  12/31/2015  12/30/2016  12/31/2017  12/31/2018 
           
           

MSCI

 $100.00  $179.05  $219.37  $185.42  $174.49  $246.17  $268.22  $413.06  $456.89  $742.92  $876.13 
           
           

S&P 500

 $100.00  $126.46  $145.51  $148.59  $172.37  $228.19  $259.43  $263.02  $294.47  $358.76  $343.03 
           
           

NYSE Composite

 $100.00  $128.18  $145.42  $140.37  $162.87  $205.31  $219.25  $210.75  $235.70  $279.61  $255.66 
           

The above graph is not “soliciting material,” is not to be deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our
filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), whether made before or
after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Company
Name/Index
 12/31/11   12/31/12   12/31/13   12/31/14   12/31/15   12/31/16   12/31/17   12/31/18   12/31/19   12/31/20   12/31/21
MSCI Inc. $100.00  $94.11 $132.77 $144.65 $222.77 $246.44 $400.77 $472.71 $837.61 $1,460.66 $2,017.74
S&P 500 Index $100.00 $116.00 $153.57 $174.60 $177.01 $198.18 $241.45 $230.86 $303.56 $359.41 $462.57
NYSE Composite Index $100.00 $116.03 $146.52 $156.41 $150.02 $167.92 $199.37 $181.53 $227.84 $243.76 $294.16

Source: S&P Global


Table of Contents

4            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


12

MSCI   |   PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

STRONG FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE        

In 2018, we continued to execute a focused strategy to accelerate growth, improve efficiency and attract the best talent. Our strong results reflect our commitment to building long-term shareholder value. Financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2018 include the following:

LOGO

(1) MSCI has presented supplementalnon-GAAP financial measures as part of this Proxy Statement. Definitions of eachnon-GAAP measure and a reconciliation of eachnon-GAAP financial measure with the most comparable GAAP measure are set forth inAnnex B. Thenon-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement should not be considered as alternative measures for the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Thenon-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement are used by management to monitor the financial performance of the business, inform business decision-making and forecast future results.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            5


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY        

Aligning Executive Compensation

with Company Strategy and PerformanceCorporate Responsibility

We believe, and our executive compensation program was integralresearch shows, that sound ESG and climate practices are commonly linked to our successfulbetter business results. We provide the global financial performancecommunity with innovative products and services that enable investors to make better investment decisions for a better world. As a leader in 2018. To align the interestsproviding ESG and compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) with the long-term interests of our shareholders andclimate solutions to further drive the performance culture thatinvestors, we also aim to demonstrate leading corporate responsibility practices.

Our commitment to corporate responsibility is key to successfully delivering on our corporate strategy, MSCI’s executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based compensationembodied in the form of equity grants under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) and the payment of cash incentives under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”).

LTIP

In 2016, we granted multi-year performance stock units (“PSUs”) to each of our NEOs employed at that time that covered a three-year performance cycle that ended on February 8, 2019 (the “2016 Multi-Year PSUs”). Because the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs operated on anend-to-end basis without overlapping cycles or additional grants of PSUs during the performance cycle, no additional PSUs were awarded to our NEOs in 2017 or 2018. The 2016 Multi-Year PSUs were subject to a challenging multi-year absolute TSR CAGR performance metric.

Our NEOs, other than our CEO, continued to receive annual grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) in 2017 and 2018. Mr. Fernandez’s LTIP award was granted entirely in the form of PSUs and, as such, he did not receive any additional equity awards in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The awards granted under the LTIP in 2018 for each of our NEOs are further detailed in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 on page 74. See the table on page 45 of this Proxy Statement, which reflects the annualized portion of the target value of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs attributable to 2018 (i.e.,one-third of the total target value of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs).

In 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted enhancements to the Company’s LTIP which are designed to (i) prioritize shareholder value creation and (ii) facilitate an “owner-operator” mindset among our senior executives, both of which were also primary goals of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs. The 2019 LTIP comprises a mix of the following:

following four pillars:

Better Investments for a Better World

Offer tools and content for investors globally to manage their ESG and climate risks and opportunities


    

RSUs

 

ANNUAL3-YEAR PSUsRECENT HIGHLIGHTS

●  ESG and Climate Research

●  Published “The Role of Capital in the Net-Zero Revolution” to identify specific steps to drive to a net-zero economy by 2050

●  Published the “Women on Boards Progress Report,” our annual survey on the state of women’s representation on corporate boards

●  Published “Breaking Down Corporate Net-Zero Climate Targets” to provide a framework to assess companies’ decarbonization targets

●  Data and Metrics Published

●  Launched our Implied Temperature Rise search tool, which discloses how individual companies align with different climate pathways and decarbonization targets

●  Launched the MSCI Net-Zero Tracker to gauge progress by the world’s public companies toward curbing climate risk

●  Released the U.S. Racial and Ethnic Data Set to provide information on select U.S. companies’ disclosure practices and policies with regards to racial and ethnic diversity

ANNUAL5-YEAR●   PSUs

Annual grant of RSUs to our NEOs (other than our CEO) that will service-vest in three equal installments in each of 2020, 2021Product Launches and 2022.

Our CEO was not granted any RSUs in 2019 and received all of his long-term incentive equity in the form of PSUs.

Annual grant of PSUs which will cover a three-year performance cycle (the“3-Year PSUs”) from February 6, 2019 to February 5, 2022.

Initiatives

The3-Year●   PSUs are subjectLaunched our MSCI Climate Lab Enterprise product to vest between 0%help investors monitor and 300% based onmanage climate risk across the achievementinvestment process

●  Expanded our toolkit of an absolute TSR CAGRclimate data and reporting capabilities to help investors meet the requirements of the E.U. Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (“SFDR”)

●  Together with The Burgiss Group, LLC (“Burgiss”), launched the Carbon Footprinting of Private Equity and Debt Funds product to measure the carbon intensity of private assets

●  ESG and Climate Index Launches

●  Introduced MSCI Climate Paris Aligned Indexes, designed to support investors seeking to reduce their exposure to transition and physical climate risks

●  Launched a new suite of Circular Economy Indexes that aim to represent the performance metric.

Annual grant of PSUs which will covercompanies that facilitate a five-year performance cycle (the“5-Year PSUs”) from February 6, 2019transition to February 5, 2024.

The5-Year PSUs are subject to vest between 0%a circular economy, addressing global resource challenges such as energy scarcity, biodiversity loss, waste and 200% based on the achievement of an absolute TSR CAGR performance metric.pollution

In addition, in response to feedback from shareholders in the meetings described below, the Compensation Committee determined that, under the 2019 LTIP, it would no longer consider relative TSR CAGR or use an extended performance assessment period when determining actual achievement of the absolute TSR CAGR goals in the3- and5-year PSUs. These changes provide for an even more rigorous performance assessment and increase the“at-risk” element of the LTIP.

6            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

In 2019, our CEO received 100% of his equity compensation in the form of3-Year PSUs and5-Year PSUs. Granting a majority of our CEO’s LTIP in the form of PSUs has been previously viewed favorably by our shareholders.

For additional information about the 2019 LTIP program, please see page 63 of this Proxy Statement.

AIP

The AIP closely aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of shareholders by using a formulaic approach based on specific annual financial criteria and individual key performance indicators (“KPIs”) when determining annual cash incentives. The Compensation Committee regularly assesses the metrics and weighting of those metrics, in addition to shareholder feedback, to ensure that the AIP reflects the appropriate metrics and proper balance of those metrics necessary to deliver the annual growth that will serve as the foundation for longer-term value creation. In 2018, in response to shareholder feedback, the Compensation Committee expanded the inclusion of Adjusted EPS to the product-level grids, rather than only including it in the corporate-level grid, because Adjusted EPS is a primary measure used by many of our shareholders in assessing our ongoing performance.

Actual cash incentives paid to our NEOs for 2018 were higher than their target values based on actual performance against the applicable financial metrics and their KPIs due to our strong financial performance and the performance of our NEOs in 2018. See the table on page 63 of this Proxy Statement for the actual amounts paid.

CEO COMPENSATION

Since our 2018“Say-on-Pay” proposal to approve our executive compensation program (the“Say-on-Pay Vote”) (for which 98.9% of the votes cast were voted in support of the compensation of our NEOs), the Compensation Committee’s actions with respect to our CEO’s compensation were solely to (i) pay Mr. Fernandez an annual cash bonus in respect of 2018 of $1.8 million under our AIP, based on actual performance against the applicable financial metrics and his KPIs and (ii) increase his LTIP target for 2019 by 10.1% (based on an annualized value of his LTIP target in 2018). The increase took into account the fact that Mr. Fernandez’s LTIP awards will continue to be granted solely in the form of PSUs and the fact that his LTIP contained the greatest“at-risk” component as a result of receiving a higher percentage of5-Year PSUs than any other NEO. As reflected in the table on page 46 of this Proxy Statement, on an annualized basis, Mr. Fernandez’s 2018 compensation (which, along with the compensation of the other NEOs, is the subject of this year’sSay-on-Pay vote) increased by only 4.2% relative to 2017. Such increase was attributable to the increased payout of his annual cash bonus for 2018 based on actual performance against the applicable financial metrics and KPIs due to our strong financial performance and his performance in 2018 and an increase in base salary. Mr. Fernandez had not received an increase in base salary since 2014 and did not receive an increase in base salary in 2019.

ENHANCED CLAWBACK POLICY

Effective February 7, 2019, the Company’s Clawback Policy was enhanced to be more rigorous and cover a broader range of detrimental conduct and financial restatements. Under the enhanced Clawback Policy, the Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, recoup any incentive compensation (cash and equity) received by members of the Executive Committee and the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer, in the event of (1) a restatement of the Company’s financial statements, (2) a restatement or adjustment of the achievement of applicable performance metrics, (3) detrimental conduct that has impacted the achievement of applicable performance metrics and (4) detrimental conduct that causes material financial or reputational harm. For additional details regarding our enhanced Clawback Policy, see page 71 of this Proxy Statement.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            7


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY        

INCREASED STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS

As part of the Compensation Committee’s ongoing assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices to ensure furtherance of the goals identified above and for alignment with best practices, effective January 1, 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted more rigorous stock ownership guidelines. The ownership requirements for the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) were increased from 3x base salary to 4x base salary and the ownership requirements for the rest of the Company’s Executive Committee members (other than our CEO) increased from 2x base salary to 3x base salary. Our CEO’s ownership requirements remained at 6x base salary. For more information on the changes to the stock ownership guidelines, refer to page 70 of this Proxy Statement.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

As noted above, in 2018, 98.9% of the votes cast on theSay-on-Pay Vote were voted in support of the compensation of our NEOs. Due to the structure of the executive compensation program in 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Compensation Committee was not in a position in 2017 or 2018 to incorporate feedback we received from our shareholders regarding the PSU component of our LTIP program until early 2019 (when the performance period applicable to the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs concluded).

While none of the shareholders we spoke with expressed any significant concerns regarding the Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions in 2018, which are the subject of this year’sSay-on-Pay Vote, the conclusion of the performance period for the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs presented the Compensation Committee with the opportunity to incorporate feedback received from our shareholders on our LTIP when designing our 2019 LTIP (as described above), which will be the subject of the 2020Say-on-Pay Vote.

The Company will continue to maintain an active dialogue with shareholders and evaluate feedback on issues of importance to them, including the metrics that drive each of our NEO’s long-term incentive compensation. Our engagement with shareholders on executive compensation is further described on page 51 of this Proxy Statement.

8            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Environmental, Social and Governance Highlights

ESG considerations are becoming increasingly important to our shareholders and clients, as demonstrated by the growth in MSCI ESG Research and Ratings and MSCI ESG indexes. We also view strong ESG practices as core to our own success. Our Board conducts an annual review of its governance practices, Committee charters and governance policies to ensure that the Company’s practices are in line with current best practices. Below are some highlights of our ESG practices. Policies and practices that were strengthened in 2018 and early 2019 are marked with an “*”. Additional information on our ESG practices is available on our website at:www.msci.com/corporate-responsibility. Information contained on the website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.

 
  

OUR POLICIES

WHAT WE DO

  

DIVERSE AND

ENGAGED BOARD

•  Directors must bring a wide range of qualifications, experiences, backgrounds, skills and attributes to our Board, supporting its oversight role on behalf of shareholders

•  Directors are prohibited from serving on the boards of more than four public companies, including MSCI (directors who serve as chief executive officer of a public company should not serve on the boards of more than a total of three public companies, including MSCI)*

•  Comprehensive director orientation program and director education policy

•  4 of 10 (40%) director nominees bring gender or racial diversity to the Board

•  3 of 10 (30%) director nominees are women

•  See “Director Core Competencies” on page 14 of this Proxy Statement

•  No director is overboarded

•  New directors meet with senior management for atwo-day orientation program and attend the meetings of each Committee during their first year

ACTIVE BOARD

REFRESHMENT

•  Board generally favors the periodic rotation of Committee assignments and Committee chair positions

•  Committee chairs expected to serve approximately 4 to 6 years on average in order to facilitate rotation of Committee chairs while preserving experienced leadership

•  Mandatory director retirement age of 72

•  The Governance Committee has primary responsibility for director succession planning

•  New Lead Director (Robert G. Ashe) appointed to serve in 2018

•  New chairs for all NYSE-mandated committees appointed to serve in 2018

•  3 of 10 (30%) director nominees joined the Board within the last five years

•  Average director age of 62 (among director nominees)

•  Director skills matrix maintained and reviewed regularly to aid in search of director candidates

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            9


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY        

 

Social Responsibility

Build a highly engaged workforce, including through learning and development efforts and DE&I initiatives


RECENT HIGHLIGHTS

●  Diversity Equity & Inclusion (DE&I)

●  Hired our first Chief Diversity Officer, responsible for operating across MSCI to align our DE&I goals with business outcomes, help embed DE&I considerations in the way we do business, attract and retain the best diverse talent and increase the impact of our internal workplace initiatives

●  Published our 2020 and 2019 U.S. Consolidated EEO- 1 Report data, in addition to disclosing diversity data aligned to Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) categories

●  Formed three new DE&I employee resource groups (“ERGs”), the Asian Support Network, All Abilities Network and Hola! MSCI

●  Executed 4th Annual Global DE&I Summit, an internal event that focuses on leadership development and strategic planning

●  Compensation

●  All Managing Directors created, and were held accountable for, individual DE&I Goals directly linked to their 2021 compensation

●  Enhanced Executive Committee Share Ownership Guidelines to be one of the most robust in our peer group and to reflect MSCI’s deep commitment to an “owner-operator” mindset

●  Employee Engagement: In our most recent employee engagement survey (not including employees from newly acquired companies), the percentage of respondents characterized as “fully engaged” equaled the highest since implementing the survey

●  Future of Work: Launched our Future of Work initiative that introduces increased flexibility of when and where employees work, reimagines the use of our offices and ramps up the use of technology to enhance our interactions with clients and employees

 
  

OUR POLICIES

WHAT WE DO

  
ACCOUNTABILITY AND INDEPENDENCE

•  Annual election of directors with majority vote standard for uncontested elections and plurality standard for contested elections


Table of Contents

•  No staggered Board

•  No shareholder rights plan (i.e., a poison pill)

•  Robust director share ownership guidelines

•  Comprehensive Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (“Code of Ethics”)

•  9 of 10 (90%) director nominees are independent

•  All NYSE-mandated committees are 100% independent

•  All incumbent directorsre-elected by at least 97% of votes cast in 2018

•  Annual Board, Committee and individual director evaluations*

•  AnnualSay-on-Pay Vote

•  All directors satisfy stock ownership guidelines

•  Directors participate in active shareholder engagement efforts

RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHTBoard, through its Committees, has principal responsibility for oversight of risk management process, including cybersecurity and data privacy

•  Board actively engaged in risk management oversight. See page 28 of this Proxy Statement for additional detail

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF ESG PRACTICESBoard has oversight over the Company’s ESG practices and disclosures*

•  The Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s ESG practices and disclosures

•  The Company appointed a Chief Responsibility Officer (“CRO”) in 2018 to manage the Company’s ESG practices and make periodic reports to the Governance Committee

ENVIRONMENTAL HIGHLIGHTSCommitment to being environmentally conscious

•  89% of our global staff are located in offices with LEED, BREEAM or equivalent recognition

•  In 2018, the Company engaged a third-party advisor with the aim of continuing to improve the Company’s environmental practices and disclosures, including by participating in the Carbon Disclosure Project*

•  Signatory toUN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment

10            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY13

 

Sustainable Operations

Manage carbon emissions and climate risks, and implement sustainable operational practices


RECENT HIGHLIGHTS

●  New Commitments

●  Committed to a goal of net-zero carbon emissions before 2040 throughout our operations, prioritizing reducing our most material and controllable emissions and engaging with our suppliers

●  Committed to support all of the United Nations (“UN”) Sustainability Development Goals (“SDGs”) and aim to measure impact for SDGs relating to gender equality, decent work and economic growth, reduced inequality and climate action

●  External Recognition: Improved our CDP score to reach leadership score of A-

●  Expanding Alliances

●  Became a founding member of the Net Zero Financial Service Providers Alliance, committing to align our relevant services and products with a 2050 net-zero emissions target

●  Participated in, and met with policymakers and financial regulators at, the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26)

●  Engaging with our Suppliers

●  Updated Supplier Code of Conduct to address emissions in the MSCI supply chain. Prioritized engagement with major suppliers to align net-zero goals

●  Developed an internal Sustainable Supplier Management Team to support efforts to learn about our suppliers’ corporate responsibility practices and seek alignment with our own commitments

●  New Reporting

●  Published first SFDR report

●  Published first UN SDGs report

●  Updating our Policies

●  Updated our Environmental Policy to include our commitment to net-zero and to environmental issues (e.g., biodiversity, waste and water)

●  Updated our Travel Policy to encourage employees to prioritize virtual meetings and use of low carbon travel options

 
  

OUR POLICIES

WHAT WE DO

  

ENVIRONMENTAL
Robust Governance

Implement policies and practices that reflect MSCI’s commitment to strong governance practices


RECENT HIGHLIGHTS (continued)

●  Board Developments

●  Appointed Rajat Taneja, a new director with a deep background in technology

●  Enhanced Board Committee Charters to reflect leading practices and renamed the Audit and Risk Committee, Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee and Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee to provide more clarity and transparency on Board committee-level oversight

●  Conducted board education sessions to strengthen the Board’s expertise on climate, including sessions on climate science, climate investing, climate reporting solutions and net-zero commitments

●  Corporate Responsibility Governance

●  Formed a Corporate Responsibility Policy Committee (“CRPC”), responsible for reviewing strategic corporate responsibility initiatives

●  Expanded the Corporate Responsibility Committee (“CRC”) to include new members from DE&I, Technology, Data Management, Client Coverage, Controllership and Financial Planning & Analysis teams.

●  Risk Oversight: Integrated climate and DE&I into our risk management program, with reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee

   

•  Supporting local employee-driven committees that have been established in many of our offices to engage in a variety of initiatives, including promoting sustainable waste management and working practices, educating and increasing awareness of key environmental issues and challenges facing those offices and running initiatives to engage employees on local environmental matters

SOCIAL HIGHLIGHTSStrong focus on human capital development as overseen by the Compensation Committee, including review of the Company’s corporate culture, learning and development programs and efforts to promote diversity and gender pay parity*

•  Executive Diversity Council (“EDC”), led by our Chief Operating Officer, launched in 2018

•  Maintain two active employee resource groups: the MSCI Pride Group and the MSCI Women’s Leadership Forum (“WLF”)

•  Inaugural Annual Diversity and Inclusion Summit hosted by our CEO, President, Chief Operating Officer and other Executive Committee members and attended by high performing women at the Company with leadership capabilities as well as members of the EDC

•  Annual review by the Compensation Committee of talent management and succession planning; all directors are invited to participate

•  Matching employee charitable contribution program in the U.S.

•  Most of our largest regional offices have a Philanthropic Committee which provides a forum for employees to volunteer with a variety of organizations

•  In 2018, we saw improved engagement from employees across the Company based on the Company’s annual employee engagement survey

•  The Company’s Supplier Code expects suppliers to respect the standards embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labor Organization Conventions

For additional information about our Corporate Responsibility Program, please see page 45 of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            11


14
MSCI   |   PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Governance Highlights

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOMINEES        Our Board of Directors Nominees

Each of our current directors other than Wendy E. Lane (who will not stand for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting but will remain on the Board through that date), is standing for election to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. The table below provides information on each of our director nominees.

    

NAME

 

AGE

 

DIRECTOR SINCE

 

PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION

 

INDEPENDENT

 

 

Henry A. Fernandez

 

60

 

2007

 

Chairman and CEO, MSCI Inc.

 

 

Robert G. Ashe

Lead Director

 

 

59

 

 

2013

 

 

Former General Manager, Business Analytics, IBM Corp. (Formerly CEO of Cognos Inc.)

 

 

🌑

 

 

Benjamin F. duPont

 

 

55

 

 

2008

 

 

Co-Founder and Partner, Chartline Capital Partners

 

 

🌑

 

 

Wayne Edmunds

 

 

63

 

 

2015

 

 

Former Interim Group CEO, BBA Aviation, and Former CEO, Invensys plc

 

 

🌑

 

 

Alice W. Handy

 

 

70

 

 

2009

 

 

Former Managing Member and CEO, Investure

 

 

🌑

 

 

Catherine R. Kinney

 

 

67

 

 

2009

 

 

Former President, New York Stock Exchange

 

 

🌑

 

 

Jacques P. Perold

 

 

60

 

 

2017

 

 

Former President, Fidelity Management and Research Company

 

 

🌑

 

 

Linda H. Riefler

 

 

58

 

 

2007

 

 

Former Chairman of Global Research and Chief Talent Officer, Morgan Stanley

 

 

🌑

 

 

George W. Siguler

 

 

71

 

 

2009

 

 

Co-Founder, Siguler Guff & Company

 

 

🌑

 

 

Marcus L. Smith

 

 

52

 

 

2017

 

 

Former Director of Equity (Canada) and Portfolio Manager, MFS Investment Management

 

 

🌑

 

nominees, including which of our four standing committees the director nominee sits on. Our four standing committees are the Audit and Risk Committee (the “Audit Committee”), the Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), the Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee (the “Governance Committee”) and the Strategy and Finance Committee (the “Strategy Committee”).

 

12            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT15


Proposal 1

 

Election of Directors

The Board recommends a vote

FOR each director nominee.

  SEE PAGE 20


Table of Contents

16MSCI   |   PROXY SUMMARY

Engaging with our Shareholders

We believe that engaging with our shareholders, prospective shareholders and sell-side analysts is the best way to address the issues that matter most to them. During 2021, we held over 300 meetings covering a wide range of matters. While we aim to engage with our shareholders year-round through investor meetings and industry conferences, our key shareholder engagement activities for 2021 included our Investor Day held in February 2021 and our Corporate Responsibility Roadshow conducted in the winter of 2021.

Corporate GovernanceDeep
Shareholder
Outreach
Team
 Senior
Business
Leaders
+Finance and
Investor
Relations Team
+Corporate
Secretary
Team
+Human Resources
Team, including
Chief Diversity
Officer
+Corporate Responsibility
Team and Global
Corporate Services
Team
+Board
Members
(select
meetings)
What We
Discussed

OUR BUSINESS

Market Trends

Competitive Environment

Product Development

Financial Performance

Overall Outlook

OUR CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY EFFORTS

Corporate Responsibility Practices and Disclosures, including ESG & Climate

Human Capital Management, including DE&I

Executive Compensation Program

OVER 300

meetings with our shareholders, prospective shareholders and sell-side analysts, including successful Investor Day and Corporate Responsibility Roadshow

~58% of our shares outstanding

represented across our shareholder engagement meetings in 2021

See “Shareholder Engagement” on page 40 for more information on our year-round shareholder engagement activities.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT17

Proposal 2

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)

The Board recommends a vote

FOR this proposal.

  SEE PAGE 55

Aligning Executive Compensation with Company Strategy, Culture and Performance

We believe our executive compensation program was integral to our successful financial performance in 2021. Our executive compensation program is designed not only to closely align the compensation and interests of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) with the long-term interests of our shareholders, but also to reflect the economic realities of our operating environment. MSCI’s executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based compensation in the form of cash incentive awards under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and equity incentive awards under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that focus respectively on the achievement of short- and long-term financial and strategic targets.

SHORT-TERM
(ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN CASH BONUS)
LONG-TERM
(EQUITY GRANTS)

●  Restricted Stock Units (for 2021, ratable vest, and for 2022, cliff-vest after a three-year service period)

●  Performance Stock Units (earned based on absolute TSR CAGR) with a 1-year post vesting mandatory holding period for 3-Year PSUs

●  Performance Stock Options (earned based on cumulative revenue and cumulative Adjusted EPS) (new for 2022)

2021 ANNUALIZED CEO2021 AVERAGE ANNUALIZED OTHER NEOS

In 2021, our CEO received over 90% of his compensation in the form of “at-risk” variable compensation under the AIP and LTIP (on average, over 85% in the case of our other NEOs).

Annual Incentive Plan

The AIP closely aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders by emphasizing a formulaic approach to determine annual cash incentive awards, which are based on the achievement of specified annual financial criteria aligned with our Board-approved Operating Plan (70% of the target annual cash bonus under the AIP), individual key performance indicators (“KPIs”) (20% of the target annual cash bonus under the AIP) and specific DE&I goals (“DE&I Goals”) (10% of the target annual cash bonus under the AIP) that serve to focus our senior management team on enhancing DE&I progress within the Company. The Compensation Committee regularly assesses the components and metrics used in the AIP and the weighting of those components and metrics, in addition to taking into account shareholder feedback.

For additional information about the 2021 AIP program, please see the discussion on page 71 of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

18MSCI   |   PROXY SUMMARY

Long-Term Incentive Plan

The LTIP is designed to prioritize shareholder value creation and facilitate an “owner-operator” mindset among our senior executives.

In 2021, we granted our NEOs a mix of RSUs and PSUs (including separate awards of PSUs with a 3-year cumulative performance period (“3-Year PSUs”) and PSUs with a 5-year cumulative performance period (“5-Year PSUs”)), the mix of which varies based on the executive’s position. Consistent with our recent practice, each of our CEO and President & COO received 100% of his equity incentive compensation in 2021 in the form of PSUs. In addition, for 2021, the Compensation Committee increased the proportion of our President & COO’s 5-Year PSUs from 50% to 60% of his overall equity incentive compensation (with the remaining 40% granted in the form of 3-Year PSUs), commensurate with our CEO.

In 2022, the Compensation Committee enhanced our LTIP by introducing a new award vehicle into the program: financial-based performance stock options (“PSOs”) that cover a cumulative three-year performance period and replace the grant of 5-Year PSUs.

The 2022 LTIP comprises a mix of the following:

2022
RSUs

Annual grant of RSUs to our NEOs (other than our CEO and President & COO) that cliff-vest at the end of a three-year service period. This reflects a change from ratable vesting over three years for RSUs granted prior to 2022.

Our CEO and President & COO were not granted any RSUs in 2021 or 2022, and instead all of their LTIP awards for such years were granted in the form of PSUs and PSOs tied to performance metrics.

2022
PSUs

Annual grant of PSUs which cover a cumulative three-year performance period.

The 3-Year PSUs are eligible to vest between 0% and 300% based on the achievement of an absolute total shareholder return compound annual growth rate (“TSR CAGR”) performance metric.

The 3-Year PSUs include a one-year post-vest mandatory holding period.

2022
PSOs

Annual grant of PSOs which cover a cumulative three-year performance period.

The PSOs are eligible to vest between 0% and 200% based on the combined level of achievement of (i) a cumulative revenue performance goal and (ii) a cumulative adjusted EPS performance goal (each weighted at 50%).

For additional information about the LTIP, please see the discussion beginning on page 79 of this Proxy Statement.

Increased Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements

In 2022, in order to further enhance an “owner-operator” mindset among senior executives, our Compensation Committee amended our existing share ownership and retention guidelines to require that all members of our Executive Committee, including our NEOs, must hold shares equivalent, in the aggregate, to 25% of the “net shares” they receive (i.e., after payment of taxes, exercise price and related costs) from equity awards granted to them after January 1, 2022. The Compensation Committee also approved revisions to the minimum ownership guidelines to increase the thresholds applicable to members of our Executive Committee, including our NEOs, to among the highest in our peer group (including 12x base salary for our CEO and President & COO). For additional information about our Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines applicable to our NEOs, please see page 83 of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT19

Executive Compensation Highlights

Over the past several years, we have continued to enhance our executive compensation program to align with shareholder interests more closely and to further incentivize our executives to focus on the long-term execution of our strategic priorities to create shareholder value. The table below highlights certain key elements of, and enhancements to, our executive compensation program over the past several years.

202020212022

   

   

   

●  No changes made to 2020 Operating Plan or annual cash incentive targets for 2020 under AIP in response to challenging operating environment

●  97.8% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders were in support of the compensation of our NEOs

●  No increase to CEO base salary or total target cash incentive award for 2020

●  CEO received all of his LTIP awards in the form of PSUs, and increased proportion of his 5-Year PSUs from 50% to 60% of total CEO equity compensation for 2020

●  President & COO began receiving all of his LTIP awards in the form of PSUs

●  CEO and President & COO received all of their LTIP awards in the form of PSUs

●  Added a 1-year post-vest mandatory holding period to 3-Year PSU awards

●  96.8% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders were in support of   the compensation of our NEOs

●  No increase to CEO and President & COO base salaries, total target cash incentive awards or target LTIP awards for 2021

●  President & COO increased proportion of 5-Year PSUs from 50% to 60% (commensurate with CEO)

●  Linked 10% of the target AIP cash incentive for all Managing Directors globally to achievement of DE&I Goals

●  Introduced PSOs as new equity vehicle

●  CEO and President & COO received all of their LTIP awards in the form of 3-Year PSUs and PSOs, tied to performance metrics

●  Annual grant of RSUs for other NEOs will cliff-vest at the end of a three-year service period

●  Retained 1-year post-vest mandatory holding period on 3-Year PSU awards

●  Increased minimum share ownership requirements applicable to all members of our Executive Committee, including our CEO and President & COO to 12X base salary

●  Added requirement that while members of the Executive Committee, such individuals including our NEOs, must hold shares equivalent, in the aggregate, to 25% of the “net shares” they receive from equity awards granted to them after January 1, 2022

●  No increase to CEO and President & COO base salaries or total target cash incentive awards for 2022

●  All Executive Committee members included a climate commitment goal in their 2022 individual KPIs under the AIP

   

Response to Say-on-Pay Vote

At our 2021 annual meeting of shareholders, stockholders again expressed overwhelming support for the compensation of our NEOs with approximately 96.8% of the votes cast approving our “Say on Pay” advisory proposal relating to our NEO compensation. This represents the fourth consecutive year of “Say on Pay” approval of 96% or higher.

To read more about what our shareholders think of our Executive Compensation program, see the discussion on page 67 of this Proxy Statement.

Proposal 3

Ratification of the Appointment of MSCI’s Independent Auditor

The Board recommends a vote

FOR this proposal.

  SEE PAGE 99

The Audit and Risk Committee periodically reviews the engagement of the independent auditor to assess, among other things, the skills, experience, service levels and costs associated with conducting the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements. PwC has served as our independent auditor since March 2014.


Table of Contents

20MSCI

 

Proposal No. 1
-Election of Directors

Our Board currently has 11 directors. Each director stands for election at each annual meeting of shareholders and holds office until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. All of the nominees presented below are directors of MSCI as of March 11, 2019. All directors were elected at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. The Board believes that each of the nominees brings strong skills and experience to the Board, giving the Board, as a group, the appropriate skills needed to exercise its oversight responsibilities and advise management with respect to the Company’s strategic initiatives.

On March 5, 2019, Wendy E. Lane informed the Company of her decision to not stand for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Her term as a director will end when her current term expires at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Concurrent with the 2019 Annual Meeting, the size of the Board will be decreased from 11 to 10. There are no disagreements with MSCI’s management or the Board related to MSCI’s operations, policies or practices to be reported in connection with Ms. Lane’s decision to not stand for re-election.

Each nominee has indicated that he or she is willing and able to serve if elected. We do not anticipate that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to stand for election, but if that happens, your proxy will be voted for another person nominated by the Board or the Board may elect to reduce its size.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION        

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to each director’s election at our 2019 Annual Meeting is required to approve Proposal No. 1. Abstentions shall not be treated as votes cast. For additional information on the consequences for directors who do not receive a majority of the votes cast, please refer to “What happens if a director does not receive a majority of the votes required for his or herre-election” inAnnex A.

LOGO

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            13


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Our Board currently has 10 directors. Each director stands for election at each annual meeting of shareholders and holds office until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. All of the nominees presented beginning on page 14 of this Proxy Statement are directors of MSCI as of March 16, 2022. All directors, other than Rajat Taneja, were elected at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders. The Board believes that each of the nominees brings strong skills and experience to the Board, giving the Board, as a group, the appropriate skills needed to exercise its oversight responsibilities and advise management with respect to the Company’s strategic initiatives.

Each nominee has indicated that he or she is willing and able to serve if elected. We do not anticipate that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to stand for election, but if that happens, your proxy vote will be cast for another person nominated by the Board, or the Board may elect to reduce its size.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to each director’s election at our 2022 Annual Meeting is required to approve Proposal No. 1. Abstentions shall not be treated as votes cast. For additional information on the consequences for directors who do not receive a majority of the votes cast, please refer to “What happens if a director does not receive a majority of the votes required for his or her re-election?” in Annex A.

 

Our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of all ten nominees named below.

Proxies solicited by our Board will be voted “FOR” these nominees unless otherwise instructed.

 


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT21

Director Core Competencies and Diversity
The Governance Committee believes the director skills, experiences and backgrounds set forth in the tables below are those most relevant to the Board’s oversight responsibilities and the Company’s strategic direction and strives to ensure that the Board includes a balanced mix of qualifications and backgrounds. Additional detail on each director nominee’s experiences and qualifications follows their biographies beginning on page 23 of this Proxy Statement.
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP8/10
Public company CEO or senior executive experience managing a complex organization with oversight of strategy, corporate development, talent management, business operations and/or overall decision making, and a consistent record of executing strategy and creating shareholder value through operational excellence.
GOVERNANCE/PUBLIC COMPANY BOARD8/10
Experience in public company corporate governance related issues, policies and best practices, serving on a public company board and familiarity with corporate board topics.
INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE8/10
Experience working as a senior executive in the financial services industry with our client segments (e.g., asset owners, broker-dealers, hedge funds and investment managers) and investment products and support tools.
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE/INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE8/10
Experience as a senior executive working for an international company or working or living in countries outside of the U.S.
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE/GOVERNMENT5/10
Experience in operating businesses in similarly regulated industries, interacting with regulators and policymakers and/or working in government.
INVESTMENTS/STRATEGY AND CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT9/10
Experience in financial investment markets and investment decisions, strategy and corporate development to maximize return for our shareholders, including cross-border investment and M&A and capital markets transactions.
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE10/10
Experience in accounting and financial reporting or experience as a financial expert and/or public company CFO, or audit partner from one of the big four audit firms.
RISK MANAGEMENT9/10
Experience in risk management with oversight and assessment of different types of risk (including ERM, IT, credit, market, operational liquidity, business and reputational).
CLIENT RELATIONS/SALES/MARKETING3/10
Experience in sales, marketing, brand development and interpreting client behaviors.
INNOVATION, DATA AND TECHNOLOGY9/10
Experience with innovative technology, digital content or enterprise technology-driven issues such as privacy, cybersecurity, data management, and the regulatory landscape surrounding technological development.
CORPORATE, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS9/10
Experience in corporate affairs, philanthropy, community development, diversity, environmental, corporate and social responsibility and/or in investor relations.
HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT/EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION9/10
Experience with making executive compensation decisions, including understanding the regulatory and financial considerations to take into account when making such decisions, and human capital management, including issues relating to succession planning; talent development, including performance reviews of executives; diversity, equity and inclusion; and culture.


Table of Contents

22MSCI   |   PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

DIRECTOR CORE COMPETENCIES   Ashe   Edmunds   Fernandez   Kinney   Perold   Rattray   Riefler   Smith   Taneja   Volent
Executive Leadership            
Governance/Public Company Board            
Industry Experience           
Global Perspective/International Experience            
Regulatory Compliance/Government               
Investments/Strategy and Corporate Development           
Financial Expertise          
Risk Management           
Client Relations/Sales/Marketing                
Innovation, Data and Technology           
Corporate, Environmental and Social Affairs           
Human Capital Management/Executive Compensation           
                     
TENURE/AGE/GENDER                    
Tenure 8 7 14 12 5 2 14 4 <1 2
Age 62 66 63 70 63 52 61 55 57 65
Gender M M M F M M F M M F
                     
RACE/ETHNICITY/BIRTHPLACE                    
African American/Black                   
Alaskan Native/Native American                    
Asian/South Asian                   
Caucasian/White             
Hispanic/Latino                   
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander                    
Two or More Races                    
LGBTQ+                    
Born Outside of the U.S.               


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT23

 

DIRECTOR CORE COMPETENCIES        2022 Director Nominees

Our Board includes an appropriate mix of experience, tenure, diversity, leadership, skills and qualifications in areas of importance to the Company. Our directors have had senior leadership experience at various domestic and multinational companies. In these positions, they obtained diverse management skills, including strategic and financial planning, regulatory compliance, risk management and leadership development. Additional detail on each director nominee’s experiences and qualifications follows their biographies beginning on page 15 of this Proxy Statement. The Governance Committee believes the director skills and experiences set forth on the “Director Core Competencies” table below are those most relevant to the Board’s oversight responsibilities and the Company’s strategic direction and strives to ensure that the Board includes a balanced mix of qualifications.

LOGO

14            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Director since: 2013

Age: 62 years old

Committees:

Audit Committee (Member)
Strategy Committee (Chair)

         CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

2019 DIRECTOR NOMINEES        

LOGO

Henry A. Fernandez

Chairman and CEO

Age:60

Director since:2007

BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Fernandez has served as a director and Chairman of our Board since 2007 and as our CEO since 1998. He served as our President from 1998 to 2017. Before leading MSCI’s transition to becoming a fully independent, standalone public company in 2009, he was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley, where he worked in emerging markets product strategy, equity derivative sales and trading, mergers and acquisitions, worldwide corporate finance and mortgage finance for U.S. financial institutions. Mr. Fernandez worked for Morgan Stanley from 1983 to 1991 and from 1994 to 2009. Mr. Fernandez holds a Bachelor of Arts in economics from Georgetown University, an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and pursued doctoral studies in economics at Princeton University.

QUALIFICATIONS: Because Mr. Fernandez has been the CEO of the Company since 1998 and has been instrumental in the internal and external growth of the Company, the design and execution of the Company’s acquisitions both before and after its IPO in 2007, including the acquisitions of Barra, LLC (formerly Barra, Inc.) in 2004, RiskMetrics Group, LLC (formerly RiskMetrics Group, Inc.) and Measurisk, LLC in 2010, IPD Group Limited, Inc. in 2012, GMI Holdings Co. in 2014 and the business of Insignis, Inc. in 2015, he brings to the Board an unparalleled historical knowledge and depth of understanding of the Company and its businesses. The skills and experience that Mr. Fernandez acquired in founding two private equity investment firms and while working in various areas at Morgan Stanley have proven invaluable to the Company’s continued success following its IPO. These skills will remain vital to the continued success of the Company’sday-to-day operations, as well as the successful development and execution of its growth plans and competitive strategies.

LOGO

RobertROBERT G. AsheASHE

Independent Lead Director

Age:59

Director since:2013

 

BIOGRAPHY:Mr. Ashe retired from IBM Corporation (“IBM”) in January 2012, where he had most recently served as General Manager of Business Analytics from 2010 to 2012 and before that as General Manager of Business Intelligence and Performance Management since 2008, following IBM’s acquisition of Cognos Inc. (“Cognos”), a Canadian provider of business intelligence and performance management products.software. Mr. Ashe worked for Cognos from 1984 to 2008, holding various executive positions, including most recently President and Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to 2008, President and Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2004 and Chief Corporate Officer from 2001 to 2002, during a portion of which time he also served as Chief Financial Officer. He also held various Senior Vice President positions in Worldwide Field Operations, Products and Application Development Tools from 1996 to 2001. Prior to that, he held various Vice President roles within Product Development and Corporate Finance. Mr. Ashe holds a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Ottawa. Mr. Ashe is also a Certified Public Accountant in Canada.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

Shopify Inc. (May 2015 to present)

PRIOR OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

ServiceSource International, Inc. (March 2013 to May 2020) and Halogen Software Inc.
(February 2013 to April 2017)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Ashe’s over 30 years of experience in the technology sector, including his oversight of product marketing, software development, revenue growth initiatives and strategic transactions, render him qualified to serve as one of our directors. As a member of other public company boards and the former CEO of a public company, Mr. Ashe also brings to the Board insight with respect to the Board’s roles and responsibilities that are vital to his role as our Lead Director.


Table of Contents

24MSCI   |   PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director since: 2015

Age: 66 years old

Committees:

Audit Committee (Chair)
Compensation Committee (Member)

WAYNE EDMUNDS

Independent Director

Mr. Edmunds previously served as the Interim Group Chief Executive of BBA Aviation plc from July 2017 to March 2018. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Invensys plc at Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”) from 2011 until his retirement in 2014. Previously, Mr. Edmunds was Chief Financial Officer of Invensys. Prior to joining Invensys in 2008, Mr. Edmunds was Senior Vice President of Finance at Reuters America, Inc. from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Edmunds served as the Chief Financial Officer of Innovance Networks Inc. (“Innovance”) from 2000 to 2004, where he was responsible for financial planning and operations. Prior to joining Innovance, Mr. Edmunds held other senior management roles in the technology sector, including working 17 years at Lucent Technologies, Inc., where he served as Vice President of Finance for the Optical Networking Division and as Vice President of Marketing and Business Development and was responsible for Europe, Middle East and Africa operations. Mr. Edmunds began his career at Amerada Hess Oil as an analyst in Corporate Treasury. Mr. Edmunds holds a Bachelor of Arts in accounting from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. in finance from Pace University.

PRIOR OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

Signature Aviation plc (August 2013 to June 2021), Dialight plc (February 2016 to August 2019) and Ashtead Group plc (February 2014 to September 2018)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Edmunds’ extensive insight into global companies in the technology sector and his memberships on the Boards of multiple international companies render him qualified to serve as one of our directors.

Director since: 2007

Age: 63 years old

HENRY A. FERNANDEZ

Chairman and CEO

Mr. Fernandez has served as Chairman of our Board since 2007 and as our CEO and a director since 1998. He also served as head of the MSCI business from 1996 to 1998 and as President from 1998 to October 2017. Before leading MSCI’s transition to becoming a fully independent, standalone public company in 2007, he was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley, where he worked in emerging markets business strategy, equity derivatives sales and trading, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate and mortgage finance. Mr. Fernandez worked for Morgan Stanley from 1983 to 1991 and from 1994 to 2007. Mr. Fernandez holds a Bachelor of Arts in economics from Georgetown University, an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and pursued doctoral studies in economics at Princeton University.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

Royalty Pharma plc (August 2020 to present)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Fernandez’s extensive experience and leadership in the financial services industry as well as his unparalleled knowledge of MSCI and its business, including as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, render him qualified to serve as one of our directors.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT25

Director since: 2009

Age: 70 years old

Committees:

Governance Committee (Member)

CATHERINE R. KINNEY

Independent Director

Ms. Kinney retired from NYSE Euronext in March 2009, having served as a Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2008. From 2007 to 2009, she served in Paris overseeing global listings, marketing and branding, and served as part of the integration team following the merger of NYSE and Euronext in April 2007. Ms. Kinney joined NYSE in 1974 and rose through the ranks holding management positions with responsibility for several divisions, including: all client relationships from 1996 to 2007, trading floor operations and technology from 1987 to 1996 and regulation from 2002 to 2004. Ms. Kinney holds a Bachelor of Arts from Iona College and has completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Graduate School of Business. She has received honorary degrees from Georgetown University, Fordham University and Rosemont College.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

MetLife Inc. (April 2009 to present) and SolarWinds Corporation (October 2018 to present)

PRIOR OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

QTS Realty Trust, Inc. (August 2013 to September 2021)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Ms. Kinney’s management experience, including her role in overseeing a multinational business, as well as her expertise in corporate governance, including her role in developing the NYSE corporate governance standards for listed companies, render her qualified to serve as one of our directors.

Director since: 2017

Age: 63 years old

Committees:

Governance Committee (Chair)
Strategy Committee (Member)

JACQUES P. PEROLD

Independent Director

Mr. Perold was president of Fidelity Management & Research Company, the investment advisor for Fidelity’s family of mutual funds, until his retirement in 2014. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Perold was president of Geode Capital Management, LLC, a sub-advisor to Fidelity. He is currently a trustee of New York Life Insurance Company’s MainStay mutual funds, a trustee of Partners in Health, and a co-founder, CEO and Chairman of CapShift, a company focused on enabling impact investments from donor-advised funds and foundations. Mr. Perold holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economic history from the University of Cape Town and a post-graduate Bachelor of Arts Honours degree in sociology from the University of Cape Town.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

Allstate Corporation (December 2015 to present)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Perold’s over 30 years of experience and leadership in strategy and operations as well as experience as an investment professional at one of the world’s largest asset management firms render him qualified to serve as one of our directors.


Table of Contents

26MSCI   |   PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director since: 2020

Age: 52 years old

Committees:

Audit Committee (Member)
Strategy Committee (Member)

SANDY C. RATTRAY

Independent Director

Mr. Rattray retired from Man Group plc in September 2021, having served as Chief Investment Officer from 2017 to September 2021. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Man AHL from 2013 to 2017 and Chief Investment Officer of Man Systematic Strategies from 2010 to 2013. Prior to holding such positions, he held several other senior leadership positions at Man Group. Before joining GLG Partners, which was later acquired by Man Group in 2007, he spent 15 years at Goldman Sachs where he held various positions, including Managing Director and head of the Fundamental Strategy Group. Mr. Rattray also sits on the MSCI Advisory Council. He holds a Master’s Degree in Natural Sciences and Economics from the University of Cambridge and a Licence Spéciale from the Université Libre de Bruxelles. He is also a governor of the Southbank Centre in London.

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Rattray’s over 25 years of experience in the global investment industry, including his focus on the technological innovation impacting the industry, render him qualified to serve as one of our directors.

Director since: 2007

Age: 61 years old

Committees:

Audit Committee (Member)
Compensation Committee (Chair)

LINDA H. RIEFLER

Independent Director

Ms. Riefler retired from Morgan Stanley in February 2013. Ms. Riefler served as the Chair of Global Research at Morgan Stanley from June 2011 to February 2013 and prior to that served as the Global Head of Research from 2008. She was the Chief Talent Officer of Morgan Stanley from 2006 to 2008. In these roles she served on both the Management Committee and Operating Committee of Morgan Stanley. Ms. Riefler joined Morgan Stanley in 1987 in the Capital Markets division and was appointed a Managing Director in 1998 while in the Research division. Ms. Riefler holds a Bachelor of Arts in economics from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

CSX Corporation (March 2017 to present)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Ms. Riefler’s in-depth knowledge of talent management, risk management, company valuation and the global capital markets render her qualified to serve as one of our directors.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT27

Director since: 2017

Age: 55 years old

Committees:

Compensation Committee (Member)
Strategy Committee (Member)

MARCUS L. SMITH

Independent Director

Mr. Smith was the Chief Investment Officer, Canada Equity and a Portfolio Manager, International Equities at MFS Investment Management (“MFS”) until his retirement in April 2017. As a portfolio manager, he was responsible for managing the MFS Institutional International Equity Portfolio and the International Concentrated Portfolio. He joined MFS in 1994 and held a variety of positions, including Chief Investment Officer (Asia) from 2010 to 2012, based in Boston, Director of Asian Research from 2005 to 2009, based in Singapore, and Equity Analyst from 1995 to 2000, based in London. Mr. Smith currently also serves as a trustee for certain Eaton Vance funds. Mr. Smith holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Mount Union and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (February 2021 to present)

PRIOR OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

DCT Industrial Trust, Inc. (October 2017 to August 2018)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Smith’s extensive experience in global financial markets and as an investment professional, including experience in Asia and Europe, render him qualified to serve as one of our directors.

Director since: 2021

Age: 57 years old

Committees:

Audit Committee (Member)

RAJAT TANEJA

Independent Director

Mr. Taneja is currently the President of Technology for Visa Inc. (“Visa”), a role he has held since September 2019. He joined Visa in November 2013 and served as Executive Vice President of Technology and Operations until August 2019. Prior to joining Visa, Mr. Taneja was Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Electronic Arts Inc. from October 2011 until November 2013. From August 1996 until October 2011, he served in various roles at Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), including as the Corporate Vice President, Commerce Division. At Microsoft, Mr. Taneja led the development and deployment of commerce and transaction technologies across its connected services, the company’s online digital advertising platforms and its first business online service offering. Mr. Taneja holds a Bachelor of Engineering from Jadavpur University and a Master of Business Administration from Washington State University.

PRIOR OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

Ellie Mae, Inc. (June 2015 to April 2019)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Mr. Taneja’s over 30 years of experience in global technology, innovation and research and development render him qualified to serve as one of our directors.


Table of Contents

28MSCI   |   PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director since: 2020

Age: 65 years old

Committees:

Governance Committee (Member)
Strategy Committee (Member)

PAULA VOLENT

Independent Director

Ms. Volent is currently Vice President and Chief Investment Officer at The Rockefeller University, a role she has held since August 2021. She previously served as Senior Vice President for Investments and Chief Investment Officer at Bowdoin College from 2006 to June 2021, Vice President for Investments at Bowdoin College from 2002 to 2006, and Associate Treasurer at Bowdoin College from 2000 to 2002. Prior to joining Bowdoin College in 2000, Ms. Volent served as a Senior Associate at the Yale Investments Office and before focusing on endowment management, she worked as a paper conservator. She holds an M.B.A. from Yale School of Management, a Master of Arts from the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of New Hampshire.

CURRENT OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:

1stdibs.com, Inc. (June 2021 to present)

QUALIFICATIONS:

We believe that Ms. Volent’s experience as a Chief Investment Officer at a number of institutions and her engagement with the global investment community render her qualified to serve as one of our directors.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT29

Corporate Finance. Mr. Ashe holds a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Ottawa. Mr. Ashe is also a Chartered Accountant in Canada.Governance

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:Robust Corporate Governance Practices ServiceSource International, Inc. (March 2013

MSCI’s Board of Directors adhere to present), Shopify Inc. (May 2015governance principles designed to present)ensure the continued effectiveness of the Board and Halogen Software Inc. (February 2013excellence in the execution of its duties. The Board has in place a set of governance guidelines reflecting these principles, including the Board’s policy of requiring a significant majority of the Board to April 2017)be comprised of independent directors; the importance of reflecting a diversity of occupational and personal backgrounds and experience on the Board, including with respect to demographics such as gender, nationality, race, ethnicity, geography and age; and the practice of regularly scheduled executive sessions, including sessions of independent directors without members of management. The MSCI Corporate Governance Policies reflect our principles on corporate governance matters.

MSCI also has a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for directors, executive officers and employees, which is reviewed annually by the Board of Directors. Any amendment to, or waiver of, the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to one of our directors or executive officers may be made only by the Board or a Board committee.

Corporate Governance Highlights

All director nominees except our CEO are independent.
Strong, independent lead director and independent Board committees.
One share, one vote.
Annual election of directors.
Proxy access.
Majority vote for uncontested elections and plurality standard for contested elections.
No shareholder rights plan (i.e., a poison pill).
Board oversight of corporate responsibility, enterprise risk management and IT/cyber risk.
Annual Board, committee and director evaluations, with third-party evaluation firm engaged periodically, including in 2019.
Executive session of independent directors held after each quarterly Board meeting.
Limits on multiple board service.
Robust director share ownership and retention guidelines (further enhanced in 2022).
Annual review of Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, committee charters and Corporate Governance Policies.
Annual off-season shareholder outreach around corporate responsibility, including regular director participation.
Full Board participation in succession and progression planning.
Targeted director education program, including leveraging in-house expertise to educate directors on climate.

Table of Contents

30MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Composition and Board Refreshment

QUALIFICATIONS:Director QualificationsWith nearly 30 years

The Governance Committee’s charter requires it to review candidates’ qualifications for membership on the Board or a committee of the Board, including making a specific determination as to the independence of each candidate based on criteria approved by the Board (and taking into account the enhanced independence, financial literacy and financial expertise standards that may be required under applicable law or NYSE rules for audit committee membership purposes, and heightened independence standards that may be required under law or NYSE rules for compensation committee membership purposes). If the Governance Committee determines that adding a new director is advisable, it will recommend such individual to the Board for appointment as a member of the Board and any committees (as applicable).

Consistent with our Corporate Governance Policies, when appointing directors, the Board seeks members who combine sound business judgment, professionalism and a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for the highest standards of ethics and integrity. Directors should have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility, be leaders or senior managers in the technology sector, Mr. Ashe has led successful initiatives in product marketing, software developmentcompanies or institutions with which they are or were affiliated and revenue growth. While at Cognos, he also executed strategic acquisitions and led the successful integration of Cognos following its acquisition by IBM. The Board believes that the experience Mr. Ashe has acquired during his career in the technology industry will providebe selected based upon contributions they can make to the Board and management with valuable perspectives onand their ability to represent and advance the Company’s investment, organic growth and acquisition strategies. Mr. Ashe has also been serving as our Lead Director since April 2018. As a member of other public company boards and the former CEO of a public company, Mr. Ashe also brings to the Board additional insight with respect to the Board’s roles and responsibilities.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

LOGO

Benjamin F. duPont

Independent Director

Age:55

Director since:2008

BIOGRAPHY: Mr. duPont isco-founder and Managing Partner at Chartline Capital Partners. Chartline Capital Partners has 26 portfolio companies, and invests in “structured” stage venture capital—with a focus on: Digital Health, Retail Analytics, Telecom Infrastructure, Digital Industrial and Food Supply Chain. In 2010, heco-founded yet2Ventures and while it continues to exist as a manager of legacy investments, as of October 2016, continuing investments are made under Chartline Capital Partners and he no longer serves as a principal of yet2Ventures. Mr. duPont alsoco-founded yet2, a global open innovation and technology scouting services company, and continues to serve on its board of directors. Prior to

that, Mr. duPont worked for the DuPont Corporation from 1986 to 1999, most recently in the Specialty Chemicals, Fibers and Automotive division. Mr. duPont holds a Bachelor of Science in mechanical engineering from Tufts University.

QUALIFICATIONS: As a partner of Chartline Capital Partners, an investment firm focused on enterprise and industrial technology companies, Mr. duPont is a resource for the Board as it assesses MSCI’s business development, technology and research and development needs in connection with its internal and external growth strategies. Additionally, asco-founder and director of yet2, a leading technology and intellectual property marketplace, Mr. duPont brings experience to the Board in the areas of intellectual property and technology evaluation, licensing and development. These areas are vital to MSCI’s continued success, as its business depends on the creation, protection, and successful exploitation of its intellectual property.

LOGO

Wayne Edmunds

Independent Director

Age:63

Director since:2015

BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Edmunds previously served as the Interim Group Chief Executive of BBA Aviation plc from July 2017 to March 2018. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Invensys plc at Invensys Systems, Inc. from 2011 until his retirement in 2014. Previously, Mr. Edmunds was Chief Financial Officer of Invensys. Prior to joining Invensys in 2008, Mr. Edmunds was Senior Vice President of Finance at Reuters America, Inc. from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Edmunds served as the Chief Financial Officer of Innovance Networks Inc. (“Innovance”) from 2000 to 2004, where he was responsible for financial planning and operations. Prior to joining Innovance, Mr. Edmunds held other senior management roles in the technology sector, including working 17 years at Lucent Technologies, Inc., where he served as Vice President of Finance for the Optical Networking Division and as Vice

President of Marketing and Business Development and was responsible for Europe, Middle East and Africa operations. Mr. Edmunds began his career at Amerada Hess Oil as an analyst in Corporate Treasury. Mr. Edmunds holds a Bachelor of Arts in accounting from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. in finance from Pace University.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS: Dialight plc (February 2016 to present), BBA Aviation plc (August 2013 to present), Ashtead Group plc (February 2014 to September 2018) and Invensys plc (June 2009 to April 2014).

QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Edmunds brings to the Board, among other skills and qualifications, insight into the dynamics of the evolving technology industry, which will assist the Board in its review and analysis of the Company’s product development and investment strategies. As a member of two U.K. public company boards, Mr. Edmunds also brings to the Board a wealth of cross-border financial, managerial and governance expertise and knowledge.

16            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

LOGO

Alice W. Handy

Independent Director

Age:70

Director since:2009

BIOGRAPHY: Ms. Handy retired from Investure on December 31, 2018, an outsourced investment office for colleges and foundations which she formed in 2003 having served most recently as its Managing Member until her retirement and its Chief Executive Officer until January 1, 2018. Prior to forming Investure, Ms. Handy was the President of the University of Virginia Investment Management Company. Beginning in 1974 and except for the period from November 1988 to January 1990, during which time Ms. Handy served as the State Treasurer of Virginia, she was actively involved in the investment of the

endowment and operating funds of the University of Virginia and served over the years as Investment Officer and Treasurer. Ms. Handy holds a Bachelor of Arts in economics from Connecticut College and pursued graduate studies in economics at the University of Virginia.

QUALIFICATIONS: The experience that Ms. Handy has acquired during her long and successful career in investing for and advising endowments across all asset classes and working with a wide variety of asset managers provides the Board with valuable knowledge and insight into critical segments of the Company’s client base. The Company also leverages her experience in the investment process across all asset classes to enhance its product development strategy and continue to expand its focus beyond equities.

LOGO

Catherine R. Kinney

Independent Director

Age:67

Director since:2009

BIOGRAPHY: Ms. Kinney retired from NYSE Euronext in March 2009, having served as aCo-President andCo-Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2008. From 2007 to 2009, she served in Paris overseeing global listings, marketing and branding, and served as part of the integration team following the merger of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and Euronext in April 2007. Ms. Kinney joined the NYSE in 1974 and rose through the ranks holding management positions with responsibility for several divisions including: all client relationships from 1996 to 2007, trading floor operations and technology from 1987 to 1996 and regulation from 2002 to 2004. Ms. Kinney holds a Bachelor of Arts from Iona College and has completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Graduate School of Business. She has

received honorary degrees from Georgetown University, Fordham University and Rosemont College.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS: MetLife Inc. (April 2009 to present), QTS Realty Trust, Inc. (August 2013 to present), Solar Winds (October 2018 to present) and NetSuite Inc. (March 2009 to November 2016).

QUALIFICATIONS:The Board believes that the leadership and management skills that Ms. Kinney acquired during her35-year career at the NYSE, where she held high level positions such as Group Executive Vice President of NYSE Euronext andCo-President andCo-Chief Operating Officer of the NYSE, contribute to the effectiveness of the Board. Additionally, the corporate governance knowledge that Ms. Kinney acquired during her successful career at the NYSE has helped the Company further strengthen its corporate governance initiatives. Ms. Kinney’s service on other public company boards also contributes additional insight to the Board with respect to public company processes.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

LOGO

Jacques P. Perold

Independent Director

Age:60

Director since:2017

BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Perold was president of Fidelity Management & Research Company, the investment advisor for Fidelity’s family of mutual funds, until his retirement in 2014. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Perold was president of Geode Capital Management, LLC, asub-advisor to Fidelity. He is currently a trustee of New York Life Insurance Company’s Mainstay mutual funds, a trustee of Boston University, and aco-founder of CapShift, a company focused on enabling impact investments from donor advised funds and foundations. Mr. Perold holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economic history from the University of Cape Town and a post-graduate Bachelor of Arts Honours degree in sociology from the University of Cape Town.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS: Allstate Corporation (December 2015 to present).

QUALIFICATIONS: The Board believes that Mr. Perold brings valuable leadership experience from a prominent global investment firm, as well as insight into a quickly evolving and complex financial system. Mr. Perold has over 30 years of experience and leadership in strategy and operations and investment expertise in the financial services industry. The Board believes the experience that Mr. Perold has acquired during his long and successful career at Fidelity provides the Board with valuable knowledge and insight into the Company’s asset management client segment. Mr. Perold’s service on another public company’s board also allows him to provide additional insight into public company processes, and his work with CapShift allows him to provide greater insight into the Company’s ESG business and practices.

LOGO

Linda H. Riefler

Independent Director

Age:58

Director since:2007

BIOGRAPHY: Ms. Riefler retired from Morgan Stanley in February 2013. Ms. Riefler served as the Chair of Global Research at Morgan Stanley from June 2011 to February 2013 and prior to that had served as the Global Head of Research since 2008. She was the Chief Talent Officer of Morgan Stanley from 2006 to 2008. In these roles she served on both the Management Committee and Operating Committee of Morgan Stanley. Ms. Riefler joined Morgan Stanley in 1987 in the Capital Markets division and was appointed a Managing Director in 1998 while in the Research division. Ms. Riefler holds a Bachelor of Arts in economics from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS: CSX Corporation (March 2017 to present).

QUALIFICATIONS: Because Ms. Riefler has been associated with the Company since 2005 and has played an important role in influencing the Company’s strategic direction, the Board believes that herin-depth knowledgeinterests of the Company and its businesses gives her unique insightshareholders. The Board will also take into account the diversity of a candidate’s perspectives, background and other demographics. Our diversity objectives are also implemented and monitored through periodic reviews by the Governance Committee of the composition of the Board and its committees in light of the then-current challenges and needs of the Board, the Company and each committee, which result in determinations as to whether it may be appropriate to make changes after considering issues of judgment, diversity, age, skills, background and experience. The composition of our current Board demonstrates the Board’s commitment to diversity in a number of areas. Women represent 30% of our current director nominees. Our directors also have differing backgrounds, educations, professional experiences, skills, ages, national origins and viewpoints.

Tenure and Board Refreshment

Our Board has shown an ongoing commitment to Board refreshment and to having highly qualified, independent perspectives in the boardroom. Five of the Company’s long-term growthdirector nominees have been added to the Board since the beginning of 2017. The average tenure of the independent director nominees is currently 6.4 years. The average tenure is 7.2 years if Mr. Fernandez is included. Also, under our Corporate Governance Policies, directors should not stand for re-election following their 72nd birthday. Since 2019, two directors have retired following their 72nd birthday and two directors decided not to stand for re-election. These retirements and decisions have provided us with opportunities for Board refreshment.

Jacques
P. Perold
appointed
Marcus L.
Smith
appointed
Patrick
Tierney
retired
Rodolphe M.
Vallee
retired
Wendy E.
Lane
retired
Paula Volent
and Sandy
Rattray
appointed
Alice W.
Handy and
George

W. Siguler
retired
Benjamin
DuPont
retired
Rajat
Taneja
appointed
to Board
March 6,
2017
November 2,
2017
May 1,
2018
May 10,
2018
April 25,
2019
February 26,
2020
April 28,
2020
April 27,
2021
June 1,
2021

Director Re-nomination

The Governance Committee also assesses the performance of current directors in its evaluation of current directors for re-nomination to the Board or re-appointment to any Board committees.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT31

New Director Search Process

Our newest director, Rajat Taneja, was appointed to the Board in 2021. Mr. Taneja has extensive global technology, innovation and strategies.research and development experience. His deep knowledge around cybersecurity and risk oversight aligned with the objective of the Audit Committee, to which he was appointed. The knowledge that Ms. Riefler acquiredappointment of Mr. Taneja was the result of the rigorous search process outlined below.

Our Board is committed to diversity within its membership. The Governance Committee, as part of the Chief Talent Officersearch process for any new director, includes women and diverse talent in the pool of Morgan Stanley enables hercandidates and any search firm it engages is instructed to help the Company realize the full potentialidentify a diverse slate of its employeescandidates. The Board takes into account diversity of perspectives, background, and implement its internal growth strategies. In addition, the experience Ms. Riefler acquired as Global Head of Research at Morgan Stanley in valuing companies and evaluating financial statements continues to serve an important roleother characteristics, including diversity with respect to supporting the Boarddemographics such as gender, nationality, race, ethnicity, geography and the Company in the assessment of risk and organic and external growth strategies. Ms. Riefler’s experience with debt and equity capital markets and investor needs also enables her to provide perspective with respect to debt and equity financings, as well as capital allocation strategies.age.

18            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

LOGO1
DIRECTOR
RECRUITMENT
PROCESS

The Governance Committee, with the feedback of the full Board, identifies key skills that would best serve the future needs of the Board and the Company. Pursuant to the authority granted in its charter, the Governance Committee retains a professional search firm to assist in the process of identifying, evaluating and conducting due diligence on potential director candidates. The Governance Committee instructs the search firm to focus on candidates with relevant industry experience and to seek a diverse slate of candidates. Using a search firm provides additional assurance to the Governance Committee that it is conducting a comprehensive search and evaluating a broad and diverse pool of potential candidates. Additionally, the Governance Committee solicits input from members of management and the Board.

2
IDENTIFICATION
AND INTERVIEW OF
CANDIDATES

From the candidates provided by the third-party search firm as well as input from directors and management, the Governance Committee identifies a short list of high-potential candidates, and the search firm then conducts an initial assessment of these candidates’ skills, experience, background and availability to commit to Board service.

The Governance Committee Chair meets with a number of candidates. Certain candidates also meet with members of the Governance Committee, the Chairman and the Lead Director.

3
BOARD DECISION
AND NOMINATION

The Governance Committee presents qualified candidates to the Board. In reviewing the potential candidates, the Board takes into account the qualifications discussed in “Director Qualifications” of this Proxy Statement. Following discussion and confirmation of the independence of such candidates, the Board formally appoints candidates to the Board.
4
NEW DIRECTOR

 

George W. Siguler

Independent Director The Board appointed Rajat Taneja to the Board, effective June 1, 2021.

Age:71  Mr. Taneja’s Qualifications:

Director since:  Over 30 years of global technology, innovation and research and development experience.

2009  Leverages his experience to provide invaluable insight into the continuing transformation of MSCI’s data and technology capabilities.

  Prior public company board experience, including service on the Technology and Cybersecurity Committee and Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee.

BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Sigulerco-founded Siguler Guff & Company (“Siguler Guff”),Proxy Access

In response to shareholder engagement, we amended our Bylaws in 2020 to permit a private equity investment organization headquartered in New York with approximately $13 billionshareholder, or a group of assets under management. Priorup toco-founding Siguler Guff, Mr. Siguler was a Managing Director and head of PaineWebber’s Private Equity Group from 1991 to 1995. From 1983 to 1984, Mr. Siguler served in the Reagan Administration as the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Mr. Siguler was also a founder of the

Harvard Management Company, the investment subsidiary of Harvard University, and served as the Associate Treasurer of the University. Mr. Siguler holds a Bachelor of Arts from Amherst College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

QUALIFICATIONS: In light 20 shareholders, owning at least three percent of the Company’s objectiveoutstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to continue to grow its businessnominate and presenceinclude in emerging markets, the insight into investment related opportunities in emerging markets that Mr. Siguler brings toCompany’s annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting the greater of two directors or twenty percent of the total number of directors on the Board, from his private equity investment experience inprovided that such markets makes him an invaluable resource toshareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the Company. In addition to his distinguished record of successrequirements specified in the investment management industry, he has developed expertise in several valued areas including finance, strategic development and operations.Bylaws.


Table of Contents

32
LOGO

Marcus L. SmithMSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independent Director

Age:52

Director since:2017

BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Smith was most recently the Director of Equity (Canada) and a portfolio manager at MFS Investment Management (“MFS”) until his retirement in April 2017. As a portfolio manager, he was responsible for managing the MFS Institutional International Equity Portfolio and the International Concentrated Portfolio. He joined MFS in 1994 and held a variety of positions, including Director of Equity (Asia) from 2010 to 2012, based in Boston, Director of Asian Research from 2005 to 2009, based in Singapore, and Equity Analyst from 1995 to 2000, based in London. Mr. Smith currently also serves

as a trustee for certain Eaton Vance funds. Mr. Smith holds a bachelor of science degree from the University of Mount Union and an M.B.A. degree from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS: DCT Industrial Trust (October 2017 to August 2018).

QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Smith contributes his strong record of industry experience and leadership to the Board. He has over 20 years of experience and leadership in fundamental equity investing and international portfolio management which is an invaluable asset to the Company. His time in Asia and Europe also brings to the Board insights into the international financial markets that further strengthens the Company’s global position as a leader in equity investment.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            19


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

Structure of our Board and Governance Practices

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE        

Henry A. Fernandez has served as the Chairman of our Board since our IPO in November 2007 and CEO since 1998. Robert G. Ashe has been our Lead Director since April 2018. The key attributes and responsibilities of the Chairman and the Lead Director roles (which are set forth below) have evolved over time to make MSCI’s leadership both decisive and effective, and enable the Company to execute on its growth strategies.

Independent Board


 

CHAIRMAN AND CEO

LEAD DIRECTOR

•  Unparalleled historical knowledgeUnder the MSCI Corporate Governance Policies, the full Board affirmatively determines the independence of directors and depthreviews the financial and other relationships between the independent directors and MSCI as part of understandingits assessment of director independence. The Governance Committee also makes specific determinations as to the independence of each candidate when reviewing candidates’ qualifications for membership on the Board or a committee of the Company and its businesses

•  OverseesBoard. Director independence is also monitored by the Executive Committee in itsday-to-day management of the Company

•  Chairs Board meetings and annual shareholder meetings

•  Works with the Lead Director to set agendas for Board meetings (which the Lead Director approves)

•  Collaborates with thefull Board on the Company’s strategy and leads management in implementing that strategy

•  Meets frequently with clients and shareholders and communicates feedback to the Board and senior management

•  Manages the development of senior management and our businesses to succeed in a dynamic and competitive landscape

•  Strong and independent leadership style

•  Appointed annually by the Board’s independent directors

•  Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present and has the authority to call, and will lead independent director sessions

•  Approves other Board related materials (directors, acting through the Lead Director, may propose matters to be included on the agenda for a meeting)

•  Approves Board meeting agendas and the appropriate schedule of Board meetings to assure time is sufficient for discussion of all agenda items

•  Facilitates a strong, independent oversight function by leading executive sessions of independent directors at least after every quarterly Board meeting

•  Facilitates communication between the Chairman and independent directors

•  Leads Board and individual director evaluations

•  Leads the annual CEO evaluation

•  Meets directly with management andnon-management employees of the Company

•  Consults and directly communicates with shareholders and other key constituents, as appropriate

•  Collaborates with the Compensation Committee to oversee management succession planning efforts

an ongoing basis.      

We believe that it is in the best interests of MSCI and its shareholders to combine the roles of Chairman and CEO at this time because it provides the Company with continued unified leadership and direction. We believe Mr. Fernandez is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most knowledgeable about the Company’s products, services and industry, and is in a position to effectively identify strategic priorities, recommend appropriate agendas and lead the execution of our strategy. While the Company’s independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from

20            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

various perspectives and disciplines, Mr. Fernandez’s historical knowledge andin-depth understanding of the Company and its products and services enable him to identify areas of focus for the Board while effectively executing the Company’s strategy. We also believe that combining the role of Chairman and CEO facilitates the flow of information between management and the Board, provides clear accountability and promotes efficient decision making, all of which are essential to effective governance.

Additionally, our Board leadership structure is enhanced by the independent leadership provided by our Lead Director who provides effective independent oversight through his expansive list of enumerated duties.

While we believe that continuing to combine the roles of Chairman and CEO is the most effective leadership structure for our Board and the Company at this time, our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) and Corporate Governance Policies also permit a structure where the CEO would not serve contemporaneously as the Chairman of the Board should the separation of such roles be deemed appropriate and in the best interests of MSCI and its shareholders in the future.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE        

Our Corporate Governance Policies provide that the Board should have a significant majority of independent directors meeting the independence requirements of the NYSE. Our Board has determined that each of Messrs. Ashe, duPont, Edmunds, Perold, SigulerRattray, Smith, and Smith,Taneja and Mmes. Handy, Kinney, and Riefler and Ms. Lane (who is not standing for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting but will remain on the Board through that date)Volent is independent in accordance with the requirements of our Corporate Governance Policies, which follow the NYSE rules and guidelines. In making such determinations, there were no material transactions, relationships or arrangements not disclosed herein under “Other Matters—Certain Transactions” to be considered by the Board in determining whether theeach director was independent. Therefore, 109 of our 1110 current directors are independent. Only Mr. Fernandez is not independent because of his position as CEO of MSCI.

All members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance Committee and GovernanceStrategy Committee satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee meets the heightened independence standards of the NYSE required for audit committee and compensation committee members, respectively.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            21


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

BOARD AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR EVALUATIONS        Board Leadership

In addition toThe Governance Committee is responsible for the ongoing assessmentcontinuing review of the functioning of the Board, each year, our directors formally evaluate the effectivenessgovernance structure of the Board, and its committees through a self-assessment administered byfor recommending to the Board members and management. Directors respond to questions designed to elicit information that will be useful in improving Board and committee effectiveness. Such feedback is discussed during executive session and where appropriate, addressed with management.

LOGO

DIRECTOR EDUCATION        

All new directors participate in a director orientation program that includesin-person briefings by senior management representing the heads of the product lines and key functional areas, and topics include, among others: the Company’s strategic plans, capital structure, historical financial performance and key policiesthose structures and practices including compliancebest suited to MSCI and trading policies. New directors are also encouraged to attend allits stockholders. The Governance Committee meetings during their first year. Directors are encouraged and provided with opportunities to attend educational sessions on subjectsthe Board recognize that could assist them in discharging their duties. Pursuant to its Director Education Policy, the Company will reimburse directors for reasonable costs incurred from attending these sessions. In addition to external educational opportunities, directors participate in onsite educational sessions, including an annual review of leading corporate governance practices by corporate governance experts, briefing sessions on topics that present special risks and opportunities, updates on accounting topics, and product line reviews presented by the heads of each of our product segments.

22            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT        

different structures may be appropriate under different circumstances.

We believe that engaging with ourit is in the best interests of MSCI and its shareholders to combine the roles of Chairman and CEO at this time, alongside a robust and independent Lead Director. We believe Mr. Fernandez is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the best waydirector most knowledgeable about the Company’s products, services and industry, and is in a position to addresseffectively identify strategic priorities, recommend appropriate agendas and lead the issuesexecution of our strategy. We also believe that matter mostcombining the role of Chairman and CEO facilitates the flow of information between management and the Board, provides clear accountability and promotes efficient decision making, all of which are essential to them. Dialogueeffective governance.

A strong, independent Lead Director with clearly defined duties and responsibilities further enhances the contributions of MSCI’s independent directors, which have been and continue to be substantial. Robert G. Ashe has been our shareholders helps us understand their perspectives on the CompanyLead Director since April 2018. As Lead Director, Mr. Ashe has significant authority and its goals and expectations for performance and identify issues that might affect our long-term strategy, corporate governance and compensation practices. As such, we provide our shareholders with many opportunitiesresponsibilities to provide for an effective and independent Board. At the same time, the Company’s other independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from various perspectives and disciplines.

The Board strongly believes that its leadership structure strikes the right balance of allowing our Chairman and CEO to promote a clear, unified vision for the Company’s strategy, providing the leadership critical for effectively and efficiently implementing the actions needed to ensure strong performance over the long term, while ensuring robust, independent oversight by the Board and the Lead Director. The key attributes and responsibilities of the Chairman and the Lead Director roles (which are set forth below) have evolved over time to make MSCI’s leadership both decisive and effective, and to enable the Company to execute on its growth strategies.

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT33
CHAIRMAN AND CEOLEAD DIRECTOR

●  Unparalleled historical knowledge and depth of understanding of the Company and its businesses

●  Oversees the Executive Committee (which includes all of our executive officers) in its day-to-day management of the Company

●  Chairs Board meetings and annual shareholder meeting

●  Works with the Lead Director to set agendas for Board meetings (which the Lead Director approves)

●  Collaborates with the Board on the Company’s strategy and leads management in implementing that strategy

●  Meets frequently with clients and shareholders and communicates feedback to the Board and senior management

●  Manages the development of senior management and our businesses to succeed in a dynamic and competitive landscape

●  Strong and independent leadership style

●  Appointed annually by the Board’s independent directors

●  Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present and has the authority to call independent director sessions

●  Approves other Board related materials (directors, acting through the Lead Director, may propose matters to be included on the agenda for a meeting)

●  Approves Board meeting agendas and schedules to assure sufficient time for discussion of all items

●  Facilitates a strong, independent oversight function by leading executive sessions of independent directors at least after every quarterly Board meeting

●  Facilitates communication between the Chairman and independent directors

●  Leads Board and individual director evaluations

●  Meets directly with management other than the CEO and President & COO

●  Consults and directly communicates with shareholders and other key constituents, as appropriate

●  Collaborates with the Compensation Committee to oversee management succession planning efforts

While we believe that continuing to combine the roles of Chairman and CEO is the most effective leadership structure for our Board and senior management, including by inviting certain shareholders to address the BoardCompany at this time, our Bylaws and present their views onCorporate Governance Policies also permit a structure where the Company. We also engage with shareholders before, during and afterCEO would not serve contemporaneously as the proxy season to present new governance practices or design features in our executive compensation program and receive feedback.

In 2018 and early 2019, we held over 200 meetings with our shareholders, and in February 2019, hosted our first Investor Day in four years to provide existing and prospective shareholders with a deeper understanding of our key strategic initiatives, highlight the achievement of our financial performance over the last several years and provide an update to our long-term financial outlook.

During these shareholder engagements, we typically discuss topics such as market trends affecting our industry, the competitive environment, our go-to-market strategy, financial performance and our overall outlook for the Company.

Below are the highlights from our engagement efforts:

Participation by our CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), other members of senior management and/or our Head of Investor Relations at 10 investor conferences and participation in seven non-deal related shareholder roadshows.

Outreach to over 100 shareholders representing over 49% of our outstanding shares as of February 27, 2019, including direct calls and in-person meetings.

Attendance by 40 shareholders (representing a total of 28% of our outstanding shares as of February 27, 2019) at our 2019 Investor Day where shareholders had the opportunity to hear senior management discuss important aspects of our business, financial performance and long-term strategy.

Additionally, in response to shareholder interest in ESG practices, we enhanced the disclosures on our Corporate Responsibility webpage to provide additional information on the framework within which MSCI manages its ESG practices and initiatives, career development practices, employee management programs, compliance policies, and environmental and sustainability practices. Multiple corporate ESG objectives were also incorporated into our CEO’s key performance indicators for 2019.

Our directors and management recognize the benefits that come from providing our shareholders with visibility and transparency into our business, as well as knowing our shareholders’ positions on issues that are important to them. We are committed to continuing to maintain an active dialogue with our shareholders. Please see pages 8 and 51 of this Proxy Statement for additional information on our shareholder engagement efforts specific to compensation matters.

ATTENDANCE AT BOARD MEETINGS AND ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS        

Our Board met nine times, held independent director executive sessions following eight of those meetings and took action by unanimous written consent on one occasion during 2018. Each director attended at least 75% of the total meetingsChairman of the Board should the separation of such roles be deemed appropriate and Committees on whichin the director served that were held whilebest interests of MSCI and its shareholders in the director was a member.

future.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            23


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

Discussions betweenCommittees of the Board and management on strategic direction, new business opportunities and the scope and mix of the Company’s products were held at each quarterly Board meeting. In addition to formal meetings, members of our Board informally interact with senior management on a periodic basis.

Our Corporate Governance Policies state that directors are expected to attend the annual meetings of shareholders. In 2018, all of our directors who were on the Board at the time attended our annual meeting of shareholders.

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS        Directors

Our Board has adopted a written charter for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance Committee and Strategy Committee setting forth the roles and responsibilities of each committee. The Board and each committee may, from time-to-time, form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate. Each committee annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for approval. ToYou may access these charters click on the “Corporate Governance” link found on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http:https://ir.msci.com)ir.msci.com). Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.

The table below provides detail on the composition of each of our designated standing committees for (1) the period beginning onas of March 21, 2017 and ending on April 29, 2018 and (2) the current committee composition which became effective on April 30, 2018.16, 2022.

    
   AUDIT
COMMITTEE
  COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
  NOMINATING
COMMITTEE
  STRATEGY
COMMITTEE
    
        

NAME OF DIRECTOR

  2017  2018  2017  2018  2017  2018  2017  2018
        
        

Henry A. Fernandez

              🌑  🌑
        
        

Robert G. Ashe

  🌑  🌑          Chair  Chair
        
        

Benjamin F. DuPont(1)

      Chair      🌑    
        
        

Wayne Edmunds

  🌑  Chair    🌑      🌑  
        
        

Alice W. Handy

    🌑      🌑      
        
        

Catherine R. Kinney

          Chair      🌑
        
        

Wendy E. Lane(2)

      🌑  🌑        
        
        

Jacques P. Perold

            Chair  🌑  🌑
        
        

Linda H. Riefler

      🌑  Chair    🌑  🌑  
        
        

George W. Siguler

          🌑  🌑    
        
        

Marcus L. Smith(3)

  🌑  🌑            🌑
        

(1) Mr. DuPont has been appointed to the Compensation Committee and will begin to serve on it effective April 25, 2019.

(2) Ms. Lane is not standing for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting but will remain on the Board through that date.

(3) Mr. Smith was appointed to the Board, effective November 2, 2017. He was appointed to the Audit Committee, effective January 30, 2018.

24            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Name of DirectorAudit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Governance
Committee
Strategy
Committee

Henry A. Fernandez(1)
  
Robert G. Ashe
Wayne Edmunds
Catherine R. Kinney
Jacques P. Perold
Sandy C. Rattray
Linda H. Riefler
Marcus L. Smith
Rajat Taneja(2)
Paula Volent
(1)Mr. Fernandez is not a formal member of any committee, but he attends most meetings for each committee.Chair
(2)Mr. Taneja was appointed to the Board and to the Audit Committee on June 1, 2021.Member

Table of Contents

34MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE

AUDIT COMMITTEEMEMBERS:

Members:

Wayne Edmunds (Chair)


Robert G. Ashe

Alice W. Handy

Marcus L. Smith


Sandy C. Rattray
Linda H. Riefler
Rajat Taneja

Meetings Held in 2018:6MEETINGS HELDIN 2021: 9

  All current members are independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors and audit committee members.

  All current members satisfy NYSE financial literacy requirements, each of Messrs. Ashe, Edmunds and Rattray and Ms. Riefler have accounting or other relevantrelated financial management expertise, and Messrs. Ashe and Edmunds have been designated as “audit committee financial experts”experts,” as defined by SEC rules.

 

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:

Primary Responsibilities:

  Oversees the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting and risk assessment and risk management (including major financial risk exposures and cybersecurity risks).

  Appoints and determines the compensation of the independent auditor.

  Evaluates the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent auditor, including obtaining a report of the independent auditor describing the items set forth in the Audit and Risk Committee’s charter, including those required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

  Pre-approves audit and permittednon-audit services.

  Reviews and evaluates the audit plan, performance, responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Company’s internal audit function.

  Reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditor the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q, respectively.

  Establishes procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by the Company’s employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters, and the review of any submissions received pursuant to such procedures.

  Reviews reports from management relating to the status of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

  Reviews with management (i) the Company’s key business risks, including the Company’s major regulatory, litigation and financial risk exposures and technology and cybersecurity risks, (ii) policies and practices with respect to risk governance, risk assessment and risk management, and (iii) the steps that have been taken to assess, monitor and control such risks.

  Reviews the Company’s enterprise risk management program, including its risk governance framework and risk management practices that facilitate the identification, assessment, mitigation and public reporting of risks that may affect the Company.

KEY AREAS OF FOCUS IN 2021:

  Climate risk considerations in light of increasing interest by stakeholders.

  Risks associated with IT and cybersecurity.

  Risk management and governance of data and research used in our ESG and Climate business.

The Audit Committee changed its name in 2021 to the Audit and Risk Committee to provide greater alignment with the full duties and responsibilities outlined in the Audit and Risk Committee’s Charter and reflect the broad scope of its oversight responsibilities.

Further details on the role of the Audit and Risk Committee, as well as the Audit and Risk Committee Report, may be found in “Audit Matters—Audit and Risk Committee Report” on page 8797 of this Proxy Statement.

Effective June 1, 2021, Rajat Taneja began serving on the Audit and Risk Committee. Mr. Taneja is independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for audit committee members and satisfies the NYSE financial literacy requirements.


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            25


2022 PROXY STATEMENT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

35

COMPENSATION, TALENT AND CULTURE COMMITTEE

COMPENSATION & TALENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEEMEMBERS:

Members:

Linda H. Riefler (Chair)


Wayne Edmunds

Wendy E. Lane


Marcus L. Smith

Meetings Held in 2018:MEETINGS HELD IN 2021: 8

  All members are independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors and compensation committee members.

  All members qualify as“non-employee “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act and satisfy the requirements of “outside directors” pursuant to §162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (“IRC”).Act.

 

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:

Primary Responsibilities:

  Reviews the Company’s compensation strategy and reviews and approves the Company’s compensation and benefits policies generally, including reviewing and approving any incentive compensation and equity-based plans of the Company that are subject to Board approval and the Company’s stock ownership guidelines for Executive Committee members.

  Identifies, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives to be used in ourthe Company’s compensation programs, sets compensation for the Company’s Executive Committee members, including its executive officers and such other members of senior management as the principal accounting officerCommittee determines (the “Executives”), and evaluates each Executive’s performance, each in light of such goals and objectives.

  Reviews and approves the compensation of ourthe Company’s CEO and each of the Company’s other Executives, including: base salary; annual and long-term incentive compensation; employment, severance and change in control agreements; and any other compensation, ongoing perquisites or special benefit items.

•  ●  Reviews non-employee director compensation every two years and recommends changes to the Board, when appropriate.

  Periodically reviews, in consultation with the CEO, the Company’s management succession planning and oversees the Company’s talent management, process,progression planning, career progression and retention strategies and programs, including the Company’s learning and development and diversityDE&I programs.

  At least annually, reviews the Company’s DE&I programs including their key performance metrics.

  Periodically reviews the Company’s initiatives and inclusion programs.strategies relating to corporate culture, including considering the Company’s performance and pay-for-performance alignment when reviewing the workplace environment and culture and periodic reviews of the results of the Company’s employee engagement and external surveys.

  Reviews and discusses with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the Company’s annual proxy statement, prepares the Compensation, & Talent Managementand Culture Committee Report required by SEC rules and recommends to the Board the inclusion of each in the Company’s annual proxy statement (included on pages 4157 and 7386 of this Proxy Statement, respectively).

  Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the frequency with which the Company will conduct “Say on Pay” votes, taking into account the results of the most recent shareholder advisory vote on frequency of “Say on Pay” votes, if any, and reviews and approves the proposals regarding the “Say on Pay” vote and the frequency of the “Say on Pay” vote to be included in the Company’s proxy statement.

  Considers the independence requirements of the NYSE prior to selecting a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor and evaluates the performance of such advisors and approves all related fees.

  At least annually, reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s Global Human Rights Policy, including any related disclosures, and recommends any proposed changes to the Board, if required.

KEY AREAS OF FOCUS IN 2021:

  In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, received ongoing reports from management around employee well-being, remote work resources and the transition to the Future of Work, our new way of working that provides greater flexibility for a vast majority of our employees.

  Focused on enhancing DE&I initiatives.

  Advised management on linking target annual cash incentives to achievement of individual DE&I goals.

  Focused on MSCI’s organizational design and development to align with an enhanced focus on complete client-centricity.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation: None.

The Compensation and Talent Management Committee changed its name in 2021 to the Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee to provide more clarity and transparency on the committee’s oversight of talent management and corporate culture and reflect the broad scope of its oversight responsibilities.

Ms. Lane is not standing for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting but will remain on the Board through that date. Effective April 25, 2019, Benjamin F. duPont will also serveceased serving on the Compensation Committee. He qualifies as a“non-employee” director for purposes of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act and satisfies the requirements of “outside directors” pursuant to §162(m) of the IRC. Mr. duPont has also confirmedCommittee in connection with his appointment that there exists no Compensation Committee interlocks or insider participation.retirement from the Board, effective April 27, 2021.


Table of Contents

26            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


36

MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEEMEMBERS:

Members:

Jacques P. Perold (Chair)

Benjamin F. duPont

Linda H. Riefler

George W. Siguler


Catherine R. Kinney
Paula Volent

Meetings Held in 2018:4MEETINGS HELDIN 2021: 5

  All members are independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors.

 

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:

Primary Responsibilities:

  Annually reviews the size and composition of the Board and its committees in light of the current challenges and needs of the Board, the Company and each committee and considers the skills, background and experience of each director in doing so.

  Oversees searches for candidates for election to the Board and recommends criteria and individuals for appointment to the Board and its committees. As part of the search process for each new director, focuses on identifying women and other diverse talent in the pool of candidates.

  Retains and terminates any search firm assistingthat assists the Governance Committee in identifying director candidates and maintains sole authority to approve all such search firms’ fees and other retention terms.

  Makes recommendations to the Board as to determinations of director independence.

  Oversees and approves the process and guidelines for the annual evaluation of performance and effectiveness of the Lead Director, the Board and its Committeescommittees, and individual directors.

  Oversees the Company’s ESGpolicies and initiatives related to corporate responsibility matters, including environmental stewardship (such as related to climate change) and other sustainability matters. Reviews with Company’s management, including the Chief Responsibility Officer, the Company’s related practices, disclosures, ratings from various providers and risks.

  Evaluates the Company’s shareholder engagement practices and considers feedback received from shareholders.

  At least annually, reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and oversees compliance therewith. Reviews with Company’s management, including the Head of Compliance, the Company’s Compliance program, priorities, initiatives, risks and mitigations.

•  Reviews  At least annually, reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s Related Person Transactions Policy and reviews all related person transactions pursuant to determine whether such transactions are appropriatethe Related Person Transactions Policy.

  At least annually, reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s Corporate Political Activities Policy, including any related disclosures, and recommends any proposed changes to the Board, if required.

KEY AREAS OF FOCUS IN 2021:

  On an ongoing basis, reviewed Board composition and Board skills needed, with a focus on enhancing diversity in ongoing director searches and led the director search process resulting in the appointment of one new director in 2021.

  Focused on policies and initiatives related to the Company’s carbon commitments, including the goal of net-zero emissions before 2040.

  Drove enhancements to the Board education program by increasing informal remote- learning sessions for deep-dives on certain areas of the CompanyCompany’s business, including on ESG and climate.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee changed its name in 2021 to undertake.

the Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee to provide more clarity and transparency on the committee’s oversight of corporate responsibility, ESG and climate and other sustainability matters and to reflect the broad scope of its oversight responsibilities.

Mr. duPont ceased serving on the Governance Committee in connection with his retirement from the Board, effective April 27, 2021.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT
STRATEGY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE37

STRATEGY AND FINANCE COMMITTEE

MEMBERS:

Members:

Robert G. Ashe (Chair)

Henry A. Fernandez

Catherine R. Kinney

Jacques P. Perold

Sandy C. Rattray
Marcus L. Smith


Paula Volent

Meetings Held in 2018:9MEETINGS HELDIN 2021: 10

  All members except Mr. Fernandez, are independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors.

 

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:

Primary Responsibilities:

•  Reviews  Evaluates management’s recommendations with respect to the strategic direction of the Company and regularly consults with the Board on the objectives of the Company’s strategic plans and management’s implementation of such plans.

  Reviews and makes recommendations with respect to the agenda for any Board strategy meetings with management, taking into account issues important to the full Board.

  Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to any mergers, combinations, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, minority investments and other strategic investments, and any financings for mergers, acquisitions and other significant financial transactions, in each case requiring the Board’s approval.

  Reviews and oversees management’s plans and objectives for the capitalization of the Company, including target leverage levels and the structure and amount of debt and equity required to meet the Company’s financing needs.

  Oversees the Company’s share repurchase programs, subject to Board-approved policies.

  Reviews and recommends for approval by the Board changes to the Company’s dividend policy.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            27


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

BOARD ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT        

The Board’s role in risk oversight is consistent with the Company’s leadership structure, with management havingday-to-day responsibility for identifying, evaluating and managing the Company’s risk exposure and the Board having the ultimate responsibility for overseeing risk management with a focus on the Company’s most significant risks. The Board is assisted in meeting this responsibility by its Committees as described below.

Board of Directors

  Oversees Major Risks  

•  Regularly reviews the strategic plans of the Company and each of its operating segments.

•  Reviews specific risk topics, including risks associated with our capital structure, growth plans and client relationships.

•  Receives quarterly written reports on enterprise-level risks, including cybersecurity risks.

•  Receives regular reports from each of the Board’s Committees on their areas of risk oversight.

•  At least annually reviews the Company’s succession plan to ensure the Company maintains an appropriate succession plan for its senior management.

Audit

Committee

•  Reviews internal controls and the Company’s financial statements with the CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and the external and internal auditors.

•  Oversees risks relating to key accounting and reporting policies.

•  Receives quarterly reports from the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management Officer.

•  Reviews with management risks associated with cybersecurity (see below).

•  Meets quarterly with the Head of Internal Audit and the Company’s external independent auditors in executive session.

Compensation & TalentKEY AREAS OF FOCUS IN 2021:

Management Committee

•  Oversees risks associated with our compensation policies and practices  Advised management on its capital allocation program, including with respect to both executive compensationits approach to share repurchases, refinancing the Company’s debt and compensation generally.increasing the Company’s quarterly dividend.

•  Employs an independent compensation consultant to assist in designing  Focused on the competitive landscape and reviewing compensation programs,advised management on merger, partnership and acquisition opportunities, with a focus on the private asset segment, including the potential risks created by the programs.

•  Oversees the Company’s executive management succession planning program.

•  Oversees the process for conducting the annual risk assessmentacquisition of the Company’s compensation policies and practices, including retaining, from time to time, third party consultants to assess risk. See “Compensation Matters—Compensation Risk Assessment” below.

Nominating and CorporateReal Capital Analytics.

Governance Committee

•  Oversees risks relating  Collaborated with management on the agenda for the Board’s two-day strategy session to the Company’s governance structure and other corporate governance matters and processes.

•  Evaluates related person transactions and any risks associated therewith.

•  Oversees complianceensure alignment with key corporate governance policies, including the Corporate Governance Policies.

•  Oversees risks related to compliance matters by reviewing with the Head of Compliance on at least an annual basis updates to the Company’s compliance policies and program, compliance statistics and investigations, trainings, certifications and relevant legal developments.

•  Oversees risks related to the Company’s ESG practices.

Strategy and

Finance Committee

•  Oversees risks relating to the Company’s strategic plan and regularly reports to the Board with respect thereto.

•  Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to certain transactions, including mergers and other strategicinternal investments and the financing of such transactions, as delegated by the Board.

•  Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s capital structure, including target leverage levels and the structure and amount of debt and equity required to meet the Company’s operating needs.

growth opportunities.


Table of Contents

38

ManagementMSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company’s Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee (“EROC”) is comprised of the President, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel, the Chief Human Resources Officer, the Chief Technology Officer and the Enterprise Risk Management Officer. The EROC oversees the Company’s risk management activities to ensure that the Company is identifying, evaluating and managing risks that may have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to achieve its operational and strategic objectives. The EROC reports to the Audit Committee.

Engagement and Evaluation of our Board

28            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENTAttendance at Board Meetings and Annual Meeting of Shareholders

      EACH DIRECTOR ATTENDED AT LEAST
10 10 4 75%

BOARD MEETINGS

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH FOLLOWED THE BOARD MEETINGS

 
 

OCCASIONS WHERE THE BOARD TOOK ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT

 
 

OF THE TOTAL BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS ON WHICH THE DIRECTOR SERVED THAT WERE HELD WHILE THE DIRECTOR WAS A MEMBER

 


        CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Cybersecurity

On a quarterly basis, the Audit Committee is updatedOur Board met ten times, held independent director executive sessions following all ten of those meetings and took action by unanimous written consent on the Company’s information security program and its related priorities and controls. As part of this update, the Audit Committee is provided with a written report on such topics that is also made available to the full Board. The Chairfour occasions during 2021. Each director attended at least 75% of the Audit Committee informs the Board of any key updates during his quarterly reports to the Board.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS        

The Governance Committee’s charter requires it to review candidates’ qualifications for membership on the Board or a committee of the Board, including making a specific determination as to the independence of each candidate, based on the criteria approved by the Board (and taking into account the enhanced independence, financial literacy and financial expertise standards that may be required under applicable law or NYSE rules for audit committee membership purposes, and heightened independence standards that may be required under law for compensation committee membership purposes). If the Governance Committee determines that adding a new director is advisable, it will recommend such individual to the Board for appointment as a membertotal meetings of the Board and any Committees.committees on which the director served that were held while the director was a member.

ConsistentDiscussions between the Board and management on strategic direction, new business opportunities and the scope and mix of the Company’s products were held at each quarterly Board meeting. In addition to formal meetings, members of our Board informally interact with oursenior management on a periodic basis and participate in informal director education sessions.

Our Corporate Governance Policies when appointingstate that directors are expected to attend the annual meetings of shareholders. In 2021, all of our directors who were on the Board takes into account the diversity of a candidate’s perspectives, background, and other demographics. Our diversity objectives are also implemented and monitored through periodic reviews by the Governance Committee of the composition of the Board and its Committees in light of the then-current challenges and needs of the Board, the Company and each Committee, which result in determinations as to whether it may be appropriate to make changes after considering issues of judgment, diversity, age, skills, background and experience. The composition of our current Board demonstrates the Board’s commitment to diversity in a number of areas. Women represent approximately 30% of our current director nominees. Our directors also have differing backgrounds, educations, professional experiences, skills, ages, national origins and viewpoints. See “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors.”

Pursuant to the authority granted in its charter, the Governance Committee retains professional search firms to assist in the process of identifying, evaluating and conducting due diligence on potential director candidates. Using a search firm provides additional assurance to the Governance Committee that it is conducting a broad search and looking at a diverse pool of potential candidates.

TENURE AND BOARD REFRESHMENT        

Our Board has shown an ongoing commitment to Board refreshment and to having highly qualified, independent perspectives in the boardroom. Three of the Company’s director nominees have been added to the Board since the beginning of 2015. The average tenure of the director nominees is currently 7.56 years. Also, under our Corporate Governance Policies, directors should not stand forre-election following their 72nd birthday.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            29


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

DIVERSITY INITIATIVES        

The Compensation Committee is regularly updated on diversity and talent management at the Company. In 2018, the Company celebrated diversity through various events and initiatives around the world, including:time attended our annual meeting of shareholders.

The EDC led by Laurent Seyer, our Chief Operating Officer, was launched.

Our CEO, President, Chief Operating Officer and other Executive Committee members, hosted an inaugural annual Diversity and Inclusion Summit which was attended by high performing women at the Company with leadership capabilities, as well as members of the EDC.

In 2018, the WLF held 85 events around the world. Outside speakers, panel and/or book discussions, networking events, client engagement and philanthropic initiatives were a part of the events.

MSCI Pride, an employee resource group for LGBTQ employees, allies and supporters hosted 28 events, including 17 events to celebrate Pride Month.

Effective January 1, 2018, MSCI enhanced our maternity and paternity leave policies to provide the same leave time for all offices around the world, subject to local requirements.

Additional information on our diversity initiatives can be found on our website atwww.msci.com/corporate-responsibility. Information contained on the website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.Independent Director Meetings

SUCCESSION PLANNING        

One of the Board’s primary responsibilities is to oversee the development and retention of executive talent and to ensure an appropriate succession plan is in place for our CEO and other members of senior management. The Compensation Committee oversees the process for succession planning for senior management positions from a talent management perspective. This includes ongoing reviews of our leadership bench and succession plans globally, with a focus on developing and retaining top talent at the senior management level, including the CEO. Additionally, high potential leaders are given exposure to Board members through formal presentations at Board or Committee meetings,one-on-one meetings with individual directors and participation in other Board activities.

During 2018, the Board and the Compensation Committee met on several occasions, including from time to time with outside consultants, in furtherance of its succession planning and executive development initiatives, which are considered in the context of our strategic goals. In addition to an annual review of the CEO led by the Lead Director, the Compensation Committee holds a formal succession planning and talent review session annually, which includes succession planning for all senior management positions, including the CEO. All members of the Board are invited to attend this meeting and provide their input on the pipeline of qualified talent for critical roles. These talent review and succession planning discussions take into account desired leadership skills and experience in light of our current business and long-term strategy. For example, the Company is increasingly focused on technology, client services and the Asia Pacific (“APAC”) region as part of its long-term strategic plan. In furtherance of its strategy, in 2018, the Company appointed Jigar Thakkar to serve as the Chief Technology Officer and Head of Engineering, Russell Read to serve as Global Head of Client Solutions and Jack Lin to serve as Head of APAC Client Coverage. Each of them was also appointed to the Executive Committee.

30            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

An important part of cultivating talent at MSCI is ensuring that employees remain engaged. As such, the Compensation Committee is provided with updates on employee engagement. In 2018, the Company saw improved engagement of employees across the Company based on the Company’s annual employee engagement survey.

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR MEETINGS        

Our Corporate Governance Policies provide that our Lead Director will preside overnon-employee director sessions. The Lead Director presided over eight (8)ten independent director sessions during 2018.2021. The Board’s standing committees also have a practice of holding executive sessions after their quarterly meetings. Our Corporate Governance Policies further provide that if anynon-employee directors are not independent, then the independent directors will meet at least once a year in an independent director session and the Lead Director will preside over each such independent director sessions.session. During 2018,2021, allnon-employee directors were independent.

Director Education and Orientation Program

Directors are encouraged and provided with opportunities to attend educational sessions on subjects that can assist them in performing their duties. Pursuant to the Director Education Policy, the Company will reimburse directors for reasonable costs incurred from attending these sessions. In addition to external educational opportunities, directors participate in educational sessions, including product line reviews presented by the heads of our product lines. Directors also participate in an annual review of leading corporate governance practices by corporate governance experts, briefing sessions on topics that present special risks and opportunities and updates on accounting topics. The Company is also part of a peer-engaged program designed to enhance director performance, and we leverage virtual platforms to provide deep dive sessions on certain aspects of MSCI’s business outside of quarterly meetings. In 2021, the Board held virtual learning sessions on, among other things, climate change science, climate investments, net-zero commitments, our go-to-market strategy and our data and technology strategy. In 2022 and following a return to in-person meetings, these virtual sessions are expected to continue and will be used to further educate the Board on, among other things, climate-related risks and opportunities and DE&I initiatives.

All new directors participate in a director orientation program that includes briefings by senior management representing the heads of product lines and key functional areas on topics that include, among others, the Company’s strategic plans, capital structure, product overviews, historical financial performance and key policies and practices, including compliance and trading policies. New directors are also encouraged to attend all committee meetings during their first year on the Board. In 2021, Mr. Taneja joined the Board while the Company was still in a remote working environment. His director orientation program was conducted virtually, which allowed for more streamlined sessions with increased global participation by senior management.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT39

Board and Individual Director Evaluations

In addition to the ongoing assessment of the functioning of the Board, each year, our directors formally evaluate the effectiveness of the Board and its committees through a self-assessment administered by our directors and management. Directors respond to questions designed to elicit information that will be useful in improving Board and committee effectiveness. Such feedback is discussed during executive session and, where appropriate, addressed with management. The process for this annual feedback is set forth below.

1

INITIATION OFPROCESS

The members of the Governance Committee provide their thoughts on the factors to be used in evaluating the Board, its committees and individual directors. The Corporate Secretary prepares a director self-assessment questionnaire based on these factors. In 2021, MSCI’s Chief Diversity Officer also reviewed and provided updates to the questionnaire to ensure that it properly reflected the importance of DE&I considerations. The Governance Committee also oversees and approves the process and guidelines for the annual evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of the Lead Director.

2

EVALUATION

Each director then completes an anonymous self-assessment questionnaire covering a range of topics, including structure, culture, and roles of the Board and its committees. The Lead Director also conducts individual director evaluations through interviews with each director on an annual basis.

3

DISCUSSION

The Corporate Secretary compiles the quantitative and qualitative data from the questionnaires and consults with the Lead Director and the Chair of the Governance Committee on the results. The Lead Director and Chair of the Governance Committee review the results with the full Board in executive session.

4

FOLLOW-UP

The Lead Director and Chair of the Governance Committee then discuss with the management the feedback provided by the Board and any enhancements in practices that may be warranted.

5

FEEDBACK
AND RECENT INITIATIVES

ENHANCED REVIEW OF STRATEGIC GOALS:

●  Periodic review with Board on strategic initiatives

●  Board and committee agendas increasingly focus on “forward-looking” topics

INCREASED FOCUS ON ESG AND CLIMATE:

●  Governance Committee assigned responsibility for ESG and climate oversight

●  Chief Responsibility Officer provides quarterly reports to the Governance Committee

●  DE&I goals required for all Managing Directors, and tied to individual compensation

●  For Executive Committee members, climate commitment goals added to KPI goals

ENHANCED DIRECTOR EDUCATIONPROGRAM:

●  Joined peer-engaged program designed to enhance director performance

●  Leveraged virtual platforms to provide deep- dive sessions on certain aspects of MSCI’s business outside of quarterly meetings, including climate

SUCCESSION PLANNING ANDTALENT MANAGEMENT:

●  President & COO meets quarterly in executive session with independent directors

●  Potential successors to senior management invited to speak at Board meetings for additional exposure

●  Succession planning at levels beyond the Executive Committee; accelerated development of current internal candidates at all levels


Table of Contents

40MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board may also periodically engage a third-party evaluation firm as part of this process. In 2019, a third-party evaluation firm met with certain members of senior management and members of the Board. The feedback from the third-party evaluation firm was considered by the Board and, where appropriate, the Board recommended enhancements to its practices based on such feedback.

Shareholder Engagement

By the Numbers: Shareholder Engagement in 2021
WE HELD OVER 300 MEETINGS with our shareholders, prospective shareholders and sell-side analysts, during which we MET WITH SHAREHOLDERS REPRESENTING ~58% OF OUR SHARES OUTSTANDING, with participation at certain meetings by our CEO, President & COO, CFO, Head of Investor Relations, Chief Responsibility Officer and other members of senior management10 INVESTOR CONFERENCES AND 8 NON-DEAL ROADSHOWS AND ANALYST SPONSORED EVENTS to discuss topics including long-term growth opportunities, strategic execution, financial performance, capital allocation and corporate responsibility
SUCCESSFUL INVESTOR DAY which highlighted the achievement of our financial performance over the last several years, as well as provided a deeper understanding of our key strategic initiatives and an update on our long-term financial outlookREWARDING CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY ROADSHOW where we met with our top shareholders representing more than 40% of our outstanding shares to discuss our corporate responsibility practices

We believe that engaging with our shareholders, prospective shareholders and sell-side analysts is the best way to address the issues that matter most to them. Dialogue with these constituencies helps us understand their perspectives on the Company’s goals and expectations for performance, as well as identify issues that might affect our long-term strategy, corporate governance and compensation practices. As such, we offer several opportunities to provide feedback to our Board and senior management, including inviting certain shareholders to address the Board to present their views on the Company.

Our Investor Relations team leads year-round outreach efforts with our investors and the investment community. During these engagements, we typically discuss topics such as market trends affecting our industry, the competitive environment, our go-to-market strategy, our financial performance and our overall outlook for the Company. In February 2021, we hosted an Investor Day to reiterate our growth opportunities and share management’s strategy for taking advantage of those opportunities.

We also engage with shareholders before, during and after the proxy season, including by hosting a Corporate Responsibility Roadshow each winter, to review and receive feedback on the Company’s governance practices, our corporate responsibility efforts and human capital management strategies and the design of our executive compensation program. The feedback we receive from these discussions, as well as from third-party rating agencies, is carefully considered by the Board, the Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.

During the Corporate Responsibility Roadshow that we hosted in the winter of 2021, our shareholders focused the discussions on, among other things, the following: (i) our corporate responsibility practices and disclosures in light of being a leader in ESG ratings and data and our path to Net-Zero and climate initiatives, (ii) human capital management, including the importance of efforts around DE&I, (iii) talent management and executive and director succession planning and (iv) Board oversight and governance, including over our corporate responsibility efforts. These meetings often included a member of our Governance Committee as well as our Head of Investor Relations, Chief Responsibility Officer, Head of Corporate Responsibility, Chief Diversity Officer, Corporate Secretary, Head of Employer Brand and Talent Pipelines and Global Head of Compensation and Benefits.

Additional information on our recent actions in response to investor feedback can be found under Corporate Responsibility on page 12 and beginning on page 45 of this Proxy Statement. Please see page 66 of this Proxy Statement for additional information on our engagement efforts specific to compensation matters.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT41

Oversight by our Board

Risk Assessment Responsibilities and Processes

Our Board discusses and receives regular updates on a wide variety of matters affecting our firm. Our Board is responsible for, and committed to, the oversight of the business and affairs of our firm. In carrying out this responsibility, the Board’s role in risk oversight is consistent with the Company’s leadership structure, with management having day-to-day responsibility for identifying, evaluating and managing the Company’s risk exposure and the Board having the ultimate responsibility for overseeing risk management governance, with a focus on the Company’s most significant risks. In this role, the Board is responsible for ensuring that the risk-management processes designed and implemented by management are functioning as intended and that necessary steps are taken to assess, monitor and control key business risks.

In order to maintain effective Board oversight across the entire firm, the Board delegates to individual committees certain elements of its oversight function, as described in the example below. The Board then receives regular updates from its committees on individual categories of risk, including strategy, reputation, operations, climate change, corporate responsibility, people, technology and regulatory. Our Board’s focus on overseeing risk management also enhances our directors’ ability to provide insight and feedback to senior management.

The Board is assisted in meeting its risk oversight responsibilities by its committees as described below. The below illustration uses climate-related risks as an example of our risk oversight responsibilities and processes.


Table of Contents

42MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Oversight: The Climate Example

Board of Directors

Oversees Major Risks

On an ongoing basis, receives quarterly written reports on enterprise-level risks, including climate-related risks.

Receives regular reports from each of the Board’s committees on their areas of risk oversight including, from time-to-time, climate-related risks.

 
Committees

AUDIT COMMITTEE

●  Receives quarterly updates from our Enterprise Risk Management Officer, which, in 2021, included a review of the governance and risks of ESG data integrity, as well as of opportunities related to reducing the Company's carbon footprint.

  Receives quarterly updates from our Chief Information Security Officer on our business continuity plans and IT disaster recovery efforts to mitigate the impact of potential disruptions, including those that could be caused by climate and extreme weather events.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

  Oversees the Company’s assessment of executive performance against goals, including ESG and climate related goals.

●  Oversees talent management, including talent acquisition and succession planning relating to leaders in our ESG and climate business.

STRATEGY COMMITTEE

●  Ensures that management factors material climate-related risks and opportunities into the Company’s strategy.

  Monitors and provides guidance on strategic objectives, including on sustainability-related mergers, partnerships and acquisition opportunities such as for those related to climate-related products and services.

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Oversees the Company’s corporate responsibility policies and initiatives, including ESG and climate initiatives.

Receives quarterly updates from the Chief Responsibility Officer. In 2021, these focused on MSCI’s net-zero commitment, climate-related initiatives and Corporate Responsibility Operating Plan.

  Members of the Governance Committee participate in the annual Corporate Responsibility Roadshow to hear and report back to the Board on shareholders’ priorities, including climate-related risks and opportunities.

●  Periodically reviews with management requests from shareholders and the investment community for climate-related disclosures.

 
Management

Our management team has day-to-day responsibility for identifying, assessing and managing ESG and climate-related risks and opportunities. The Company’s Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee oversees the Company’s key risk management activities to ensure that the Company is identifying, evaluating and managing risks that may have an impact on the Company’s ability to achieve its operational and strategic objectives, including ongoing assessments of climate risks.

The Business Resiliency team assesses the severity, probability and scale of climate-related events, and implements and tests technology systems to support our business continuity plans.

●  Our Crisis Management Team and Technology Service Operations Management Team oversee all aspects of our disaster and recovery response efforts, including protecting the general welfare and safety of our employees, data centers, networks, applications supporting business operations, communications systems and general technology recovery following an extreme weather incident or natural disaster. Our Internal Audit Team periodically reviews various aspects of these programs to provide independent assessment and assurance to management and the Board.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT43

Cybersecurity and Information Security Awareness

Our Board recognizes that the security of our technology is integral to our products, our business processes and our infrastructure. The mission of our management-level Information and Technology Risk Oversight Committee (“ITROC”), led by our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”), is to provide oversight relating to cyber security- and technology-related risks that may present significant impact to our operations, clients, reputation and financial position. Our IT risk program also includes an incident response plan that provides controls and procedures for timely and accurate reporting of any material cybersecurity incident, on-going internal and external assessments of our IT controls and security awareness training for employees.

On a quarterly basis, the Audit Committee is updated on the Company’s IT risk program by our CISO, including an overview of risks and trends, that is also made available to the full Board. In addition, the Audit Committee receives updates about the results of assessments conducted by outside advisors who provide independent assessments of our IT risk program and our response preparedness. The Chair of the Audit Committee informs the Board of any key updates during his quarterly reports to the Board.

Enterprise Risk Awareness

Our approach to overseeing new and emerging risks across MSCI is informed by our management-level Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee (“EROC”), chaired by our Chief Financial Officer. The EROC provides oversight of MSCI’s risk management activities to ensure that we are identifying, evaluating and managing risks that may have an adverse impact on our ability to achieve operational and strategic objectives. The enterprise risk management program currently evaluates risk in numerous areas within MSCI, including technology infrastructure; clients; people, including talent management and DE&I; financial resilience; legal, regulatory and compliance; and corporate responsibility, including areas such as climate risk. Within each category, we seek to identify and mitigate risks, enable improved decision-making and prioritization, and promote monitoring and reporting across functions within the Company. While the EROC captures and monitors risk management activities regarding our IT security and technology infrastructure, primary reporting and evaluation of risks relating to our technology infrastructure sits with the ITROC, as detailed above.

On a quarterly basis, the Audit Committee is updated on MSCI’s enterprise risk management program by our Enterprise Risk Management Officer, including an overview of risks and trends, that is also made available to the full Board. Quarterly presentations to the Audit Committee include more detailed discussions of emerging topics and trends. In 2021, these discussions included topics such as ESG and climate-related risks and opportunities as well as MSCI’s regulatory environment. The Chair of the Audit Committee informs the Board of any key updates during his quarterly reports to the Board.

Privacy Awareness

Integrated with our IT security program and our enterprise risk program is our global privacy program. Our privacy program is led by our Chief Privacy Officer and the members of the MSCI Privacy Office, and it reports into our CISO. Our Privacy Steering Committee meets on a quarterly basis to review key risks and trends, progress on key initiatives, focus topics and regulatory developments. The Privacy Steering Committee is an essential component of our efforts to safeguard the processing of personal, sensitive and confidential data at MSCI and provides cross-functional oversight of our privacy program.


Table of Contents

44MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Management Succession Planning

One of the Board’s principal responsibilities is to ensure appropriate succession plans are in place for our senior management and review our executive talent including our potential leadership bench. The Compensation Committee oversees the process for succession planning for senior management positions. Our CEO and President & COO also meet regularly with our functions to review talent plans with an aim to identify top talent, including diverse talent, who have the most potential to progress to the senior-most roles at MSCI.

In January 2022, as part of these efforts and following an extensive organizational design assessment conducted in 2021, we announced a number of organizational and senior leadership changes, and we expanded our Executive Committee to reflect MSCI’s ambition to serve as an indispensable partner to clients and the investment community. This expansion brings together and elevates more of the senior leaders who drive MSCI’s strategy and operations into MSCI’s primary leadership committee. The new members of the Executive Committee increase the representation from operating functions, in particular, Research, Technology and Data, and Private Assets. Additional information on our Executive Committee can be found on the “Our Leadership” section of our website (https://www.msci.com/who-we-are/our-leadership).

DEVELOPING OUR NEXT GENERATION OF LEADERS
EXPOSURE
High-potential leaders are given exposure to our directors through formal presentations at Board or committee meetings, informal virtual education sessions, one-on-one meetings with individual directors and participation in other Board activities.
FORMAL SUCCESSION PLANNING
Annual formal succession planning and talent review session held by the Compensation Committee, where all directors are invited to attend.
This session includes identifying successors and reviewing succession plans for all senior management positions, including the CEO and President positions.
ONGOING REVIEWS
The Board holds ongoing reviews of our leadership bench.

Over the last year, the Company made the following examples of senior management appointments from its succession pools:

March 2021
Former Head of Japan Client Coverage promoted to Head of APAC Client Coverage and Head of APAC Analytics following predecessor’s departure
January 2022
Former Head of ESG and Climate promoted to Chief Product Officer and Head of Index
Former Head of ESG Products promoted to Head of ESG and Climate
Former Head of Americas Index Client Coverage promoted to Head of Client Coverage – Americas

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT45

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE        Corporate Responsibility

As a leader in providing ESG and climate solutions to investors, we also aim to demonstrate leading corporate responsibility practices and policies that are meaningful to our various stakeholders, including our shareholders, clients, employees and local communities. This commitment includes our response to climate change and how we promote DE&I in our workforce.

Our commitment to corporate responsibility is embodied in four pillars: Better Investments for a Better World, Sustainable Operations, Social Responsibility, and Robust Governance:


Table of Contents

46MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Focus on Climate: Key Highlights

We take our commitment to climate seriously. As a leader in ESG and climate research and applications, MSCI is also committed to do its part to address climate change. We are focused on reducing our carbon footprint and ensuring our approach is well-aligned with our tools and solutions. Some of our recent areas of progress on our Company’s climate considerations include the ones detailed below.

New Commitments & Policies

New Actions

Additional Transparency
Through Reporting

●  Announced our commitment to the goal of Net-Zero emissions by 2040

●  Became a founding member of the Net Zero Financial Service Provider Alliance

●  Announced our commitment to support the UN SDGs and published a report demonstrating our contribution to four SDGs, using metrics aligned with our proprietary methodology to assess the SDG alignment of corporates

●  Updated our Environmental Policy to include our net-zero commitment

●  Updated our Supplier Code of Conduct to address emissions in MSCI’s supply chain

●  Updated our Travel Policy to prioritize virtual meetings and the use of low carbon travel options

●  Developed an internal Sustainable Supplier Management Team to support our efforts to learn about our suppliers’ corporate responsibility practices and through engagement, seek to align them with our own climate commitments

●  Enhanced our risk management framework to include reporting on climate considerations

●  Enhanced our corporate responsibility governance by creating a Corporate Responsibility Policy Committee

●  Conducted Board education sessions on climate

●  Brought together corporates, pensions and asset managers in roundtables to discuss climate trends and corporate responsibility practices

●  Developed easy-to-access webpage dedicated to Sustainability Reports & Policies, including:

●  UN SDG Report

●  Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Report

●  Third CDP report, with an improved grade of A-

●  SASB guide

●  Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) Report

●  Fifth UN PRI questionnaire


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT47

Corporate Responsibility Governance

We ensure the robustness of oversight over our corporate responsibility efforts through our governance process. Through a well-established framework and cross-functional committee structure, with leaders from across the organization, MSCI incorporates corporate responsibility into its core strategy—reflecting our belief that sustainable practices are essential to long-term growth. In line with this focus, the Governance Committee oversees the company’s significant corporate responsibility matters, including corporate responsibility priorities and disclosure, with management having day-to-day responsibility over these efforts.

In 2021, we enhanced our corporate responsibility governance by separating our CRC, which reviews corporate responsibility issues and policy proposals, from the newly created CRPC, a smaller group of Executive Committee members who review strategically significant proposals regarding corporate responsibility policies, actions and disclosures.

Second, we expanded the CRC, which reports to the CRPC. The CRC meets on a monthly basis and reviews corporate responsibility trends, shares updates on the implementation of MSCI’s Corporate Responsibility Operating Plan and reviews MSCI’s corporate responsibility reports. The CRC also considers corporate responsibility initiatives and makes recommendations to the CRPC on the most strategic ones.

To underscore our commitment to our corporate responsibility efforts, in 2022, our Chief Responsibility Officer relinquished her role as Head of Index to become fully dedicated to corporate responsibility.

Our Corporate Responsibility Oversight Framework


Our Chief Responsibility Officer leads the CRPC, where she presents to MSCI’s key decision makers and/or internal experts on corporate responsibility-related actions that may ultimately be recommended to our CEO, President & COO and/or the Board. As a member of the Executive Committee, she also brings corporate responsibility considerations to senior leadership discussions on MSCI’s business strategy and operations. At the Board level, she provides written updates to the Governance Committee in advance of each quarterly meeting on MSCI’s corporate responsibility efforts. The full Board also has access to these updates. In addition, at least twice per year, she presents to the Governance Committee on key initiatives and management’s performance against our Corporate Responsibility Operating Plan. In 2021, the Corporate Responsibility Operating Plan was largely informed by feedback from our stakeholders to increase our transparency in areas such as climate and DE&I. Key developments are shared with the full Board during the Governance Committee’s quarterly report to the Board.

The Head of Corporate Responsibility was appointed in 2021 and reports to the Chief Responsibility Officer. She leads our officer-level CRC in its efforts to broaden the scope of perspectives that review the Company’s corporate responsibility actions.


Table of Contents

48MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board’s Oversight of Corporate Responsibility

Board of Directors
Chairman/CEO
Henry Fernandez
 Oversees
Board Process
Meets Independently
with Board
President & COO
Baer Pettit

Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee

Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee

Audit & Risk Committee

Strategy & Finance Committee

●  Chief Responsibility Officer* provides quarterly updates

●  Corporate Secretary+ manages annual review of charters and Board policies

●  Head of Compliance provides annual update

●  External Counsel leads annual governance review

●  Governance Committee oversees shareholder engagement on corporate responsibility matters, including participation by its members in annual Corporate Responsibility Roadshow

●  Chief Human Resources Officer* oversees quarterly meetings and succession and progression planning updates

●  Chief Diversity Officer+ provides updates on DE&I initiatives and strategic enhancements

●  Head of Compensation & Benefits incorporates the Compensation Committee’s recommendations into executive compensation program

●  Compensation Consultant advises Compensation Committee on risk assessment and peer and best practices

●  CFO* and Global Controller+ oversee quarterly meetings

●  Independent Auditor oversees integrity in financial reporting

●  Internal Auditor reports to Audit Committee and provides quarterly updates on audit activities, findings and assurance

●  Enterprise Risk Management Officer and Chief Information Security Officer+ provide quarterly reports

●  CFO* oversees quarterly meetings

●  CFO* partners with Strategy Committee to develop agenda for annual strategy meeting

●  Heads of Product Lines*+ present strategy at annual strategy meeting

*Member of Corporate Responsibility Policy Committee
+Member of or function represented on Corporate Responsibility Committee

Risk Oversight of Corporate Responsibility

MSCI’s EROC is also integrated into our corporate responsibility oversight framework. The EROC oversees MSCI’s risk-management governance to ensure that MSCI has an effective process designed to identify, evaluate and manage risks that may have an adverse impact on MSCI’s ability to achieve its operational and strategic objectives. Climate-related risks are integrated into MSCI risk reporting, including transition and physical climate risks. The Audit Committee receives a quarterly update from the Enterprise Risk Management Officer on the work of the EROC, which includes reporting on climate-related risks.

Additional information on our corporate responsibility efforts, including our published sustainability reports, can be found on our Corporate Responsibility website (https://www.msci.com/who-we-are/corporate-responsibility).

Human Capital Management

We recognize that our people power our business and that our diverse workforce and inclusive work environment are critical to our success. Our Compensation Committee’s oversight responsibilities include our policies relating to DE&I, corporate culture and employee engagement. The Compensation Committee at least annually receives updates on the Company’s progress on DE&I initiatives, including key performance metrics, and the Chief Diversity Officer regularly presents to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews MSCI’s Global Human Rights Policy and related disclosures.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT49
Learning and DevelopmentDiversity, Equity and InclusionHealth and Safety and Future of Work

●  We are committed to creating a performance and growth culture of high employee engagement, where every employee takes personal ownership of their performance, career and professional growth

●  We offer tools and workshops to help employees better understand how their work aligns with our overall strategy, seek and receive feedback and coaching, successfully deliver on goals and plan and develop their careers. Recent updates include:

●  210%+(1) increase in our investment in learning and development since 2015

●  5x(1) growth in the number of participants in our learning and development programs from 2017 to 2021

●  We support employee learning by sponsoring and reimbursing employees for certain certifications and membership dues, ongoing education and relevant industry conferences and seminars

●  Additional examples of programs offered include:

●  Virtual training programs to build remote capabilities

●  Mystery Coffee: connects employees across the globe for informal networking opportunities

●  Career Success at MSCI: enables employees to plan, manage and take actions aligned with their career aspirations

●  Accelerated Leadership Development: provides one-on-one coaching, leadership skills development, networking and applied learning

●  Women’s Sponsorship/Mentorship program for high performing women

●  Integration programs for new colleagues from Real Capital Analytics

●  Our people are empowered to maximize their potential in an environment where all individuals are respected and encouraged to bring their authentic selves to work

●  In May 2021, we appointed our first Chief Diversity Officer

●  Continued sponsorship of existing ERGs, with three new ERGs launched in 2021: Asian Support Network, All Abilities Network and Hola! MSCI

●  Linked 10% of target annual cash incentive under AIP program to DE&I Goals for all Managing Directors, and created an Executive Accountability Framework to establish the philosophy and process for assessing progress against DE&I Goals

●  Executed 4th Annual Global DE&I Summit, focusing on leadership development and strategic planning

●  Continued partnerships with multiple external resources for our outreach and engagement with diverse talent, including #10,000 Black Interns and Rare Recruitment

●  Launched an inclusive internship program in New York, London and Chicago for undergraduates and masters students, sourced from partnership organizations and key universities globally

●  An employee engagement check-in survey in December 2021 showed that 91% of respondents are proud to work at MSCI and 87% feel they can bring their authentic selves to work(1)

●  We have a long-standing commitment to the health, safety and well-being of our employees

●  Early in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, we prioritized the well-being of our global workforce by having the vast majority of our employees work from home

●  At the onset of the pandemic, we engaged a firm of global medical and safety experts to provide additional information and guidance to all of our offices globally

●  We have increased communications about employee assistance programs that provide mental health and emotional well-being support, as well as resources to help manage stress and care for individuals and their families

●  In January 2022, we transitioned to our Future of Work at MSCI, which introduced increased flexibility to how and where employees work, reimagined our use of our offices, and modernized technology to enhance MSCI’s interactions with clients and employees

●  To protect the health and safety of our employees, we implemented a global vaccination policy requiring employees and visitors to be fully vaccinated prior to entering an MSCI office or participating in an MSCI-sponsored function.

●  Our Global Human Rights Policy reflects our commitment to a safe, inclusive and diverse workplace, and is annually reviewed by the Compensation Committee

(1)On September 13, 2021, we completed our acquisition of Real Capital Analytics, a provider of data and analytics for the properties and transactions that drive the global commercial real estate capital markets. This information does not reflect or include these new employees from Real Capital Analytics.
TOTAL EMPLOYEES: GENDER(1)(2)U.S. EMPLOYEES: RACE/ETHNICITY(1)(3)
(1)Data as of December 31, 2021.
(2)3% of global employees have not identified gender and are not included in the data calculations.
(3)11% of U.S. employees have not identified race/ethnicity and are not included in the data calculations.

Table of Contents

50MSCI   |   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Compensation, Talent and Culture Governance

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. To provide more clarity and transparency to investors and stakeholders on Board committee-level oversight of talent management, in 2021, the Board changed the name of its Compensation & Talent Management Committee to “Compensation, Talent and Culture Committee.” This corresponds with changes to the Compensation Committee’s charter in 2021 to reflect more direct oversight of talent management, including talent acquisition, development and career progression, as well as the Company’s policies relating to DE&I, corporate culture and employee engagement. As noted above in the description of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving annually all compensation awarded to the Company’s Executives, including the CEO and theour other NEOs presented in the Summary Compensation Table on page 74 of this Proxy Statement. Information on the Compensation Committee’s processes, procedures and analysis of executive officer compensation for 2018 is provided in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section included herein.NEOs.

The Compensation Committee activelyalso regularly engages with our CEO, President & COO, Chief Human Resources Officer, Chief Diversity Officer and other members of senior leadership on a broad range of human capital management topics. The Board regularly receives reports from the Compensation Committee on human capital management topics throughout the year. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the Company’s talent management strategies and programs with respect to senior levels in its dutiesthe organization, including the Company’s DE&I strategies and follows procedures intended to ensure good compensation governance.programs and key performance metrics, and periodically reviews open senior management roles, future talent needs, the Company’s corporate culture and learning and development programs, as well as the results of the Company’s employee engagement survey. See page 2635 of this Proxy Statement for additional information on the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities.

The principal compensation plans and arrangements applicable to our executive officersNEOs are described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Matters” section of this Proxy Statement and the executive compensation tables included herein.therein. The Compensation Committee may delegate the administration of these plans and arrangements, as appropriate, including to one or more officers of the Company, subcommittees or to the Chair of the Compensation Committee, in each case, when it deems doing so to be appropriate, and in the best interests of the Company and consistent with applicable law and NYSE requirements.

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant assisting the Compensation Committee in the evaluation of CEO or other executive officer compensation, including authority to approve such compensation consultant’s fees and other retention terms.compensation. As further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section included herein, during 2018,2021, the Compensation Committee retainedcontinued to retain Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”) as its own externalindependent compensation consultant to review CEO and other executive officer compensation. All of the services provided by Semler Brossy to the Compensation Committee during 20182021 were to provide advice or recommendations on the amount or form of executive officer and director compensation, and Semler Brossy did not provide any additional services to the Company during 2018.2021. The Compensation Committee has considered, among other things, the factors delineated in Rule10C-1 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 10C-1”), including the NYSE listing rules implementing Rule10C-1 and Semler Brossy’s conflict of interest policies, and determined that the engagement of Semler Brossy does not raise any conflict of interest or other factors that compromise the independence of its relationship with the Compensation Committee. In developing its views on compensation matters and determining the compensation awarded to our CEO and other executive officers, the Human Resources Departmenthuman resources department provides data and analyses to aid the Compensation Committee in its decisions. The CEO also makes recommendations on compensation

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            31


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE        

for executive officers other than himself and the Compensation Committee takes these recommendations into account in reaching its compensation decisions. From time to time, the Compensation Committee may obtain input from external legal counsel, including Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (“Davis Polk”), on compensation award documentation and other compensation-related practices, which in 20182021 was communicated to the Compensation Committee via management, the Legal Departmentlegal department or the Human Resources Department.human resources department. In light of this relationship, the Compensation Committee has considered, among other things, the factors delineated in Rule10C-1, including the NYSE listing rules implementingRule 10C-1 and Davis Polk’s conflict of interest policies.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS        

MSCI has a corporate governance webpage that can be found under the “Corporate Governance” link on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http://ir.msci.com).

Our Corporate Governance Policies (including our Director Independence Standards), CodeTable of Ethics and Business Conduct (the “Code of Ethics”) and Committee charters are available electronically, without charge, on or through our website. To access these documents, click on the “Corporate Governance” link found on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http://ir.msci.com). These documents are also available, without charge, to any shareholder who requests them by writing to us at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or via email atinvestor.relations@msci.com.Contents

Our Code of Ethics applies to our directors, executive officers and employees. If we make any substantive amendment to, or grant a waiver to, a provision of the Code of Ethics for our CEO, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and Global Controller or persons performing similar functions, we will satisfy the applicable SEC disclosure requirement by promptly disclosing the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http://ir.msci.com). Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.

32            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


2022 PROXY STATEMENT51

Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines

Director Compensation

In 2018,Director Compensation Best Practices

Robust Director Stock Ownership GuidelinesEach non-employee director is required to own a target number of shares of stock of the Company equal to the sum of the “net shares” resulting from the vesting of the RSUs granted to such director for each of the last five years.
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging PolicyWe prohibit all directors and employees, including all NEOs, from hedging or pledging the Company’s common stock or engaging in short sales, purchases or sales of options, puts or calls, as well as derivatives such as swaps, forwards or futures and trading on a short-term basis in the Company’s common stock.
Emphasis on Equity CompensationThe most significant portion of non-employee director compensation is the annual RSU equity award for service on the Board.

Director Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee reviews non-employee director was entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $75,000. In additioncompensation every two years and recommends changes, when appropriate, to the annual retainer,non-employee directors were also entitledBoard. The Compensation Committee is aided in its review by its external independent compensation consultant, Semler Brossy. The Compensation Committee takes into account peer benchmarking and broader general industry practices to the following cash retainers for serving as chairs and/ornon-chair members of the Board’s standing committees. Directors do not receive meeting fees and employee directors do not receive any separate compensation for their Board activities.

 
   RETAINER 
 
 

Committee Chair

  
 
 

Audit Committee

  $30,000 
 
 

Compensation & Talent Management Committee

  $25,000 
 
 

Strategy and Finance Committee

  $25,000 
 
 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

  $20,000 
 
 

CommitteeNon-Chair Member

  
 
 

Audit Committee

  $10,000 
 
 

Compensation & Talent Management Committee

  $10,000 
 
 

Strategy and Finance Committee

  $10,000 
 
 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

  $10,000 
 

Eachestablish non-employee director was also entitled to receive an annual equity award payable in RSUs having an aggregate fair market value of $160,000 fornon-employee directors and $210,000 for the Lead Director based on the closing price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE on the date prior to grant.compensation.

DIRECTOR FEESCOMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP FEES
  
*Based on the closing price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE on the trading day prior to grant.
Effective May 1, 2022, the cash retainer for serving as chair of the Governance Committee will increase by $5,000 to $25,000, for parity with the chair role of a number of our other committees. In addition, the grant date values of the annual RSU equity awards for each non-employee director will increase by $20,000 to $185,000 and for the Lead Director will increase to $235,000, following a review of peer company and market practice.

Directors may elect under the terms of the MSCI Inc. 2016Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan (the “Directors Plan”) to receive their cash retainer in the form of shares of our common stock. Under the Directors Plan,non-employee directors are subject to annual limits on their cash and equity compensation, which were approved by our shareholders at our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, as follows:non-employee directors may not receive in any calendar year (i) options, restricted stock, RSUs and other stock-based awards with a grant date fair value of more than $1,000,000 (as determined in accordance with


Table of Contents

52MSCI   |   DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

applicable accounting standards) and (ii) retainers and other cash-based awards in excess of $1,000,000. These caps cannot be increased without the approval of our shareholders.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            33


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES        

RSUs granted tonon-employee directors are granted on May 1st of each year and vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Cash retainers and RSU awards are prorated when a director joins the Board and/or a committee at any time other than May 1st. RSUs not granted on or after May 1st vest on the next May 1st to occur following the grant date. For example, if a director joins the Board on February 1, 2019,2022, his or her prorated RSUs will vest on May 1, 2019.2022. If a director joins the Board on May 31, 2019,2022, his or her prorated RSUs will vest on May 1, 2020.2023.

RSUs are recognized as an expense in the Company’s financial statements for financial reporting purposes with respect to 20182021 in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic718-10.

Holders of these RSUs are entitled to participate in dividend equivalent payments, and such payments may be settled in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof, to be decided by the Company in its sole discretion. Prior to the conversion to shares, RSU holders do not have any rights as an MSCI shareholder with respect to such RSUs, including the right to vote the underlying shares. The RSUs are generallynon-transferable; however, our Board may, in its discretion, specify circumstances under which an award may become immediately transferable and nonforfeitable or under which the award will be forfeited. The RSUs vest and convert to shares immediately upon termination of service for reasons of death, disability or a change in control. If service as a director terminates for any other reason, all unvested RSUs will be cancelled and forfeited unless determined otherwise by the Board or the Compensation Committee.

Non-employee directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attending Board meetings.meetings and educational sessions.

Director Deferral Plan

On August 2, 2011, the Board adoptedUnder the MSCI Inc. Independent Directors Deferral Plan and subsequently amended and restated the plan in 2016 as the MSCI Inc.Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”). The Deferral Plan permits, our directors are permitted to defer receipt of shares of our common stock payable in lieu of cash retainers and/or upon conversion of RSUs granted to the director following the year for which an election has been submitted;provided that an election made by a director within 30 days after the director becomes eligible to receive a cash retainer or RSUs shall apply to any common stock payable in lieu of such a cash retainer and/or upon conversion of such RSUs granted to the director following the date on which the director makes the election. Receipt of shares of our common stock may be deferred until a future date specified by the director, a separation from service (as defined by Treasury regulations), or the earlier of the two. While the Deferral Plan allows for it, the Board has not yet implemented a process for the deferral of cash payments.

34            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT2021 Non-Employee Director Compensation


Name     Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash(1)(2)
($)
     Stock
Awards(3)(4)
($)
     All Other
Compensation(5)
($)
     Total
($)
Robert G. Ashe 114,642 214,710 1,777 331,129
Benjamin F. duPont(6)   9,159 9,159
Wayne Edmunds 120,000 164,676 1,363 286,039
Catherine R. Kinney 89,867 164,676 75,468 330,011
Jacques P. Perold 110,000 164,676 1,363 276,039
Sandy C. Rattray 100,000 164,676 1,363 266,039
Linda H. Riefler 115,000 164,676 1,363 281,039
Marcus L. Smith 100,000 164,676 1,363 266,039
Rajat Taneja(7) 82,231 150,738 1,040 234,009
Paula Volent 99,583 164,676 1,363 265,622
(1)Pursuant to MSCI’s Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, directors hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders. The Board term beginning on April 27, 2021 and ending on April 26, 2022 (the “2021 Board Term”) and the Board term beginning on April 28, 2020 and ending on April 27, 2021 (the “2020 Board Term”) do not coincide with MSCI’s January through

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT53
December fiscal year. Amounts included in the table above represent cash earned or paid, or stock awards granted, as applicable, during the year ended December 31, 2021. Because directors are paid for service from May 1 to April 30, prorated amounts are calculated from the applicable date to May 1st of the relevant Board term.

(2)
Cash amounts in this column include the annual retainers and committee fees paid during the year ended December 31, 2021. Four of our directors elected to receive all or a portion of their annual cash retainers in stock as set forth below. The number of shares issued was determined by dividing the aggregate value of the elected portion of the cash retainer by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date ($485.77 for Mr. Ashe and Mmes. Kinney and Volent and $461.97 for Mr. Taneja) and rounding down to the next whole share. Mr. Taneja elected to defer receipt of such shares until the earlier of June 1, 2025 and the 60th day after his “separation from service” as a director under the Deferral Plan.
NameCashStock
Mr. Ashe    DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

2018 Non-Employee Director Compensation

    

NAME

 

FEES EARNED OR
PAID IN CASH(1)(2)

($)

STOCK

AWARDS(3)(4)

($)

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION(5)

($)

      TOTAL      

($)

    

Robert G. Ashe

109,982209,9122,688322,582
    
    

Benjamin F. duPont

84,911159,8698,207252,987
    
    

Wayne Edmunds

115,000159,8692,173277,042
    
    

Alice W. Handy

84,972159,86951,210296,051
    
    

Catherine R. Kinney

84,972159,86937,335282,176
    
    

Wendy E. Lane(6)

85,000159,8692,173247,042
    
    

Jacques P. Perold

105,000159,8692,173267,042
    
    

Linda H. Riefler

110,000159,8692,173272,042
    
    

George W. Siguler

85,000159,8692,173247,042
    
    

Marcus L. Smith(7)

97,493159,8691,866259,228
    
    

Patrick Tierney(8)

530530
    
    

Rodolphe M. Vallee(9)

6,4386257,063
    

(1) Pursuant to MSCI’s Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, directors hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders. The Board term beginning on May 10, 2018 and ending on April 25, 2019 (the “2018 Board Term”) and the Board term beginning on May 11, 2017 and ending on May 10, 2018 (the “2017 Board Term”) do not coincide with MSCI’s January through December fiscal year. Amounts included in the table above represent cash earned or paid, or stock awards granted, as applicable, during the year ended December 31, 2018. Because directors are paid for service from May 1 to April 30, prorated amounts are calculated from the applicable date to May 1st of the relevant Board term.

(2) Cash amounts in this column include the annual retainers and Committee fees paid during the year ended December 31, 2018. Four of our directors elected to receive all or a portion of their annual cash retainers in stock as set forth below. The number of shares issued was determined by dividing the aggregate value of the elected portion of the cash retainer by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date ($150.66) and rounding down to the next whole share. Each of Mr. duPont and Mmes. Handy and Kinney elected to defer receipt of such shares until the 60th day after his or her “separation from service” as a director under the Deferral Plan.

$114,641.72 (236 shares)
Ms. Kinney 

NAME

CASHSTOCK

Mr. Ashe

$109,982 (730 shares)

Mr. duPont

$82,500$2,411 (16 shares)

Ms. Handy

$84,972 (564 shares)

Ms. Kinney

$84,972 (564 shares)

(3) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2018 in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 718-10. The fair value is calculated by multiplying the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant date by the number of units awarded. For assumptions regarding these calculations, please see notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019. However, the values in this column may not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the non-employee directors at the time the RSUs vest. The number of RSUs awarded is determined by dividing the aggregate value of the RSU award by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date ($149.83) and rounding down to the next whole RSU. For the 2018 Board term, each of Messrs.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            35


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES        

duPont, Edmunds, Perold, Siguler and Smith and Mmes. Handy, Kinney, Lane and Riefler each received 1,067 RSUs, and Mr. Ashe received 1,401 RSUs. These RSUs will vest on May 1, 2019. Mr. duPont and Mmes. Handy and Kinney elected to defer receipt of such shares issuable upon vesting until the 60th day after their respective “separation from service” as a director under the Deferral Plan.

(4) As of December 31, 2018, each of our non-employee directors had the following outstanding stock awards in the form of RSUs: Messrs. duPont, Edmunds, Perold, Siguler and Smith and Mmes. Handy, Kinney, Lane and Riefler each had 1,067 RSUs outstanding, and Mr. Ashe had 1,401 RSUs outstanding.

(5) Cash amounts in this column include dividend equivalents paid during the year ended December 31, 2018 in connection with the Company’s payment of its quarterly cash dividend. Each of Mr. duPont and Mmes. Handy and Kinney received shares of our common stock and a cash payment for fractional shares received as a dividend equivalent payment for outstanding RSUs and in lieu of receiving a cash dividend payment for shares subject to his/her deferral election. The table below sets forth the amounts received by each:

NAME

SHARESCASH RECEIVED
FOR FRACTIONAL
SHARES

Mr. duPont

$7,543.61 (46 shares) $663.5189,867.45 (185 shares)
Mr. Taneja 

Ms. Handy

$50,466.12 (309 shares) $743.8682,230.66 (178 shares)
Ms. Volent 

Ms. Kinney

$36,606.52 (224 shares) $728.2899,582.85 (205 shares)
(3)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2021 in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 718-10. The fair value is calculated by multiplying the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant date by the number of units awarded. For assumptions regarding these calculations, please see notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022. However, the values in this column may not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the non-employee directors at the time the RSUs vest. The number of RSUs awarded is determined by dividing the aggregate value of the RSU award by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date ($485.77 for Messrs. Ashe, Edmunds, Perold, Rattray and Smith and Mmes. Kinney, Riefler and Volent and $468.13 for Mr. Taneja) and rounding down to the next whole RSU. For the 2021 Board term, each of Messrs. Edmunds, Perold, Rattray and Smith and Mmes. Kinney, Riefler and Volent received 339 RSUs, Mr. Taneja received 322 RSUs, and Mr. Ashe received 442 RSUs. These RSUs will vest on May 1, 2022. Ms. Riefler elected to defer receipt of such shares issuable upon vesting until the 60th day after her “separation from service” as a director under the Deferral Plan. Mr. Taneja elected to defer receipt of such shares until the earlier of June 1, 2025 and the 60th day after his “separation from service” as a director under the Deferral Plan.
(4)As of December 31, 2021, each of our non-employee directors had the following outstanding stock awards in the form of RSUs: Messrs. Edmunds, Perold, Rattray and Smith and Mmes. Kinney, Riefler and Volent each had 339 RSUs outstanding, Mr. Taneja had 322 RSUs outstanding and Mr. Ashe had 442 RSUs outstanding.
(5)Cash amounts in this column include dividend equivalents paid during the year ended December 31, 2021 in connection with the Company’s payment of its quarterly cash dividend. Each of Messrs. duPont and Taneja and Mmes. Kinney and Riefler received shares of our common stock and a cash payment for fractional shares received as a dividend equivalent payment for outstanding RSUs and in lieu of receiving a cash dividend payment for shares, in each case subject to his or her deferral election. The table below sets forth the amounts received by each.
Name     Shares      Cash Received for
Fractional Shares
Mr. duPont  $8,242.33 (19 shares)           $916.43
Ms. Kinney $72,951.85 (137 shares)  $1,153.87
Ms. Riefler    $969.54
Mr. Taneja    $1,040.00
(6)Mr. duPont did not stand for re-election at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders and served on the Board through April 27, 2021, and thus did not receive compensation for the 2021 Board Term.
(7)Mr. Taneja was appointed to the Board, effective June 1, 2021.

(6) Ms. Lane is not standing for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting but will remain on the Board through that date.

(7) Mr. Smith was appointed to the Audit Committee, effective January 30, 2018 and received a $2,493.15pro-rated cash retainer for his service as a member of the Audit Committee for the 2017 Board Term.

(8) Mr. Tierney retired from the Board, effective May 1, 2018, and thus did not receive compensation for the 2018 Board Term.

(9) Mr. Vallee retired from the Board at our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders (May 10, 2018) and received apro-rated cash retainer for his service on the Board for the 2018 Board Term, which included a cash amount in lieu of receiving apro-rated RSU award.

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Under the Company’s stock ownership guidelines fornon-employee directors, commencing on the date of ourApril 28, 2016, annual meeting of shareholders, eachnon-employee director has been required to own a target number of shares of stock of the Company equal to the sum of the “net shares” resulting from the vesting of the RSUs granted to such director for each of the last five years, with such aggregate share ownership to be achieved within five years of initially being elected or appointed to the Board and maintained thereafter. “Net shares”Shares” means the number of shares that would remain if the shares resulting fromunderlying the vesting of the RSUsequity awards are sold or withheld by the Company to (i) pay the


Table of Contents

54MSCI   |   DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

exercise price of a stock option, (ii) satisfy any tax withholding obligations (assuming a tax rate of 40%50%) upon either (i) the conversion of such RSUs into shares or (ii) the cessation of(iii) satisfy any tax deferral period with respect to such RSUs.other applicable transaction costs.

Shares that count towards satisfaction of the target level of stock ownership under thesethe stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors consist of the following:

(1)

Shares beneficially owned individually, either directly or indirectly (including any shares beneficially owned as a result of an election to receive a retainer (or any portion thereof), in shares);

(2)

Shares beneficially owned jointly with, or separately by, immediate family members residing in the same household, either directly or indirectly;

(3)

Shares underlying vested and unvested RSUs granted under the MSCI Inc. Independent Directors’ Equity Compensation Plan or the Directors Plan; and

(4)

Shares for which receipt has been deferred (including any shares held through the Deferral Plan or any other deferred compensation plan maintained by the Company).

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of ournon-employee directors are in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT55

36            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Beneficial Ownership of Common StockProposal No. 2

Stock Ownership ofAdvisory Vote to Approve Executive Officers and Directors

We require members of our Executive Committee (which includes all of our executive officers) and our directors to comply with our stock ownership guidelines to further align their interests with the interests of our shareholders. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of the members of our Executive Committee and our directors are in compliance with the applicable stock ownership guidelines. See “Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines” below and “Director Compensation and Stock OwnershipGuidelines—Non-Employee(Say-on-Pay) Director Stock Ownership Guidelines” above for additional information regarding our ownership guidelines for the members of our Executive Committee and our directors, respectively.

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each of our NEOs and directors, and by all of our directors and executive officers as of February 27, 2019, as a group. The address for each of our executive officers and directors is 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007. Percentage of share ownership amounts are based on 84,665,447 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2019.

    
  SHARES(1)  RIGHT TO
ACQUIRE
(2)
 BENEFICIAL  
OWNERSHIP  
TOTAL
(3)
 PERCENT OF  
CLASS
(4)
    
    

Named Executive Officers

    
    
    

Henry A. Fernandez(5)

  1,994,773  49,774 2,044,547 2.4%
    
    

Kathleen A. Winters(6)

  65,850   65,850 —%
    
    

C.D. Baer Pettit

  283,443   283,443 —%
    
    

Laurent Seyer

  92,611   92,611 —%
    
    

Jigar Thakkar(7)

      —%
    
    

Directors

    
    
    

Robert G. Ashe

  11,748   11,748 —%
    
    

Benjamin F. duPont

  23,257   23,257 —%
    
    

Wayne Edmunds

  5,815   5,815 —%
    
    

Alice W. Handy

  33,036   33,036 —%
    
    

Catherine R. Kinney

  22,797   22,797 —%
    
    

Wendy E. Lane(8)

  5,815   5,815 —%
    
    

Jacques P. Perold

  1,608   1,608 —%
    
    

Linda H. Riefler

  16,265   16,265 —%
    
    

George W. Siguler

  28,478   28,478 —%
    
    

Marcus L. Smith

  587   587 —%
    
    

All NEOs, Executive Officers and Directors as of February 27, 2019 as a Group

  2,613,534  49,774 2,663,308 3.1%
    

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            37


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK        

(1) Excludes shares of our common stock that may be acquired through the vesting of RSUs, including performance-based RSUs, or the exercise of stock options. Includes 26,124, 18,844 and 3,452 shares of our common stock for Mmes. Handy and Kinney and Mr. duPont, respectively, for which such directors have elected to defer receipt of their respective shares until the 60th day after such director’s “separation from service” as a director.

(2) Includes shares of our common stock that can be acquired through vesting of RSUs and the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the date of this table (i.e., through April 28, 2019). See the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” Table included herein for additional information regarding RSUs and stock options held by each NEO as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, each of our non-employee directors had the following outstanding stock awards, all of which are in the form of RSUs: Messrs. duPont, Edmunds, Perold, Siguler and Smith and Mmes. Handy, Kinney, Lane and Riefler each had 1,067 RSUs outstanding, and Mr. Ashe had 1,401 RSUs outstanding. Such RSUs are scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(3) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, to our knowledge each executive officer and director, as of February 27, 2019, had sole voting and investment power with respect to his or her shares of our common stock. Beneficial Ownership Totals may differ from those set forth in Statements of Changes in Beneficial Ownership reported on Form 4 filed with the SEC due to the exclusion herein of RSUs granted by the Company, as described in footnote (1) to this table.

(4) All executive officers and directors (other than Mr. Fernandez) each beneficially owned less than 1.0% of the shares of our outstanding common stock. Percentages for each beneficial owner are calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act. Percentages for each named executive officer, executive officer and director as of February 27, 2019 and collectively as a group are based on the number of our shares outstanding as of February 27, 2019, which excludes shares of our common stock that can be acquired through vesting of RSUs and the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the date of this table (i.e., through April 28, 2019).

(5) Includes 314,479 shares of our common stock held by the Fernandez 2007 Children’s Trust in which the spouse of Mr. Fernandez is the trustee and his children are the beneficiaries, 4,355 shares of our common stock held by two of his children under the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act and 7,900 shares of our common stock directly held by one of Mr. Fernandez’s children.

(6) After the date of this table (February 27, 2019), on March 1, 2019, Ms. Winters notified the Company of her decision to resign. The Board appointed Andrew C. Wiechmann, who has been serving as the Company’s Head of Strategy, Corporate Development and Investor Relations, to serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective as of March 5, 2019.

(7) Mr. Thakkar joined the Company in July 2018.

(8) Ms. Lane is not standing for re-election at the 2019 Annual Meeting but will remain on the Board through that date.

Stock Ownership of Principal Shareholders

The following table contains information regarding the only persons we know of that beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock. Percentage of class amounts are based on 84,665,447 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2019.

NAME AND ADDRESS

SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED

  
 

The Dodd-Frank Act enables MSCI’s shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules.

For an overview of the compensation of our NEOs and our compensation strategy, see “Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Summary” below.

We are asking for shareholder approval of the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules, which include the disclosures under “Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables included herein and the narrative following the compensation tables. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on MSCI, the Compensation Committee or the Board. The Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of MSCI’s shareholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider those shareholders’ concerns, and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. MSCI currently conducts annual advisory votes on executive compensation.

NUMBER OF
SHARESVOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at our 2022 Annual Meeting, at which a quorum is present, is required to approve Proposal No. 2. Abstentions shall not be treated as votes cast.

 PERCENTAGE
OF CLASS
(1)
  
 

Our Board of Directors Recommends a vote “FOR”the approval of thecompensation of MSCI’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

Proxies solicited by the Board will be voted “FOR”this approval unless otherwise instructed.

 

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

 9,413,281(2)11.12%

Blackrock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

6,413,485(3)7.58%

FMR LLC

245 Summer Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

4,838,251(4)5.71%
  

(1) Because percentageTable of class ownership is based on the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of a date that differs from the date used by the principal shareholders to calculate the percentages for purposes of filing the applicable Schedule 13G or 13G/A, percentages of class ownership presented herein may differ from amounts reported in the applicable Schedule 13G or 13G/A filed with the SEC by the relevant principal shareholder.Contents

38            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


56

        BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCKMSCI

(2) Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 6) filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that The Vanguard Group had sole voting power as to 108,415 shares of our common stock, shared voting power as to 20,133 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power as to 9,286,074 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power as to 127,207 shares of our common stock. In addition, the Schedule 13G/A discloses that the person filing the report is an investment adviser in accordance with §240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) and the identification and classification of the subsidiaries which acquired the securities being reported on therein are set forth on Appendix A thereto.

(3) Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 7) filed with the SEC on February 6, 2019. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power as to 5,633,722 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power as to 6,413,485 shares of our common stock. In addition, the Schedule 13G/A discloses that the person filing the report is a parent holding company or control person in accordance with§240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G) and the identification and classification of the subsidiaries which acquired the securities being reported on therein are set forth on Exhibit A thereto.

(4) Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3) filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that FMR LLC had sole voting power as to 497,463 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power as to 4,838,251 shares. In addition, the Schedule 13G/A discloses that the person filing the report is a parent holding company or control person in accordance with §240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G) and the identification and classification of the subsidiaries which acquired the securities being reported on therein are set forth on Exhibit A thereto.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to provide to us copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports and written representations from the reporting persons that such reports were timely filed and no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, we believe that all required reports during 2018 have been timely filed under the SEC’s rules for reporting transactions by executive officers and directors in our common stock except for a Form 4 relating to one exempt transaction for Mr. Thakkar, which was filed with the SEC one day late on July 19, 2018.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            39



2022 PROXY STATEMENT

        COMPENSATION MATTERS57

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (referred to as the “CD&A”) section summarizes our general philosophy with regard to the compensation of our CEO,Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our former Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Treasurer, and our three next most highly paid executive officers in 20182021 (collectively referred to as “named executive officers” or “NEOs”). The CD&A provides context for the executive compensation disclosures presented below in both tabular and narrative form. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s compensation strategy and reviews and approves executive officer compensation as well as the Company’s compensation and benefits policiesprogram generally. The Compensation Committee approved the compensation structure and amounts for each of our NEOs for 20182021 and also approved changesenhancements to the long-term equity incentive component of our executive compensation program that became effective for equity grants in 2019.2021 following feedback we received from our shareholders.

OUR NEOS FOR 2021 ARE:

LOGO

On March 1, 2019, Ms. Winters notified the Company of her decision to resign. The Board appointed Andrew C. Wiechmann, who has been serving as the Company’s Head of Strategy, Corporate Development and Investor Relations, to serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective as of March 5, 2019.

HENRY A.
FERNANDEZ
ANDREW C.
WIECHMANN
C. D. BAER
PETTIT
SCOTT A.
CRUM
ROBERT J.
GUTOWSKI
Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer and TreasurerPresident and Chief Operating OfficerChief Human Resources OfficerGeneral Counsel

Highlights

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY        Executive Summary

Our executive compensation program is designed to link pay to performance, encourage prudent decision-making and risk management, and create a balanced focus on short-term and long-term performance andthat fuels shareholder value creation. In the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, it is imperative that we maintain a responsible executive compensation program that encourages and rewards our leaders for achieving short-term and long-term results.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            41


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

The following table sets forth the key components of our target-based compensation program in effect in 20182021.

PHILOSOPHY

Each of the three components has a different purpose. The sum of the base salary, target annual cash incentive and 2019. The Compensation Committee approved certain enhancementstarget equity incentive creates a target total compensation. Actual cash incentive and equity incentive payouts are dependent upon the achievement of the relevant AIP and LTIP goals tied directly to the 2019 long-term equity incentive program in response to shareholder feedback. These enhancements are described in greater detail beginning on page 51performance of this Proxy Statement.the Company, the product/functional unit and the individual.


 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
ELEMENTS

•  Fixed Component: Base salary

•  Variable Components:

•   Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)

•   Long Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”)

PHILOSOPHY

•  Each of the three components has a different purpose. The sum of the base salary, target annual cash incentive and annualized target equity incentive creates a target total compensation. Actual cash incentive and equity incentive payouts are dependent upon the achievement of the relevant AIP and LTIP goals tied directly to the performance of the Company, the product/functional unit and the individual.

We believe that this target-based incentive structure fosters a culture of high performance and accountability and promotes long-term sustainable shareholder value creationinterests by closely aligning executive compensation with objectively measured Company performance and strategic goal attainment as further described below.


Table of Contents

58MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

HOW PAY SUPPORTS OUR BUSINESS STRATEGYBusiness Strategy and Compensation

Our overriding objective isThe diagram below illustrates how our executive compensation program aligns the strategic initiatives underlying our corporate mission to creategenerate long-term sustainableshareholder value for our shareholders. To accomplish this objective, we are focused on the following five strategic pillars:

(i) expand leadershipcreation. The metrics included in research-enhanced content, (ii) strengthen existing and new client relationships by providing solutions, (iii) improve access to our solutions through cutting-edge technology and platforms, (iv) expand value-added service offerings and (v) execute strategic relationships and acquisitions with complementary content and technology companies.

The variable components of our compensation program (AIPare aligned with our strategic initiatives and LTIP) are directly tieddesigned to measure the Company’s strategyachievement of objectives that not only deliver short- and performance.medium-term returns, but also help to build the foundation for long-term shareholder value creation.

LOGO

Achievement Against Strategic Pillars Drives Achievement of Annual Financial Goals Drives Long-Term Value Creation Measured Through Annual Incentive KPIs Measured Through Annual Incentive Financial Goals Measured Through PSU Goals and Demonstrated Through Share Price Appreciation

42            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Mission: to enable investors to build better
portfolios for a better world.

Strategic Pillars of Growth

Extend leadership in research-
enhanced content across
asset classes
Lead the enablement of ESG and climate
investment integration
Enhance distribution and content-
enabling technology
         COMPENSATION MATTERS

2018 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

We delivered very strong financial results in 2018, with achievements across various key financial and operating metrics. We achieved record recurring sales, which drove strong subscription revenue growth. We maintained operational efficiency with our continued focus on expense management and productivity initiatives in 2018. In addition, the price per share of MSCI stock increased 16.5% during 2018 from a closing share price of $126.54 on December 29, 2017 to a closing share price of $147.43 on December 31, 2018. Our financial success in 2018 is a testament to the benefits of our enhancedgo-to-market strategy, continued innovation and product enhancement and the increasing power of our cross-product collaboration and our integrated franchise. The strong execution of our strategy contributed to our exceptional financial performance in 2018 and positions the Company for continued growth and profitability in the years ahead. The charts and tables below provide highlights of our operational achievements over the three-year performance period covered by the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs granted in 2016. SeeAnnex B for definitions of operating metrics and the descriptions and reconciliations of allnon-GAAP financial measures referenced herein.

LOGO

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            43


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

    

LOGO

Expand solutions that empower
client customization
Strengthen client relationships
and grow into strategic
partnerships with clients
Execute strategic relationships and
acquisitions with complementary
content and technology companies
 

REVENUE GROWTHPerformance-Based Compensation

•  Operating revenues in 2018 increased $159.8 million, or 12.5%, to $1.4 billion, compared to 2017.

•  Total Run Rate on December 31, 2018 grew by $65.6 million, or 4.8%, to $1.4 billion, compared to December 31, 2017.

•  Maintained strong retention rates, with a full-year total Retention Rate for 2018 of 94.1%.

 
SHORT-TERM
(ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN CASH BONUS)
   
LONG-TERM
(EQUITY GRANTS)
 
LOGO

OPERATING EFFICIENCY

•  Delivered 67.1% and 17.1% growth in net income and Adjusted EBITDA(1), respectively, driven by strong operating leverage.

•  Effective tax rate was 19.4% and adjusted tax rate (2) was 20.7%, reflecting ongoing efforts to better align our tax profile with our global operating footprint, as well as the impact of active tax planning in connection with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017 (“Tax Reform”).

•  Full-year 2018 diluted EPS and adjusted EPS (3) up 71.0% and 34.4%, respectively.

   

  Restricted Stock Units (for 2021, ratable vest, and for 2022, cliff-vest after a three-year service period)

  Performance Stock Units (earned based on absolute TSR CAGR) with a 1-year post vesting mandatory holding period for 3-Year PSUs

  Performance Stock Options (earned based on cumulative revenue and cumulative Adjusted EPS) (new for 2022)

2021 Business Highlights

Execution on Strategic Priorities

Despite the economic uncertainties and social disruptions that continued throughout 2021, we delivered another year of strong results. In fact, MSCI set a new bar for performance across a number of key financial and operating metrics in 2021. Our intense client-centricity has enabled us to continue to serve as a go-to partner for our clients, and we believe that our performance in 2021 demonstrates the strength of our execution and the results of our key long-term investments. We achieved these results in 2021 while our employees continued to deliver exceptional performance in a largely remote-work environment.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT59

Strong Financial Performance

OPERATING REVENUES     DILUTED EPS / ADJUSTED EPS(1)
(Unaudited)
  
  
LOGONET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITY / FREE CASH FLOW(1)
(Unaudited)
 

NET NEW SALES(2)
CAPITAL OPTIMIZATION(Unaudited)

•  Returned $1.1 billion

(in capital to shareholders in 2018 through share repurchases and cash dividends pursuant to a disciplined capital allocation strategy.

•  Increased regular quarterly cash dividend by 52.6% to $0.58 per share, representing $2.32 per share on an annualized basis.

•  Reduced our outstanding share count by 6.6% through share repurchases.

thousands)
 (in thousands)
   

(1) “Adjusted EBITDA,” a measure used by management to assess operating performance, is defined as net income before (I) provision for income taxes, (II) other expense (income), net, (III) depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements, (IV) amortization of intangible assets and, at times, (V) certain other transactions or adjustments. SeeAnnex B for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income.

(2) “Adjusted tax rate” is defined as the effective tax rate excluding the impact of adjustments made in connection with Tax Reform (except for amounts associated with active tax planning implemented as a result of Tax Reform). SeeAnnex B for a reconciliation of adjusted tax rate to effective tax rate.

(3) “Adjusted EPS” is defined as diluted EPS before the after-tax impact of the amortization of acquired intangible assets, the impact of divestitures, the impact of Tax Reform adjustments (except for amounts associated with active tax planning implemented as a result of Tax Reform) and, at times, certain other transactions or adjustments. SeeAnnex B for a reconciliation of adjusted EPS to diluted EPS.

44            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


  COMPENSATION MATTERS
(1)“Adjusted EPS” and “free cash flow” are non-GAAP financial measures. See Annex B for definitions and reconciliations of all non-GAAP financial measures referenced herein.
(2)Net New Sales is defined as gross sales (new recurring subscription sales plus non-recurring sales) less subscription cancellations.

For additional information about key strategic developments and milestones during 2021, please see the details under “KPI Component and DE&I Goals Component” on page 72 of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

60MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

KEY 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONSKey 2021 Compensation Decisions

WeIn 2021, despite the continuing complex and challenging operating environment resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, our employees continued to display their resilience and dedication to our business, which was fundamental to the strong performance we achieved in 2021. The Company remained committed to nurturing and fostering an “owner-operator,” performance-based culture among employees that aligns compensation with the shareholder experience.

Specifically, in 2021, we granted a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation in the form of “at-risk” variable compensation under the LTIP and the AIP. The 2021 LTIP awards granted to our NEOs consist of a mix of grants of annual RSUs and PSUs (including 3-Year PSUs and 5-Year PSUs) that varies based on the executive’s position, as further detailed on page 80 of this Proxy Statement. Consistent with our historical practice, Mr. Fernandez received 100% of his equity compensation in the form of PSUs, with 60% granted in the form of 5-Year PSUs and 40% granted in the form of 3-Year PSUs. In addition, for 2021, the Compensation Committee:

Increased the proportion of Mr. Pettit’s 5-Year PSUs from 50% to 60% of his overall equity incentive compensation for 2021 (with the remaining 40% granted in the form of 3-Year PSUs), commensurate with Mr. Fernandez;
Added a one-year post-vest mandatory holding period to the 3-Year PSUs that were granted to our NEOs in 2021, where such shares, or rights with respect to such shares, may not be transferred until the expiration of such holding period; and
Under the AIP, introduced DE&I Goals for our senior leaders, linked to 10% of target annual cash bonus.

The Compensation Committee believes that the complimentary performance metrics and associated performance cycles utilized under the AIP and LTIP collectively encourage our senior executives to manage our business with an “owner-operator” mindset that focuses on the long-term health of our business and the interests of our shareholders. Specifically, we believe that PSUs encourage a longer-term orientation to managing our business, while at the same time, the AIP serves as meaningful check and balance to ensure that our executive compensation program encourages our NEOscontinues to deliver strongmeasure and reward for performance against core financial, results that positionoperational and strategic milestones in the Company for futurenear-term to fuel the long-term growth of shareholder value.

The key features of the 2021 RSUs and success. WithPSUs are as follows:

RSUs:

Granted to NEOs other than the CEO and President & COO

Service-vest in three equal installments in each of 2022, 2023 and 2024

Structure of this component was unchanged from prior years

Long-term value of underlying stock tied to share price

3-YEAR TSR PSUs:
Granted to all NEOs to facilitate an “owner-operator” mindset
Cliff-vest at the end of a three-year performance cycle from February 3, 2021 to February 2, 2024, based on achievement of rigorous absolute TSR CAGR performance metrics
Reflect the right to receive between 0% and 300% of the target number of shares based on achievement of the TSR CAGR performance metric over the applicable performance period
Realize meaningful value only to the extent that shareholders also realize value
Include a one-year post-vest mandatory holding period, where such shares, or rights with respect to such shares, may not be transferred until the expiration of such holding period

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT61

5-YEAR TSR PSUs:

Granted to all NEOs to facilitate an “owner-operator” mindset
Cliff-vest at the end of a five-year performance cycle from February 3, 2021 to February 2, 2026, based on achievement of rigorous absolute TSR CAGR performance metrics
Reflect the right to receive between 0% and 200% of the target number of shares based on achievement of the TSR CAGR performance metric over the applicable performance period
Provide “stretch” opportunity to reward for exceptional long-term value creation over a longer-than-typical performance period

Key 2022 Compensation Decisions

In 2021, with the help of its external independent compensation consultant, Semler Brossy, the Compensation Committee carefully considered relevant internalundertook a comprehensive process to research and external economic and business factors affecting NEO pay for 2018. The Compensation Committee considered shareholder feedback, reviewed peer compensation analyses, kept apprised of the changing legal and regulatory framework affecting pay practices and reviewed the performance of our NEOs and the Company as a whole.

As previously disclosed in our 2016, 2017 and 2018 proxy statements, we granted the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs to our NEOs in 2016, other than Mr. Thakkar, who joined the Company in July 2018, in order to further align our executive compensation program with our long-term strategic plan for fiscal years 2016 through 2018. The 2016 Multi-Year PSUs covered three years of the annual PSU component of long-term incentive compensation (i.e., for 2016, 2017 and 2018). As such, consistent with our previous commitment to our shareholders, (i) Mr. Fernandez was not granted equity awards in 2017 and 2018 and (ii) our other NEOs only received grants of RSUs (no PSUs) in 2017 and 2018.

SEC disclosure rules require us to report the total three-year value of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs as 2016 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2016, rather than reporting the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs on an annualized basis for the years they cover (i.e., reportingone-third of the awards in each of 2016, 2017 and 2018). The table below illustrates an alternative way to view the compensation paid for 2018 to our NEOs who received 2016 Multi-Year PSUs (which reflects the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs (at their target value) on an annualized basis—i.e.,one-third of the total three-year target value) relative to the total 2018 compensation that is required to be reported for such NEOs in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 pursuant to SEC rules. The table below is not a substitute for the tables and disclosure required by the SEC’s rules, as set forth on page 74 of this Proxy Statement.

 
  ALTERNATIVE 2018 TOTAL COMPENSATION TABLE 
 
      

NAME

 ANNUALIZED
BASE
SALARY ($)
  2018
CASH
BONUS ($)
  2018
RSUs
($)
  ANNUALIZED
TARGET
PSUs ($)
(1)
  

TOTAL 2018
COMPENSATION

($)(2)

  2018 SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE TOTAL
($)
(2)
 
      
      

Henry A. Fernandez

  1,000,000   1,800,080      5,900,000   8,700,080   2,978,454 
      
      

Kathleen A. Winters

  525,000   1,004,620   520,000   780,000   2,829,620   2,101,349 
      
      

C.D. Baer Pettit

  834,666   1,347,926   500,000   1,600,000   4,282,592   2,864,473 
      
      

Laurent Seyer

  630,340   1,121,551   265,000   1,060,000   3,076,891   2,161,640 
      

(1) The amounts in this column reflect the annualized target value (i.e.,one-third of the target value) of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs granted to the NEOs in 2016.

(2) The amounts reflected in the “Total 2018 Compensation” column above reflect the core components of our executive compensation program in 2018 (taking into account an allocation ofone-third of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs) relative to the total compensation that is required to be reported in this year’s Summary Compensation Table for 2018, and this column does not reflect all of the components of compensation required to be included in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 (as depicted in the table above), including the amounts set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            45


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

The table below illustrates an alternative way to view our CEO’s year-over-year total compensation for each of 2018, 2017 and 2016, which similar to the table above, reflects the annualized target value (i.e.,one-third of the target value) of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs for each of 2018, 2017 and 2016. As reflected in the table below, on an annualized basis, Mr. Fernandez’s 2018 compensation (which is the subject of this year’sSay-on-Pay Vote) increased by only 4.2% relative to 2017 and only 5.7% relative to 2016. Such increase was attributable to the increased payout of his annual cash bonus for 2018 based on actual performance against the applicable financial metrics and KPIs due to our strong financial performance and his performance in 2018 and an increase in his base salary. Mr. Fernandez had not received an increase in base salary since 2014 and did not receive an increase in his base salary for 2019.

 
   ALTERNATIVE CEO YEAR-OVER-YEAR COMPENSATION TABLE 
 
     
   

ANNUALIZED
BASE

SALARY
($)

   

ANNUAL
CASH
BONUS

($)

   RSUs
($)
   

ANNUALIZED
TARGET PSUs

($)

   ALTERNATIVE
TOTAL
COMPENSATION
($)
 
     
     

2018

   1,000,000    1,800,080        5,900,000    8,700,080 
     
     

2017

   950,000    1,497,580        5,900,000    8,347,580 
     
     

2016

   950,000    1,383,720        5,900,000    8,233,720 
     

As we committed to our shareholders and disclosed in 2018, no equity awards were granted to Mr. Fernandez in 2018, and our other NEOs were only granted RSUs (and no PSUs) in 2018. Since our 2018Say-on-Pay vote, the Compensation Committee’s actions with respect to Mr. Fernandez’s compensation were solely to (i) pay him an annual cash bonus in respect of 2018 of $1.8 million under our AIP, based on actual performance against the applicable financial metrics and his KPIs and (ii) increase his LTIP target for 2019 by 10.1% (based on an annualized value of his LTIP target in 2018). The increase took into account the fact that Mr. Fernandez’s LTIP awards will continue to be granted solely in the form of PSUs and the fact that his LTIP contained the greatest“at-risk” component as a result of receiving a higher percentage of5-Year PSUs (as described below) than any other NEO.

For more information on our long-term equity incentive program, see “—Elements of Executive Compensation—Variable Compensation—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation Program” below.

46            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

KEY 2019 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

During 2018, the Compensation Committee researched and evaluatedevaluate an appropriate design for our 20192022 LTIP since we were inthat applies across MSCI, including to our NEOs, to ensure continued alignment of the final performance year forLTIP with MSCI’s go-forward strategic objectives. As part of this review, the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs. Compensation Committee evaluated our current LTIP design against the LTIP practices of our peers and broader industry LTIP practices. In particular, the Compensation Committee considered the following feedback from external and internal reviews, including the views of our shareholders:

there was strong continued support for MSCI’s “owner-operator” culture that is advanced by the LTIP;
the LTIP should focus on a three-year performance period, which is more compelling because it is aligned with the timeframe of MSCI’s strategic planning; and
the Company should consider complementing the absolute TSR CAGR performance metric in the PSUs with financial metrics that are directly linked to the Company’s strategic plan. In particular, feedback to the Compensation Committee was that a focus on revenue and earnings provided the strongest links to MSCI’s go-forward strategy.

After a thorough review and evaluation of the Company’s and its peers’ equity grant practices and taking into account shareholder feedback,process, the Compensation Committee implemented enhancementsdesigned the 2022 LTIP to further enhance our pay-for-performance culture by incorporating the above described feedback and reviews and positioning the 2022 LTIP to support the Company’s long-term equity incentive programstrategic plan and the need to incentivize continued to employ absolute TSR CAGRstock price appreciation. Specifically, the Compensation Committee made the following enhancements for 2022:

introduced PSOs that are earned and vest based on achievement of two equally-weighted performance metrics that are directly linked to the Company’s strategic plan—cumulative revenue and cumulative adjusted EPS—each measured over a cumulative three-year performance period. The grant of the PSOs in 2022 replaced the 5-Year PSU component of our 2021 LTIP;
revised the vesting structure of annual RSU grants to cliff-vest 100% at the end of a three-year service period (rather than annual ratable vesting over a three-year period); and
updated the Company’s share ownership and retention guidelines to provide for even more rigorous requirements.

As a result of these changes, and as discussed in more detail below, the overarching measure of performance. The Company’s 2019 equity compensation2022 LTIP consists of grants of annual RSUs, 3-year PSUs and PSUsPSOs, with athe mix amongst the awards based on position, as further detailed on page 66the executive’s level. The LTIP mix is tiered to align according to level, with our CEO and President & COO having the highest “at-risk” mix, by receiving 100% of this Proxy Statement. Notably, the Company will not grant “multi-year” equitytheir LTIP awards in 2019. the form of performance-based awards of PSUs and PSOs.

The 2022 PSOs were designed such that the Company’s senior leaders, including the NEOs, will only realize value from an award if our cumulative revenue and cumulative Adjusted EPS performance over the cumulative three-year period is above threshold and if increases in our stock price are sustained above the exercise price. As a result, the Compensation Committee believes that the PSOs will further align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by helping to drive performance and by complementing the TSR-based performance metrics applicable to the 3-Year PSUs, which will continue to reward participants for sustained exceptional growth in the Company’s stock price.


Table of Contents

62MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

The key features of the 20192022 RSUs, PSUs and PSUsPSOs are as follows:

RSUs:
Granted to NEOs other than the CEO and President & COO
Cliff-vest at the end of a three-year vesting period (reflects a change from our historical practice of annual ratable vesting)
Long-term value of underlying stock tied to share price

3-YEAR TSR PSUs:

Granted to all NEOs
Cliff-vest at the end of a three-year performance period from February 3, 2022 to February 2, 2025, based on achievement of rigorous absolute TSR CAGR performance metrics
Reflect the right to receive between 0% and 300% of the target number of shares based on achievement of the TSR CAGR performance metric over the applicable performance period
Realize meaningful value only to the extent that shareholders also realize value
Include one-year post-vest mandatory holding period, where such shares, or rights with respect to such shares, may not be transferred until the expiration of such holding period

PSOs:

Granted to all NEOs to further facilitate an “owner-operator” mindset and focus on longer-term strategic goals
Vest upon satisfaction of both a service condition and a performance condition, with the service condition satisfied on the third anniversary of the grant date
Represent the right to exercise between 0% and 200% of the target number of shares subject to the option based on the combined level of achievement of a cumulative revenue performance goal and a cumulative adjusted EPS performance goal, each weighted at 50% and measured over a three-year performance period

LOGO

RSUs: "GrantedIn addition, to NEOs other thanfurther promote our “owner-operator” mindset, the CEO "Service-vest in three equal installments in each of 2020, 2021 and 2022 "The structure of this component remained unchanged from prior years)."Tied to long-term share price appreciation3-Year TSR PSUs: "Granted to all NEOs "Cliff-vest at the end of a three-year performance cycle from February 6, 2019 to February 5, 2022, based on achievement of rigorous absolute TSR CAGR performance metrics (see page [XX] below)"Realize meaningful value only to the extent that shareholders also realize value5-Year TSR PSUs: "Granted to all NEOs to facilitate an owner-operator mindset "Cliff-vest at the end of a five-year performance cycle from February 6, 2019 to February 5, 2024, based on achievement of rigorous absolute TSR CAGR performance metrics (see page [XX] below)"Provide stretch opportunity to reward for exceptional long-term value creation over a longer-than-typical performance period In response to shareholder feedback, the 3-Year PSUs and 5-Year PSUs granted in 2019:" do not include an alternative relative TSR performance metric; and "Are subject to only one performance period (i.e., there will be no re-test or extended performance period).

Other changes made to the Company’s executive compensation program in 2019 include:

Adoption of a more rigorous Clawback Policy. See page 71 of this Proxy Statement for additional information with respect to our Clawback Policy.

Updates toCompensation Committee updated the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executive Committee members, including our NEOs, to require that, in orderaddition to enhanceexisting requirements, our “owner-operator” philosophy.Executive Committee members must hold shares equivalent, in the aggregate, to 25% of the “Net Shares” from equity awards granted to them after January 1, 2022. The Compensation Committee also approved revisions to the minimum share ownership requirements to increase the thresholds applicable to members of our Executive Committee, including our NEOs, to be among the highest multiples of base salary in our peer group. See page 7083 of this Proxy Statement for additional information with respect to our Executive Committee Stock Ownership Guidelines.


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            47


2022 PROXY STATEMENT
COMPENSATION MATTERS        

63

Governance and Administration

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Goals

UpdatesWe evaluate our executive compensation structure on an annual basis to ensure alignment with our Anti-Hedgingcompensation philosophy and Pledging Policybusiness strategy and shareholder priorities. Our compensation philosophy centers around maintaining a compensation program for our NEOs that is designed to clarify that all employees are prohibited from engaging in short sales, purchases or salespromote the achievement of options, puts or calls, as well as derivatives such as swaps, forwards or futuresour short-term and tradinglong-term financial and strategic goals. For additional information on a short-term basisour strategic initiatives, see page 58 of this Proxy Statement.

In addition to the principles described in the Company’s common stock. See“Executive Summary” on page 7257 of this Proxy Statement, for additional informationour executive compensation program is designed to:

promote achievement of the Company’s financial and strategic goals and provide alignment with the objectives of our multi-year strategic plan;
provide a framework to advance our strategic goals and encourage our NEOs to make a long-term commitment to the Company;
base compensation determinations on the performance of the Company, the product/functional unit and the individual;
attract, retain and engage top-level talent and provide each NEO with compensation opportunities that are competitive with market practices and within our cost structure;
appropriately manage compensation risk in light of our business strategy; and
align the long-term interests of our senior executives with those of our shareholders by promoting actions that will allow for sustainable top- and bottom-line growth opportunities and capital returns to shareholders and maintain an “owner-operator” culture and strong corporate governance practices.

Our executive compensation philosophy provides our NEOs with respectthe opportunity to earn a significant portion of their compensation in the form of variable compensation (i.e., annual cash incentive awards under our Anti-HedgingAIP and Pledging Policy.long-term equity incentive awards under our LTIP), with the remaining portion of their total compensation as their base salary. This emphasis on variable compensation is illustrated in the following pay mix charts:

2021 ANNUALIZED CEO2021 AVERAGE ANNUALIZED OTHER NEOS

Table of Contents

64MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

Governance and AdministrationExecutive Compensation Practices

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES

Our executive compensation practices incorporate the following corporate governance best practices that protect the interests of our shareholders and are consistent with high standards of risk management.

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DON’T DO

 Emphasize variable compensation (see page 54 of this Proxy Statement)

 HaveProvide formula-based annual cash incentives

incentive opportunities

 Subject equity awards to vestingrigorous service- and performance-vesting requirements (generally three-year ratable for RSUs and three-year and five-year cliff for PSUs)

●  Impose rigorous stock ownership guidelines and requirements on all of our NEOs (6xand other Executive Committee members, with guidelines among the highest multiples of base salary in our peer group

 12x annual base salary for our CEO 4x for the President/COO and 3xPresident & COO

●  8x annual base salary for our other NEOs) andNEOs

 4x annual base salary for other Executive Committee members

●  In addition to the above, beginning with awards granted in 2022, require members of our Executive Committee, including our NEOs, to hold shares equivalent, in the aggregate, to 25% of the net shares they receive (after payment of taxes, exercise price and related costs) from equity awards until they no longer serve on the Executive Committee, reflecting MSCI’s deep commitment to an “owner-operator” mindset

●  Maintain a clawback policy for incentive based- compensationbased-compensation (cash and equity) with provisions that cover a broad range of detrimental conduct and include clawback provisions in equity awards

financial restatements

●  Provide for double-trigger vesting upon a change in control

●    Have restrictedOnly pay dividend equivalents on performance vesting awards that are only paidPSUs if and when the underlying award vests

●  Make CEOCEO’s and President & COO’s equity grant entirely in PSUsawards tied to multi-year TSR performance metrics, focusedto focus on long-term shareholder value creation

●    Require that 2016 Multi-Year PSUs be subject to additional holding of shares representing 50% of the netafter-tax shares received for aone-year period after vesting

Retain an independent compensation consultant at the direction of the Compensation Committee

●  Incorporate DE&I and climate-related considerations into our AIP program

×●  Do not providegross-ups to cover excise taxes

×●   Do not have any employment agreements with our executive officers

×Do not allow any directors or employees, including all NEOs, to hedge or pledge the Company’s common stock, engage in short sales, purchases or sales of options, puts or calls, as well as derivatives such as swaps, forwards or futures or trade on a short-term basis in the Company’s common stock

×●  Do not allow repricing of options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) awards without shareholder approval

×●  Do not provide for “liberal” share recycling when shares are tendered or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations or as payment of an option exercise price


Table of Contents

48            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


2022 PROXY STATEMENT65

Executive Compensation Process

The executive compensation program described in this section is the result of a year-long process:

  COMPENSATION MATTERS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS

We evaluate our executive compensation structure on an annual basis to ensure alignment with our compensation philosophy and business strategy. Our compensation philosophy centers around maintaining a compensation program for our NEOs that is designed to promote the achievement of our short-term and long-term financial and strategic goals. The goals of the Company include:

driving long-term sustainable growth, profitability and shareholder value creation by protecting and building our existing businesses;

developing innovative and competitive products;

pursuing organic and inorganic growth opportunities;

strengthening our technology platform;

focusing on client-centricity; and

developing our talent pipeline.

In addition to those principles described in the “Executive Summary” on page 41 of this Proxy Statement, our executive compensation program is designed to:

promote achievement of the Company’s financial and strategic goals and provide alignment with the strategic objectives of our multi-year strategic plan;

provide a framework to advance our strategic goals and encourage our NEOs to make a long-term commitment to the Company;

base compensation on the performance of the Company, the product/functional unit and the individual;

attract, retain and engagetop-level talent and provide each NEO with compensation opportunities that are competitive with market practices and within our cost structure;

appropriately manage compensation risk in light of our business strategy; and

align the long-term interests of our senior executives with those of our shareholders by promoting actions that will allow for sustainabletop- and bottom-line growth opportunities and capital returns to shareholders and maintain a culture of ownership and strong corporate governance practices.

Our executive compensation philosophy provides a compensation structure which pays base salaries to our NEOs that represent a relatively small percentage of their total compensation, while offering them the opportunity to earn a significant portion of their compensation in the form of variable compensation (i.e., annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards). This emphasis on variable compensation is illustrated in our pay mix charts on the next page, which reflect 2018 compensation based on 2018 base salary, the actual annual cash incentives paid to our NEOs in respect of 2018 and the annualized target value of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs attributable to 2018 (i.e.,one-third of the target value) for the CEO and the average of the other NEOs who received 2016 Multi-Year PSUs.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            49


COMPENSATION MATTERS        LATE JANUARY/
EARLY FEBRUARY
 

●  Review and determine the AIP awards for prior-year performance for NEOs based on an assessment of the Company’s achievement of the financial metrics established for the prior year, as well as the executive’s achievement of his or her individual KPIs and DE&I Goals for such prior year. The CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on compensation for NEOs (other than himself), and the Compensation Committee takes these recommendations into consideration in reaching its final compensation decisions.

●  Certify achievement of TSR metrics and any other performance metrics applicable to any equity awards granted in prior years.

●  Establish the AIP structure for the current year, including the applicable AIP financial metrics and target AIP awards for each NEO.

●  Establish the structure and performance metrics applicable to equity awards to be granted under the LTIP for the current year, and grant equity awards based on a number of factors, including the Company’s recent performance, peer analysis and the executive’s individual performance and potential future contributions.

MARCH Consider risks arising from the Company’s incentive compensation plans.
APRIL

●  Review Say-on-Pay voting recommendations from proxy advisors and our shareholder vote at our annual meeting.

Review and approve KPIs for current year’s AIP.

JULY TO OCTOBER

Review our status and progress on our performance culture.

●  Review senior management fit for role and potential successors.

●  Review peer group.

Independent compensation consultant reports on compensation practices and trends in the industry.

Review design of next year’s executive compensation programs.

NOVEMBER

NEOs summarize preliminary results against their current-year KPIs and prepare preliminary KPIs for the upcoming year.

●  Meet with shareholders to discuss our executive compensation policies and collect feedback.

DECEMBER●  Finalize design of executive compensation program for upcoming year and review preliminary recommendations for actual and target levels of compensation.
ONGOING

●  Management provides feedback from shareholder outreach regarding our executive compensation program.

●  Review progress made on performance metrics.

●  Monitor compliance with stock ownership guidelines.


Table of Contents

66MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

LOGO

DETERMINATION OF EXECUTIVE  COMPENSATION—CONSIDERATIONS & PROCESS

The Company does not have any individual employment, severance, or similar agreements with its NEOs, and therefore, our NEOs are employees “at will.” As a result, the Company is not contractually bound to compensate the NEOs in a specific manner or amount and has the flexibility to alter or revise its compensation programs as circumstances dictate. The CEO makes recommendations to theIndependent Compensation Committee on compensation for NEOs other than himself, and the Compensation Committee takes these recommendations into consideration in reaching its compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to make final compensation decisions relating to the NEOs.Consultant

The Compensation Committee selected and engaged Semler Brossy as its independent compensation consultant to assist with a range of executive compensation matters, including the overall design of our executive compensation program, evaluation and selection of peer group companies, provision of competitive market data and other matters related to our NEO compensation program. During 2018,2021, Semler Brossy was present at all Compensation Committee meetings and consulted on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee recognizes that it is important to receive objective advice from its outside advisor. Therefore,advisor and regularly meets with Semler Brossy in Executive Session without management’s attendance. Semler Brossy reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee,which, pursuant to its charter, maintains sole responsibility for retaining or terminating the compensation consultant. Semler Brossy did not provide any other services to MSCI during 2018.2021.

Executive Compensation Considerations

The Compensation Committee takes into account a range of factors in determining compensation components and setting compensation amounts. Among others, these factors includeIn addition to reviewing NEO performance against annual goals, various financial and operational metrics, KPIs and DE&I Goals, the Compensation Committee reviews peer group analyses provided by Semler Brossy (used as a reference without benchmarking to a specified target), NEO performance against annual goals, various financial and operational metrics and KPIs.shareholder feedback. The weight attributed to each individual factor may change from time to time, depending on the circumstances of such decisions. We believe this continues to be the best approach for the Company, as it enables the Compensation Committee to balance competing interests, address evolving concernspriorities and meet Company objectives.

2021 Say-on-Pay Vote Results

50            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

2018SAY-ON-PAY VOTE RESULTS AND SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

In 2018, 98.9%2021, 96.8% of the votes cast on theSay-on-Pay Advisory Vote were voted in support of the compensation of our NEOs.

HIGH APPROVAL FOR THE LAST 4 YEARS

Shareholder Engagement

While noneMSCI has established a robust process for engaging shareholders on executive compensation. On at least an annual basis, we meet with shareholders to provide an overview of the shareholders we spoke with expressed any significant concerns regarding the Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions in 2018, which are the subject of this year’sSay-on-Pay Vote, the Compensation Committee carefully considers any feedback we do receive in order to determine whether any changes or enhancements to our executive compensation program will beand highlight changes, if any, that have been made going forward.

As discussed above, duesince our last meeting with the relevant shareholder. In 2021, the Company met with 14 of its largest shareholders (representing approximately 41% of its outstanding shares as of September 30, 2021) in individual meetings to discuss our corporate responsibility practices, including our executive compensation program. None of the shareholders expressed significant concerns with the Company’s compensation program, and the shareholders generally reacted positively to the grant of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs to our NEOs in 2016, as well as our adherence to our commitment that we would not grant our NEOs any PSUs in 2017 or 2018, the Compensation Committee was not in a position in 2017 or 2018 to incorporateCompany’s compensation program.

Our 2021 and 2022 compensation programs reflect feedback we received from our shareholders regarding the PSU componentshareholders.


Table of our LTIP program until early 2019 (when the performance period applicable to the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs concluded).

In connection with the design of our 2019 LTIP program, which will be the subject of the 2020Say-on-PayContents Vote, the Compensation Committee incorporated feedback we received from our shareholders, as described in the table below.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT67

LTIPRECENT ENHANCEMENTS IN RESPONSE TO SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK

WHAT WE HEARD

WHAT WE DIDWHY
Support for cultivating an “owner-operator” mindset
Eliminate relative TSR CAGR test if Company absolute TSR CAGR performance below threshold

2019 PSU awards will vest and be performance adjusted based solely on absolute TSR CAGR

Imposed rigorous absolute TSR CAGR thresholds that if not achieved will resultAdded a one-year post-vest mandatory holding period to our 3-Year PSUs granted in no PSU payout

Absolute TSR CAGR is anall-encompassing measure of Company performance that does not divert focus from any individual strategic priority

This metric complements the performance measures under our AIP which directly tie to the Company’s strategy

Performance period should not be extended another six months for performance sharesEliminated “retesting” feature in new PSUs for 2019 and going forwardIncreases management’s accountability

Our shareholders indicated they prefer that a majority of our CEO’s long-term incentive awards be performance-based

100% PSUs in 2016 and in 2019 (no equity grants in 2017 or 2018)2021We believe that equity award features that promote an “owner-operator” culture focus our CEO should be primarily rewarded for increasing absolutesenior leaders on long-term shareholder value which reinforcescreation
Stronger linkages between ESGand our compensation programIn 2021, introduced DE&I Goals for our senior leadersWe believe that integrating DE&I Goals into our compensation programs ensures executive decision making that aligns with our corporate culture
Request for disclosure around howthe COVID-19 pandemic impactedour compensation programIn 2021, added disclosures to reflect the Compensation Committee’s decision not to make any changes to the performance goals under the AIP or LTIP (including the target performance levels or actual achievement levels) for 2021 in response to the pandemic, including for any currently outstanding awardsWhile the Company was less severely impacted by the pandemic than those in other industries, we believe that our compensation program is designed to reflect the economic realities of the operating environment and align with the impact of the operating environment on our stakeholders
Stronger facilitation of an “owner-operator” philosophymindset and is alignedfocus onlonger-term strategic goals

In 2022, granted PSOs with executing oura three-year performance period, based on the combined level of achievement of operating and financial metrics, and a ten-year term. PSOs replaced the grant of 5-Year PSUs

Implemented more rigorous stock ownership and retention guidelines

We believe that the grant of PSOs with a focus on financial and operating metrics will complement the metrics used in PSUs and provide greater incentives for the execution of the Company’s strategic plan

We believe our 2022 LTIP program together with our enhanced stock ownership guidelines will further an “owner-operator” mindset

Request for disclosure aroundhow our Compensation Committeeassessed performance forpurposes of DE&I GoalsIn 2022, added disclosure regarding NEO performance with respect to DE&I Goals as well as the Company-wide approach to assessing performance against DE&I Goals through our Executive Accountability FrameworkWe believe it is important to convey transparent information around the achievement of DE&I Goals by our senior leaders as well as our process of assessing those goals

The Company will continue to maintain an active dialogue with shareholders and evaluate feedback on issues of importance to them, including the metrics that drive each of our NEO’s long-term incentive compensation. See page 40 of this Proxy Statement for additional information on our shareholder engagement efforts in 2021.

Peer Groups

To ensure competitiveness of compensation structures and pay levels for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of peer company compensation data. Each year, prior to beginning this review, the Compensation Committee examines the composition of companies previously considered our peer companies to make certain that the selected companies continue to be relevant as evaluated according to the following screening criteria:

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            51


Scale, to reflect similar size and complexity;
Geographic footprint, to reflect business structure and international complexity;
Public ownership structure to ensure availability of data;
Competitors for talent; and
Similar business model.

Table of Contents

68MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

The peer group used to inform fiscal 2021 pay decisions for our NEOs was comprised of 16 companies that, in aggregate, approximated MSCI’s size, scope of operations, and operating metrics. In particular, the group was selected such that it, in aggregate:

Approximated MSCI’s size on a revenue basis for fiscal 2021;
Reflected MSCI’s high-margin, high-valuation operating metrics and international reach; and/or
Represented the competitive talent market for financial technology, research and consulting, and data systems/information technology companies.
  

Company
GICS Classification
MSCI Inc.Financials—Capital Markets—Financial Exchanges and Data
Aspen Technology Inc.Information Technology—IT Services—Application Software
Black Knight Inc.Information Technology—IT Services—Data Processing and Outsourced Services
Dun & BradstreetIndustrials—Professional Services—Research and Consulting Services
Equifax Inc.Industrials—Professional Services— Research and Consulting Services
FactSet Research Systems Inc.Financials—Capital Markets—Financial Exchanges and Data
Fair Isaac CorporationInformation Technology—Software—Application Software
Gartner, Inc.Information Technology—IT Services—IT Consulting and Other Services
IHS Markit Ltd.Industrials—Professional Services—Research and Consulting Services
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.Financials—Capital Markets—Financial Exchanges and Data
Moody’s CorporationFinancials—Capital Markets—Financial Exchanges and Data
Morningstar, Inc.Financials—Capital Markets—Financial Exchanges and Data
SEI Investments CompanyFinancials—Capital Markets—Asset Management and Custody Banks
S&P Global Inc.Financials—Capital Markets—Financial Exchanges and Data
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.Information Technology—Software—Application Software
TransUnionIndustrials—Professional Services—Research and Consulting Services
Verisk Analytics, Inc.Industrials—Professional Services—Research and Consulting Services

Review for 2022

In its annual review of the executive compensation peer group for 2022, the Compensation Committee undertook a holistic review of the executive compensation peer group and determined the group to be sufficiently robust for market comparisons and balances. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee maintained the same peer group, as the selected companies met the same criteria described above for 2021 and the group continued to be an appropriate size.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT69

Review of Our Programs

ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONElements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program in 20182021 generally has consisted of the following elements:

LOGO

52            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

In 2019, our CEO continued to receive 100% of his LTIP in the form of PSUs. The 2019 equity mix for our NEOs and other Executive Committee members can be found on page 66 of this Proxy Statement.

The primary objectives for each element of our executive compensation program are outlined in the chart below and described in further detail where noted.elements. We have also noted changes implemented in 20192022 where applicable.

Compensation
Element
     Purpose     2021     2022

ANNUAL BASE SALARY

STARTS ON
PAGE 70

 Provides certainty and predictability to meet ongoing living and other financial commitments ●  The only fixed component of our executive compensation program 

●   The only fixed component of our executive compensation program.

●   In 2022, each of Messrs. Wiechmann and Gutowski received an increase to his annual base salary after a consideration of several factors, including peer group market data and competitive practices

ANNUAL INCENTIVE

(Cash Bonus)

STARTS ON
PAGE 71

 Intended to drive one-year performance results against financial targets and other Company, individual and leadership focused goals 

●   Metrics vary by executive, but include:

●   Revenue

●   Adjusted EPS

●   Net New Sales

●   Free Cash Flow

●   Key Performance Indicator/Leadership Effectiveness Goals

●   DE&I Goals

 No change to metrics

LONG-TERM INCENTIVES

STARTS ON
PAGE 79

 Fosters an “owner-operator” mindset, closely aligns management’s interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders and promotes the retention of key members of our management team 

●   RSUs which ratably service vest over three years

●   Grant of 3-Year PSUs and 5-Year PSUs (which vest based on absolute TSR)

●   3-Year PSUs cover a cumulative three-year performance period

●   5-Year PSUs cover a cumulative five-year performance period

●   Each of Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit received 100% of their LTIP awards in the form of PSUs for 2021, with 60% of their PSUs granted in the form of 5-Year PSUs, the highest percentage amongst all of our NEOs for 2021 (for Mr. Pettit, an increase from 50% in 2020)

 

●   RSUs which cliff vest after a three-year vesting period

●   Grant of 3-Year PSUs (which vest based on absolute TSR)

●   PSOs with a three-year performance period which vest based on the combined level of achievement of a cumulative adjusted EPS performance metric and a cumulative revenue performance metric

●   Each of Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit received 100% of their LTIP awards in the form of performance awards, with 50% in the form of PSUs and 50% in the form of PSOs, with other NEOs receiving a mix of 30% RSUs, 35% PSOs and 35% PSUs


   

COMPENSATION

ELEMENT

  

PURPOSE

 

  

2018

 

  

2019

 

   
   

Annual Base Salary

(starts on page 54)

  

•  The only fixed component of our executive compensation program

 

•  Provides certainty and predictability to meet ongoing living and other financial commitments

  

•  Base salaries are set at competitive market rates

  

•  Ms. Winters, our former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, received a 5% increase in her base salary

   
   

Annual Incentive

(Cash Bonus)

(starts on page 55)

  

•  Intended to drive one year performance results against financial targets and other Company, individual and leadership focused goals

  

•  Metrics vary by executive, but include:

 

•  Revenue

 

•  Adjusted EPS

 

•  Net New Sales(1)

 

•  Free Cash Flow (defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less Capex)

 

•  Contribution Margin(2) (expressed in dollars)

 

•  Key Performance Indicator/Leadership Effectiveness Goals

  

•  No change to metrics

   
   

Long-Term Incentives

(starts on page 63)

  Intended to closely align management’s interests with the long term best interests of our shareholders and to promote the retention of key members of our management team  

•  No PSUs granted in 2018 in light of the grant of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs (which vest based on the level of achievement of the applicable absolute TSR CAGR (or relative TSR CAGR) performance metrics measured over a minimum three-year performance period)

 

•  Messrs. Pettit and Seyer and Ms. Winters received annual service-vesting RSUs for their long-term incentive awards in 2018. RSUs service-vest in three equal annual installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date

  

•  Grant of3-Year PSUs and5-Year PSUs (which vest based on absolute TSR) and do not have any “retesting” features

 

•  3-Year PSUs cover a three year performance period

 

•  5-Year PSUs cover a five year performance period

 

•  No changes to RSU awards

 

•  Our CEO continues to receive 100% of his LTIP awards in the form of PSUs

Table of Contents

(1)70

“Net New” means gross sales (new recurring subscription sales plus non-recurring sales) less subscription cancellations.

(2)MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

“Contribution Margin” means operating revenues less cost of revenues, selling and marketing expenses and research and development expenses.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            53


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

Fixed Compensation

Annual Base Salary

Base salary is the only fixed component of our executive compensation program. The annual base salary element offers our NEOs a measure of certainty and predictability to meet ongoing living and other financial commitments. In setting base salaries for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee has sought to establish base salary rates that (i) are competitive with those provided for similar positions at companies in our peer group thatand (ii) recognize the experience and performance of the NEO. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our NEOs on an annual basis.

Effective January 1, 2019, Ms. Winters, None of our former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,NEOs received an increase in base salary from $525,000 to $550,000. The increase was made as part of the Compensation Committee’s annual review of the NEOs’ base salaries and was intended to align her base salary with competitive market practice. No other changes to NEO base salaries were made.

for 2021.

Name2021 Base Salary Rate ($)

NAME

2018 BASE

SALARY

RATE ($)

Henry A. Fernandez

1,000,000
Andrew C. Wiechmann 
500,000

Kathleen A. Winters

525,000

C. D. Baer Pettit

(1)
834,666859,819
Scott A. Crum 550,000
Robert J. Gutowski 450,000

Laurent Seyer

(1)
630,340

Jigar Thakkar

500,000
Base salary for Mr. Pettit was paid in British pounds sterling and converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.37571. Mr. Pettit’s 2021 base salary rate was £625,000.

Variable Compensation

The variable compensation actually paid to our NEOs is subject to complementary performance metrics whichthat are designed to (i) emphasize pay for performance, and(ii) balance short-term and long-term incentives, and (iii) take into account input from our shareholders. The variable elements of our target-based incentive compensation program include:

(1) an annual cash incentive component; and

(1)

an annual cash incentive component; and

(2) a long-term equity incentive component.

(2)

a long-term equity incentive component

In determining target cash and equity incentive compensation amounts for each NEO, the Compensation Committee takes into account a number of factors, including: the differences in relative responsibilities; experience and performance in role; the ability to impact overall Company performance; Company, product segment and individual performance; and historical compensation and peer group analyses (used as a reference without benchmarking to a specified target).

There is no minimum amount of variable compensation payable to the NEOs. The Compensation Committee makes determinations, in its discretion, as to the amounts of variable compensation awarded based on program metrics and individual performance, subject to the terms of any applicable plan or arrangement.


Table of Contents

54            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


2022 PROXY STATEMENT

        COMPENSATION MATTERS71

Annual Cash Incentives

The Company awards annual cash incentives pursuant to the Company’s AIP, which closely aligns management’s interests with those of shareholders by employing a formulaic approach that takes into account specific financial criteria and individual KPIs and DE&I Goals when determining cash incentives. The Compensation Committee believes that subjecting a portion70% of the target cash incentive topre-established performance targets further promotes shareholder value creation by more directly aligning executive compensation with Company performance and strategic goal attainment. EachUnder the AIP, each NEO is eligible to earn an annual target cash incentive under the AIP.

Under the AIP, participantsand may receive between 0% and 150% of their target cash incentive opportunity based on attainment of the level of certain financial performance metrics (weighted(together, weighted at 70%) and, individual KPIs (weighted at 30%20%) and DE&I Goals (weighted at 10%). For 2018,2021, the target cash incentive opportunity, metrics, and corresponding weightings for our NEOs are included in the table set forth below:

   
    FINANCIAL COMPONENT—OVERALL WEIGHTING OF 70%  
   
    
    

MSCI METRICS

 

 

PRODUCT METRICS

 

  

 

NAME

 

 

2018 TARGET CASH
INCENTIVE ($)

 REVENUE ADJUSTED
EPS
 TOTAL
NET
NEW
SALES
 FREE
CASH
FLOW
 ANALYTICS
TOTAL NET
NEW
SALES
 INDEX
TOTAL
NET
NEW
SALES
 

 

“ALL
OTHER”
TOTAL
NET
NEW
SALES

 

KEY  

PERFORMANCE  

INDICATORS  

(KPIs)  

         
         

Henry A. Fernandez

 1,400,000 17.5% 28.0% 17.5% 7.0%    30.0%
         
         

Kathleen A. Winters

 800,000 17.5% 28.0% 17.5% 7.0%    30.0%
         
         

C. D. Baer Pettit

 1,048,341 17.5% 28.0% 17.5% 7.0%    30.0%
         
         

Laurent Seyer

 934,827 14.0% 14.0%  7.0% 14.0% 14.0% 7.0% 30.0%
         
         

Jigar Thakkar(1)

 324,110 17.5% 28.0% 17.5% 7.0%    30.0%
         

(1) Mr. Thakkar’s 2018 target cash incentive opportunity was prorated based on his 7/16/18 hire date as reflected in the table above. His annualized target cash incentive award is $700,000.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            55


     Financial Component—Overall Weighting of 70%    
     MSCI Metrics    
Name 2021 Target Cash
Incentive ($)
 Revenue Adjusted
EPS
 Total Net
New Sales
 Free Cash
Flow
 KPIs DE&I
Goals
Henry A. Fernandez       $1,400,000     20.0%     30.0%     40.0%     10.0%     20.0%     10.0%
Andrew C. Wiechmann $600,000 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0%
C. D. Baer Pettit(1) $1,238,139 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Scott A. Crum $700,000 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Robert J. Gutowski $650,000 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0%
(1)
COMPENSATION MATTERS        

The 2021 target annual cash incentive opportunity reflected in the table above for Mr. Pettit was converted from British pounds sterling to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.37571 for fiscal 2021. Mr. Pettit’s actual 2021 target cash incentive amount was £900,000.

FINANCIAL COMPONENT

The threshold, target and maximum for each financial component making up the AIP, as well as the actual results attained for 2018,2021, are included in the table set forth below.

            Threshold     Target     Maximum     Actual(2)
Metrics Target
$mm(1)
 % Of
Target
    Payout (% Of
Opportunity)
 % Of
Target
     Payout (% Of
Opportunity)
 % Of
Target
     Payout (% Of
Opportunity)
 % Of
Target
     Payout (% Of
Opportunity)
MSCI Revenue 1,894.6 95% 50% 100% 100% 105% 150% 107.9% 150%
MSCI Adjusted
Earnings Per Share
 8.37 90% 50% 100% 100% 110% 150% 118.9% 150%
MSCI Total Net 225.3 70% 50% 100% 100% 130% 150% 112.3% 120.4%
New Sales                  
Free Cash Flow 687.1 85% 50% 100% 100% 115% 150% 128.5% 150%
(1)Except Adjusted EPS, which is not stated in millions.
(2)In determining the actual results attained for the Total Net New Sales metric under the 2021 AIP, the Compensation Committee made an adjustment to the Company’s reported results in accordance with the terms of the AIP, which permits the Compensation Committee to make adjustments, in whole or in part, to any performance measures (and the methodologies relating to such measures) for certain events specified in the AIP. Specifically, the Compensation Committee made an adjustment to the reported results for the Total Net New Sales metric to recognize a one-time customer payment in 2021 of $18 million. The Compensation Committee made this adjustment because the customer payment resulted in economic benefits to the Company similar to a non-recurring sale, but, absent this adjustment, would not have been taken into account under the Total Net New Sales category in 2021 or future years given the nature of the performance metrics. Non-recurring sales are credited at 75% for the Total Net New Sales category for compensation purposes under the AIP. As a result, there was a positive adjustment to the achievement of the Total Net New Sales metric under the 2021 AIP of $13.5 million.

     
    THRESHOLD TARGET MAXIMUM ACTUAL
     
         

METRICS

 TARGET
$MM
(1)
 % OF
TARGET
 PAYOUT (% OF
OPPORTUNITY)
 % OF
TARGET
 PAYOUT (% OF   
OPPORTUNITY)   
 % OF   
TARGET   
 PAYOUT (% OF   
OPPORTUNITY)   
 % OF   
TARGET   
 PAYOUT (% OF   
OPPORTUNITY)   
         
         

MSCI Revenue

 1,398.9 95% 50% 100% 100% 105% 150% 102.5% 125.1%
         
         

MSCI Adjusted EPS

 4.87 90% 50% 100% 100% 110% 150% 109.9% 149.3%
         
         

MSCI Total Net New

 128.8 70% 50% 100% 100% 130% 150% 108.2% 113.7%
         
         

Free Cash Flow

 472.1 85% 50% 100% 100% 115% 150% 119.4% 150.0%
         
         

Analytics Total Net New Sales

 41.5 60% 50% 100% 100% 140% 150% 99.9% 99.9%
         
         

Index Total Net New Sales

 65.8 60% 50% 100% 100% 140% 150% 113.3% 116.7%
         
         

“All Other” Total Net New Sales(2)

 21.4 60% 50% 100% 100% 140% 150% 108.4% 110.6%
         

(1) Except Adjusted EPS, which is not stated in millions

(2) “All Other” consistsTable of Real Estate and ESG segments’ Net New SalesContents

72MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

In determining the 2018 actual cash incentive amounts awarded under the 2021 AIP, the Compensation Committee made certain adjustments to the target financial metrics applicable to our NEOs in accordance with the terms of the AIP, which permits the Compensation Committee to make adjustments, in whole or in part, to any performance measures (including target performance levels) for certain events specified in the AIP. Specifically, the Compensation Committee made adjustments to the target metrics listed below to take into account the impact resulting from the completion of two divestitures which occurred in 2018: (1) the divestitureCompany’s acquisition of Financial Engineering Associates, Inc. (“FEA”), which was completedRCA on April 9, 2018September 13, 2021 and (2) accelerated cash tax payments that impacted the divestitureCompany’s free cash flow in 2021 and that were not originally part of Investor Force Holdings, Inc.,the Company’s operating plan.

Metrics     Original Target
$mm
     Adjustments
$mm
     Adjusted
Target
$mm
MSCI Revenue 1,872.4 +22.1 1,894.6
MSCI Total Net New Sales 222.2 +3.1 225.3
Free Cash Flow 790.1 -103.0 687.1

KPI COMPONENT AND DE&I GOALS COMPONENT

The Compensation Committee believes that including KPIs (20% of the target AIP cash bonus amount) and DE&I Goals (10% of the target AIP cash bonus amount) under the AIP provides an opportunity to assess individual results against specific goals as well as progress against multi-year efforts. The Compensation Committee regularly assesses the components and metrics used in the AIP and the weighting of those components and metrics, in addition to taking into account shareholder feedback.

In 2021, we accelerated our commitment to advancing DE&I by linking the AIP target compensation of each Managing Director, including each of our NEOs, to DE&I progress. Our Managing Directors’ DE&I Goals are intended to ensure long-term stability at the Company, align with our long-term strategy and enhance our DE&I objectives. In particular, our CEO’s KPIs and DE&I Goals are directly tied to long-term strategic transformation, succession planning, new-hire onboarding and strengthening MSCI’s culture of inclusion and belonging, all of which build a strong foundation for future growth.

We developed an Executive Accountability Framework (“InvestorForce”EAF”), which to establish the philosophy and process to assess each Managing Director’s progress against DE&I Goals and overall DE&I performance, considering specific goals set by each Managing Director at the beginning of the year. The EAF stresses that creating an inclusive environment is as important as improving diverse representation; therefore, Managing Directors are assessed on their qualitative and quantitative results with a range of potential outcomes including those relating to talent development, retention, hiring practices and engagement. In addition, leaders are assessed as to whether they consistently display inclusive leadership behaviors and drive activity that fosters an inclusive environment. Each NEO was completed on October 12, 2018.

   

METRICS ($ IN MILLION

EXCEPT ADJUSTED EPS)

  ORIGINAL
TARGET
   ADJUSTMENTS   ADJUSTED
TARGET
 
   
   

Adjusted EPS

   4.93    (0.06   4.87 
   

56            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

The KPI component is weighted at 30% forassessed individually with further calibration across all NEOs. In assessing the KPI component,Performance recommendations were then made to the Compensation Committee, took into account thewhich reviewed and approved performance in respect of each NEO, as described below. SeeAnnex B for the definitionsNEO.


Table of eachnon-GAAPContents measure, reconciliations of eachnon-GAAP financial measure with the most comparable GAAP measure and other information regarding the use ofnon-GAAP financial measures.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT

Henry A. Fernandez, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer73

Fortified strategy and strengthened leadership

•  Continued the transformation of MSCI by developing a strategy that focuses on providing actionable solutions that enable industry participants to prepare for the future.

•  Led a robust strategic planning process, which focused on key long-term growth areas such as ESG, fixed income, wealth management, client solutions, the MSCI Analytics Platform and a broader technology transformation.

•  Enhanced the leadership team to support the Company’s growth strategy by (i) hiring a Chief Technology Officer and Head of Engineering to execute our technology optimization strategy and a Global Head of Client Solutions to bring integrated solutions to our larger asset owner and asset manager clients and assist in developing our private asset class strategy and (ii) appointing the Head of Client Coverage—APAC to the Executive Committee to elevate representation of the Asia Pacific region in management’s decision making-process.

•  Strengthened the Company’s focus on ESG issues by (i) appointing a Chief Responsibility Officer for the first time at the Company to lead a cross-functional team of senior leaders who will work together to streamline the Company’s ESG disclosures and reevaluate and make recommendations for improving the Company’s ESG strategy and policies and (ii) incorporating multiple corporate ESG objectives into his KPIs for 2019.

Drove exceptional financial performance and enhanced capital management

•  During a year of volatility in international markets and periods of heightened levels of uncertainty in the U.S. markets, achieved the following strong financial results:

•  Delivered revenues of $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing 12.5% growth over the year ended December 31, 2017.

•  Robust expense management, together with strong revenue performance generated net income of $508 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing an increase of 67.1% and Adjusted EBITDA of $772 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing an increase of 17.1%; in each case compared to the prior year, and a net income margin of 35.4% and Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 53.9%; in each case for the year ended December 31, 2018.

•  Achieved strong operating metrics contributing to a total run rate at December 31, 2018 of $1.4 billion, with an organic subscription run rate growth of 10.0%.

•  Generated outstanding diluted EPS and Adjusted EPS growth of 71.0% and 34.4%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, which was driven by continued strong operating performance.

•  Successfully executed a $500 million senior notes offering, which positioned the Company to take advantage of market volatility and repurchase $925 million of shares at opportunistic price levels.

•  Increased the quarterly dividend by 52.6%, resulting, when combined with share repurchases, in returning $1.1 billion to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2018.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            57


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

 

HENRY A. FERNANDEZ, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Drive exceptional financial performance andenhance capitalmanagement

Henry A. Fernandez, Chairman  Achieved exceptional results in 2021, demonstrating the strength of an ambitious strategy, key long-term investments and consistent execution, along with unprecedented demand for the BoardCompany’s solutions.

  Highlights include the following (versus 2020):

  2021 Full-Year Operating Revenue of $2.04 billion, up 20.5%.

  2021 Full-Year Net New Sales up 48.7%.

  2021 Full-Year Adjusted EPS* up 27.1%.

  2021 Full-Year Free Cash Flow* up 16.2%.

  Expanded MSCI’s role as a change agent for the global investment industry.

  Led strategic progress in providing the common language and Chief Executive Officer (continued)tools investors use for indexation, risk management, factors, ESG, climate and other key investment categories.

  Oversaw “triple crown” investments to help fuel future growth and meet client demand, including through the acquisition of Real Capital Analytics, a global commercial real estate data provider.

●   Returned capital to shareholders, including opportunistically repurchasing approximately $140 million of MSCI common stock and returning approximately $300 million to shareholders in the form of quarterly dividends (increase of approximately 23% versus 2020).

Driveshareholdervalue throughstrategic partnerships andproduct launches
 

  Prioritized the development and introduction of new products and services to accelerate growth, and launched new partnerships to capture emerging opportunities. Examples include:

   Launched new ISaaS products, including Data Explorer, Climate Lab Enterprise and Index Builder.

   Entered into new partnership agreement with Royalty Pharma plc to expand MSCI’s existing thematic index suite with new indexes that aim to represent the performance of long-term, cutting-edge companies that are expected to disrupt the biopharmaceuticals and life sciences industries.

   Licensed China A 50 Connect Index to HKEX, leading to the most successful launch ever of an MSCI index-linked futures contract.

   Jointly created the MSCI COLCAP Index with the Colombia Stock Exchange.

   Advanced the Company’s long-term strategy through a partnership agreement with Goldman Sachs Global Markets to distribute portfolio-level Barra factor analytics to clients via its Marquee platform, its digital storefront for Goldman Sachs, and select third-party content.

AdvanceMSCI’s climatecapabilities andhelped clientstransition to aNet-Zero world

  Continued to steer MSCI’s leadership in providing the transparency clients need to better integrate ESG and climate risks and opportunities into investment processes. Launched several significant ESG and Climate tools and solutions, including:

   Net-Zero Tracker, a quarterly gauge of progress by public companies toward curbing climate risk. The Tracker calculates the individual and aggregate emissions of all MSCI ACWI-IMI companies and highlights leading and lagging companies and sectors in the path towards net-zero emissions.

   Climate Lab Enterprise, which helps investors monitor and manage climate-related risks.

   Implied Temperature Rise, a search tool that computes and discloses how the emissions trajectories of companies, portfolios and funds align with different global temperature pathways.

   Carbon Footprinting of Private Equity and Debt Funds, a product jointly developed with Burgiss and MSCI’s ESG team, which measures the carbon emissions of 15,000 private companies and the carbon intensity of nearly 4,000 private equity and debt funds.

   Prioritized MSCI’s own climate goals through a more robust commitment to corporate responsibility, including by the introduction of MSCI’s goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2040 throughout its global operations and by becoming a founding member of the Net Zero Financial Service Providers Alliance.

*“Adjusted EPS” and “free cash flow” are non-GAAP financial measures. See Annex B for definitions and reconciliations of all non-GAAP financial measures referenced herein.

Table of Contents

74MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

Strengthen MSCI’s commitment to building a diverse, equitable and inclusive culture

  Championed and intensified the focus across MSCI on DE&I outcomes. Amplified engagement and accountability:

  Appointed first Chief Diversity Officer.

  Introduced DE&I Executive Accountability Framework, aligned with the firm’s compensation process and the introduction of individual DE&I Goals for senior leaders tied to incentive compensation.

  Enhanced commitment and approach to identifying and attracting senior diverse talent, which resulted in hiring 11 Managing Directors across functions and geographies, many from diverse or under-represented backgrounds, including four female and three Black executives.

  Strengthened MSCI’s culture of inclusion and belonging:

  Conducted listening tour with 16 local offices, where DE&I was a key topic of discussion.

  Hosted a global conversation with the MSCI Pride ERG leaders to gather feedback on important issues affecting the LGBTQ+ community.

  Conducted a fireside chat at the 4th Annual Global DE&I Summit in November, celebrating and recognizing the achievements of the Executive Diversity Council and employee resource group leaders.

  Focused on employee engagement and empowerment:

  Drove MSCI’s Future of Work transformation through the development of a forward-looking, hybrid-work strategy centered on client-centricity, trust and empowerment.

  According to our December 2021 employee engagement survey (not including employees from newly acquired companies), the percentage of respondents characterized as fully engaged equaled the highest since we implemented the survey.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT75

ANDREW C. WIECHMANN, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER
Drive financialmanagementexcellence

  Established “Finance at the Front” initiative to drive deeper insights, enhanced decision making, proactive focus on business improvement and achievement of financial targets.

  Drove enhancements to overall financial management process, including the internal capital allocation process to ensure a rigorous and intense focus on triple-crown investment activity and firm-wide efficiencies.

  Proactively managed investments and firm resources to capitalize on market opportunities, drive financial performance and ensure strong execution, with a focus on value creation, helping to drive record financial results for 2021 across key metrics.

Championcontinuedtransformationof the financeorganizationand firmwide processes

  Continued intense focus on process simplification and automation to improve efficiency.

  Rationalized, simplified and automated internal reporting.

  Oversaw successful deployment of enhanced revenue management system and broader subscription revenue processes.

  Drove alignment and enhanced decision making through key metric visibility, improved forecasting and process discipline.

  Incorporated risk management in operating rhythm to ensure broader awareness around and intentionality in levels of Company risk.

  Continued buildout of business intelligence capabilities to enhance understanding of markets and competitors, improve decision making and optimize outcomes.

Enhance capitaldiscipline andfurther optimizecapital structure

  Advanced firmwide focus on optimizing cash flow dynamics of the business through proactive working capital management and enhanced client contract discipline.

  Capitalized on attractive market opportunities to enhance credit profile, lower cost of capital and extend maturities.

  Executed $1.8 billion of new financing transactions, including refinancing $1 billion of outstanding debt, and extended the life of our revolving credit facility.

  Meaningfully extended debt maturities (with the earliest maturity being eight years out) and materially reduced weighted average cost of debt.

  Achieved an investment grade rating from Fitch and an upgrade from Moody’s.

Further instillfirmwide cultureof mergers,partnerships and acquisitions(“MP&A”)

  Drove enhanced firmwide focus on MP&A to accelerate key strategic growth areas and enable further business expansion.

  Formalized processes with product and functional leaders to develop and manage MP&A opportunity pipeline in order to drive focus and accountability.

  Successfully attracted and onboarded key new Strategy and Corporate Development hire to help drive MP&A culture.

  Successfully executed and drove value realization of two acquisitions, two minority investments and 20+ strategic partnerships in priority areas.

  Implemented new policies and procedures for engaging with existing and prospective partners to ensure alignment with MSCI’s corporate responsibility objectives.

Enhance diverserepresentationwithin thefinance organization andthroughout MSCI

  As a result of expanded recruiting outreach to broader qualified talent pool, increased diversity in Finance organization globally.

  Championed diversity in all talent development, promotion and succession decisions in the Finance organization to ensure all talent is being appropriately considered and supported.

  Acted as Executive Sponsor of All Abilities Network.

  Active participant as speaker/sponsor of ERGs: Women’s Leadership Forum, MSCI Pride, Black Leadership Network and All Abilities Network; participant in 4th Annual Global DE&I Summit.


Table of Contents

76MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

BAER PETTIT, PRESIDENT & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Prioritizeinvestmenttargets to drivegrowth

  Drove greater investment into high growth areas and delivered strong financial and operating results:

  Drove record financial results and growth in 2021 across key metrics.

  Oversaw the execution of record sales and performance against key operating metrics in 2021.

  Oversaw an increase in MSCI’s footprint in private assets through the acquisition of Real Capital Analytics.

  Drove the 2022 Operating Plan process by emphasizing critical growth areas, with a heightened focus on client-centricity. Continued to identify and prioritize efficiencies to create additional investment capacity.

Acceleratetechnologytransformation

  Transformed technology function by strengthening technology leadership team through key hires in ESG and Climate and Index, and by targeting greater investment into critical technology initiatives:

  Directed investment into new ISaaS offerings.

  Oversaw the development and release of new thematic indexes via Barra Portfolio Manager.

  Drove progress on cloud migration across multiple product lines in a cost-efficient manner, including the complete migration of ESG and Climate applications and services.

Focus on beingpartner of choiceand helping ourclients buildbetter portfolios

  Oversaw improvements to client experience by simplifying contract structures, promoting greater automation and adding tools to help clients find relevant content more efficiently.

  Optimized incentive compensation programs within the Client Coverage organization to drive focus on client-centricity.

  Prioritized the “Wealth” client segment, leveraging our various tools and solutions to better capitalize on the growing demand for customization in investment processes.

Prioritized focus on peoplenew research, including related to ESG and cultureClimate and Thematics, to provide clarity on key investment problems.

•  Promoted a performance culture of high employee engagement  Developed new ESG and personal accountability.

•  Led efforts to change the Company’s culture to emphasize innovation.

•  Championed the expansion of MSCI diversity practices to facilitate a highly diverse and inclusive workplace by:

•  Conducting an inaugural annual Diversity and Inclusion Summit that was attended by high performing women with leadership capabilities, as well as members of the EDC;

•  Launching the first formal and structured mentoring program for high performing women; and

•  SupportingClimate solutions, including through the launch of the MSCI Pride Employee Resource Group for LGBTQ employees.first Paris Aligned Fixed Income indexes in the market.

•  Completed a rigorous assessment of our current talent pool

Instill practicesthat supportan inclusiveand successor development planning processinnovativeculture

  Actively supported efforts to ensure that weall Managing Directors have, the right leadership in place to continue to deliver on our strategic objectives, with an emphasis on strengthening the pipeline of our female successors.

Kathleen A. Winters, Former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurerare measured against, specific and individualized DE&I Goals.

Drove initiatives to maximize the value of the franchise

•  Oversaw reduction of effective tax rate and adjusted tax rate to 19.4% and 20.7%, respectively,  Served as executive sponsor for the year ended December 31, 2018 comparedPride and Allies ERGs, including by hosting a town hall and speaking at the Pride and Allies Summit.

  Conducted career conversations to 34.9%support internal succession planning for key roles within the Research and 27.5%, respectively,Product functions.

  Supported development of a leadership profile to evaluate candidates more objectively for the year ended December 31, 2017.assessment, selection and promotion.

•  Improved forecasting  Oversaw use of MSCI’s innovation ‘Breakthrough’ methodology in numerous areas, including talent attraction and transparency around excess cashmobility, Future of Work challenges and cash available to repatriate and executed a $415 million cash repatriation planDE&I initiatives, resulting in the year ended December 31, 2018.

•  Promoted increased shareholder interestestablishment of transformational practices around recruiting and broadened shareholder base through a 55% increase in shareholder meetings versus prior year.

•  Oversaw the successful divestiture of twonon-core businesses in the year ended December 31, 2018, resulting in proceeds of $83.8 million andpre-tax gains of approximately $57.2 million.

Balanced operational needs with achieving strategic priorities

•  Introduced operating efficiencies to control Adjusted EBITDA expense growth and drive attractive operating leverage in the year ended December 31, 2018, with net income margin expansion and Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion of over 1,000 and 200 basis points, respectively, net income and Adjusted EBITDA growth of 67.1% and 17.1%, respectively, and Diluted EPS and Adjusted EPS growth of 71.0% and 34.4%, respectively, each driven by operating performance, reduced share count and lower effective tax rate.

•  Prioritized high return investments and strengthened execution ofin-flight investments through an enhanced internal capital allocation process.hybrid-work collaboration.


Table of Contents

58            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


2022 PROXY STATEMENT

        COMPENSATION MATTERS77

 

SCOTT A. CRUM, CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER
Strengthen oursenior talentpipeline

Kathleen A. Winters, Former Chief Financial Officer  Significantly accelerated Executive Committee succession and Treasurer (continued)progression planning by focusing on preparing internal senior talent and identifying external pipeline of senior talent.

  Created Managing Director and Executive Committee success profiles, which will serve as the basis for future selection, promotion and progression decisions.

  Developed Managing Director assessment, selection, promotion and progression methodology.

  Hired 11 Managing Directors in 2021, with strong diversity across both gender and ethnicity.

Developed rigorous approach for identifying specific capability gaps for converting learning programs, including our flagship leadership and management programs, to virtual.

  Expanded learning offerings, including programs to support our Future of Work implementation, inclusive leadership efforts and the well-being of our people.

Advance ourculture ofdiversity, equityand inclusion
 

  Appointed MSCI’s first Chief Diversity Officer, responsible for operating across MSCI to align our DE&I goals with business outcomes.

  Introduced DE&I metrics for Managing Directors tied to 10% of target annual cash incentive compensation.

  Hired thirty-six interns to the One MSCI internship program in New York, Chicago and London.

  Launched three new ERGs in 2021: Asian Support Network, All Abilities Network and Hola! MSCI.

  Offered unconscious bias training to all employees globally, using a science-based approach with practical applications, to raise awareness of bias and create a more inclusive culture.

Enhanced capital managementpay equity practices for all female new hires.

Continue tosupport andenhance ourperformance andgrowth culture 

•  Oversaw disciplined process  Developed and structure for share repurchase programs to enable $925 millionimplemented our comprehensive Future of share repurchases at highly attractive values.

•  Proactively managed cash flowsWork program that contained vision, principles and cash position to enable a 52.6% increase in the dividend in the year ended December 31, 2018.

•  Drove the successful execution of a $500 million financing transaction during an attractive window in the high yield market.

global guidelines.

Drove improvements in financial performance management, processes  Led organizational design initiative, which yielded new organizational design and systems

•  Increased financial process automation, resulting in greater process controls and reduced cycle times.

•  Expanded the use of metrics-based dashboards to enhance investment decision-making and to drive operational efficiency throughout the organization. Led initiative to prioritize client analysis and other profitability analytics, enabling the Company to make more informed business decisions.

•  Significantly improved the cash collection process, leading to net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow of $613 million and $564 million, respectively, an increase of 51.6% and 58.7% in the year ended December 31, 2018 versus the prior year. This improvement was achieved across all regions, even though many international markets faced challenging economic environments.

Strengthened performance of the Finance function by focusing on talent management

•  In connection with succession planning and talent management efforts, took the following actions to broaden and deepen the Finance talent:

•  Reorganized senior leadership team; hiredstructure.

  Redesigned our long-term incentive program to further support an “owner-operator” culture.

  Positioned MSCI as a new Global Controller and Principal Accounting Officer.

•  Drove deeper succession planning and filled skill gaps through the hiring of externalplace for climate-focused talent in key roles across the Finance function, including Investor Relations, Controllership and Business Finance.

•  Led extensivein-house training to build capabilitytheir careers.

  Using MSCI’s “Breakthrough Methodology,” transformed the way MSCI attracts and retain talent.recruits.

  Sponsored initiatives focused on increasing speed and quality of hiring.

•  Created an Innovation Forum  Established Human Resources Operational Effectiveness Team to allow various teams within Financethe Human Resources organization to encouragework under a singular vision of driving the creation and developadoption of innovative ideas to drive business performance.

•  Began the work of implementing a new planning tool, which will drive better processes, automationdata, technology and accuracy.operational solutions.


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            59


78
MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

 

ROBERT J. GUTOWSKI, GENERAL COUNSEL

EnhanceC. D. Baer Pettit, Presidentcorporategovernance and

Delivered strong financial performanceresponsibility practices andprofile, includingadvancing ESGand climateinitiatives     

•  Oversaw strong organic subscription run rate growth  Advised on and championed increased ESG reporting and related shareholder engagement.

  Counseled Chief Responsibility Officer and CRC on climate initiatives, including net-zero commitments and related company policies, activities and initiatives.

  Managed compliance with global legal requirements related to pandemic response, including advising on return-to-work protocols and implementation of 10.0%.

•  Drove an increaseMSCI’s Future of 12.5% in operating revenues of $159.8 million, to $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increased revenues were driven by strong revenue performance in all major product segments: Index by 16.2%, Analytics by 4.7% (4.6% excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(“ex-Fx”)Work program across more than 20 countries. and 7.0%ex-Fx and excluding the impact of the divestitures of InvestorForce and FEA(“ex-divestitures”)), ESG by 30.2% and Real Estate by 12.0%.

•  Led firmwide investment process, focusing on key initiatives to drive growth.

Leaddevelopmentof clientcontracting efficiencies toimprove clientexperience andaccelerate/growsales
 

  Improved client contract automation processes.

Increased ratedeal speed and capacity.

  Simplified contract structures and ease of organic innovationlicensing across multiple product lines under a single client contract.

  Facilitated enterprise scale transactions and relationships.

  Enhanced cross-functional coordination of contract lifecycle from contract inception through signature and booking.

Expandengagement withregulators andpolicymakers 

  Successfully onboarded a Head of Government and Regulatory Affairs to coordinate proactive engagement globally.

•  Introduced global innovation initiative resulting  Established productive relationships and open dialogues with key regulators in the creation of practical resources to spur innovation, as well as “Early Stage Innovation Forums” that all employees can leverage to receive feedback. The initiative has also prioritized identifying barriers to innovation, resulting in the reallocation of resources to invest in future growth opportunities.

•  Led successful efforts to launchmultiple jurisdictions, with a significant number of new products, including new thematic indexes representing current trends (e.g., cybersecurity, robotics, the aging society, and efficient energy); a wide range of additional ESG products; the MSCI Tadawul 30 Index as well as several China index series; and Factor Box.

•  Oversaw the expansion of new client services and strategies and the acquisition of new clientsfocus on the MSCI Analytics Platform.

•  Established a President’s Operating Forum as an important operating process designed to increase the Company’s innovation and to guide product and functional teams to efficiently manage the investments and overall resourcesenhancing their understanding of the Company.scope, role and uses of our ESG and climate and index products.

  Established MSCI as a trusted resource by providing expert research, data and insights to policymakers regarding market practices.

Embracetechnology andinnovation todrive operationalimprovements
 

  Assessed technology stack across both Compliance and Internal Audit to improve scale and speed of monitoring and testing activities.

Championed  Benchmarked against market leading enabling technology transformationtools, which include Power BI, artificial intelligence/machine learning, data analytics and robotic process automation.

  Evaluated program design, implementation and effectiveness against regulatory guidance and published areas of regulatory scrutiny and focus.

Activelychampionand promotea departmentand companycommitment to a culture of DE&Ithat moves fromawareness toaction 

  Closely partnered with and advised Chief Diversity Officer on DE&I initiatives and disclosures, including pay equity, diversity reporting, goal setting, ERG programming and recruiting activities.

•  Appointed   Served as Executive Sponsor and vocal advocate for the Black Leadership Network, an MSCI ERG focused on enhancing the recruitment, development, retention and promotion of Black employees.

  Raised MSCI’s DE&I leadership profile by becoming a new Chief Technology Officer and Headsignatory to the General Counsel Pledge to support the American Bar Association’s Resolution 113, which aims to enhance diversity in the legal profession through law firm disclosure of Engineering to lead MSCI’s technology strategy and modernize our digital workplace.

•  Strengthened the Company’s research and product development approach in order to help our clients more effectively and efficiently achieve their investment objectives, including:

•  a new mortgage prepayment and rate model;

•  a new Multi-Asset Class factor model suite, with capabilities for strategic asset allocation, in addition to a new China Equity Model, adding increased insights into Emerging Markets; and

•  full integration of our ESG content into numerous Analytics applications, allowing clients to more easily integrate ESG ratings, data and indexes into such areas as portfolio construction and stress testing.

•  Established a new Lean/Agile Center of Excellence to ensure more predictable time to market for our products, greater productivity and a stronger focus on quality-first practices.diversity data.


60      Table of Contents      MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

2022 PROXY STATEMENT

Laurent Seyer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Client Officer79

Accelerated initiatives to expand the client base and deepen existing client relationships

•  Drove client solutions approach through deepC-level engagement with large clients and prospects to position MSCI as an indispensable and critical partner. Increased the number of aggregate senior account manager/key account manager accounts by 10.1% to 163 in 2018, which represents $909.7 million of total Run Rate (63.6% of MSCI’s total Run Rate) as of December 31, 2018.

•  Continued to improve the client service model by implementing metrics to generate leading indicators of cancellation risk based on product usage, client engagement and commercial activity. Full-year 2018 total retention rate was 94.1%.

•  Oversaw the launch of Regional Operating Committees in the Americas, APAC, and EMEA, ensuring effective and consistent coordination of our strategy in those regions and countries within those regions.

•  Drove a 4 percentage point increase from 2017 in MSCI’s net promoter score, which measures service quality and client loyalty.

Drove initiatives to promote long-term growth

•  Led the achievement of record recurring subscription sales and recurring net new sales that increased by 9.6% and 14.8%, respectively, in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year. Achieved gross sales of $200.2 million: Index—$95.4 million, Analytics—$75.2 million, ESG—$20.2 million, Real Estate—$9.4 million.

•  Drove record recurring Index sales with two quarters of more than $20 million in new recurring subscription sales, resulting in 18.5% growth for the year ended December 31, 2018.

•  Led sales of ESG, factor, custom and specialized Index modules, representing approximately 29.5% of new Index recurring subscription sales for the year ended December 31, 2018, which reflects our ability to generate new sales within the Index segment.

•  Continued to develop an MSCI value proposition that articulates the value that MSCI delivers to clients and the benefit they derive, in order to unify and strengthen the MSCI brand. Oversaw the implementation of the marketing transformation. Successfully oversaw hiring of senior marketing team, including a Head of Corporate and Internal Communications, Head of Product Marketing, Head of Segment Marketing, Head of Sales Enablement and Head of Digital Marketing.

Upgraded global coverage leadership and strengthened diversity initiatives

•  Hired a Head of Client Coverage—APAC to oversee and positively influence the region’s transformation. Accomplished the creation of foursub-regions: Greater China, North Asia, South Asia (includes India) and Australia and New Zealand to penetrate the APAC market andC-level suite.

•  Hired new Global Head of Client Solutions to bring integrated solutions to our larger asset owner and asset manager clients to support improvements in their investment decision processes.

•  Served as Chairperson of MSCI Executive Diversity Council and championed the expansion of MSCI diversity practices to facilitate a highly diverse and inclusive workplace. Sponsored first ever MSCI Diversity and Inclusion Summit to define core priorities and strategy to reinforce the importance of diversity and inclusiveness at the Company.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            61


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

Jigar Thakkar, Chief Technology Officer and Head of Engineering

Mr. Thakkar joined in July 2018. Since joining, he has developed a three-year roadmap for the Technology and Data Services (“TDS”) organization and has gained traction on the following initiatives:

Increased focus and resources to accelerate the transformation of our TDS organization

•  Developed an ecosystem that will allow the organization to continue to explore new technologies that will help create an environment to achieve future growth.

•  Drove automation, progressed the machine learning initiative and incorporated a wide range of data science algorithms and methods within our production environment.

•  Accelerated the plan to upgrade parts of our IT infrastructure to incorporate advanced technologies to increase productivity. Started several initiatives and systems to support and improveend-user productivity.

•  Reaffirmed the Company’s integrated approach by focusing on team alignment and shareable MSCI architecture, as well as ensuring alignment with industry standards.

•  Designed an optimized IT organizational structure by creating new senior roles to deliver on the TDS strategic roadmap and tackle additional opportunities.

Prioritized initiatives to drive development and strengthen productivity

•  Reconfirmed platform investment as a top TDS priority; clarified the roadmap to drive product development and revenue growth.

•  Successfully launched an enhanced Application Programming Interface, which improves access to our Analytics, Index and ESG content by clients, and is integrated into the MSCI Analytics Platform.

•  Modernized infrastructure and developed operational efficiencies, including the addition of a wide range of new capabilities, and the integration of machine learning into MSCI operations. Introduced initiatives to improve engineering productivity by upgrading software approval processes, and reducing silos and hand-offs within the TDS organization.

62            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

Actual cash incentives paid in respect of 20182021 were based on actual performance against the financial, KPI and KPIDE&I targets under the AIP as set forth in the table below. Given our strong financial performance, coupled with generally above-targettarget payouts on the KPI goals, our NEOs received cash incentives for 20182021 that were aboveapproximately equal to their target values.

    

NAME

 

  

2018 TARGET CASH   

INCENTIVE($)

 

  2018 FINANCIAL
PAYOUT (70%
WEIGHTING AT
TARGET)
  2018 KPI PAYOUT (30%
WEIGHTING AT
TARGET)
  2018 TOTAL ACTUAL
CASH INCENTIVE
  VALUE ($)       

AS % OF    

TARGET    

  VALUE ($)     

AS % OF   

TARGET   

  VALUE ($)     

AS % OF    

TARGET    

       

Henry A. Fernandez

  1,400,000  1,317,070       134.4%      483,009     115.0%     1,800,080     128.6%    
       
       

Kathleen A. Winters

  800,000  752,612       134.4%      252,008     105.0%     1,004,620     125.6%    
       
       

C. D. Baer Pettit

  1,048,341  986,242       134.4%      361,684     115.0%     1,347,926     128.6%    
       
       

Laurent Seyer

  934,827  813,057       124.2%      308,494     110.0%     1,121,551     120.0%    
       
       

Jigar Thakkar(1)

  324,110  304,911       134.4%      97,239     100.0%     402,150     124.1%    

(1) The actual cash incentive bonus paid to Mr. Thakkar in respect of fiscal 2018 was prorated from his start date of July 16, 2018. His annualized target cash incentive award is $700,000.

For fiscal 2019, Mr. Pettit’s target cash incentive opportunity under the AIP was increased to $1,201,919 to reflect competitive market practice for his role.

    2021 Target   2021 Financial Payout
(70% Weighting at Target)
 2021 KPI Payout (20%
Weighting at Target)
   2021 DE&I Goals
Payout (10%)
   2021 Total Actual
Cash Incentive
Name Cash Incentive
($)
 Value
($)
   As % of
Target
   Value
($)
   As % of
Target
 Value
($)
   As % of
Target
 Value
($)
   As % of
Target
Henry A. Fernandez 1,400,000 1,354,092 138.2% 308,008 110.0% 154,000 110.0% 1,816,100 129.7%
Andrew C. Wiechmann 600,000 580,325 138.2% 126,005 105.0% 60,000 100.0% 766,330 127.7%
C. D. Baer Pettit(1) 1,238,139 1,197,539 138.2% 272,393 110.0% 123,814 100.0% 1,593,746 128.7%
Scott A. Crum 700,000 677,046 138.2% 154,004 110.0% 77,000 110.0% 908,050 129.7%
Robert J. Gutowski 650,000 628,686 138.2% 136,504 105.0% 71,500 110.0% 836,690 128.7%
(1)The actual cash incentive bonus amount paid to Mr. Pettit was converted from British pounds sterling to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.37571.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation Program (LTIP)

The Compensation Committee believes that MSCI’s executive compensation program should reinforce a pay for performancepay-for-performance culture that aligns the interests of our senior executives with those of our shareholders by incorporating the achievement of multi-year stock price performance metrics into variable compensation awards (in addition to the annual financial metrics applicable to cash incentive awards under the AIP). In 2018, we followed

While equity-based awards are typically granted on an annual basis under our typical practice of granting annual LTIP awards (i.e., granting RSUs to Messrs. Pettit and Seyer and Ms. Winters) following the regularly scheduled annual meeting of the Compensation Committee in January 2018. As was the case with Mr. Thakkar,program, we also periodically grantoff-cycle LTIP awards (e.g., for new hire grants, replacement grants, retention grants, etc.). The grant date for such awards is determined on an individual basis, typically based on the applicable start date or the date of the event whichthat triggered the award.

In 2021, the Company’s long-term equity incentive compensation program largely stayed the same compared to 2020, and we followed our typical practice for granting annual LTIP awards in early February 2021 following the regularly scheduled annual meeting of the Compensation Committee in late January 2021.

In 2021, the Compensation Committee continued to place a strong emphasis on pay for performance by granting a significant portion of equity incentive awards in the form of PSUs that are subject to multi-year TSR-based performance metrics, which the Compensation Committee believes more closely align the Executive Committee’s goals with those of the Company’s shareholders and complement the annual financial metrics applicable to cash incentive awards under the AIP.

The Compensation Committee approved the grant of two types of 2021 PSU awards to the members of the Company’s Executive Committee, including the NEOs: 3-Year PSUs and 5-Year PSUs. Given the generally positive feedback on the rigor of the TSR CAGR goals we received in the past from our shareholders, the Compensation Committee carried forward the absolute TSR CAGR performance metric for the 2021 PSUs. As detailed below, the Compensation Committee also granted RSUs to all NEOs other than Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit.

Additionally, to further promote our “owner-operator” mindset, the Compensation Committee added a one-year post-vest mandatory holding period to our annual 2021 3-Year PSUs that were granted to our NEOs, where such shares, or rights with respect to such shares, may not be transferred until the expiration of such holding period.

The Compensation Committee believes that the grant of 2021 PSUs to the Executive Committee members provides greater incentives for the execution of the Company’s strategic plan and the creation of additional value-enhancing corporate development initiatives.


Table of Contents

80MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

2021 Equity Mix

The table below sets forth the allocation of 2021 RSUs, 3-Year PSUs and 5-Year PSUs granted to the NEOs. As reflected in the table below, in 2021, Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Pettit received 100% of their equity incentive compensation in the form of PSUs. For 2021, the Compensation Committee increased the proportion of Mr. Pettit’s 5-Year PSUs to 60% of his overall equity compensation in 2021 (with the remaining 40% granted in the form of 3-Year PSUs). We believe this change further aligns the interests of Mr. Pettit with those of our shareholders and reinforce our “owner-operator” philosophy and the execution of our strategic plan.

Vehicle     CEO      President & COO      Other NEOs
RSUs 0% 0% 30%
3-Year PSUs 40% 40% 35%
5-Year PSUs 60% 60% 35%

RSUs

RSUs are inherently aligned with the interest of our shareholders because they are linked to share price appreciation. They also increase the retentive value of our overall compensation program. Messrs. Pettit and Seyer and Ms. Winters, received service-vesting RSUs for their long-term incentive awardsgranted in 2018. These RSUs2021 vest in equal annual installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.date, subject generally to continued employment with the Company. While these RSU awards do not have explicit performance-vesting conditions, the ultimate value that maywill be delivered to our NEOs from these awards depends on our future stock price performance. The table on the next page shows the value on the grant date of the RSU awards granted to our NEOs in 2018.

Mr. Fernandez did not receive any RSUs in 2018 because 100% of his long-term incentive compensation is granted in the form of PSUs. Certain one-time RSU awards granted to Mr. Thakkar in connection with the commencement of his

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            63


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

employment with the Company are not included in the table below because they were not considered by the Committee as part of his long-term incentive compensation. For additional details on the one-time sign-on RSU awards granted to Mr. Thakkar, see page 69 of this Proxy Statement.

NAME

2018 RSU VALUE ($)

Henry A. Fernandez

Kathleen A. Winters

519,926

C. D. Baer Pettit

499,981

Laurent Seyer

264,983

Jigar Thakkar

2016 Multi-Year PSU Payout

In light of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs that were granted in 2016 to the members of the Company’s Executive Committee, including each of our current NEOs (other than Mr. Thakkar) none of our NEOs were granted PSU awards in 2018. The 2016 Multi-Year PSUs were granted to provide greater incentives for the execution of the Company’s three-year strategic plan, the creation of additional long-term value-enhancing corporate development initiatives and closer alignment of our senior executives’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders.

The 2016 Multi-Year PSUs cliff-vested on February 8, 2019. The combined Multi-Year PSU payout percentage for the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs was 300% based on the achievement of an absolute TSR CAGR of 35.14%, well above the maximum performance level of 30% absolute TSR CAGR applicable to the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs. For information regarding the actual number of PSUs that Messrs. Fernandez, Pettit and Seyer and Ms. Winters received following the performance adjustment, please refer to page 78 of this Proxy Statement.

When the Compensation Committee granted the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs, it established rigorous Absolute TSR performance metrics such that any above-target payout of the awards would need to be the result of significant value creation for our shareholders over the three-year performance period. As highlighted in the table below, the payout of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs at the maximum performance level was driven by our management team delivering market-leading returns for our shareholders, as illustrated by our cumulative total shareholder return and compound annual growth rate for the three-year performance period beginning on February 9, 2016 and ending on February 8, 2019, and an increase in our market capitalization of $7.9 billion.

       

2/9/16

STARTING
PRICE
(1)

  

2/8/2019

ENDING
VALUE
(2)

  2/8/2019
CLOSING
PRICE
(3)
  TSR CAGR
FOR
PSUs
(4) (5)
  ACTUAL
TSR
CAGR
(5)(6)
  

2/9/2016

MARKET
CAPITALIZATION

  

2/8/2019

MARKET

CAPITALIZATION

  

INCREASE IN

MARKET

CAPITALIZATION

       
       

$65.08

  $160.63  $172.29  35.14%  38.34%  $6.5B  $14.4B  $7.9B
       

(1) Closing market price on February 9, 2016.

(2) Average of the closing market prices of the Company for the 60 consecutive trading days ending on February 8, 2019 (November 12, 2018 to February 8, 2019) plus reinvested dividends over the performance period (the “Ending Value”).

(3) Closing market price on February 8, 2019.

(4) Calculated using the Ending Value on February 8, 2019.

(5) For the purpose of determining TSR CAGR, the value of dividends and other distributions were treated as reinvested in additional shares of common stock at the closing market price on the ex-dividend date (calculated by dividing the total dividend paid by the closing market price on the ex-dividend date). In addition, the TSR CAGR amounts reflected in the table above include cumulative earnings on dividends which represent the dividends earned on the reinvested shares.

(6) Calculated using the Closing Price on February 8, 2019.

64            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

Special 2015 PSU Award Payout

The four-year performance period applicable to the second tranche of the specialone-time PSUs awarded on January 27, 2015 to Mr. Pettit concluded on December 31, 2018, and resulted in the following level of achievement:

 

PERFORMANCE METRIC

 

  

PERFORMANCE PERIOD: 2015-2018

 

 
   
   TARGET   ACHIEVEMENT   % PAYOUT 
   
   

ROIC

   12.95   16.01   110
   

The payout percentage for the second tranche of this award based on the above level of ROIC achievement was 110% based on a target ROIC of 12.95% and achievement of 16.01%. The PSU payout percentage reflects adjustments to the target ROIC performance goals for the sale of the Real Estate occupiers business and the acquisition of the business of Insignis, Inc. For information regarding the actual number of PSUs that Mr. Pettit received following the performance adjustment, please refer to our 2018 proxy statement.

2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation Program

In order to continue to promote the alignment of executive compensation and long-term shareholder value creation, and in response to shareholder feedback, the Compensation Committee adopted enhancements to the Company’s long-term equity incentive compensation program for 2019.

While the Compensation Committee made certain changes to equity incentive awards in 2019, the Compensation Committee’s overall approach to equity incentive compensation in 2019 continues to place a strong emphasis on pay for performance by granting a significant portion of equity incentive awards in the form of PSUs that are subject to multi-yearTSR-based performance metrics, which the Compensation Committee believes more closely align the Executive Committee’s interests with those of the Company’s shareholders and complement the annual financial metrics applicable to cash incentive awards under the AIP.

Under its updated approach, on January 29, 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of two types of 2019 PSU awards to the members of the Company’s Executive Committee (including theNEOs)—3-Year PSUs and5-Year PSUs (together, the “2019 PSUs”).

The Compensation Committee introduced the5-Year PSUs with a five-year performance period to further align our senior executives’ pay opportunities with the long-term experience of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee believes that the longer performance time horizon will encourage senior executives to manage the business with an “owner-operator” mindset.

The 20193-Year PSUs were granted on an annual basis—i.e., unlike the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs (which were intended to cover three-years of the PSU component of equity compensation), the 2019 PSU grants are intended to cover one year of the PSU component of equity compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that the grant of the annual PSUs to the Executive Committee members will provide greater incentives for the execution of the Company’s strategic plan and the creation of additional value-enhancing corporate development initiatives. The Compensation Committee also granted service-vesting RSU awards to members of the Executive Committee (other than our CEO) on terms consistent with prior year RSU grants.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            65


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

The table below sets forth the allocation of 2019 RSUs,3-Year PSUs and5-Year PSUs granted to the NEOs. As reflected in the table below, Mr. Fernandez will continue to receive 100% of his equity incentive compensation in the form of PSUs.

2019 Equity Mix

   

VEHICLE

    CEO    PRESIDENT/COO  OTHER NEOs  
   
   

RSUs

  0%20%40%
   
   

3-Year PSUs

50%50%40%
   
   

5-Year PSUs

50%30%20%
   

The3-Year PSUs and5-Year PSUs granted in 20192021 will cliff-vest on February 5, 20222, 2024 and February 5, 2024,2, 2026, respectively, subject generally to the Executive’sexecutive’s continued employment with the Company and the Company’s level of achievement of the applicable absolute TSR CAGR performance metric measured over a three-year performance period and five-year performance period, respectively.

In determining the target value of and appropriate mix for the 20192021 PSUs, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the Executive’sexecutive’s performance and potential future contributions, the Executive’sexecutive’s overall career experience, peer group analyses, and the increased risk profile of the compensation program in relation tofor the Executive (i.e., the introduction of a longer-term performance measurement horizon).executive.

The table below sets forth the target value for each NEO’s equity awards.

NAME

  RSUs  3-YEAR
PSUs
  5-YEAR
PSUs
   
   

Henry A. Fernandez

    3,250,000  3,250,000
   
   

Kathleen A. Winters

  520,000  520,000  260,000
   
   

C. D. Baer Pettit

  600,000  1,500,000  900,000
   
   

Laurent Seyer

  360,000  900,000  540,000
   
   

Jigar Thakkar

  520,000  520,000  260,000
   

We generally received positive feedback from shareholders onawards for 2021. Under SEC disclosure rules, we are required to disclose the rigor of the TSR CAGR goalsaccounting value for the 2016 Multi-YearRSUs and PSUs granted to the NEOs in 2021 in the “Summary Compensation Table”. As such, the target values reflected in the table below may differ from the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table for such awards for 2021.

Name     RSUs
($)
     3-YEAR PSUs
($)
     5-YEAR PSUs
($)
Henry A. Fernandez  3,000,000 4,500,000
Andrew C. Wiechmann 270,000 315,000 315,000
C. D. Baer Pettit  1,600,000 2,400,000
Scott A. Crum(1) 360,000 420,000 420,000
Robert J. Gutowski 270,000 315,000 315,000
(1)The table above does not reflect one-time retention RSUs granted to Mr. Crum in early 2021 with a grant date value of $275,000, in recognition of his leadership and dedication supporting our employees and clients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The 3-Year PSUs and thus carried forward the absolute TSR CAGR performance metric for the 2019 PSUs. Additionally, we added a long-term “stretch” vehicle that further encourages an “owner-operator” mindset and truly rewards exceptional shareholder value creation. The 5-Year PSUs carry the additional risk inherent in achieving longer-term, sustained performance and are discounted accordingly.

The3-Year PSUs and5-Year PSUs reflect the rightability to receive between 0% and 300% and 0% and 200%, respectively, of the target number of shares based on achievement of the TSR CAGR performance metric over the applicable performance period.

66            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

The table below sets forth the TSR CAGR performance percentage for the3-Year PSUs. There will be extrapolation and interpolation (rounded to two decimal places) to derive a TSR CAGR performance percentage that is not expressly set forth in the table below, and any resulting fractional shares will be rounded down to the nearest whole share.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT81

3-Year PSU TSR CAGR Performance Percentage

TSR CAGR (%)     Performance Percentage (%)
≥ 30.0 (maximum) 300
20.0 200
10.0 (target) 100
9.0 50
8.0 (threshold) 25
< 8.0 No Vesting

 

TSR CAGR (%)

PERFORMANCE
PERCENTAGE (%)
 
 

30.0 (maximum)

300
 
 

20.0

200
 
 

10.0 (target)

100
 
 

9.0

50
 
 

8.0 (threshold)

25
 
 

< 8.0

No Vesting
 

The table below sets forth the TSR CAGR performance percentage for the5-Year PSUs. There will be extrapolation and interpolation (rounded to two decimal places) to derive a TSR CAGR performance percentage that is not expressly set forth in the table below, and any resulting fractional shares will be rounded down to the nearest whole share.

 

TSR CAGR (%)

PERFORMANCE
PERCENTAGE (%)
 
 

20.0 (maximum)

200
 
 

15.0

150
 
 

12.5 (target)

100
 
 

10.0 (threshold)

50
 
 

<10.0

No Vesting
 

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            675-Year PSU TSR CAGR Performance Percentage

TSR CAGR (%)     Performance Percentage (%)
≥ 20.0 (maximum) 200
15.0 150
12.5 (target) 100
10.0 (threshold) 50
<10.0 No Vesting


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

We believeThe Compensation Committee established the above TSR performance goal percentages applicable to the 3-Year PSUs and the 5-Year PSUs after considering historical 3- and 5-year TSR performance of S&P 500 companies and MSCI’s business projections. The Compensation Committee believes that a payout on the applicable threshold, target and maximum goals established for both PSU vehicles in 2021 represent rigorous hurdles that would ultimately deliver significant shareholder value creation if achieved, as evidenced by the fact that achievement of the TSR performance goals at the threshold performance levels applicable to the 2021 3-Year PSUs and/orand 5-Year PSUs at or above-target performance would benefit our shareholders duetranslate to significant increasessubstantial growth in our share valueshareholders’ investments over the applicablesuch performance period, as illustrated byreflected in the tablechart below.


Table of Contents

82MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

LOGO2019 PSU AWARD PAYOUTS

The three-year performance period applicable to the PSUs granted to each of Messrs. Fernandez, Wiechmann, Pettit, Crum and Gutowski on February 6, 2019 PSUs contain currentconcluded on February 5, 2022 and post-employment restrictive covenants, including restrictions against competition, the solicitation of clients, vendors and employees of the Company and the use or disclosure of confidential information.

The grant date fair value of the 2019 RSU and PSU awards will be included in our “Summary Compensation” Table and “Grants of Plan Based Awards” Table for 2019 in our 2020 proxy statement. SEC disclosure rules require that we report,resulted in the yearfollowing level of grant,achievement:

      Performance Period: 2019-2022
Performance Metric Target     Achievement     % Payout
TSR CAGR 10.00% ≥ 30.00% 300%

Following the total accountingperformance adjustment, Mr. Fernandez received 80,187 PSUs, Mr. Wiechmann received 3,021 PSUs, Mr. Pettit received 37,008 PSUs, Mr. Crum received 10,854 PSUs and Mr. Gutowski received 3,021 PSUs, which such PSUs vested and converted to shares on February 7, 2022.

2022 Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation Program

In order to continue to promote the alignment of executive compensation and long-term shareholder value creation, the Compensation Committee adopted enhancements to the Company’s long-term equity incentive compensation program for 2022, while continuing to place a strong emphasis on maintaining and enhancing our “owner-operator” culture by granting a significant portion of equity grantsincentive awards in the form of performance-based awards, specifically PSUs and PSOs.

Additional information on our 2022 LTIP is provided in the grant date rather than over the lifesection titled “Key 2022 Compensation Decisions” on page 61 of the award.this Proxy Statement.

Former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer2022 Equity AwardsMix

Vehicle     CEO     President     Other NEOs
RSUs 0% 0% 30%
3-Year PSUs 50% 50% 35%
PSOs 50% 50% 35%

As a result of Ms. Winters’s resignation on March 1, 2019, all outstanding and unvestedThe table below sets forth the target value for each NEO’s 2022 annual equity awards held by her as of such date were forfeited in their entirety pursuant to their terms.awards:

Name     RSUs
($)
     3-YEAR PSUs
($)
     PSOs
($)
Henry A. Fernandez  5,000,000 5,000,000
Andrew C. Wiechmann 390,000 455,000 455,000
C.D. Baer Pettit  2,750,000 2,750,000
Scott A. Crum 495,000 577,500 577,500
Robert J. Gutowski 360,000 420,000 420,000

Benefits

The Company provides health, welfare and other benefits to remain competitive in hiring and retaining its employees. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in these benefit plans on the same terms and conditions as all other employees. We do not provide any special or enhanced benefits to our NEOs.

68            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

In the United States and the United Kingdom, the Company has established defined contribution plans for all eligible employees. Contributions by the Company to these defined contribution plans for our NEOs for the applicable period are disclosed in the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table below.

Employment Agreements

All of the NEOs are employed on an “at-will” basis, and the Company does not have any individual employment agreements with the NEOs providing for a fixed duration of employment. As a result, the Company has the flexibility to alter or revise its compensation programs as circumstances dictate.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT83

Under Mr. Wiechmann’s offer letter with the Company and Mr. Pettit’s employment letter with a subsidiary of the Company, in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without cause, each of Messrs. Wiechmann and Pettit is eligible to receive, subject to his compliance with certain conditions, (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of his then-current annual base salary plus target annual bonus opportunity and (ii) a prorated cash bonus under the AIP for the year of termination based on actual performance through the date of termination (as of December 31, 2021, assuming 100% achievement of the annual bonus opportunity, such amounts would have equaled $1,700,000 for Mr. Wiechmann and $3,336,097 for Mr. Pettit; the amount for Mr. Pettit is shown as being paid in British pounds sterling and converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.37571 for fiscal 2021).

In addition, we maintain a Change in Control Severance Plan for the benefit of eligible senior executives of the Company (including the NEOs) that provides for severance benefits on a “double-trigger” basis—i.e., in the event of a qualifying termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without “cause” or by the participant for “good reason” in connection with a change in control.

Additional information on post-termination and change in control benefits for our NEOs, assuming a qualifying event occurred as of December 31, 2021, is provided in the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control,” on page 91 of this Proxy Statement.

No Excessive Perquisites

The NEOs are employed “at will.” Based on the Company’s philosophy that its executive compensation program should be straightforward and directly linked to performance, the compensation program for the NEOsdoes notinclude any of the following pay practices:

Employment agreements;

Exciseexcessive perquisites, excise taxgross-ups; gross-ups or

Supplemental supplemental executive retirement benefits.

Information on post-termination and change in control payments to our NEOs as of December 31, 2018 is provided in the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control,” on page 79 of this Proxy Statement.

In connection with the commencement of his employment in 2018, Mr. Thakkar entered into an offer letter agreement with the Company. According to the terms of the offer letter, Mr. Thakkar’s base salary was set at $500,000 per year and he became eligible to receive (i) an annual cash bonus award with a target opportunity of $700,000 and (ii) an annual long-term incentive award with a target opportunity of $1,300,000, granted with a mix of equity awards to be determined by the Compensation Committee in a manner consistent with our other NEOs for equity grants beginning in 2019. Mr. Thakkar’s offer letter included aone-time $500,000sign-on cash bonus and aone-time $1,350,000sign-on cash bonus to compensate him for cash incentive awards and equity incentive awards, respectively, which were forfeited at his previous employer as a result of his resignation. Each of theseone-timesign-on cash bonuses were paid to him on July 31, 2018 and require Mr. Thakkar to reimburse 100% of the cash bonus should he resign within 12 months of his hire date. He also received (i) aone-timesign-on RSU award with a grant date value of $1,760,000, which will vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, to compensate him for equity incentive awards that he forfeited at his previous employer as a result of his resignation and (ii) three specialsign-on RSU awards with an aggregate value of $3,000,000. The first special RSU award was granted on July 16, 2018 and had a grant date fair value of $1,500,000. The second special RSU award will be granted on July 16, 2019 and will have a grant date fair value of $1,000,000. The third special RSU award will be granted on July 16, 2020 and will have a grant date fair value of $500,000. Each of the special RSU awards will vest in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Mr. Thakkar also received $516,139.40 in the form of a relocation allowance, executive destination services and spousal job hunting assistance in connection with his relocation from Seattle to New York. Such amounts are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.

PEER GROUPS        Stock Ownership Guidelines

To ensure competitiveness of compensation structures and pay levels for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of peer company compensation data. Prior to beginning this review, the Compensation Committee examines the composition of such peers to make certain that the selected companies continue to be relevant as evaluated according to the following screening criteria:

Scale, to reflect similar size and complexity;

Geographic footprint, to reflect business structure and international complexity;

Ownership structure, to reflect similarity of responsibilities and availability of data;

Competitors for talent; and

Similar business model.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            69


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

The 2018 peer group used to assist in compensation decisions included the following 11 companies:

•  Dun & Bradstreet Corporation

•  FactSet Research Systems Inc.

•  Fair Isaac Corporation

•  Gartner, Inc.

•  IHS Markit Ltd.

•  Moody’s Corporation

•  Morningstar, Inc.

•  SEI Investments Company

•  SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

•  TransUnion

•  Verisk Analytics, Inc.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES        

The Compensation Committee believes that significant stock ownership at the senior mostsenior-most levels of MSCI’s leadership (e.g., the Executive Committee), which includes our executive officers, aligns management’s interests with those of our shareholders and encourages an “owner-operator” mindset. As part of the Compensation Committee’s ongoing assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices to ensure furtherance of the goals identified above and for alignment with best practices, effective January 1, 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted the more rigorous stock ownership guidelines detailed below. On January 25, 2022, the Compensation Committee further amended the stock ownership guidelines to adopt more rigorous requirements that reflect among the highest multiples of base salary in our peer group, as detailed below. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all Executive Committee members, including our NEOs, are in compliance with both thepre-2019 pre-2022 Stock Ownership Guidelines and the current Stock Ownership Guidelines.

Our CEO significantly exceeds his applicable stock ownership guidelines (see page 100 of this Proxy Statement for additional details).

POSITIONPosition

     Stock Ownership
Guidelines (Effective 2022)
     STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINESStock Ownership
(EFFECTIVE 2019)
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
(PRE-2019)
Guidelines (Pre-2022)
Chief Executive Officer 

Chief Executive Officer

6x12x base salary 6x base salary
President & Chief Operating Officer 
12x base salary 4x base salary

President

Other Management Committee Members, including other NEOs
 8x base salary3x base salary
Executive Committee 4x base salary 3x base salary

Chief Operating Officer

4x base salary3x base salary

Executive Officer

3x base salary3x base salary

Executive Committee

3x base salary2x base salary

All Executive Committee members are required to meet the applicable ownership guidelines under the current Stock Ownership Guidelines within five years following the date of such executive’s appointment to the Executive Committee (or, if later, five years from January 1, 2019). For the purpose of determining whether each individual is in compliance with these stock ownership guidelines and requirements, the following are counted towards satisfaction of the minimum ownership requirements:

(1)

shares beneficially owned individually, directly or indirectly;

(2)

shares beneficially owned jointly with, or separately by, immediate family members residing in the same household, either directly or indirectly; and

(3)

“Net Shares” underlying unvested RSUs, unvested PSUs (solely to the extent of any award minimum—i.e., any unvested PSUs that are subject to achievement of outstanding performance goals are not counted),“in-the “in-the money” vested stock options and any other vested or unvested equity awards (as determined in the Compensation Committee’s discretion).


Table of Contents

84

MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

“Net Shares” means the number of shares that would remain if the shares underlying the equity awards are sold or withheld by the Company to (i) pay the exercise price of a stock option, (ii) satisfy any tax withholding obligations (assuming a tax rate of 50%) or (iii) satisfy any other applicable transaction costs.

70            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

Until the expected ownership levels are achieved, each Executive Committee member is required to retain 50% of the Net Shares resulting from the vesting, settlement or exercise, as applicable of all stock options, RSUs, PSUs or other equity awards granted to such executive.

In formulating the revised Stock Ownership Guidelines, the Compensation Committee reviewed competitive share ownership guideline data and considered changes that took into account the redesign of our LTIP and the appointments of Messrs. Pettit and Seyer to the positions of President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively, in 2017.

The Compensation Committee determined that increasing the share ownership multiples for the President and Chief Operating Officer and other senior leaders, including our NEOs, better reflected alignment with the broader responsibilities of those roles and streamliningroles.

In addition to the minimum ownership levels forrequirements, in 2022, the Compensation Committee approved revisions to the share retention requirements of the stock ownership guidelines to provide that until an executive ceases to serve on the Company’s Executive Committee, such executive will be required to retain a number of shares equivalent to, in the aggregate, 25% of the “Net Shares” resulting from the vesting, settlement or exercise, as applicable, of all membersequity incentive awards granted to such executive after January 1, 2022 (or, if later, the date such executive becomes a member of the Executive Committee). The Compensation Committee (e.g., eliminating different treatmentdetermined that the addition of this 25% “Net Shares” holding requirement would further enhance our goal of ensuring an “owner-operator” mindset among executive officer andnon-executive officer memberssenior leaders. This approach will ensure that a portion of the Net Shares received from every award will be retained while an individual serves on the Executive Committee) better reflected the equal contributions of Executive Committee members as the Company moves towards a more integrated approach to client service and product creation.

Additionally, Executive Committee members who received 2016 Multi-Year PSUs are subject to share retention requirements for those awards, under which they are required to hold shares representing 50% of the net shares (after tax) received for aone-year period after vesting.

The summary of the current Stock Ownership Guidelines provided herein is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Stock Ownership Guidelines, which was filed as an exhibit to the 2018 Annual Report onForm 10-K.Committee.

Other Policies

CLAWBACK POLICY        Clawback Policy

Effective February 7,In 2019, the Board expanded the Company’s Clawback Policy beyond financial results or operating metrics that were achieved as a result of willful misconduct or intentional or fraudulent conduct. Under the revised Clawback Policy, the Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, may to the extent permitted by applicable law, recoup any incentive compensation (cash and equity) received by members of the Executive Committee and the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer, in the event of a restatement of financial or other performance-based measures (regardless of whether detrimental conduct has occurred) or in the event that detrimental conduct results in an increased level of performance goal achievement or otherwise causes material financial and/or reputational harm to the Company, as described below.

In the case of a restatement of financial or other performance-based measures, the Board may recover up to the amount by which the incentive compensation received exceeds the amount that would have been received if the error had not been made within the two years preceding the date on which the Board determines that the financial or other measure contains a material error.

In the case of detrimental conduct that, in the sole discretion of the Board, has resulted in a level of achievement of a performance-based measure or caused material financial or reputational harm to the Company, the Board may recover incentive compensation received by the person during thetwo-year period immediately preceding the date on which such person engaged in such detrimental conduct (or the date on which the Compensation Committee discovers that such person engaged in detrimental conduct). Detrimental conduct consists of:

willful misconduct or breach of a fiduciary duty with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries;

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            71


COMPENSATION MATTERS        conviction of, or having entered a plea bargain or settlement admitting guilt for, any crime of moral turpitude or felony under any applicable law with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries;

commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation, with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries;
failure to take action with respect to any acts or conduct described above when taken by another person that such person has actual knowledge of or directing any other person to take any of the actions described above; and
breach of any restrictive covenant to which such person is subject contained in any applicable agreement or arrangement with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

conviction of, or having entered a plea bargain or settlement admitting guilt for, any crime of moral turpitude or felony under any applicable law with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries;

commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation, with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries;

failure to take action with respect to any acts or conduct described above when taken by another person that such person has actual knowledge of or directing any other person to take any of the actions described above; and

breach of any restrictive covenant to which such person is subject contained in any applicable agreement or arrangement with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

The expanded Clawback Policy applies to all incentive compensation (cash and equity) granted on or after February 7, 2019. Incentive compensation granted prior to that date remains subject to theour prior Clawback Policy which is described in greater detail in our 2018 proxy statement.Policy.


When the final clawback requirementsTable of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) are released, we will review our policy and modify it if necessary to ensure compliance. The summary of the Clawback Policy provided herein is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Clawback Policy, which was filed as an exhibit to the 2018 Annual Report onForm 10-K.Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT85

ANTI-HEDGING AND PLEDGING POLICY        Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

We prohibit all directors and employees, including all NEOs, from hedging or pledging the Company’s common stock or engaging in short sales, purchases or sales of options, puts or calls, as well as derivatives such as swaps, forwards or futures and trading on a short-term basis in the Company’s common stock.

TAX CONSIDERATIONS        Tax Considerations

The Compensation Committee takes into consideration the tax implications of our executive compensation program, including with respect to the tax deductibility of compensation paid under Section 162(m) of the IRC.

Section 162(m) of the IRC generally limits the tax deductibility of compensation paid in excess of $1 million to certain of our executive officers during any taxable year. Prior to the enactment of Tax Reform, Section 162(m) of the IRC provided an exception from this deduction limitation for “qualified performance-based compensation,” which we historically relied on by awarding cash and equity incentive compensation to our executive officers under the MSCI Inc. Performance Formula and Incentive Plan and/or the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Pursuant to Tax Reform, effective January 1, 2018 for MSCI, the “performance-based compensation” exception under Section 162(m) of the IRC was eliminated. However, there is transition relief for compensation paid pursuant to a “written binding contract” in effect on or before November 2, 2017 and not materially modified thereafter.

In the exercise of its business judgment, and in accordance with its compensation philosophy, the Compensation Committee continues to have flexibility to award compensation that is not tax deductible if it determines that such award is in our shareholders’ best interests and is necessary to comply with contractual commitments, or to maintain flexibility needed to attract talent, promote retention or recognize and reward desired performance.

72            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT        Compensation Risk Assessment

The Compensation Committee believes that the design, implementation and governance of our executive compensation program are consistent with high standards of risk management. Our executive compensation program reflects an appropriate mix of compensation elements, balancing current and long-term performance objectives, cash and equity compensation, and risks and rewards.

The compensation framework used for making compensation decisions is multi-faceted as it incorporates multiple metrics over varying time periods and is subject to the application of informed judgment by the Compensation Committee.

To further ensure that the interests of our NEOs are aligned with those of our shareholders, a significant portion of executive officer long-term incentive compensation is awarded as equity subject to vesting requirements. RSUs and PSUs typically vest and settle over a three-year or five-year period, as applicable—in the case of RSUs, ratably over three years, and in the case of PSUs, cliff-vesting based on achievement of applicable performance goals at the end of a three-year or five-year performance period, as applicable).

Executive Committee members are required to meet the applicable stock ownership guidelines described under “Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 70 of this Proxy Statement, including, for individuals who received 2016 Multi-Year PSUs, a requirement to hold shares representing 50% of the net shares (after tax) received for aone-year period after vesting.

Incentive compensation is subject to the Clawback Policy described under “Clawback Policy” on page 71 of this Proxy Statement.

The compensation framework used for making compensation decisions is multi-faceted as it incorporates multiple metrics over varying time periods and is subject to the application of informed judgment by the Compensation Committee.
To further ensure that the interests of our NEOs are aligned with those of our shareholders, a significant portion of executive officer long-term incentive compensation is awarded as equity subject to vesting requirements. Awards typically vest over a multi-year period, and in the case of performance-based awards, vest based on achievement of applicable performance goals at the end of a relevant performance period.
Executive Committee members are required to meet the applicable stock ownership guidelines described under “Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 83 of this Proxy Statement.
Incentive compensation is subject to the Clawback Policy described under “Clawback Policy” on page 84 of this Proxy Statement.

Based on these features, we believe our executive compensation program effectively (i) ensures that our compensation opportunities do not encourage excessive risk taking, (ii) keeps our NEOs focused on the creation of long-term, sustainable value for our shareholders and (iii) provides competitive and appropriate levels of compensation over time.

TheIn 2021, the Compensation Committee has reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to all of our employees and believes that our policies do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking and that any level of risk they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Semler Brossy assisted the Compensation Committee with its review of our compensation program by reviewing materials provided by management related to our compensation program, including the Company’s LTIP. The Compensation Committee also reviewed materials previously prepared by a third-party consultant in 2017 related to certain of the Company’s variable incentive plans, including the AIP, from a risk and governance perspective.


Table of Contents

86MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

Compensation, & Talent Managementand Culture Committee Report

We, the Compensation, & Talent Managementand Culture Committee of the Board of Directors of MSCI Inc., have reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. Based on this review and these discussions, the Compensation, & Talent Managementand Culture Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Respectfully submitted,

Linda H. Riefler (Chair)

Wayne Edmunds

Wendy E. LaneMarcus L. Smith


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            73


2022 PROXY STATEMENT
COMPENSATION MATTERS        

87

Executive Compensation Tables

ExecutiveSummary Compensation

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE         Table

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid or awarded by MSCI to the Company’s NEOs during fiscal years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

2018 Summary Compensation Table2021 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

       

 

NAME AND PRINCIPAL

POSITION

 

FISCAL

YEAR

  

SALARY

($)(1)

  

BONUS

($)(2)

  

STOCK

AWARDS

($)(3)

  

NON-EQUITY

INCENTIVE PLAN

COMPENSATION

($)(4)

  

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION

($)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)

  

TOTAL

($)(10)

 
       
       

Henry A. Fernandez

  2018   1,000,000         1,800,080   178,374   2,978,454 

Chairman and

  2017   950,000         1,497,580   28,921   2,476,501 

Chief Executive Officer

  2016   950,000      19,734,859   1,383,720   95,683   22,164,262 
       
       

Kathleen A. Winters

  2018   525,000      519,926   $1,004,620   51,803   2,101,349 

Former Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer

  2017   525,000   400,000   519,982   974,390   52,375   2,471,747 
  2016   350,000   400,000   5,159,888   874,480   39,290   6,823,658 
       
       

C.D. Baer Pettit

  2018   834,666      499,981   $1,347,926   181,900   2,864,473 

President

  2017   608,254      399,922   1,060,787   74,028   2,142,992 
  2016   454,762      5,199,956   967,407   75,774   6,697,899 
       
       

Laurent Seyer

  2018   630,340      264,983   $1,121,551   144,766   2,161,640 

Chief Operating Officer and

  2017   608,254      264,970   1,002,715   101,947   1,977,887 

Chief Client Officer

  2016   481,597      5,545,525   812,090   60,580   6,899,793 
       
       

Jigar Thakkar

  2018   229,167   1,850,000   3,259,836   $402,150   546,938   6,288,091 

Chief Technology Officer and Head of Engineering

       
       

(1) Base salaries for Messrs. Pettit and Seyer were paid in British pounds sterling and converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.335466, $1.288674 and $1.355282 for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Mr. Pettit’s 2018 base salary rate was £625,000 Mr. Seyer’s 2018 base salary rate was £472,000.

(2) The amounts included in this column for Ms. Winters in 2016 and 2017 include the payments in May 2016 and May 2017 of two equal installments of a $800,000 sign-on cash bonus that were payable to Ms. Winters pursuant to the terms of her offer letter entered into in connection with the commencement of her employment in 2016. The amount included in this column for Mr. Thakkar in 2018 includes the payment on July 31, 2018 of a $500,000 sign-on cash bonus and a $1,350,000 sign-on cash bonus paid to Mr. Thakkar pursuant to the terms of his offer letter entered into in connection with the commencement of his employment in 2018 to compensate him for cash incentive awards and equity incentive awards, respectively, which were forfeited at his previous employer as a result of his resignation.

(3) Represents the grant date fair value of awards granted during each fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 718-10, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures, and does not reflect whether the NEO will actually receive a financial benefit from the award. The awards reported in this column were granted in February 2018 as part of the annual compensation process. The amount included in this column for Ms. Winters in 2016 includes theone-timesign-on RSU award granted to Ms. Winters in connection with the commencement of her employment in 2016. The amount included in this column includes for Mr. Thakkar: (i) aone-timesign-on RSU award granted to Mr. Thakkar in connection with the commencement of his employment in 2018 to compensate him for equity incentive awards that he forfeited at his previous employer as a result of his resignation and (ii) the first of three grants of specialsign-on RSU awards, which was granted to him in 2018 with the second and third grants scheduled to be made in 2019 and 2020.

(4) Represents the annual cash bonus paid for 2018, 2017 and 2016, as applicable, (i) under the 2018 AIP in February 2019 with respect to the 2018 performance year, (ii) under the 2017 AIP in February 2018 with respect to the 2017 performance year and (iii) under the 2016 AIP in February 2017 with respect to the 2016 performance year.

(5) The Company does not offer defined benefit pension plans or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to NEOs.

74            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Name and Principal Position     Fiscal
Year
     Salary
($)(1)
     Bonus
($)
     Stock
Awards
($)(2)
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
     All Other
Compensation
($)(4)(5)(6)(7)
     Total
($)
Henry A. Fernandez 2021 1,000,000  7,499,592 1,816,100 22,620 10,338,312
Chairman and 2020 1,000,000  7,499,849 1,402,210 22,080 9,924,139
Chief Executive Officer 2019 1,000,000  6,499,950 1,734,320 21,690 9,255,960
Andrew C. Wiechmann 2021 500,000  899,268 766,330 68,780 2,234,378
Chief Financial Officer 2020 500,000  499,836 525,970 72,364 1,598,170
and Treasurer 2019 406,900  849,669 564,850 32,643 1,854,062
C.D. Baer Pettit 2021 859,819  3,999,665 1,593,746 90,215 6,543,445
President and 2020 802,253  3,999,824 1,157,080 193,394 6,152,551
Chief Operating Officer 2019 798,256  2,999,797 1,406,743 165,788 5,370,583
Scott Crum 2021 550,000  1,473,932 908,050 33,857 2,965,839
Chief Human Resources Officer 2020 550,000  1,199,683 701,110 33,342 2,484,135
  2019 550,000  1,099,695 867,160 36,266 2,553,121
Robert J. Gutowski 2021 450,000  899,268 836,268 55,823 2,241,781
General Counsel 2020 450,000  399,726 475,750 61,014 1,386,490
(1)Base salary for Mr. Pettit was paid in British pounds sterling and converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.375710, $1.283605 and $1.277209 for fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Mr. Pettit’s 2021 base salary rate was £625,000.

(2)
Represents the grant date fair value of awards granted during each fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures, and does not reflect whether the NEO will actually receive a financial benefit from the award. The awards reported in this column were granted in February 2019, February 2020 and February 2021 as part of the annual compensation process. The following table represents the grant date fair value of awards granted during February 2021:
  
GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE OF STOCK UNITS GRANTED DURING 2021 ($)      
Name     RSUs     PSUs     Total
Henry A. Fernandez  7,499,592 7,499,592
Andrew C. Wiechmann 269,715 629,553 899,268
C.D. Baer Pettit  3,999,665 3,999,665
Scott A. Crum 634,476 839,456 1,473,932
Robert J. Gutowski 269,715 629,553 899,268
The grant date fair value of the PSUs granted to the NEOs during 2021 was calculated based on the probable outcome of the market conditions as of the grant date, consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Subtopic 718-10, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The grant date value of the PSUs granted to the NEOs in 2021, assuming the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved (300% for the 3-Year PSUs and 200% for the 5-Year PSUs), is $17,998,840 for Mr. Fernandez, $1,573,767 for Mr. Wiechmann, $9,599,203 for Mr. Pettit, $2,098,599 for Mr. Crum and $1,573,767 for Mr. Gutowski. Information regarding the assumptions used to value these awards is set forth in note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3)Represents the annual cash bonus paid for 2021, 2020 and 2019, as applicable, (i) under the 2021 AIP in February 2022 with respect to the 2021 performance year, (ii) under the 2020 AIP in February 2021 with respect to the 2020 performance year and (iii) under the 2019 AIP in February 2020 with respect to the 2019 performance year.
(4)The Company does not offer defined benefit pension plans or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to NEOs.
(5)The amounts reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2021 include Company matching contributions to the MSCI Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan of $22,620 for Mr. Fernandez, Mr. Crum, Mr. Wiechmann and Mr. Gutowski. Company contributions to the MSCI Barra Group (UK) Personal Pension Plan for Mr. Pettit in 2021 totaled £62,500 ($85,982). The amount of British pounds sterling was converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.375710, $1.283605 and $1.277209 for fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Table of Contents

88MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS
(6)The amount included in the “All Other Compensation” column includes Company matching contributions to the 2021 UK Medical Coverage for Mr. Pettit in 2021 for £4,676 ($6,432). The amount of British pounds sterling was converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.375710.
(7)In connection with the Company’s payment of its quarterly cash dividend, the “All Other Compensation” column includes for 2021 the payment to the NEOs of dividend equivalents for outstanding RSUs and, for Messrs. Wiechmann and Gutowski, outstanding 2018 PSUs, as follows:

(6) The amounts reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2018 include Company matching contributions to the MSCI Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan of $21,300 for Mr. Fernandez and Ms. Winters and $8,500 for Mr. Thakkar. Company contributions to the MSCI Barra Group (UK) Personal Pension Plan for Mr. Pettit in 2018 totaled £63,500 ($83,467) and Mr. Seyer in 2018 totaled £47,200 ($63,034). The amount of British pounds sterling was converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.335466, $1.288674 and $1.355282 for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(7) The amounts included in the “All Other Compensation” column include Company matching contributions to the 2018 UK Medical Coverage for Messrs. Pettit and Seyer in 2018 for £3,725 ($4,374). The amount of British pounds sterling was converted to U.S. dollars using the fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.335466

(8) In connection with the Company’s payment of its quarterly cash dividend or the vesting of the 2015 PSUs in 2018, the All Other Compensation column includes for 2018 the payment to the NEOs of dividend equivalents for outstanding PSUs that vested in 2018 and outstanding RSUs as follows: $157,074 for Mr. Fernandez, $30,503 for Ms. Winters, $94,059 for Mr. Pettit, $77,358 for Mr. Seyer and $22,299 for Mr. Thakkar.

20182021 DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS ($)

    
         

OUTSTANDING RSUs

 

   
    
       

 

NAME

  2015
Special
PSUs
  2015
PSUs
  1Q 2018  2Q 2018  3Q 2018  4Q 2018  TOTAL
       
       

Henry A. Fernandez

    157,074          157,074
       
       

Kathleen A. Winters

      7,241  5,740  8,761  8,761  30,503
       
       

C.D. Baer Pettit

  35,921  41,632  3,267  3,267  4,986  4,986  94,059
       
       

Laurent Seyer

    19,682  11,415  11,415  17,423  17,423  77,358
       
       

Jigar Thakkar

          11,149  11,149  22,299

(9) The amount reflected for Mr. Thakkar in the “All Other Compensation” column includes aone-time relocation allowance of $516,139.40 provided to him in connection with the commencement of his employment with the Company in 2018. This amount also includes (a) $500,000 to cover all relocation, living and commuting expenses for relocation from Seattle to New York, (b) an amount to cover executive destination services which provide neighborhood tours, home search, school search, etc. and spousal job hunting assistance, which includes a reimbursement for taxes in the amount of $7,550.

(10) The 2016 Multi-Year PSUs covered three years of PSU grants. Accordingly, our NEOs did not receive PSUs (and no RSUs, in the case of Mr. Fernandez) in 2017 and 2018. However, due to SEC disclosure rules, we were required to report the entire three-year value of these awards in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2016. Because the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2017 and 2018 only includes the value of the annual RSU awards granted for 2017 and 2018, the variances between the amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2016, 2017 and 2018 are presented in a manner that is not consistent with how the Compensation Committee viewed the awards–i.e., that the annualized target value (i.e.,one-third of the target value) of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs should be reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 as compensation for 2018 (with the othertwo-thirds reflected equally in the Summary Compensation Tables for 2016 and 2017). Accordingly, notwithstanding the SEC’s disclosure rules, we believe the 2018 total direct compensation for our NEOs who received the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs (taking into account the annualized target value of their 2016 Multi-Year PSUs relating to 2018) to be as follows: $8,700,080 for Mr. Fernandez, $2,829,620 for Ms. Winters, $4,282,592 for Mr. Pettit and $3,076,891 for Mr. Seyer. The amounts in the previous sentence do not include the amounts set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018. See the Alternative 2018 Total Compensation Table on page 45 of this Proxy Statement.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            75


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

  2018 Outstanding RSUs
Name     PSUs     1Q 2021     2Q 2021     3Q 2021     4Q 2021     Total
Henry A. Fernandez      
Andrew C. Wiechmann 31,619 3,116 3,116 4,155 4,155 46,161
C.D. Baer Pettit  907 907 1,210 1,210 4,234
Scott A. Crum  2,485 2,485 3,313 3,313 11,596
Robert J. Gutowski 28,991 980 980 1,306 1,306 33,563

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS        Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2018.2021.

2018 Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table2021 GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

       

NAME

 

TYPE

OF AWARD

  

GRANT

DATE

 

COMPENSATION

COMMITTEE

ACTION DATE

  

ESTIMATED
FUTURE
PAYOUTS

UNDER
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE

PLAN AWARDS(1)

 

  

ESTIMATED
FUTURE
PAYOUTS

UNDER EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS

 

  

ALL OTHER

STOCK

AWARDS:

NUMBER

OF
SHARES

OF STOCK

OR UNITS

(#)(2)

 

GRANT
DATE

FAIR
VALUE

OF
STOCK

AWARDS

($)(3)

 

THRESHOLD

(#)

  

TARGET

(#)

 

MAXIMUM

(#)

  

THRESHOLD

(#)

  

TARGET

(#)

  

MAXIMUM

(#)

 
           

Henry A. Fernandez

  AIP    1/29/2018     1,400,000  2,100,000            
           
           

Kathleen A. Winters

  AIP    1/29/2018     800,000  1,200,000            
           
           
  RSU  2/6/2018  1/29/2018                  3,832 519,926
           
           

C.D. Baer Pettit

  AIP    1/29/2018     1,048,341  1,572,512            
           
           
  RSU  2/6/2018  1/29/2018                  3,685 499,981
           
           

Laurent Seyer

  AIP    1/29/2018     934,827  1,402,241            
           
           
  RSU  2/6/2018  1/29/2018                  1,953 264,983
           
           

Jigar Thakkar

  AIP    5/16/2018     700,000  1,050,000            
           
           
  RSU   7/16/2018   5/16/2018                  8,845  1,499,935
           
           
  RSU  7/16/2018  5/16/2018                  10,378 1,759,901
           

(1) Represents the target and maximum payouts with respect to the AIP. There are no threshold or minimum payouts under the AIP. For additional information regarding the AIP, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Variable Compensation–Annual Incentive Plan” above.

(2) Represents service vesting RSUs granted during fiscal 2018. The RSUs (other than Mr. Thakkar’sone-time RSU awards which are described below) vest in three annual installments of 34%, 33% and 33% beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. In connection with the commencement of his employment with the Company, Mr. Thakkar received: (i) aone-timesign-on RSU award to compensate him for equity incentive awards that he forfeited at his previous employer as a result of his resignation and (ii) the first of three grants of specialsign-on RSU awards. The special RSU award vests in four annual installments of 25% each beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. For additional details on these RSU awards, see page 69 of this Proxy Statement. The amounts included for Mr. Thakkar in this column include these RSU awards.

(3) Represents the grant date fair value of stock awards as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic718-10. The grant date fair value for these stock awards was based on the closing price of MSCI’s common shares on the trading day preceding the grant date or service inception date as the case may be.

76            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


       Compensation Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)(2)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Name  Type of
Award
   Grant
Date
  Committee
Action Date
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
  or Units
(#)
  Awards
($)(7)
Henry A. Fernandez AIP   1/26/2021  1,400,000 2,100,000     
 PSU(4)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     7,226 21,678  2,999,657
  PSU(5)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     17,420 34,840  4,499,934
Andrew C. Wiechmann AIP   1/26/2021  600,000 900,000     
RSU(3)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021       647 269,715
  PSU(4)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     758 2,274  314,661
  PSU(5)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     1,219 2,438  314,892
C.D. Baer Pettit(2) AIP   1/26/2021  1,238,139 1,857,209     
RSU(3)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021        
  PSU(4)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     3,854 11,562  1,599,872
  PSU(5)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     9,290 18,580  2,399,793
Scott A. Crum AIP   1/26/2021  700,000 1,050,000     
RSU(3)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021       863 359,759
  RSU(3)(6)   2/3/2021 1/26/2021       659 274,717
  PSU(4)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     1,011 3,033  419,685
  PSU(5)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     1,625 3,250  419,770
Robert J. Gutowski AIP   1/26/2021  650,000 975,000     
RSU(3)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021       647 269,715
  PSU(4)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     758 2,274  314,661
  PSU(5)  2/3/2021 1/26/2021     1,219 2,438  314,892
(1)Represents the target and maximum payouts with respect to the AIP for 2021. There are no threshold or minimum payouts under the AIP. For additional information regarding the AIP, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Variable Compensation–Annual Cash Incentives” above.

(2)
AIP payment for Mr. Pettit was paid in British pounds sterling and converted to U.S. dollars using the 2021 fiscal year average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.375710. Mr. Pettit’s 2021 AIP payment was £1,238,139.

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT        COMPENSATION MATTERS89
(3)Represents service vesting RSUs granted during 2021. The RSUs vest in three annual installments of 34%, 33% and 33% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service through each applicable vesting date.
(4)Represents 3-Year PSUs granted during 2021, which cliff-vest at the end of a three-year performance cycle from February 2, 2021 to February 1, 2024, based on achievement of a TSR CAGR performance metric and subject to continued service through the last day of the performance period. The actual number of PSUs will be determined at the end of the performance period and may be adjusted down to 0% or up to 300% of the target amount.
(5)Represents 5-Year PSUs granted during 2021, which cliff-vest at the end of a five-year performance cycle from February 2, 2021 to February 1, 2026, based on achievement of a TSR CAGR performance metric and subject to continued service through the last day of the performance period. The actual number of PSUs will be determined at the end of the performance period and may be adjusted down to 0% or up to 200% of the target amount.
(6)Represents one-time retention RSUs granted to Mr. Crum in early 2021 in recognition of his leadership and dedication supporting our employees during the pandemic.
(7)Represents the grant date fair value of stock awards as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 718-10. The grant date fair value for these stock awards was based on the closing price of MSCI’s common shares on the trading day preceding the grant date or service inception date as the case may be. For PSUs, the grant date fair value is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Subtopic 718-10. For the values of these PSUs, assuming attainment of the maximum level of the performance conditions, see footnote 2 to the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END        Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows the number of shares covered by exercisable and unexercisable stock options and outstanding RSUs and PSUs held by each of our NEOs on December 31, 2018,2021, which units remain subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions.

  Stock Awards
Name     Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
     Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
     Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(3)
     Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
Henry A. Fernandez   334,619 205,017,715
Andrew C. Wiechmann 3,995 2,447,697 14,347 8,790,263
C.D. Baer Pettit 1,163 712,558 150,524 92,224,550
Scott A. Crum 3,186 1,952,030 35,444 21,716,184
Robert J. Gutowski 1,256 769,539 13,295 8,145,714
(1)Represents unvested RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2021. This column does not give effect to retirement provisions for Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit. Equity awards granted to employees eligible for retirement treatment vest on the date retirement eligibility is attained. Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit became eligible for retirement treatment by satisfying one of the following conditions: age 50 with 12 years as a Managing Director, at age 50 with 15 years as an officer, at least age 55 with 5 years of service (the sum of age plus years of service must equal or exceed 65) or 20 years of service. The number of RSUs included in this table vest on the following dates for each NEO:
  Number of RSUs By Vesting Date
Name     2/4/22     2/6/22     2/7/22     3/5/22     2/4/23     2/6/23     2/4/24
Henry A. Fernandez       
Andrew C. Wiechmann 216 169 339 2,671 216 169 215
C.D. Baer Pettit   1,163    
Scott A. Crum 508 406 852  508 406 506
Robert J. Gutowski 216 135 339  216 135 215
(2)The market value of outstanding RSUs is based on a share price of $612.69, the closing price of MSCI Inc. common stock on December 31, 2021, rounded to the nearest whole number.
(3)Represents outstanding and unvested PSUs held on December 31, 2021 that remain subject to performance adjustment and forfeiture provisions, as illustrated in the following tables. This column does not give effect to retirement provisions for Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit. These numbers represent PSUs each NEO would receive upon vesting, assuming maximum attainment of the applicable performance goals.

Table of Contents

 
  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 
 
        

NAME

 

NUMBER OF

SECURITIES

UNDERLYING

UNEXERCISED

OPTIONS

EXERCISABLE

(#)(1)

  

NUMBER OF

SECURITIES

UNDERLYING

UNEXERCISED

OPTIONS

UNEXERCISABLE

(#)

  

OPTION

EXERCISE

PRICE

($)

  

OPTION

EXPIRATION

DATE

(MM/DD/YYYY)

  

NUMBER

OF

SHARES

OR UNITS

OF STOCK

THAT

HAVE

NOT

VESTED

(#)(3)(6)

  

MARKET

VALUE OF

SHARES
OR

UNITS OF

STOCK

THAT
HAVE

NOT

VESTED

($)(4)

  

EQUITY

INCENTIVE

PLAN

AWARDS:

NUMBER

OF

UNEARNED

SHARES,

UNITS OR

OTHER

RIGHTS

THAT

HAVE NOT

VESTED

(#)(5)

  

EQUITY

INCENTIVE

PLAN

AWARDS:

MARKET OR

PAYOUT

VALUE OF

UNEARNED

SHARES,

UNITS OR

OTHER

RIGHTS

THAT HAVE

NOT VESTED

($)(4)

 
        
        

Henry A. Fernandez

  49,774      36.70   12/14/2020         870,633   128,357,423 
        
        

Kathleen A. Winters(2)

              15,105   2,226,930   93,510   13,786,179 
        
        

C.D. Baer Pettit

              8,597   1,267,456   236,103   34,808,665 
        
        

Laurent Seyer

              30,040   4,428,797   156,417   23,060,558 
        
        

Jigar Thakkar

              19,223   2,834,047       
90MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

(1) The 49,774 exercisable stock options held by Mr. Fernandez at an exercise price of $36.70 represent special price-vested stock options that were part of an award consisting of four tranches that vested2019, 2020 and became exercisable based on the satisfaction of both service and price vesting conditions. These options were granted on December 14, 2010 and this fourth tranche vested and became exercisable in 2016.

(2) As a result of Ms. Winters’s resignation on March 1, 2019, all outstanding and unvested equity awards held by her as of such date were forfeited in their entirety pursuant to their terms.

(3) Represents RSUs and PSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2018 for which performance conditions have been met, but remain2021 PSU Awards, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions. This column does not give effect to Full Career Retirement provisions for Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit. Equity awards granted to employees eligible for Full Career Retirement vest on the date Full Career eligibility is attained. Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit became eligible for Full Career Retirement by satisfying one of the following conditions: age 50 with 12 years as a Managing Director, at age 50 with 15 years as an officer, at least age 55 with 5 years of service (the sum of age plus years of service must equal or exceed 65) or 20 years of service. The number of RSUs and PSUs for which performance conditions have been met included in this table vest on the following dates for each NEO:

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            77


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

 
  NUMBER OF RSUs AND PSUs BY VESTING DATE
 
            

NAME

 2/6/19 2/7/19 2/10/19 5/2/19 7/16/19 12/16/19 2/6/20 2/7/20 7/16/20 2/6/21 7/16/21 7/16/22
            
            

Henry A. Fernandez

            
            
            

Kathleen A. Winters

 1,278 1,862 2,282 5,267   1,277 1,862  1,277  
            
            

C.D. Baer Pettit

 1,229 1,432 2,048    1,228 1,432  1,228  
            
            

Laurent Seyer

 651 949 1,357   24,832 651 949  651  
            
            

Jigar Thakkar

     5,672    5,670  5,670 2,211

(4) The market value of outstanding RSUs and PSUs is based on a share price of $147.43, the closing price of MSCI Inc. common stock on December 31, 2018, rounded to the nearest whole number.

(5) Represents outstanding PSUs held on December 31, 2018 that remain subject to performance adjustment and forfeiture provisions. This column does not give effect to Full Career Retirement provisions for Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit. These numbers represent PSUs each NEO would receive assuming maximum attainment of the applicable performance goals. The 2016 Multi-Year PSUs vested on February 8, 2019 and the final awards were certified by the Compensation Committee on February 13, 2019.

1/27/2015 Special

2019—3-Year PSU Award-Unadjusted, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions

NameNumber of PSUs at 300%
(Maximum) Vesting
Henry A. Fernandez(1)80,187
Andrew C. Wiechmann(2)3,021
C.D. Baer Pettit(3)37,008
Scott A. Crum(4)10,854
Robert J. Gutowski(5)3,021
(1)Following the performance adjustment, Mr. Fernandez received 80,187 PSUs which vested and converted to shares on February 7, 2022.
(2)Following the performance adjustment, Mr. Wiechmann received 3,021 PSUs which vested and converted to shares on February 7, 2022.
(3)Following the performance adjustment, Mr. Pettit received 37,008 PSUs which vested and converted to shares on February 7, 2022.
(4)Following the performance adjustment, Mr. Crum received 10,854 PSUs which vested and converted to shares on February 7, 2022.
(5)Following the performance adjustment, Mr. Gutowski received 3,021 PSUs which vested and converted to shares on February 7, 2022.

2019—5-Year PSU Award-Unadjusted, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions

NameNumber of PSUs at 200%
(Maximum) Vesting
Henry A. Fernandez84,022
Andrew C. Wiechmann1,356
C.D. Baer Pettit23,266
Scott A. Crum5,686
Robert J. Gutowski1,356
 

NAME

2020—3-Year PSU Award-Unadjusted, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions
 NUMBER OF SPECIAL PSUs AT 110%
(MAXIMUM) VESTING BY DATE (#)
 
 
Name12/31/19Number of PSUs at 300%
(Maximum) Vesting
Henry A. Fernandez42,708
Andrew C. Wiechmann2,490
C.D. Baer Pettit28,470
Scott A. Crum5,979
Robert J. Gutowski1,992
2020—5-Year PSU Award-Unadjusted, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions 
 
 

Name

Number of PSUs at 200%
(Maximum) Vesting
Henry A. Fernandez71,184
Andrew C. Wiechmann2,768
C.D. Baer Pettit

31,638
Scott A. Crum6,642
Robert J. Gutowski2,214
  
13,4432021—3-Year PSU Award-Unadjusted, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions 
NameNumber of PSUs at 300%
(Maximum) Vesting
Henry A. Fernandez21,678
Andrew C. Wiechmann2,274
C.D. Baer Pettit11,562
Scott A. Crum3,033
Robert J. Gutowski2,274

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT91

2016 Multi-Year2021—5-Year PSU Award-Unadjusted, subject to forfeiture and cancellation provisions

 
   

NUMBER OF PSUs AT 300%

(MAXIMUM) VESTING

   TOTAL 
 
   

NAME

  

NON-FULL
CAREER

RETIREMENT
2/8/19

   

FULL
CAREER

RETIREMENT
2/8/19

     
   
   

Henry A. Fernandez

   580,422    290,211    870,633 
   
   

Kathleen A. Winters

   93,510        93,510 
   
   

C.D. Baer Pettit

   157,404    78,699    236,103 
   
   

Laurent Seyer

   156,417        156,417 
   

(6) The amount in this column includes the one-time special RSU retention award granted to Mr. Seyer on December 16, 2016 with respect to 24,832 shares that will service vest on December 16, 2019. The one-year Adjusted EBITDA goal applicable for Section 162(m) purposes to the special retention RSU award granted to Mr. Seyer on December 16, 2016 was achieved on December 31, 2017 at $659.2 million (in full satisfaction of the $450 million target) as certified by the Compensation Committee on February 2, 2018.

78            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


Name
             COMPENSATION MATTERSNumber of PSUs at 200%
(Maximum) Vesting
Henry A. Fernandez34,840
Andrew C. Wiechmann2,438
C.D. Baer Pettit18,580
Scott A. Crum3,250
Robert J. Gutowski2,438

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED        Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table contains information with regard to stock options exercised by our NEOs and vesting and conversion of restricted stock held by the NEOs during fiscal 2018.2021.

  
   OPTION AWARDS   STOCK AWARDS 
  
    

NAME

  

NUMBER OF

SHARES

ACQUIRED ON

EXERCISE

(#)

   

VALUE REALIZED

ON EXERCISE

($)(1)

   

NUMBER OF

SHARES

ACQUIRED ON

VESTING

(#)

   

VALUE REALIZED

ON VESTING

($)(1)

 
    
    

Henry A. Fernandez

           62,980           8,964,644        
    
    

Kathleen A. Winters

           8,095           1,166,058        
    
    

C.D. Baer Pettit

           33,189           4,710,911        
    
    

Laurent Seyer

           10,197           1,441,050        
    
    

Jigar Thakkar

                

(1) The value realized for stock awards is based on the closing price of MSCI common stock on the stock vesting date.

  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name     Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
     Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)
     Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
     Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)
Henry A. Fernandez    
Andrew C. Wiechmann   5,173 2,223,407
C.D. Baer Pettit   2,391 999,366
Scott A. Crum   2,193 942,573
Robert J. Gutowski   4,751 2,042,027
(1)The value realized for stock awards is based on the closing price of MSCI common stock on the stock vesting date.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL        Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Change in Control Severance Plan

In the event of a change in control of the Company, Executive Committee members, including all of our NEOs, would be entitled to benefits under the MSCI Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan (the “CIC Plan”), which was adopted by the Board of Directors in May 2015. The CIC Plan covers participants identified on a schedule attached to the CIC Plan (subject to any additions to or removals from the participant list by the Compensation Committee), including the Company’s CEO, CFO and the Company’s other NEOs. In the event of a “Qualifying Termination” (as(for certain terminations related to changes in control, as defined in the CIC Plan), participants will receive the severance payments and benefits specified in the CIC Plan. Severance payments and benefits under the CIC Plan are subject to a “double-trigger” as both a change in control and a termination of the participant’s employment by the Company without “cause” or by the participant for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the CIC Plan) are required in order for the participant to qualify for payments and benefits. The CIC Plan does not include any golden parachute excise taxgross-up provisions. Any severance payments and benefits under the CIC Plan are subject to execution of an agreement by the CIC Plan participant releasing claims against the Company. Participants are also obligated to comply with confidentiality,non-solicitation andnon-disparagement covenants under their release agreement.

Annual Incentive Plan

In the event of a change in control (as defined in the AIP), unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the performance period applicable to any outstanding AIP cash bonus award will cease as of the date immediately prior to the change in control. The portion of any such award based on performance metrics (other than KPIs) will be payable based on the higher of (i) the Company’s actual achievement of the performance metrics (other than KPIs) for the prorated period ending immediately prior to the change in control and (ii) 100%. The portion of any such award based on KPIs will be payable at 100% of the target KPIs. All awards will be payable by the Company (or the successor or survivor entity) within 60 days of the date of the change in control, prorated for the portion of the applicable performance period

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            79


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

that elapsed prior to the change in control.


Table of Contents

92MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS

If the Company’s successor will not be implementing a comparable annual incentive plan for the remaining portion of the year in which the change in control occurs, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, elect not to prorate the awards. If any AIP participant is eligible to receive a prorated annual bonus for the year in which the change in control occurs pursuant to any other change in control severance plan, including the CIC Plan, the individual’s prorated annual bonus payable under such other plan will be reduced by the amount of the bonus paid under the AIP.

Offer Letters

For information regarding certain amounts payable to each of Messrs. Wiechmann and Pettit in connection with an involuntary termination of employment other than for cause pursuant to the terms of their offer letter or employment letter, respectively, please see “Employment Agreements” on page 82 of this Proxy Statement.

Equity Acceleration

The descriptions of equity acceleration provisions below apply to the applicable outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2018.2021.

Terminations Other than due to Death, Disability, Involuntary Termination without Cause, Governmental Service or Full Career Retirement.TERMINATIONS OTHER THAN DUE TO DEATH, DISABILITY, INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE, GOVERNMENTAL SERVICE OR RETIREMENT

Upon termination of an NEO’s employment for any reason other than due to death, disability, involuntary termination without cause, certain governmental service or full career retirement (as such terms are defined in the applicable award agreement), his or her unvested RSUs and PSUs will generally be cancelled immediately. Equity awards granted to NEOs who are eligible for full career retirement treatment are cancelled following a termination for cause.

DEATH OR DISABILITY

Death or Disability.Upon termination of an NEO’s employment due to death or “disability” (as defined in the applicable award agreement):

RSUs. RSUs will vest and convert into shares within 30 days of the termination date.

2016 Special Retention RSUs2019-2021 PSUs. RSUs will vest and convert into shares within 30 days of the applicable Committee determination date (or, if the termination date is on or after such applicable determination date, within 30 days of the termination date).

2015 SpecialOne-Time PSUs. PSUs will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period.

2016 Multi-Year PSUs. A prorated portion of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date (as defined in the applicable award agreement), determined by multiplying (i) the target number of PSUs by (ii) a fraction, (A) the numerator of which is the sum of (x) the number of months elapsed from the grant date until the date of such termination (rounded up to the next whole month)plus (y) 12 months (up to a maximum of 36 months), and (B) the denominator of which is 36 months, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period.

Involuntary Termination.INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION

If the Company terminates an NEO’s employment without “cause” (as defined in the applicable award agreement) and he or she signs and does not revoke an agreement and release of claims satisfactory to the Company within 60 days of the termination date:

2019 RSUs. If the NEO is not eligible for full-career retirement treatment as of the termination date, RSUs will vest and convert into shares within 60 days of the termination date. If the NEO is eligible for full-career retirement treatment, RSUs will vest and convert into shares at any time, determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, during the period commencing on January 1 of the year following the year of termination and ending on theone-year anniversary of the termination date (or, 15 days following the expiration of anynon-compete the NEO is subject to, if earlier), but in no event before January 1 of the year following the year of termination.

2016 Special Retention2020-2021 RSUs. A prorated portion of the RSUs will vest and convert intoto shares within 60 dayson the next regularly scheduled vesting date equal to the product of (i) one-third of the total number of RSUs granted pursuant to the award multiplied by (ii) a fraction, (A) the numerator of which is the total number of months the NEO was employed by the Company during the applicable Committee determination12-month vesting period (rounded up to the next whole month) and (B) the denominator of which is 12 months. However, for NEOs who have achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility” (as defined in the applicable award agreement), the RSUs will fully vest on the date (or, ifof termination and will convert to shares on the termination date is on or after such applicable determination date, within 60 days of the termination date).original payment schedule.

80            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        COMPENSATION MATTERS

2015 SpecialOne-Time PSU2019 PSUss. The. PSUs will service-vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period.

2016 Multi-Year2020-2021 3-Year PSUs. AllA prorated portion of the target number of PSUs will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT93
date in each case,equal to the product of (i) the target number of PSUs multiplied by (ii) a fraction, (A) the numerator of which is the total number of months the NEO was employed by the Company during the 3-year performance period (rounded up to the next whole month), and (B) the denominator of which is 36 months, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period. However, for NEOs who have achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility,” all of the target PSUs (i.e., not prorated) will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period.
2020-2021 5-Year PSUs. If the termination of employment occurs prior to the second anniversary of the grant date, the PSUs will be forfeited in their entirety. Following the second anniversary of the grant date, a prorated portion of the target number of PSUs will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date equal to the product of (i) the target number of PSUs multiplied by (ii) a fraction, (A) the numerator of which is the total number of months the NEO was employed by the Company during the 5-year performance period (rounded up to the next whole month), and (B) the denominator of which is 60 months, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period. However, for NEOs who have achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility,” all of the target PSUs (i.e., not prorated) will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period.

Governmental Service.GOVERNMENTAL SERVICE

Upon termination of an NEO’s employment as a result of commencing certain employment with a governmental employer (as defined in the applicable award agreement):

2019 RSUs. The RSUs will vest and convert into shares on the termination date or within 60 days thereafter.

2016 Special Retention RSUs. RSUs will vest and convert into shares within 60 days of the applicable Committee determination date (or, if the termination date is on or after such applicable determination date, within 60 days of the termination date).

2015 SpecialOne-Time PSUs and Multi-Year2019 PSUs. If such termination occurs prior to the adjustment date, the PSUs will be adjusted within a range based on the expected (or actual, if such termination occurs after the end of the performance period) achievement of the performance metrics for the performance period (which will be determined by extrapolating the performance metrics that have been achieved as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter prior to the date on which the NEO’s employment terminates) and such adjusted PSUs will vest and convert into shares within 60 days following the termination date. If such termination occurs following the adjustment date, his or herthe PSUs will fully vest and convert into shares within 60 days of termination.

Full Career Retirement.RETIREMENT

Upon termination of an NEO’s employment as a result of “full career retirement” (as defined in circumstances that makes him or her eligible for retirement treatment (based on the applicable award agreement):

2019 RSUs. RSUs will vest and convert into shares at any time, determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, during the period commencing on January 1 of the year following the year of termination and ending on theone-year anniversary of the termination date (or, 15 days following the expiration of anynon-compete the NEO is subject to, if earlier), but in no event before January 1 of the year following the year of termination.

2020-2021 RSUs. For NEOs who have achieved “Legacy Retirement Eligibility” or “55/10 Retirement Eligibility” (as such terms are defined in the applicable award agreement) but who have not achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility,” a prorated portion of the RSUs will vest and convert to shares on the next regularly scheduled vesting date equal to the product of (i) one-third of the total number of RSUs granted pursuant to the award multiplied by (ii) a fraction, (A) the numerator of which is the total number of months the NEO was employed by the Company during the applicable 12-month vesting period (rounded up to the next whole month) and (B) the denominator of which is 12 months. For NEOs who have achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility,” the RSUs will fully vest on the date of termination and will convert to shares on the original payment schedule.

2016 Multi-Year2019 PSUs. If such terminationretirement eligibility occurs prior to or on the vesting date, the portion of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs that is full career retirement eligible will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period; except that, if on the adjustment date, he or shethe NEO is subject to anon-compete restriction, the PSUs will convert, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, during the period (x) commencing on the adjustment date and (y) ending on December 31, 2019.2022 or December 31, 2023, as applicable. If such termination occurs after the vesting date (but prior to the adjustment date), the adjusted PSUs will convert into shares on December 31, 2019.2022 or December 31, 2023, as applicable.

2020-2021 PSUs. For NEOs who have achieved “Legacy Retirement Eligibility” or “55/10 Retirement Eligibility” but who have not achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility,” a prorated portion of the target number of PSUs will vest and convert to shares on the adjustment date equal to the product of (i) the target number of PSUs multiplied by (ii) a fraction, (A) the numerator

Table of Contents

94MSCI   |   COMPENSATION MATTERS
of which is the total number of months the NEO was employed by the Company during the 3- or 5-year performance period, as applicable (rounded up to the next whole month), and (B) the denominator of which is 36 or 60 months, as applicable, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period. However, for NEOs who have achieved “62/10 Retirement Eligibility,” all of the target PSUs (i.e., not prorated) will vest and convert into shares on the adjustment date, subject to adjustment based on actual performance through the end of the performance period.

Change in Control.CHANGE IN CONTROL

In the event an NEO’s employment is terminated by MSCI without “cause” or by him or her for “good reason,” in each case, within 24 months following a “change in control” (as such terms are defined in the applicable award agreement):

RSUs. RSUs will vest and convert into shares within 60 days of the date of termination of employment.

2016 Special Retention RSUs. RSUs will vest and convert into shares within 60 days of the termination date.

2015 SpecialOne-Time2019-2021 PSUs. The PSUs will vest and convert to shares within 60 days of the date of termination of employment, and the performance metrics will be deemed to have been achieved at the greater of (i) the rate at which the PSUs are accrued by the Company on its financial statements and (ii) 100%.

2016 Multi-Year PSUs. A prorated portionactual achievement of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs will vest and convert to shares within 60 days of the date of termination of employment based on the number of months elapsed from the grant date until the date of

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            81


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

termination (rounded up to the next whole month), plus 12 months (up to a maximum of 36 months), and the performance metrics will be deemed to have been achieved atfor the greater of (i)period commencing on the actual level of attainmentfirst day of the applicable performance metrics as ofperiod and ending on the date ofimmediately prior to the change in control and (ii) 100%.

The following table represents the amounts to which our NEOs or their estates or representatives, as applicable, would have been entitled to receive had their employment been terminated on December 31, 20182021 or had a change in control occurred on December 31, 2018.2021.

TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

           

 

CHANGE IN CONTROL

 

 

NAME(1)

 

INVOLUNTARY

TERMINATION

WITHOUT

CAUSE-

EQUITY AT TARGET

PERFORMANCE(1)(2)

  

TERMINATION

DUE TO DEATH,

DISABILITY-

EQUITY AT TARGET

PERFORMANCE(1)(3)

  

TERMINATION

DUE TO

GOVERNMENT

SERVICE - EQUITY

AT TARGET

PERFORMANCE(1)(4)

  

CASH

SEVERANCE(5)

  

BENEFITS AND

PERQUISITES -

COBRA / UK
MEDICAL

CONTINUATION

PREMIUMS(6)

  

TERMINATION

WITHOUT CAUSE

OR FOR GOOD

REASON

(FOLLOWING A

CHANGE IN

CONTROL) - EQUITY

AT TARGET

PERFORMANCE(1)(7)

 
      
      

Henry A. Fernandez(8)

 $19,015,816  $27,666,124  $28,523,872  $5,120,920  $61,205  $28,523,872 
      
      

Kathleen A. Winters

 $5,290,526  $6,683,002  $6,822,323  $2,952,327  $67,417  $6,822,323 
      
      

C.D. Baer Pettit(8)

 $6,958,549  $9,322,146  $9,717,259  $3,920,079  $11,811  $9,717,259 
      
      

Laurent Seyer

 $9,553,317  $11,898,780  $12,115,650  $3,218,251  $11,811  $12,115,650 
      
      

Jigar Thakkar

 $2,834,047  $2,834,047  $2,834,047  $1,858,333  $20,056  $2,834,047 

(1) All values are based on a closing stock price of $147.43 per share as of December 31, 2018. The amounts included in this table also represent values associated with the acceleration of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs. However, such PSUs vested on February 8, 2019 and the ultimate payouts were certified by the Compensation Committee on February 13, 2019. As such, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, the value attributable to the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs reflected in the table above are no longer currently applicable in the event of any future termination of employment or change in control.

(2) These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment due to an involuntary termination without cause (not following a change in control), in each case, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $57,047,449 for Mr. Fernandez, $11,417,716 for Ms. Winters, $17,452,321 for Mr. Pettit, $19,802,355 for Mr. Seyer and $2,834,047 for Mr. Thakkar. As indicated above, these values are largely attributable to the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs and are no longer applicable as of the date of this Proxy Statement, as the awards have since vested and been paid out to the NEOs.

(3) These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment due to death or disability, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $82,998,372 for Mr. Fernandez, $15,595,145 for Ms. Winters, $24,543,114 for Mr. Pettit, $26,838,747 for Mr. Seyer, and $2,834,047 for Mr. Thakkar.

(4) These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment due to a termination for government service pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $85,571,615 for Mr. Fernandez, $16,013,109 for Ms. Winters, $25,187,973 for Mr. Pettit, $27,489,356 for Mr. Seyer and $2,834,047 for Mr. Thakkar.

(5) A lump sum cash payment under our CIC Plan equal to the sum of (1) two times the participant’s base salary and (2) two times the participant’s average annual cash bonus (three-year average annual cash bonus). For more information on our CIC Plan and qualifying terminations of employment thereunder, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Change in Control Severance Plan” above. Since Mr. Thakkar commenced his employment with the Company in July 2018, the amount included for him reflects the annualized target cash bonus amount provided in his offer letter described on page 69 of this Proxy Statement.

82            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


           Change in Control
Name(1)     Involuntary
Termination
Without
Cause-
Equity at Target
Performance(1)(2)
     Termination
Due to Death,
Disability-
Equity at Target
Performance(1)(3)
     Termination
Due to
Government
Service - Equity
at Target
Performance(1)(4)
     Cash
Severance(5)
     Benefits and
Perquisites -
Cobra / UK
Medical
Continuation
Premiums(6)
     Termination
Without Cause
or for Good
Reason
(Following a
Change in
Control)-
Equity
at Target
Performance(1)(7)
Henry A. Fernandez        $87,745,786        $87,745,786        $87,745,786  $5,301,752        $72,354        $87,745,786
Andrew C. Wiechmann $3,258,898 $6,047,863 $6,047,863 $2,238,100 $ $6,047,863
C.D. Baer Pettit $16,594,096 $38,957,894 $38,957,894 $4,320,918 $17,367 $38,957,894
Scott A. Crum $5,130,666 $10,781,506 $10,781,506 $2,750,880 $84,391 $10,781,506
Robert J. Gutowski $1,629,755 $4,098,283 $4,098,283 $2,078,900 $72,354 $4,098,283
(1)All values are based on a closing stock price of $612.69 per share as of December 31, 2021. The amounts included in this table also represent values associated with the acceleration of the 2019 PSUs for the NEOs, which vested on February 7, 2022. As such, as of the date of this proxy statement, the value attributable to the 2019 PSUs reflected in the table above for Messrs. Fernandez ($49,129,773), Wiechmann ($1,850,936), Pettit ($22,674,432), Crum ($6,650,137) and Gutowski ($1,850,936) are no longer currently applicable in the event of any future termination of employment or change in control.

(2)
These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment due to an involuntary termination without cause (not following a change in control), in each case, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $205,017,715 for Mr. Fernandez, $5,633,072 for Mr. Wiechmann, $44,318,931 for Mr. Pettit, $12,393,493 for Mr. Crum and $3,874,039 for Mr. Gutowski.
(3)        COMPENSATION MATTERSThese amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment due to death or disability, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $205,017,715 for Mr. Fernandez, $11,237,960 for Mr. Wiechmann, $92,937,108 for Mr. Pettit, $23,668,215 for Mr. Crum and $8,915,252 for Mr. Gutowski.
(4)These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment due to a termination for government service pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $205,017,715 for Mr. Fernandez, $11,237,960 for Mr. Wiechmann, $92,937,108 for Mr. Pettit, $23,668,215 for Mr. Crum and $8,915,252 for Mr. Gutowski.
 (5)A lump sum cash payment under our CIC Plan equal to the sum of (1) two times the participant’s base salary and (2) two times the participant’s average annual cash bonus (three-year average annual cash bonus). For more information on our CIC Plan and qualifying terminations of employment thereunder, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Change in Control Severance Plan” above.

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT95
(6)A lump sum cash payment under our CIC Plan equal to 135% of the approximate amount of COBRA continuation premiums for the participant and his or her eligible dependents for 24 months for the coverage option and level of medical, dental and/or vision coverage in effect for the participant immediately prior to the date of termination (or, in the case of an international participant, equivalent local private medical benefits); provided, however, that such continued participation shall only be provided to an international participant to the extent permitted under the terms of any applicable group health plan and applicable law. For more information on our CIC Plan and qualifying terminations of employment thereunder, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Change in Control Severance Plan” above.
(7)These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason, in each case, within 24 months following a change in control, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $205,017,715 for Mr. Fernandez, $11,237,960 for Mr. Wiechmann, $92,937,108 for Mr. Pettit, $23,668,215 for Mr. Crum and $8,915,252 for Mr. Gutowski.

(6) A lump sum cash payment under our CIC Plan equal to 135% of the approximate amount of COBRA continuation premiums for the participant and his or her eligible dependents for 24 months for the coverage option and level of medical, dental and/or vision coverage in effect for the participant immediately prior to the date of termination (or, in the case of an international participant, equivalent local private medical benefits); provided, however, that such continued participation shall only be provided to an international participant to the extent permitted under the terms of any applicable group health plan and applicable law. For more information on our CIC Plan and qualifying terminations of employment thereunder, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Change in Control Severance Plan” above.

(7) These amounts represent the values associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and payout of PSUs at the target performance level upon a termination of the NEO’s employment by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason, in each case, within 24 months following a change in control, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. The value associated with the acceleration of unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming payout at the maximum performance level) is $85,571,615 for Mr. Fernandez, $16,013,109 for Ms. Winters, $25,187,973 for Mr. Pettit, $27,489,356 for Mr. Seyer, and $2,834,047 for Mr. Thakkar.

(8) For Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit, excludes unvested but outstanding RSU and PSUs at target, due to the awards’ Full Career Retirement provisions. As of December 31, 2018, the values of these awards at target were $14,261,936 and $5,134,987 for Messrs. Fernandez and Pettit, respectively. These awards would be cancelled following an involuntary termination for cause (as defined in the award agreement), but would not be cancelled upon a voluntary termination.

2018 PAY RATIO        2021 Pay Ratio

In accordance with the requirements of Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K (which we collectively refer to as the “Pay Ratio Rule”), we are providing the following estimated information for 2018:2021:

the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (except our Chief Executive Officer) was $55,857;

the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer was $2,978,454; and

the ratio of these two amounts was 53 to 1. We believe that this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Pay Ratio Rule.

Due to SEC disclosure rules, we were required to report the total three-year value of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs granted to our CEO as 2016 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2016, rather than reporting the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs on an annualized basis for the years it covers (i.e., reportingone-third of the award value in each of 2016, 2017 and 2018). Accordingly, an alternative way to view our CEO Pay Ratio for 2018 is to include the annualized target value of the CEO’s Multi-Year PSUs that is attributable to 2018 (i.e.,one-third of the target value of the 2016 Multi-Year PSUs) as part of his 2018 annual total compensation, which would result in a CEO Pay Ratio for 2018 of 159 to 1.

the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (except our Chief Executive Officer) was $58,415;
the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer was $10,338,312; and
the ratio of these two amounts was 177 to 1. We believe that this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Pay Ratio Rule.

SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and apply various assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.

Methodology for Identifying Ourour “Median Employee”

Employee PopulationEMPLOYEE POPULATION

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our Chief Executive Officer), we first identified our total employee population from which we determined our “median employee.” We determined that, as of OctoberDecember 31, 2018,2021, our employee population consisted of 3,1224,303 individuals (of which 23.1%47.4% of MSCI employees were located in the United StatesAsia Pacific region, 23.3% in Europe, Middle East and 76.9% were locatedAfrica, 20.6% in jurisdictions outside the United States). As of December 31, 2018, 61.4%U.S. and 38.6% of our employees were locatedCanada, and 8.7% in emerging market centersMexico and developed market centers, respectively.Brazil). Our employee population consisted of our global workforce of full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees, as described in more detail below.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            83


COMPENSATION MATTERS        

Determining our Median EmployeeDETERMINING OUR MEDIAN EMPLOYEE

To identify our “median employee” from our total employee population, we compared the amount of base salary plus actual cash bonus paid for 2018.2021. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of our full-time employees who were hired in 20182021 but did not work for us for the entire fiscal year and permanent part-time employees. We identified our “median employee” using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all of our employees included in the calculation.

Our Median EmployeeOUR MEDIAN EMPLOYEE

Using the methodologies described above, we determined that our “median employee” was a full-time, salaried employee located in Mumbai, India, with base wagessalary for the12-month period ending December 31, 20182021 in the amount of $41,229.$41,580.

Determination of Annual Total Compensation of our “Median Employee” and our CEO

Once we identified our “median employee,” we then calculated such employee’s annual total compensation for 20182021 using the same methodology we used for purposes of determining the annual total compensation of our NEOs for 20182021 (as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table for 20182021 on page 7487 of this Proxy Statement).


Table of Contents

84            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


96

        COMPENSATION MATTERSMSCI

Proposal No. 2 - Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)

The Dodd-Frank Act enables MSCI’s shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory ornon-binding basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules.

For an overview of the compensation of our NEOs, see “Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Summary” above.

We are asking for shareholder approval of the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules, which include the disclosures under “Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, the compensation tables included therein and the narrative following the compensation tables. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on MSCI, the Compensation Committee or the Board. The Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of MSCI’s shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider those shareholders’ concerns, and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. MSCI currently conducts annual advisory votes on executive compensation.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at our 2019 Annual Meeting, at which a quorum is present, is required to approve Proposal No. 2. Abstentions shall not be treated as votes cast.

LOGO

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            85


Audit Matters

Independent Auditor’s Fees

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees (including related expenses) billed and/or accrued in 20182021 and 20172020 for professional services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”).PwC. On March 19, 2018,15, 2021, the Audit and Risk Committee approved the engagement of PwC as the Company’s independent auditor for 2018.2021. These fees were approved pursuant to thepre-approval policies and procedures described below.

  

$ IN THOUSANDS

  2018  2017
  
  

Audit fees(1)

  2,609  2,346
  
  

Audit-related fees(2)

  65  89
  
  

Tax fees(3)

  1,681  1,195
  
  

All other fees(4)

  601  175
  
  

Total

  4,956  3,805
  

(1) Audit fees consisted of fees billed and/or accrued for (i) audits of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Reports on Form
$ IN THOUSANDS2021     2020
Audit fees(1)3,396 3,120
Audit-related fees(2)698 15
Tax fees(3)1,329 1,607
All other fees(4)16 6
Total5,439 4,748
(1)Audit fees consisted of fees billed and/or accrued for (i) audits of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and related services, (ii) reviews of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly financial statements, (iii) audits of various entities for statutory and other reporting requirements, (iv) comfort letters, consents and other services related to SEC and other regulatory filings and (v) audits of our internal control over financial reporting (as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).

(2) Audit-related fees consisted of fees billed and/or accrued for (i) reports related to the assessment of internal controls and compliance with professional standards and (ii) the annual audit of the 401(k) financial statements and other consultations.

(3) Tax fees related to international tax restructuring were $845,000 in 2018 and $582,000 in 2017. Tax consulting fees related to international and domestic tax matters in 2018 and 2017 were $325,000 and $210,000, respectively. Tax fees related to tax compliance assistance in 2018 and 2017 were $511,000 and $403,000, respectively.

(4) In 2018 and 2017, all other fees primarily consisted ofnon-recurring fees related to the engagement of the independent auditor to assist the Company in complying with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which went into effect on May 25, 2018.

86            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


(2)
In 2021 and 2020, Audit-related fees consisted of fees billed and/or accrued for the annual benefit plan audit as well as other assurance and related services.
(3)        AUDIT MATTERSTax fees related to tax compliance assistance in 2021 and 2020 were $1,043,596 and $1,409,000, respectively. Tax consulting fees related to international and domestic tax matters, including international tax planning, in 2021 and 2020 were approximately $285,431 and $198,000, respectively.
(4)In 2021 and 2020, all other fees primarily consisted of fees related to accounting research software subscriptions.

Pre-Approval Policy of the Audit and Risk Committee of Services Performed by Independent Auditors

The Audit and Risk Committee has implementedpre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit andnon-audit services by the independent auditor to ensure the services do not impair their independence. Under these procedures, the Audit and Risk Committeepre-approves both the type of services to be provided by the independent auditors and the estimated fees related to those services. During thepre-approval pre -approval process, the Audit and Risk Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the auditor. Even if a service has received generalpre-approval, if it involves a fee in excess of $400,000$750,000 or relates to tax planning and advice, it requires a separatepre-approval of the full Audit and Risk Committee. The Audit and Risk Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee topre-approve certain engagements not requiring approval by the full Audit and Risk Committee. The Chair must report, for informational purposes, anypre-approval decisions to the Audit and Risk Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of the auditor’s independence, including compliance with SEC and NYSE rules and regulations. Management reports the actual fees versuspre-approved amounts periodically throughout the year by category of service.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT97

Audit and Risk Committee Report

The Audit and Risk Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, which is accessible through the “Corporate Governance” link under the “Investor Resources” tab found on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http:https://ir.msci.com)ir.msci.com). Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC. The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for the oversight of the integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting, the Company’s risk management, the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent auditor, the performance of the Company’s internal and independent auditors and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit and Risk Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to appoint, compensate, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace the Company’s independent auditor. The Board has determined that all of the Audit and Risk Committee’s members are independent under the applicable independence standards of the NYSE and the Exchange Act.

The Audit and Risk Committee serves in an oversight capacity and is not part of the Company’s managerial or operational decision-making process. Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and for the report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, PwC, was responsible for auditing the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K, expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as well as reviewing the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q. The Audit and Risk Committee’s responsibility is to oversee the financial reporting process and to review and discuss management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit and Risk Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management, the internal auditor and the independent auditor.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            87


AUDIT MATTERS        

The Audit and Risk Committee held sixten meetings during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, and among other things:

reviewed and discussed the Company’s quarterly and annual earnings releases;
reviewed and discussed the (i) quarterly unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes and (ii) audited consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 with management and PwC;
reviewed and discussed the annual plan and scope of work of the independent auditor;
reviewed and discussed the annual plan and scope of work of the internal auditor and summaries of significant reports to management by the internal auditor;
met with PwC, the internal auditor and Company management in executive sessions to discuss the results of their examinations and evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and compliance programs;
reviewed and discussed the critical accounting policies set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and reviewed critical audit matters reported by PwC;
reviewed business and financial market conditions, including periodic assessments of risks posed to MSCI’s operations and financial condition (including those related to technology and cybersecurity); and
evaluated the performance of PwC and approved their engagement as the Company’s independent auditor.

reviewed and discussed the Company’s quarterly and annual earnings releases;

reviewed and discussed the (i) quarterly unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes and (ii) audited consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 with management and PwC;

reviewed and discussed the annual plan and scope of work of the independent auditor;

reviewed and discussed the annual plan and scope of work of the internal auditor and summaries of significant reports to management by the internal auditor;

met with PwC, the internal auditor and Company management in executive sessions to discuss the results of their examinations and evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and compliance programs;

reviewed and discussed the critical accounting policies set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K;

reviewed business and financial market conditions, including periodic assessments of risks posed to MSCI’s operations and financial condition; and

evaluated the performance of PwC and approved their engagement as the Company’s independent auditor.

The Audit Committee discussed with PwC matters that independent registered public accounting firms are required to discuss with audit committees in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including, among other things, matters related to the conduct of the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16 “Communications with Audit Committees.” This review included discussions by the Audit Committee with management regarding the Company’s consolidated financial statements and with the independent auditor as to the audit thereof, including, among other things, the quality (not merely the acceptability) of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures relating to critical accounting policies.

PwC also provided to the Audit and Risk Committee its annualthe written disclosures and the letters required by the applicable PCAOB requirements regarding PwC’s communications with the Audit and Risk Committee concerning independence, letter required under Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and represented that it is independent from the Company. We discussed with PwC their independence from the Company, and considered whether the services they provided to the Company beyond those rendered in connection with their integrated audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and the reviews of the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q, were compatible with maintaining their independence.


Table of Contents

98MSCI   |   AUDIT MATTERS

During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Audit and Risk Committee also received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, audit-related and tax services provided. Pursuant to thepre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit andnon-audit services by the independent auditors as described above within“— “—Pre-Approval Policy of the Audit and Risk Committee of Services Performed by Independent Auditors,” the Audit and Risk Committee approved, among other things, fees related to the integrated audits, statutory audits, consultations internal control reviews and due diligence services pertaining to business acquisitions.certain non-audit services. The Audit and Risk Committee also approved certain tax fees consisting of compliance and advisory services related to (i) international corporate restructurings, (ii) tax consulting fees related to international and domestic tax matters, (iii)including international corporate restructurings, and (ii) tax compliance assistance and (iv) services to comply with the GDPR.assistance.

88            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        AUDIT MATTERS

Based on our review and these meetings, discussions and reports described above, and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to above and in the Audit and Risk Committee’s charter, we recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s 20182021 Annual Report onForm 10-K.

Respectfully submitted,

Wayne Edmunds (Chair)


Robert G. Ashe
Sandy C. Rattray
Linda H. Riefler
Rajat Taneja


Alice W. HandyTable of Contents

Marcus L. Smith

2022 PROXY STATEMENT99

Proposal No. 3 -

Ratification of the Appointment of MSCI Inc.’s Independent Auditor

The Audit and Risk Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent auditors for 2022 and presents this selection to the shareholders for ratification. PwC will audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 and perform other permissible pre-approved services.

A PwC representative will attend the 2022 Annual Meeting to respond to your questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so. If shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit and Risk Committee will reconsider it. Even if shareholders ratify the selection of PwC, the Audit and Risk Committee, in its discretion, may select a new independent auditor at any time during the year if it believes that the change would be in the best interest of the Company.

The Audit and Risk Committee periodically reviews the engagement of the independent auditor to assess, among other things, the skills, experience, service levels and costs associated with conducting the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements. PwC has served as our independent auditor since March 2014.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at our 2022 Annual Meeting, at which a quorum is present, is required to approve Proposal No. 3. Abstentions shall not be treated as votes cast.

 Our Board of Directors Recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditor.
Proxies solicited by our Board will be voted “FOR” this ratification unless otherwise instructed.

Table of Contents

100MSCI

Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

The AuditStock Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors

We require members of our Executive Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent auditors for 2019(which includes all of our executive officers) and presents this selectionour directors to comply with our stock ownership guidelines to further align their interests with the shareholders for ratification. PwC will auditinterests of our consolidated financial statements for 2019 and perform other permissiblepre-approved services.

A PwC representative will attend the 2019 Annual Meeting to respond to your questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so. If shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider it. Even if shareholders ratify the selection of PwC, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a new independent auditor at any time during the year if it believes that the change would be in the best interestshareholders. As of the Company.date of this Proxy Statement, all of the members of our Executive Committee and our directors are in compliance with the applicable stock ownership guidelines. See “Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 83 of this Proxy Statement and “Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines—Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 53 of this Proxy Statement for additional information regarding our ownership guidelines for the members of our Executive Committee and our directors, respectively.

The Audit Committee periodically reviewsfollowing table sets forth the engagementbeneficial ownership of the independent auditor to assess, among other things, the skills, experience, service levelsour common stock by each of our NEOs and costs associated with conducting the annual auditdirectors, and by all of the Company’s financial statements.our directors and executive officers as of March 1, 2022, as a group. The address for each of our executive officers and directors is 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007. Percentage of share ownership amounts are based on 81,267,909 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2022.

Named Executive Officers      Shares(1)     Right to
Acquire(2)
     Beneficial
Ownership
Total(3)
     Percent of
Class(4)
Henry A. Fernandez(5) 2,052,401  2,052,401 2.53%
Andrew C. Wiechmann 14,505 2,671 17,176 —%
C.D. Baer Pettit 259,087  259,087 —%
Scott A. Crum 30,087  30,087 —%
Robert J. Gutowski 15,122  15,122 —%
Directors        
Robert G. Ashe 15,825 442 16,267 —%
Wayne Edmunds 8,095 339 8,434 —%
Catherine R. Kinney(6) 26,491 339 26,830 —%
Jacques P. Perold 3,888 339 4,227 —%
Sandy C. Rattray 569 339 908 —%
Linda H. Riefler 18,545 339 18,884 —%
Marcus L. Smith 2,867 339 3,206 —%
Rajat Taneja(7) 178 322 500 —%
Paula Volent 980 339 1,319 —%
All Current Executive Officers and Directors as of March 1, 2022 as a Group (14 Persons) 2,448,640 5,808 2,454,448 3.02%

(1)Excludes shares of our common stock that may be acquired through the vesting of RSUs and PSUs. Includes 20,478 shares of our common stock for which Ms. Kinney has elected to defer receipt of such shares until the 60th day after her “separation from service” as a director and 178 shares of our common stock for which Mr. Taneja has elected to defer receipt of such shares until the earlier of (i) June 1, 2025 and (ii) the 60th day after his “separation from service” as a director.
(2)Includes shares of our common stock that can be acquired through vesting of RSUs within 60 days of the date of this table (i.e., through May 1, 2022). See the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” Table included herein for additional information regarding RSUs held by each NEO as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, each of our non-employee directors had the following outstanding stock awards, all of which are in the form of RSUs: Messrs. Edmunds, Perold, Rattray and Smith and Mmes. Kinney, Riefler and Volent each had 339 RSUs outstanding, Mr. Ashe had 442 RSUs outstanding and Mr. Taneja had 322 RSUs outstanding. Such RSUs are scheduled to vest on May 1, 2022. Ms. Riefler elected to defer receipt of such RSUs until the 60th day after her "separation from service" as a director. Mr. Taneja elected to defer receipt of such RSUs until the earlier of (i) June 1, 2025 and (ii) the 60th day after his “separation from service” as a director.

Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT101

(3)Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, to our knowledge each executive officer and director, as of March 1, 2022, had sole voting and investment power with respect to his or her shares of our common stock. Beneficial Ownership Totals may differ from those set forth in Statements of Changes in Beneficial Ownership reported on Form 4 filed with the SEC due to the exclusion herein of RSUs granted by the Company, as described in footnote (1) to this table.
(4)All executive officers and directors (other than Mr. Fernandez) each beneficially owned less than 1.0% of the shares of our outstanding common stock. Percentages for each beneficial owner are calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act. Percentages for each named executive officer, executive officer and director as of March 1, 2022 and collectively as a group are based on the number of our shares outstanding as of March 1, 2022, which excludes shares of our common stock that can be acquired through vesting of RSUs within 60 days of the date of this table (i.e., through May 1, 2022).
(5)Includes 314,479 shares of our common stock held by the Fernandez 2007 Children’s Trust of which the spouse of Mr. Fernandez is the trustee, 503,109 shares of our common stock held by The Henry Fernandez 2022 MSCI Annuity Trust of which Mr. Fernandez is the trustee, 7,900 shares of our common stock held by one of his children under the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act and 15,800 shares of our common stock directly held by two of Mr. Fernandez’s children.
(6)Includes 4,020 shares of our common stock held by the Catherine R. Kinney 2020 GRAT of which Ms. Kinney is the trustee and 10,558 shares of our common stock held by the Catherine R. Kinney 2021 GRAT No. 2 of which Ms. Kinney is the trustee.
(7)Mr. Taneja was appointed to the Board, effective June 1, 2021.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION        Stock Ownership of Principal Shareholders

The affirmative votefollowing table contains information regarding the only persons we know of a majoritythat beneficially own more than 5% of the votes cast at our 2019 Annual Meeting, at which a quorum is present, is required to approve Proposal No. 3. Abstentions shall not be treatedcommon stock. Percentage of class amounts are based on 81,267,909 shares of our common stock outstanding as votes cast.of March 1, 2022.

Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Name and AddressNumber of
Shares
Percentage
of Class(1)
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
8,548,608(2)10.52%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
6,730,522(3)8.28%
(1)Because percentage of class ownership is based on the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of a date that differs from the date used by the principal shareholders to calculate the percentages for purposes of filing the applicable Schedule 13G or 13G/A, percentages of class ownership presented herein may differ from amounts reported in the applicable Schedule 13G or 13G/A filed with the SEC by the relevant principal shareholder.
(2)Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 9) filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that The Vanguard Group had sole voting power as to 0 shares of our common stock, shared voting power as to 136,149 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power as to 8,212,212 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power as to 336,396 shares of our common stock. In addition, the Schedule 13G/A discloses that the person filing the report is an investment adviser in accordance with §240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) and the identification and classification of the subsidiaries which acquired the securities being reported on therein are set forth on Appendix A thereto.
(3)Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 10) filed with the SEC on February 3, 2022. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power as to 6,023,969 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power as to 6,730,522 shares of our common stock. In addition, the Schedule 13G/A discloses that the person filing the report is a parent holding company or control person in accordance with §240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G) and the identification and classification of the subsidiaries which acquired the securities being reported on therein are set forth on Exhibit A thereto.

Table of Contents

LOGO

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            89


102MSCI

Other Matters

Corporate Governance Documents

MSCI has a corporate governance webpage that can be found under the “Corporate Governance” link under the “Investor Resources” tab on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (https://ir.msci.com).

Our Corporate Governance Policies (including our Director Independence Standards), Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and committee charters are available electronically, without charge, on or through our website. To access these documents, click on the “Corporate Governance” link under the “Investor Resources” tab found on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (https://ir.msci. com). These documents are also available, without charge, to any shareholder who requests them by writing to us at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or via email at investor.relations@msci.com.

Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to our directors, executive officers and employees. If we make any substantive amendment to, or grant a waiver to, a provision of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for our CEO, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and Global Controller or persons performing similar functions, we will satisfy the applicable SEC disclosure requirement by promptly disclosing the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (https://ir.msci.com).

Certain Transactions

Transactions with Shareholders.Shareholders

From time to time, shareholders that own more than 5% of our common stock subscribe to, license or otherwise purchase, in the normal course of business, certain of our products and services. These transactions are negotiated on anarm’s-length basis and are subject to review under our Related Person Transactions Policy described below.

During 2018,2021, BlackRock, Inc., FMR LLC, and The Vanguard Group and/or their respective affiliates subscribed to, licensed or otherwise purchased in the normal course of business, certain of our products and services. For purposes of full disclosure, revenues recognized by us from subscriptions, licenses and other fees related to our products and services in 20182021 from each of these shareholders and/or their respective affiliates are set forth in the table below.

NAMEName

     2018 REVENUES2021 Revenues

BlackRock, Inc.

 $170.7259.7 million

FMR LLC

The Vanguard Group
 $23.4 17.7 million

The Vanguard Group

$15.5 million

Transactions with Directors

Sandy C. Rattray served as the Chief Investment Officer of Man Group plc from 2017 to September 30, 2021. In 2021, Man Group plc and its subsidiaries subscribed to, licensed or otherwise purchased in the normal course of business, certain of the Company’s products and services. Revenues recognized from subscriptions, licenses and other fees related to such products and services in 2021 were approximately $3.7 million.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT103

Related Person Transactions Policy

The Company maintains a written Related Person Transactions Policy (the “Policy”), which governs the approval of related person transactions. The Governance Committee administers the PolicyPolicy. It is the responsibility of each director, director nominee and may amend it from timeexecutive officer to time. For purposespromptly notify the legal department of the Policy: (i) a Related Person Transaction means (1) a Transaction involving the Companytransactions in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 inhe or she may be involved. The legal department also conducts diligence and maintains controls and procedures to identify and submit for review and approval any fiscal year and a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest and (2) any material amendment or modification to the foregoing, regardless of whether such Transaction previously has been approved in accordance with the Policy; (ii) a “Related Person” means any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year was, a director or executive officer of MSCI or a nominee to become a director of MSCI, a person or entity that is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of MSCI’s voting securities, excluding any beneficial owner that reports its ownership on Schedule 13G pursuant to Rule13d-1(b) under the Exchange Act (a “5% Stockholder” under the Policy) and the Immediate Family Members (as defined in the Policy) of any of the foregoing;provided, however, that the General Counsel may nevertheless determine that it would be advisable for specific transactions by beneficial owners reporting on Schedule 13G pursuant to Rule13d-1(b) to be reviewed under the Policy; and (iii) a “Transaction” means any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, including indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and transactions involving employment and similar relationships. transactions.

Under the Policy, the Legal and Compliance Department, in consultation with the General Counsel and outside counsel to the extent appropriate,legal department determines whether potential Related Person Transactions are subject toa proposed transaction constitutes a related person transaction requiring review under the Policy and/or disclosure as a Related Person Transaction under SEC rules;provided that any potential Related Person Transaction with the General Counsel will be reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer and referred to the Governance Committee, if appropriate.disclosure. If the Legal and Compliance Department and the

90            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        OTHER MATTERS

General Counsel determinelegal department determines that (i) the proposed Transactiontransaction constitutes a Related Person Transactionrelated person transaction or (ii) it would be beneficial to further review the Transactiontransaction under the Policy, then in either case, the Transaction is referredlegal department may review and approve certain transactions pursuant to delegation from the Governance Committee or refer the transactions to the Governance Committee for approval or ratification.Committee.

Directors, director nomineesWhen evaluating a proposed Related Person Transaction, the legal department will consider all relevant facts and executive officers are required to report for themselves and their Immediate Family Members (as defined incircumstances, including: (1) the Policy) (i) relationships that are outside the ordinary course of business; (ii) employment of Immediate Family Members; (iii) transactions that would be considered unusual for one or bothdollar amount of the parties; (iv) transactions that aretransaction, the commercial reasonableness of the terms and the purpose of the transaction, as well as the benefit to the Company; (2) whether negotiations were at arm’s length; (3) the terms and conditions of comparable or similar transactions; (4) whether the transaction is provided on terms that may be more favorable than those available to others; (5) the general public; (v) transactions where they receive compensation or other material benefits of any kind from the other entity, in whole or part, due to the creation, negotiation or approvalmateriality and character of the transaction; (vi) transactions where they are personally involvedrelated person’s interest in the creation, negotiationtransaction and whether there may be any conflicts of interest; (6) whether the transaction would be considered unusual for one or approvalboth of the parties and (7) whether the transaction (other than as an employee of MSCI); and (vii) transactions where they are a more than 10% equity holder of the other entity.

In determining whether to approve a Related Person Transaction, the Governance Committee considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including (if applicable) without limitation:

(1)

the commercial reasonableness of the terms of the proposed Transaction;

(2)

the benefit to the Company and the availability and/or opportunity costs of alternative Transactions;

(3)

the materiality and character of the Related Person’s direct or indirect interest;

(4)

the nature of the negotiations (e.g., whether the proposed Transaction was the result of arm’s length negotiations and fair dealing); and

(5)

whether the Transaction would, or would be perceived to, present an improper conflict of interest for the Related Person taking into account (i) the size of the Transaction; (ii) the overall financial position of the Related Person; (iii) the direct or indirect nature of the Related Person’s interest in the Transaction; (iv) whether the Transaction is of an ongoing nature; and (v) any other relevant factors; and if the Related Person is a director (or an Immediate Family Member of a director), the impact on the director’s independence under applicable rules. Certain categories of Transactions set forth in the Policy have been determined not to be Related Person Transactions and are not subject to the Policy.

With respect to Related Person Transactions with directors or officers or with entities in which such person may serve as an officer,impact director trustee or similar role pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Governance Committee may consider (1) whether such director or officer received any compensation or material benefit of any kind from the other entity due, in whole or in part, to the creation, negotiation or approval of the Transaction and (2) whether such director or officer is personally involved in the creation, negotiation or approval of the Transaction.independence if applicable.

Except as the Legal and Compliance Department shall otherwise determine based on the information provided pursuant to the Policy, the following Transactions have been determined not to be Related Person Transactions:

(1)

transactions between MSCI and any entity in which a Related Person has a relationship solely as a director, a less than 5% equity holder of any entity whose equity securities are publicly traded, a less than 10% holder of an entity whose equity securities are not publicly traded, an employee (other than an executive officer) or one or more of these relationships;

(2)

certain compensation agreements and corporate sponsored investment opportunities approved by the Compensation Committee or Board, as applicable;

(3)

director compensation arrangements, if such arrangements have been approved by the Board;

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            91


OTHER MATTERS        

(4)

any transaction where the Related Person’s interest arises solely from the ownership of the Company’s common stock and all holders of the Company’s common stock received the same benefit on apro rata basis;

(5)

certain transactions involving terms established on a competitive basis;

(6)

sales or licenses of products and services by the Company to a Related Person or to an entity in which a Related Person is an executive officer in the ordinary course of business and reflecting standard terms, including standard fees, subject to standard discounts prevailing at the time of the Transaction that would be offered at that time for comparable Transactions for or with unaffiliated third parties and where (x) to the extent the transaction involves an entity in which a Related Person is an executive officer: (i) the Related Person does not receive any compensation or other material benefit of any kind from the other entity due, in whole or in part, to the creation, negotiation or approval of the Transaction and (ii) the Related Person is not personally involved in the creation, negotiation or approval of the Transaction and (y) the amount involved in the Transaction equals less than the greater of $1 million or 2% of the annual consolidated gross revenues of the other entity that is party to the Transaction and less than 2% of the annual consolidated revenues of the Company;

(7)

investments in financial products based on or created with the use of MSCI products; and

(8)

certain indemnification payments.

Other Business

We do not know of any matters that may be presented for action at the meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote on such matter in their discretion.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on
April 25, 2019.26, 2022. Our Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 20182021 are available free of charge at
www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com. Information
contained on thissuch website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or
any other report we file with the SEC.


Table of Contents

92            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


104MSCI

Annex A: Frequently Asked Questions

HOW DO WE REFER TOHow do we refer to MSCI INC. IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT?Inc. in this Proxy Statement?

We refer to MSCI Inc. as the “Company,” “MSCI,” “we,” “our” or “us” and the Board of Directors of MSCI Inc. as the “Board.” MSCI is incorporated in Delaware and its shares are listed on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol MSCI. References to “Shares,” “shares” or “shares of our common stock” in this Proxy Statement refer to shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

WHAT ARE THE DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING?What are the date, time and place of the 2022 Annual Meeting?

We will hold the 20192022 Annual Meeting on April 25, 201926, 2022 at 2:30 P.M. Eastern Time, via the internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019MSCI2022.

In order to access the virtual annual meeting, you will be asked to provide your16-digit control number. Instructions on how to attend and participate via the internet, including how to demonstrate proof of share ownership, are posted atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019MSCI2022. Information contained on this website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.

WILL THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING BE WEBCAST?Will the 2022 Annual Meeting be webcast?

Yes. You may attend the annual meeting virtually atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019MSCI2022, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting. A webcast replay of the 20192022 Annual Meeting will also be archived on our Investor Relations website,http:https://ir.msci.com/events.cfm, until April 25, 2020.26, 2023.

HOW DOHow do I SUBMIT A QUESTION AT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING?submit a question at the 2022 Annual Meeting?

To submit questions before the 2022 Annual Meeting, please email your question(s) to the Corporate Secretary at corporatesecretary@msci.com by no later than April 25, 2022. Please include “Annual Meeting Questions” in the subject line and provide your name, 16-digit control number and, if applicable, indicate the proposal to which your question relates in the body of the email.

You may submit a question during the meeting via our virtual shareholder meeting website,www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019www.virtualshareholdermeeting. com/MSCI2022.If your question is properly submitted during the relevant portion of the meeting agenda, our Chairman willintends to respond to your question during the live webcast. Questions on similar topics may be combined and answered together. A webcast replay of the 20192022 Annual Meeting, including the Q&A session, will also be archived on our Investor Relations website,http:https://ir.msci.com/events.cfm, until April 25, 2020.26, 2023.

WHAT IF I ENCOUNTER TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES DURING THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING?What if the Company encounters technical difficulties during the 2022 Annual Meeting?

If we experience technical difficulties during the meeting (e.g., a temporary or prolonged power outage), our Chairman will determine whether the meeting can be promptly reconvened (if the technical difficulty is temporary) or whether the meeting will need to be reconvened on a later day (if the technical difficulty is more prolonged). In any situation, we will promptly notify shareholders of the decision viawww.virutalshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019MSCI2022.

If you encounter technical difficulties accessing our meeting or asking questions during the meeting, a support line will be available on the login page of the virtual meeting website.

Who may attend the 2022 Annual Meeting?

All stockholders as of March 1, 2022, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the 2022 Annual Meeting. In order to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting, a stockholder must own MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT      common stock at the close of business on March 1, 2022. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder (“street name”), you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record (that is, your broker, bank, custodian, or nominee) to be able to vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting.


Table of Contents      A-1


2022 PROXY STATEMENT
ANNEX A        

105

WHO MAY VOTE AT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING?Who may vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting?

You can vote your shares of MSCI common stock at our 20192022 Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder at the close of business on February 27, 2019March 1, 2022 (the “record date”). As of February 27, 2019,March 1, 2022, there were 84,665,44781,267,909 shares of MSCI common stock outstanding. Each share of MSCI common stock entitles you to one vote on each matter voted on at the annual meeting of shareholders.

A majority of the shares of MSCI common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date must be present in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a “quorum.” Your shares are counted as present at the 20192022 Annual Meeting if you vote through the internet at the virtual annual meeting of shareholders or properly submit your proxy prior to the 20192022 Annual Meeting.

WHY DIDWhy did I RECEIVE AONE-PAGE NOTICE IN THE MAIL REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS INSTEAD OF A FULL SET OF PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS?receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of printed proxy materials?

Pursuant to the “notice and access” rules adopted by the SEC, we are making this Proxy Statement and our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K (including any amendments thereto) available to our shareholders over the internet. As a result, unless you have previously requested electronic access to our proxy materials or the receipt of paper proxy materials, you will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K (including any amendments thereto) over the internet, how to request a free paper or email copy of these materials and how to vote by mail, telephone or via the internet. We will mail the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about March 11, 2019.16, 2022. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is not a proxy card and cannot be used to vote your shares.

In addition, if you are voting online, you will be prompted to consent to receiving proxy materials electronically in future years. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials electronically will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of our annual meetings of shareholders on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials electronically will remain in effect until you terminate it. See “How do I sign up for electronic delivery of proxy materials?” below for further information on electing to receive proxy materials electronically.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOLDING SHARES AS A “RECORD HOLDER” AND AS A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES HELD IN “STREET NAME”What is the difference between holding shares as a “record holder” and as a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”?

Record Holder.Holder. If your shares are registered directly in your name with MSCI’s transfer agent, Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. (including its affiliates, “Broadridge”), you are considered a “record holder” with respect to those shares, and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be sent directly to you.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name.If your shares are held in an account with a brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer, or other intermediary, then you are considered a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and other proxy materials will be forwarded to you by that intermediary. As a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” you have the right to direct that intermediary on how to vote the shares held in your account by following their instructions for voting.voting and using their forms. If you do not provide your brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer or other intermediary with instructions on how to vote your shares, such intermediary or intermediary nominee will be able to vote your shares only with respect to the proposal related to the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditor for 2019.2022.


Table of Contents

A-2            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


106

MSCI   |   ANNEX AA: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

HOW DOHow do I VOTE MY SHARES?vote my shares?

You may direct your vote by internet, telephone or mail. Your vote must be received by the deadline specified on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable.

  IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD:If You are a Shareholder of Record 

IF YOU ARE A BENEFICIAL HOLDER OFIf You are a Beneficial Holder of
Shares Held in “Street Name”

SHARES HELD IN “STREET NAME”:

By InternetPrior to

the 20192022 Annual Meeting*


(24 hours a day):

www.proxyvote.com www.proxyvote.com

Use the internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 25, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
www.proxyvote.com

By InternetDuringthe

2019 2022 Annual Meeting*


(24 hours a day):

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019 www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019MSCI2022

You may attend the meeting via the internet and vote during the meeting. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions.
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2022

By Telephone*


(24 hours a day):

 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 25, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
 Follow the voting instructions you receive from your brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer or other intermediary.
By Mail: 

By Mail:

You can vote by mail by requesting a paper copy of the materials, which will include a proxy card. Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 Follow the voting instructions you receive from your brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer or other intermediary.

* While MSCI and Broadridge do not charge any fees for voting by internet or telephone, there may be related costs from other parties, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies, for which you are responsible.

HOW DOES THE BOARD RECOMMEND THAT I VOTE AND WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED FOR ADOPTION OR APPROVAL OF EACH MATTER TO BE VOTED ON?

  

PROPOSAL NO.*

While MSCI and Broadridge do not charge any fees for voting by internet or telephone, there may be related costs from other parties, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies, for which you are responsible.

How does the Board recommend that I vote and what vote is required for adoption or approval of each matter to be voted on?

Proposal  No. PROPOSALProposal VOTE REQUIREDVote Required DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONDirectors’ Recommendation
1 

1

Election of Directors Number of votes cast “FOR” exceeds number of votes cast “AGAINST” for each director FORall nominees
2 

2

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation(Say-on-Pay) Majority of the total votes cast by holders of shares present through the virtual meeting or represented by proxy FORthe approval of the Executive Compensation of our NEOs
3 

3

Ratification of the Appointment of MSCI’s Independent Auditor Majority of the total votes cast by holders of shares present through the virtual meeting or represented by proxy FORthe ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

HOW WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED IFHow will my shares be voted if I DO NOT GIVE SPECIFIC VOTING INSTRUCTIONS AND WHAT ARE BROKERNON-VOTES?do not give specific voting instructions and what are broker non-votes?

Record HoldersHolders. . If you indicate that you wish to vote as recommended by our Board or if you sign, date and return a proxy card but do not give specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement (e.g., “FOR” for Proposal No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3) and in their discretion regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at our 20192022 Annual Meeting. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we did not know of any proposals or matters to be raised at the 20192022 Annual Meeting other than those presented in this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            A-3


2022 PROXY STATEMENT
ANNEX A        

107

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in “Street Name.” Brokernon-voting non-votes occurs when your brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer or other intermediary has not received specific voting instructions from you with respect to shares held in “street name” and the broker does not have discretionary voting authority with respect to a proposal. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and you do not give instructions as to how to vote, your broker may have authority to vote your shares only on discretionary items but not onnon-discretionary items, as determined by the NYSE.

Non-discretionary items.The following proposals are considered“non-discretionary” “non-discretionary” items: Proposal No. 1—election of directors and Proposal No. 2—approve, bynon-binding vote, our executive compensation.

Discretionary item.item. Proposal No. 3—the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for 20192022 is a “discretionary” item. NYSE member brokers that do not receive voting instructions from beneficial owners of shares held in “street name” may vote on this proposal in their discretion, subject to any voting policies adopted by the broker holding your shares.

Brokernon-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. However, brokernon-votes are not counted for purposes of Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 and will therefore have no effect on the outcome of these proposals. Therefore, if you hold your shares in an account with a brokerage firm, bank, a broker dealer or other intermediary, it is critically important that you submit your voting instructions if you want your shares to count for thenon-discretionary items listed above.

How are abstentions treated?

WHAT ARE MY CHOICES FOR CASTING MY VOTE ON EACH MATTER TO BE VOTED ON?Abstentions are also counted as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions have no effect on the determination of whether a nominee or any of the proposals have received the vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and voting at the 2022 Annual Meeting. However, abstentions could prevent the approval of a proposal where the number of affirmative votes, though a majority of the votes represented and cast, does not constitute a majority of the required quorum.

What are my choices for casting my vote on each matter to be voted on?

PROPOSAL NO.

PROPOSALProposal No. VOTING OPTIONSProposal EFFECT OF ABSTENTIONSVoting Options

1

 Effect of Abstentions
1Election of Directors FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN (for
(for each director nominee)
 No effect—not counted as a “vote cast”
2 

2

Advisory Vote to Approve

Executive Compensation

(Say-on-Pay)

 FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN No effect—not counted as a “vote cast”
3 

3

Ratification of the Appointment

of MSCI’s Independent Auditor

 FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN No effect—not counted as a “vote cast”

WHAT HAPPENS IFHow many votes are required to elect directors and adopt proposals?

The election of each director and ratification of the appointment of PwC as MSCI’s independent auditor requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. The approval of a resolution regarding the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement is a non-binding advisory vote; however, we value the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements. A DIRECTOR DOES NOT RECEIVE A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES REQUIRED FOR HIS OR HERmajority of the shares entitled to vote on a matter, whether present virtually or by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the meeting.

RE-ELECTION?What happens if a director does not receive a majority of the votes required for his or her re-election?

Under the laws of Delaware (our state of incorporation), if the director is not elected at the annual meeting, the director will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” OurHowever, our Bylaws also provide that, in order for an incumbent director to become a nominee of the Board, the director must submit an irrevocable resignation as director that becomes effective if (i) he or she does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election and (ii) the Board accepts the resignation. If a director does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, the Governance Committee will consider the director’s resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board will decide whether to accept or reject the resignation and publicly disclose its decision including the rationale behind the decision if it rejects the resignation, within 90 days after the election results are certified.


Table of Contents

A-4            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


108

MSCI   |   ANNEX AA: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

HOW DOHow do I REVOKE OR CHANGE MY PROXY?revoke or change my proxy?

If you are a “record holder,” you can revoke or change your proxy at any time before your shares are voted, subject to the voting deadlines that are described on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable, by:

Voting again by internet or by telephone (only your last internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the meeting will be counted);

Signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date; or

Voting by internet while attending the virtual annual meeting (attending the annual meeting by internet does not revoke your proxy unless you vote by internet during the virtual annual meeting).

Voting again by internet or by telephone (only your last internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the meeting will be counted);
Signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date; or
Voting by internet while attending the virtual annual meeting (attending the annual meeting by internet does not revoke your proxy unless you vote by internet during the virtual annual meeting).

If you are a “record holder,” you may also revoke your proxy by giving written notice of revocation to c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007, which must be received no later than 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on April 24, 2019.25, 2022.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” you may revoke your proxy by following the instructions your brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer or other intermediary provides.

WILL MY VOTE BE CONFIDENTIAL?Will my vote be confidential?

Our Bylaws provide that your individual vote is confidential and will not be disclosed to any officer, director or employee of MSCI, except as required by law and in certain limited circumstances such as when you request or consent to disclosure.disclosure, or make a request or comment on the proxy card.

WHERE CANWho counts the votes cast at the 2022 Annual Meeting?

Representatives of Broadridge will tabulate the votes cast at the 2022 Annual Meeting, and American Election Services, LLC will act as the independent inspector of elections.

Where can I FIND THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING?find the voting results of the 2022 Annual Meeting?

TheWe expect to announce the preliminary voting results will be announced at the 20192022 Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be tallied by representatives of Broadridge, our inspector of elections, and will be subsequently published by us by the filing of a Current Report on Form8-K with the SEC within four business days after the 20192022 Annual Meeting.

We make available freeWho will pay for the cost of charge, on or through our website, these reports and other information as soon as reasonably practicable following the time they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. To access these reports, click on the “SEC Filings” link found on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http://ir.msci.com). Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.

WHO WILL PAY FOR THE COST OF THE PROXY SOLICITATION?proxy solicitation?

We pay the expenses of the preparation of proxy materials and the solicitation of proxies for our 20192022 Annual Meeting. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers, employees or agents in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Our directors, officers and employees will receive no additional compensation for any such solicitation.

We have also hired Saratoga Proxy Consulting LLC (“Saratoga”), 520 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10018, to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies. We will pay Saratoga a fee of $10,000, plus reasonable expenses, for these services. We will reimburse brokers and other similar institutions for costs incurred by them in mailing proxy materials to beneficial owners.

HOW DOHow do I SIGN UP FOR ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS?sign up for electronic delivery of proxy materials?

Shareholders can access this Proxy Statement and our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K via the internet atwww.proxyvote.comby following the instructions outlined on the secure website. For future annual meetings of

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            A-5


ANNEX A        

shareholders, shareholders can consent to accessing our proxy materials, including the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K and the Proxy Statement, electronically in lieu of receiving hard copies by mail. To receive our proxy materials electronically, you will need access to a computer and an email account. If you vote through the internet atwww.proxyvote.com, you will be prompted to consent to receiving proxy materials electronically in future years. To consent to electronic delivery, when prompted, you must indicate that you agree to receive such materials electronically in future years.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT109

Shareholders that wish to revoke their request for electronic delivery may do so at any time without charge, by contacting us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or by telephone at(212) 981-7465.

If you hold your shares through a brokerage firm, bank, broker dealer or other intermediary and you have not already done so, you can choose electronic delivery of our proxy materials by contacting such intermediary. You may also update your email address by contacting such intermediary.

WHAT IS HOUSEHOLDING?What is householding?

Consistent with notices sent to shareholders of record sharing a single address, we will send only one copy of each of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K and this Proxy Statement to that address unless we have received contrary instructions from any shareholder at that address. This “householding” practice reduces our printing and postage costs. Shareholders may request or discontinue householding, or may request a separate copy of each of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K or this Proxy Statement as follows:

Shareholders wishing to discontinue or begin householding, should contact us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary at MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or by telephone at(212) 981-7465.

Shareholders owning their shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record who wish to either discontinue or begin householding should contact their record holder.

Shareholders wishing to discontinue or begin householding, should contact us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary at MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or by telephone at (212) 981-7465.

Shareholders owning their shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record who wish to either discontinue or begin householding should contact their record holder.

Any householded shareholder may request prompt delivery of a copy of each of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, our 20182021 Annual Report on Form10-K or the Proxy Statement, as applicable, by contacting us at(212) 981-7465 or by writing to us at Investor Relations, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or via email atinvestor.relations@msci.com. investor.relations@msci.com. Instructions for requesting such materials are also included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

HOW CANHow can I SUBMIT A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL AT THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?

Shareholders intending to presentsubmit a proposal at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders and have it included in next year’s Proxy Statement must submit the proposal to us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007. We must receive the proposal by no later than November 12, 2019. If we hold our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders more than 30 days before or after April 25, 2020 (theone-year anniversary date of the 2019 Annual Meeting), we will disclose the new deadline by which shareholder proposals must be received under Item 5 of Part II of our earliest possible Quarterly Report on Form10-Q or, if impracticable, by any means reasonably determined to inform shareholders. In addition, shareholder proposals must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act and with the SEC regulations underRule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials.

A-6            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        ANNEX A

Shareholders intending to present a proposal at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, but not to include the proposal in our Proxy Statement, or to nominate a personrecommendation for election as a director must comply with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws. Our Bylaws require, among other things, that our Corporate Secretary receive written notice from the shareholder of record of intent to present such proposal or nomination no more than 120 days and no less than 90 days prior to the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Therefore, the Company must receive notice of such a proposal or nomination for the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders no earlier than December 27, 2019 and no later than January 26, 2020. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, a copy of which is available upon request to us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007.

HOW CAN I SUBMIT A RECOMMENDATION FOR A DIRECTOR CANDIDATE?candidate?

The Governance Committee oversees searches for and identifies qualified individuals for membership on MSCI’s Board. See “Corporate Governance—Director Qualifications” above.Please see page 30 of this Proxy Statement for additional information on director qualifications.

Shareholders may make recommendations for consideration by the Governance Committee at any time. To recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Governance Committee, a shareholder must submit a written notice which demonstrates that it is being submitted by a shareholder of MSCI and include information about each proposed director candidate, including name, age, business address, principal occupation, principal qualifications and other relevant biographical information. In addition, the shareholder must confirm his or her candidate’s consent to serve as a director. There is no difference in the manner in which the Governance Committee evaluates nominees proposed by shareholders and those identified by the Governance Committee. Shareholders must send recommendations to the Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007.

HOW DOHow can I COMMUNICATE WITH INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS OR THE BOARD AS A GROUP?submit nominees (such as through proxy access) or a shareholder proposal at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders?

Shareholders who wish to submit a “proxy access” nomination for inclusion in our proxy statement in connection with our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders may do so by submitting a nomination notice, in compliance with the procedures and along with the other information required by our Bylaws, in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or by email to corporatesecretary@msci.com, no earlier than October 17, 2022 and no later than November 16, 2022.

Shareholders intending to present a proposal at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders under SEC Rule 14a-8 to request that the proposal be included in next year’s Proxy Statement must submit the proposal to us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007 or by email to corporatesecretary@msci.com. We must receive the proposal by no later than November 16, 2022. If we hold our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders more than 30 days before or after April 26, 2023 (the one-year anniversary date of the 2022 Annual Meeting), we will disclose the new deadline by which shareholder proposals must be received under Item 5 of Part II of our earliest possible Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or, if impracticable, by any means reasonably determined


Table of Contents

110MSCI   |   ANNEX A: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

to inform shareholders. In addition, shareholder proposals must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and with the SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials.

Shareholders intending to present a proposal at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, but not for inclusion of the proposal in our Proxy Statement, or to nominate a person for election as a director, must comply with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws. Our Bylaws require, among other things, that our Corporate Secretary receive written notice from the shareholder of record of intent to present such proposal or nomination no more than 120 days and no less than 90 days prior to the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Therefore, the Company must receive notice of such a proposal or nomination for the 2023 Annual meeting of shareholders no earlier than December 27, 2022 and no later than January 26, 2023. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, a copy of which is available upon request to us in writing at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007.

How do I communicate with individual directors or the Board as a group?

Shareholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board by mail. To communicate with the Board, any individual director or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or any such individual director or group or committee of directors by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent to the Board at c/o Corporate Secretary, MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007. Correspondence that is unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board such as spam, junk mail and mass mailings, product complaints, personal employee complaints, product inquiries, new product suggestions, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements will not be forwarded to the Board.

HOW DOHow do I REPORT ISSUES REGARDING ACCOUNTING, INTERNAL CONTROLS AND OTHER AUDITING MATTERS?report issues regarding accounting, internal controls and other auditing matters?

Any communication tointerested parties may report potential issues regarding accounting, internal controls and other auditing mattersmatters. The communication should be marked “Personal and Confidential” and sent to MSCI Inc., 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, 49th Floor, New York, New York 10007, Attention: Chair of the Audit Committee of MSCI Inc., in care of the General Counsel. Our Procedures for Submission of Ethical or Accounting Related Complaints are available on our website. To access this document, click on the “Corporate Governance” link under the “Investor Resources” tab found on our website’s Investor Relations homepage (http:https://ir.msci.com)ir.msci.com). Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.


Table of Contents

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            A-7


2022 PROXY STATEMENT111

Annex B: Supplemental Financial Information

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESNon-GAAP Financial Measures

Full-Year 2021 Reconciliation of Operating Revenue Growth to Organic Operating Revenue Growth (unaudited)

  Comparison of The Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Index Total
Change
Percentage
 Recurring
Subscription
Change
Percentage
 Asset-
Based Fees
Change
Percentage
 Non-Recurring
Revenues
Change
Percentage
Operating revenue growth 23.1%  12.1%  38.6%  29.8% 
Impact of acquisitions and divestitures —%  —%  —%  —% 
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations 0.1%  0.1%  (0.1%) —% 
Organic operating revenue growth 23.2%  12.2%  38.5%  29.8% 
             
Analytics Total
Change
Percentage
  Recurring
Subscription
Change
Percentage
  Asset-
Based Fees
Change
Percentage
  Non-Recurring
Revenues
Change
Percentage
 
Operating revenue growth 5.9%  5.3%  —%  48.1% 
Impact of acquisitions and divestitures —%  —%  —%  —% 
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations 0.2%  0.2%  —%  (0.1%)
Organic operating revenue growth 6.1%  5.5%  —%  48.0% 
             
ESG and Climate Total
Change
Percentage
  Recurring
Subscription
Change
Percentage
  Asset-
Based Fees
Change
Percentage
  Non-Recurring
Revenues
Change
Percentage
 
Operating revenue growth 49.2%  47.9%  —%  152.5% 
Impact of acquisitions and divestitures —%  —%  —%  —% 
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (5.8%) (5.9%) —%  (1.9%)
Organic operating revenue growth 43.4%  42.0%  —%  150.6% 
             
All Other – Private Assets Total
Change
Percentage
  Recurring
Subscription
Change
Percentage
  Asset-
Based Fees
Change
Percentage
  Non-Recurring
Revenues
Change
Percentage
 
Operating revenue growth 51.3%  54.5%  —%  (23.9%)
Impact of acquisitions and divestitures (41.3%) (43.1%) —%  —% 
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (6.0%) (6.0%) —%  (3.6%)
Organic operating revenue growth 4.0%  5.4%  —%  (27.5%)


Table of Contents

112MSCI   |   ANNEX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
             
Consolidated Total
Change
Percentage
 Recurring
Subscription
Change
Percentage
 Asset-
Based Fees
Change
Percentage
 Non-Recurring
Revenues
Change
Percentage
Operating revenue growth 20.5%  14.3%  38.6%  33.9% 
Impact of acquisitions and divestitures (1.3%) (1.8%) —%  —% 
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (0.5%) (0.7%) (0.1%) (0.3%)
Organic operating revenue growth 18.7%  11.8%  38.5%  33.6% 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income (unaudited)

 
   YEARS ENDED
 
   

IN THOUSANDS (EXCEPT PERCENTAGES)

  DEC. 31, 2018         DEC. 31, 2017(1)         DEC. 31, 2016       
   
   

Index Adjusted EBITDA

  $607,853         $522,241         $431,478       
   
   

Analytics Adjusted EBITDA

  143,645         125,624         128,507       
   
   

All Other Adjusted EBITDA

  

20,935       

  

11,892       

  

9,472       

   

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

  

772,433       

  

659,757       

  

569,457       

   

Amortization of Intangible Assets

  54,189         44,547         47,033       
   
   

Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

  

31,346       

  

35,440       

  

34,320       

   

Operating Income

  

686,898       

  

579,770       

  

488,104       

   

Other Expense (Income), Net

  57,002         112,871         102,166       
   
   

Provision for Income Taxes

  

122,011       

  

162,927       

  

125,083       

   

Net Income

  

$507,885       

  

$303,972       

  

$260,855       

   

Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)

  53.9%         51.8%         49.5%       
   
   

Net Income Margin (%)

  

35.4%       

  

23.9%       

  

22.7%       

(1) As a result of the adoption of recent accounting guidance, the Company has restated its adjusted EBITDA by excluding $0.6 million of non-service related pension costs from adjusted EBITDA expenses for the full-year ended Dec. 31, 2017.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            B-1


  Years Ended
In Thousands (Except Percentages) Dec. 31, 2021 Dec. 31, 2020 Dec. 31, 2019
Index Adjusted EBITDA $951,312       $766,493        $670,188 
Analytics Adjusted EBITDA  198,799   172,924   152,113 
ESG and Climate Adjusted EBITDA  29,748   22,851   21,813 
All Other – Private Assets Adjusted EBITDA  16,931   9,242   6,385 
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA  1,196,790   971,510   850,499 
Amortization of intangible assets  80,592   56,941   49,410 
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements  28,901   29,805   29,999 
Impairment related to sublease of leased property  7,702       
Acquisition-related integration and transaction costs(1)  6,870       
Multi-Year PSU payroll tax expense        15,389 
Operating Income  1,072,725   884,764   755,701 
Other expense (income), net  214,589   198,539   152,383 
Provision for income taxes  132,153   84,403   39,670 
Net Income $725,983       $601,822        $563,648 
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)  58.6%  57.3%  54.6%
Net Income Margin (%)  35.5%  35.5%  36.2%
(1)
ANNEX B        

Incremental and non-recurring costs attributable to acquisitions directly related to the execution of the transaction and integration of the acquired business that have occurred no later than 12 months after the close of the transaction.

Reconciliation of Net Income and Diluted EPS to Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS (unaudited)

  Years Ended
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data Dec. 31, 2021 Dec. 31, 2020 Dec. 31, 2019
Net Income $725,983        $601,822          $563,648 
Plus: Amortization of acquired intangible assets and equity method investment basis difference  47,001   37,413   34,773 
Plus: Multi-Year PSU payroll tax expense        15,389 
Less: Discrete excess tax benefit related to Multi-Year PSU vesting        (66,581)
Plus: Debt extinguishment costs associated with the 2024, 2025, 2026 and 2027 Senior Notes Redemptions  59,104   44,930   16,794 
Plus: Write-off of internally developed capitalized software  16,013       
Plus: Impairment related to sublease of leased property(1)  8,702       
Plus: Acquisition-related integration and transaction costs(2)(3)  7,041       
Less: Gain from changes in ownership interest of equity method investee  (6,972)      
Less: Tax Reform adjustments     (6,256)   
Less: Income tax effect  (26,462)  (16,490)  (13,226)
Adjusted net income $830,410        $661,419          $550,797 

Table of Contents

  

 

YEARS ENDED

 

 
   

IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA

DEC. 31, 2018DEC. 31, 2017DEC. 31, 2016
   
   

Net Income

$507,885$303,972$260,855
   
   

Plus: Amortization of acquired intangible assets

43,98139,15747,033
   
   

Less: Gain on sale of Alacra (nottax-effected)

(771)
   
   

Less: Gain on sale of FEA (nottax-effected)

(10,646)
   
   

Less: Gain on sale of InvestorForce

(46,595)
   
   

Less: Valuation allowance released related to InvestorForce disposition

(7,758)
   
   

Plus: Tax Reform adjustments

(8,272)34,500
   
   

Less: Income tax effect

1,678

(10,772)

(15,243)

   

Adjusted net income

$480,273

$366,086

$292,645

   

Diluted EPS

$5.66$3.31$2.70
   
   

Plus: Amortization of acquired intangible assets

0.490.430.49
   
   

Less: Gain on sale of Alacra (nottax-effected)

(0.01)
   
   

Less: Gain on sale of FEA (nottax-effected)

(0.12)
   
   

Less: Gain on sale of InvestorForce

(0.52)
   
   

Less: Valuation allowance released related to InvestorForce disposition

(0.09)
   
   

Plus: Tax Reform adjustments

(0.09)0.38
   
   

Less: Income tax effect

0.02

(0.13)

(0.16)

   

Adjusted EPS

$5.35

$3.98

$3.03

   
2022 PROXY STATEMENT113
             
  Years Ended
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data Dec. 31, 2021 Dec. 31, 2020 Dec. 31, 2019
Diluted EPS            $8.70             $7.12             $6.59 
Plus: Amortization of acquired intangible assets and equity method investment basis difference  0.56   0.44   0.41 
Plus: Multi-Year PSU payroll tax expense        0.18 
Less: Discrete excess tax benefit related to Multi-Year PSU vesting        (0.78)
Plus: Debt extinguishment costs associated with the 2024, 2025, 2026 and 2027 Senior Notes Redemptions  0.71   0.53   0.20 
Plus: Write-off of internally developed capitalized software  0.19       
Plus: Impairment related to sublease of leased property(1)  0.10       
Plus: Acquisition-related integration and transaction costs(2)(3)  0.08       
Less: Gain from changes in ownership interest of equity method investee  (0.08)      
Plus: Tax Reform adjustments     (0.07)   
Less: Income tax effect  (0.31)  (0.19)  (0.16)
Adjusted EPS            $9.95             $7.83             $6.44 
(1)Right-of-use impairment of $7.7 million related to sublease of leased property is presented within “General and administrative” expenses and the write-off of leasehold improvements of $1.0 million is presented within “Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements” expenses.
(2)Acquisition-related integration and transaction costs of $1.4 million are presented within “General and administrative” expenses and $0.2 million are presented within “Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements” expenses.
(3)Incremental and non-recurring costs attributable to acquisitions directly related to the execution of the transaction and integration of the acquired business that have occurred no later than 12 months after the close of the transaction.

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA Expenses to Operating Expenses (unaudited)

   

 

YEARS ENDED

 

  

IN THOUSANDS

  DEC. 31, 2018           DEC. 31, 2017(1)          
  
  

Index Adjusted EBITDA expenses

  $227,622           $196,718         
  
  

Analytics adjusted EBITDA expenses

  336,294           332,645         
  
  

All Other adjusted EBITDA expenses

  

97,635         

  

85,052         

  

Consolidated adjusted EBITDA expenses

  

661,551         

  

614,415         

  

Amortization of intangible assets

  54,189           44,547         
  
  

Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements

  

31,346         

  

35,440         

  

Total Operating Expenses

 

  $747,086         

 

  $694,402         

 

(1) As a result of the adoption of recent accounting guidance, the Company has restated its adjusted EBITDA by excluding $0.6 million ofnon-service related pension costs from adjusted EBITDA expenses for the full-year ended Dec.31, 2017.

B-2            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


  Years Ended
In Thousands Dec. 31, 2021 Dec. 31, 2020 
Index adjusted EBITDA expenses       $300,452       $250,002 
Analytics adjusted EBITDA expenses  345,500  340,884 
ESG and Climate adjusted EBITDA expenses  136,444  88,513 
All Other – Private Assets adjusted EBITDA expenses  64,358  44,481 
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA expenses  846,754  723,880 
Amortization of intangible assets  80,592  56,941 
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements  28,901  29,805 
Impairment related to sublease of leased property  7,702   
Acquisition-related integration and transaction costs(1)  6,870   
Total Operating Expenses $970,819 $810,626 
(1)

        ANNEX BIncremental and non-recurring costs attributable to acquisitions directly related to the execution of the transaction and integration of the acquired business that have occurred no later than 12 months after the close of the transaction.

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow (unaudited)

  Years Ended
In Thousands Dec. 31, 2021 Dec. 31, 2020 Dec. 31, 2019
Net cash provided by operating activities       $936,069         $811,109         $709,523 
Capital expenditures  (13,509)  (21,826)  (29,116)
Capitalized software development costs  (39,285)  (29,149)  (24,654)
Capex  (52,794)  (50,975)  (53,770)
Free cash flow $883,275  $760,134  $655,753 

   

 

YEARS ENDED

 

   

IN THOUSANDS

  DEC. 31, 2018  DEC. 31, 2017  DEC. 31, 2016
   
   

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $612,762  $404,158  $442,363
   
   

Capital expenditures

  (30,257)  (33,177)  (32,284)
   
   

Capitalized software development costs

  (18,704)  (15,640)  (10,344)
   
    

Capex

  

(48,961)

  

(48,817)

  

(42,628)

   

Free cash flow

 

  $563,801

 

  $355,341

 

  $399,735

 

ReconciliationTable of Effective Tax Rate to Adjusted Tax Rate (unaudited)Contents

   

 

YEARS ENDED

 

  
   DEC. 31, 2018  DEC. 31, 2017
  
  

Effective tax rate

  19.37%  34.90%
  
  

Tax Reform impact on effective tax rate

  

1.31%

  

(7.39)%

  

Adjusted tax rate

 

  20.68%

 

  27.51%

 

114MSCI   |   ANNEX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

NOTES REGARDING THE USE OFNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESNotes Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

MSCI has presented supplementalnon-GAAP financial measures as part of this Proxy Statement. A reconciliation is provided that reconciles eachnon-GAAP financial measure with the most comparable GAAP measure. Thenon-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement should not be considered as alternative measures for the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Thenon-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement are used by management to monitor the financial performance of the business, inform business decision making and forecast future results.

“Adjusted EBITDA,” a measure used by management to assess operating performance,EBITDA” is defined as net income before (1) provision for income taxes, (2) other expense (income), net, (3) depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements, (4) amortization of intangible assets and, at times, (5) certain other transactions or adjustments.adjustments, including impairment related to sublease of leased property and certain non-recurring acquisition-related integration and transaction costs.

“Adjusted EBITDA expenses,” a measure used by management to assess operating performance,expenses” is defined as operating expenses less depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements and amortization of intangible assets and, at times, certain other transactions or adjustments.adjustments, including impairment related to sublease of leased property and certain non-recurring acquisition-related integration and transaction costs.

“Adjusted net income” and “adjusted EPS” are defined as net income and diluted EPS, respectively, before theafter-tax impact ofof: the amortization of acquired intangible assets, including the amortization of the basis difference between the cost of the equity method investment and MSCI’s share of the net assets of the investee at historical carrying value, the impact of divestitures,related to costs associated with debt extinguishment, the impact related to certain non-recurring acquisition-related integration and transaction costs, the impact from impairment related to sublease of leased property, the impact related to gain from changes in ownership interest of equity method investee, and, at times, certain other transactions or adjustments. We also exclude the tax impact of adjustments for the Tax Reform adjustments (exceptCuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017 (“Tax Reform”), except for certain amounts associated with active tax planning implemented as a result of Tax Reform) and, at times, certain other transactions or adjustments.

“Adjusted tax rate” is defined as the effective tax rate excluding the impact of Tax Reform adjustments (except for amounts associated with active tax planning implemented as a result of Tax Reform).Reform.

“Capex” is defined as capital expenditures plus capitalized software development costs.

MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            B-3


ANNEX B        

“Free cash flow” is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less Capex.

Operating revenues ex-FX and ex-divestitures”Organic operating revenue growth” is defined as operating revenuesrevenue growth compared to the prior year period excluding the impact of acquired businesses, divested businesses and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Asset-based fees adjusted for the impact of foreign currency exchange and the operating revenues attributable to divested businessesrate fluctuations does not adjust for the comparable prior year period.impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the underlying assets under management.

We believe adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA expenses are meaningful measures of the operating performance of MSCI because they adjust for significantone-time, unusual ornon-recurring items as well as eliminate the accounting effects of certain capital spending and acquisitions that do not directly affect what management considers to be our coreongoing operating performance in the period.

We believe adjusted net income and adjusted EPS are meaningful measures of the performance of MSCI because they adjust for theafter-tax impact of significantone-time, unusual ornon-recurring items as well as eliminate the accounting effectsimpact of acquisitionsany transactions that do not directly affect what management considers to be our coreongoing operating performance in the period.

We believe that adjusted tax rate is useful to investors because it increasesalso exclude the comparability ofperiod-to-period results by adjusting for the estimated netafter-tax impact of Tax Reform.the amortization of acquired intangible assets and amortization of the basis difference between the cost of the equity method investment and MSCI’s share of the net assets of the investee at historical carrying value, as these non-cash amounts are significantly impacted by the timing and size of each acquisition and therefore not meaningful to the ongoing operating performance in the period.

We believe that free cash flow is useful to investors because it relates the operating cash flow of MSCI to the capital that is spent to continue and improve business operations, such as investment in MSCI’s existing products. Further, free cash flow indicates our ability to strengthen MSCI’s balance sheet, repay our debt obligations, pay cash dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock.


Table of Contents

2022 PROXY STATEMENT115

We believe organic operating revenues ex-FX and ex-divestitures arerevenue growth is a meaningful measuresmeasure of the operating performance of MSCI because they adjustit adjusts for the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and excludeexcludes the impact of operating revenues attributable to acquired and divested businesses for the comparable prior year period, providing insight tointo our coreongoing operating performance for the period(s) presented.

Adjusted EBITDA, We believe that the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this Proxy Statement facilitate meaningful period-to-period comparisons and provide a baseline for the evaluation of future results.

Adjusted EBITDA expenses, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, adjusted EPS, adjusted tax rate, Capex, free cash flow and organic operating revenues ex-FX and ex-divestitures,revenue growth are not defined in the same manner by all companies and may not be comparable to similarly-titlednon-GAAP financial measures of other companies. These measures can differ significantly from company to company depending on, among other things, long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the tax jurisdictions in which companies operate and capital investments. Accordingly, the Company’s computation of these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures computed by other companies.

Supplemental Information Regarding Retention Rate and Run Rate

Retention Rate

Retention Rate is an important metric because subscription cancellations decrease our Run Rate and ultimately our future operating revenues over time. The annual Retention Rate represents the retained subscription Run Rate (subscription Run Rate at the beginning of the fiscal year less actual cancels during the year) as a percentage of the subscription Run Rate at the beginning of the fiscal year.

The Retention Rate for anon-annual period is calculated by annualizing the cancellations for which we have received a notice of termination or for which we believe there is an intention not to renew or discontinue the subscription during thenon-annual period, and we believe that such notice or intention evidences the client’s final decision to terminate or not renew the applicable agreement, even though such notice is not effective until a later date. This annualized cancellation figure is then divided by the subscription Run Rate at the beginning of the fiscal year to calculate a cancellation rate. This cancellation rate is then subtracted from 100% to derive the annualized Retention Rate for the period.

B-4            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


        ANNEX B

Retention Rate is computed by operating segment on aproduct/service-by-product/service basis. In general, if a client reduces the number of products or services to which it subscribes within a segment, or switches between products or services within a segment, we treat it as a cancellation for purposes of calculating our Retention Rate except in the case of a product or service switch that management considers to be a replacement product or service. In those replacement cases, only the net change to the client subscription, if a decrease, is reported as a cancel. In the Analytics and the ESG and Climate operating segments, substantially all product or service switches are treated as replacement products or services and netted in this manner, while in our Index and Real Estate operating segments, product or service switches that are treated as replacement products or services and receive netting treatment occur only in certain limited instances. In addition, we treat any reduction in fees resulting from a down-saledown-sell of the same product or service as a cancellation to the extent of the reduction. We do not calculate Retention Rate for that portion of our Run Rate attributable to assets in index-linked investment products or futures and options contracts, in each case, linked to our indexes.

Run Rate

Run Rate is a key operating metric and is important because an increase or decrease in our Run Rate ultimately impacts our future operating revenues over time. At the end of any period, we generally have subscription and investment product license agreements in place for a large portion of total revenues for the following 12 months. We measure the fees related to these agreements and refer to this as “Run Rate.”


Table of Contents

116MSCI   |   ANNEX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Run Rate estimates at a particular point in time the annualized value of the recurring revenues under our client license agreements (“Client Contracts”) for the next 12 months, assuming all Client Contracts that come up for renewal, or reach the end of the committed subscription period, are renewed and assuming then-current currency exchange rates, subject to the adjustments and exclusions described below. For any Client Contract where fees are linked to an investment product’s assets or trading volume/fees, the Run Rate calculation reflects, for ETFs, the market value on the last trading day of the period, for futures and options, the most recent quarterly volumes and/or reported exchange fees, and for othernon-ETF products, the most recent client-reported assets. Run Rate does not include fees associated with“one-time” “one-time” and othernon-recurring transactions. In addition, we add to Run Rate the annualized fee value of recurring new sales, whether to existing or new clients, when we execute Client Contracts, even though the license start date, and associated revenue recognition, may not be effective until a later date. We remove from Run Rate the annualized fee value associated with products or services under any Client Contract with respect to which we have received a notice of termination, non-renewal ornon-renewal an indication the client does not intend to continue their subscription during the period and have determined that such notice evidences the client’s final decision to terminate or not renew the applicable products or services, even though such notice is not effective until a later date.

Changes in our recurring revenues typically lag changes in Run Rate. The actual amount of recurring revenues we will realize over the following 12 months will differ from Run Rate for numerous reasons, including:

fluctuations in revenues associated with new recurring sales;

modifications, cancellations andnon-renewals of existing Client Contracts, subject to specified notice requirements;

fluctuations in revenues associated with new recurring sales;
modifications, cancellations and non-renewals of existing Client Contracts, subject to specified notice requirements;
differences between the recurring license start date and the date the Client Contract is executed due to, for example, contracts with onboarding periods or fee waiver periods;
fluctuations in asset-based fees, which may result from changes in certain investment products’ total expense ratios, market movements, including foreign currency exchange rates, or from investment inflows into and outflows from investment products linked to our indexes;
fluctuations in fees based on trading volumes of futures and options contracts linked to our indexes;
fluctuations in the number of hedge funds for which we provide investment information and risk analysis to hedge fund investors;
price changes or discounts;
revenue recognition differences under U.S. GAAP, including those related to the timing of implementation and report deliveries for certain of our products and services;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and
the impact of acquisitions and divestitures.


Table of Contents

Our Principles of Sustainable Investing

At MSCI, we believe ESG & climate factors will significantly impact financial assets and the daterisk and return of investments, which will lead to a large-scale re-allocation of capital over the Client Contract is executed duecoming years.

Given the significant and increasing impact that we expect ESG to exert on assets and the allocation of capital, MSCI urges all investors to integrate ESG considerations throughout their investment processes: to identify new investment opportunities, manage emerging risks and achieve long-term, sustainable investment performance.

The MSCI Principles of Sustainable Investing set forth our views on the core principles and best practices for example, contracts with onboarding periods;

fluctuations in asset-based fees, which may result from changes in certain investment products’ total expense ratios, market movements, including foreign currency exchange rates, or from investment inflows into and outflows from investment products linked to our indexes;

fluctuations in fees based on trading volumes of futures and options contracts linked to our indexes;

fluctuations in the number of hedge funds for which we provide investment information and risk analysis to hedge fund investors;

price changes;

revenue recognition differences under U.S. GAAP, including those related to the timing of implementation and report deliveries for certain of our products and services;

ESG integration.

To learn more visit msci.com/esg-investing

Information and reports on our website will not be deemed a part of, or otherwise incorporated by reference in, this Proxy Statement or any other report we file with the SEC.

Explore MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT            B-5


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

ANNEX B        

MSCI INC.
C/O BROADRIDGE
P.O. BOX 1342
BRENTWOOD, NY 11717

 

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and

the impact of acquisitions and divestitures.

”Organic subscription Run Rate growth” is defined as the period over period Run Rate growth, excluding the impact of changes in foreign currency and the first year impact of any acquisitions. It is also adjusted for divestitures. Changes in foreign currency are calculated by applying the currency exchange rate from the comparable prior period to current period foreign currency denominated Run Rate.

 

B-6            MSCI INC. PROXY STATEMENT


MSCI INC.

C/O BROADRIDGE

P.O. BOX 1342

BRENTWOOD, NY 11717

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting- Go towww.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

 

Use the internetInternet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2019.25, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

During The Meeting - Go towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019MSCI2022

 

You may attend the meeting via the internetInternet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2019.25, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

D66835-P67779
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E565912-P18689                 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

 

MSCI INC.

   
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

1.

Election of Directors

Nominees:

For

Against

  Abstain  

1a.

Henry A. Fernandez

1b.

Robert G. Ashe

1c.

Benjamin F. duPont

1d.

Wayne Edmunds

1e.

Alice W. Handy

1f.

Catherine R. Kinney

1g.

Jacques P. Perold

1h.

Linda H. Riefler

1i.

George W. Siguler

1j.

Marcus L. Smith

   
1.Election of Directors
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.    Henry A. Fernandezooo
1b.    Robert G. Asheooo
1c.    Wayne Edmundsooo
1d.    Catherine R. Kinneyooo
1e.    Jacques P. Peroldooo
1f.    Sandy C. Rattrayooo
1g.    Linda H. Rieflerooo
1h.    Marcus L. Smithooo
1i.    Rajat Tanejaooo
1j.    Paula Volentooo

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
 ForAgainstAbstain
   
 2.

For

Against

  Abstain  

2.

To approve, by non-binding vote, our executive compensation, as described in these proxy materials.

      

o
o

o
   

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:

  
   
 

For

3.

Against

  Abstain  

3.

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditor.

 ooo

 

 

.

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date
 Signature (Joint Owners)Date


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

E56913-P18689                         

MSCI INC.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 25, 2019 2:30 PM Eastern Time

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of MSCI Inc. The undersigned hereby appoints each of Cecilia Aza and Frederick W. Bogdan as proxies of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned and to vote as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card all of the shares of common stock of MSCI Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MSCI Inc. to be held live via the internet on April 25, 2019, at 2:30 PM Eastern Time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, upon all matters that may properly come before the meeting. You can virtually attend the meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2019.If no such direction is made, the proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.

Address Changes/Comments:

        


Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 

       
 

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
Date Signature (Joint Owners)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

Date 


Table of Contents

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

D66836-P67779

MSCI INC.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 26, 2022 2:30 P.M. Eastern Time

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of MSCI Inc. The undersigned hereby appoints each of Cecilia Aza and Robert J. Gutowski as proxies of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned and to vote as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card all of the shares of common stock of MSCI Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MSCI Inc. to be held live via the Internet on April 26, 2022, at 2:30 P.M. Eastern Time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, upon all matters that may properly come before the meeting. You can virtually attend the meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MSCI2022. If no such direction is made, the proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side